Jump to content

User talk:Joseph2302: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Thankyou: new section
→‎Help needed: new section
Line 457: Line 457:


Sir, thanks for investigating and understanding that I am not linked to Pakistan's Military. Just because I happen to have interest in military history, and unfortunately, being unaware of Wikipedia's username polices, I had a user name that misled some (although that username was not controversial, still I had it changed) to wrongly and at times deliberately believe that I am a member of Pakistani military and thus a certain user here have resorted to IP edits and have accused me of CoI in the past. Now, that I have changed my username after understanding and reading the polices here, I still was reported that too by an IP with fewer than 10 edits (9 of them were edits that accused me [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bangladesh_Liberation_War#Discussion here]). I must say that you understood the mischief behind the report and made the correct discussion. Thanks. —[[User:TripWire|<font face="Eras Demi ITC" size="3px"><b><font color="DarkMagenta">Trip</font><font color="DarkSlateGray">Wire</font></b></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:TripWire|talk]] </sup> 12:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Sir, thanks for investigating and understanding that I am not linked to Pakistan's Military. Just because I happen to have interest in military history, and unfortunately, being unaware of Wikipedia's username polices, I had a user name that misled some (although that username was not controversial, still I had it changed) to wrongly and at times deliberately believe that I am a member of Pakistani military and thus a certain user here have resorted to IP edits and have accused me of CoI in the past. Now, that I have changed my username after understanding and reading the polices here, I still was reported that too by an IP with fewer than 10 edits (9 of them were edits that accused me [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bangladesh_Liberation_War#Discussion here]). I must say that you understood the mischief behind the report and made the correct discussion. Thanks. —[[User:TripWire|<font face="Eras Demi ITC" size="3px"><b><font color="DarkMagenta">Trip</font><font color="DarkSlateGray">Wire</font></b></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:TripWire|talk]] </sup> 12:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

== Help needed ==

Hello Joseph2302,

I have a question about the page I've tried to create. In the comments to help to develop the article you wrote "Needs more reliable sources to show that the corporation is notable enough". Does it mean if the company is not important enough it can't be on wikipedia ? I'm a little bit because I've edited two articles on the french and german wikipedia and there is no problem. It is also the first time that I use wikipedia and

Thank you

~~TitusKreyenberg~~

Revision as of 12:11, 15 June 2015

PLEASE READ


If I have nominated your article for deletion (WP:AFD or WP:CSD), removed your content or reverted your change and you would like to know why,
please review the following Wikipedia policies and guidelines, among others that may be mentioned in a message I left on your Talk page:

If none of these pages addresses your concerns,
you can leave me a note.
If you do, please sign and date your post by typing four tildes: ~~~~.

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

If you fail to do these things, you won't necessarily get a proper reply.
Paid editors are banned from this talkpage.

WordSeventeen is indefinitely banned from my talkpage.


If you've come to this page because you got a notification saying I'm patrolling your page, then it just means that I've checked your new page meets Wikipedia standards. If it didn't, then I will have tagged the problems on the article itself.

05:54:30, 7 June 2015 review of submission by Amarecanbhai


Just need some help on knowing how many reference citations do I need to add to the article for it to be approved, and also a little help with images. Thanks.

Amarecanbhai (talk) 05:54, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. As many as you can is good, although looking at the draft now, you've got sources from all the big Indian newspapers (Hindu, Times of India, New Indian Express), so it's probably enough to show notability. Quite a few unreferenced sentences though, so either find sources for them, or remove them. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

01:39:36, 8 June 2015 review of submission by SG Ultima


Hello Joseph, just saw your comments on the draft page for "Xtreme Chaotix," in particular regarding how "much of the information is unsourced, and so is original research, which is not permitted."

Appreciate if you can help identify which parts are you referring that are unsourced. Unfortunately, as the organisation was dissolved, the website with relevant information regarding its existence and history cannot be found today (other than through info provided by its founding members and remnant articles from forums or websites). I have loads of documents officially recognising sponsorship from international brands, and images of our organisation winning major gaming championships. Would those help?

Also appreciate if you can elaborate why this is not suitable for wikipedia, since the idea for generating this page was inspired from another local gaming team under the article "PMS Asterisk" - which seem to source most of the info from the creator's personal blog.

Thanks!

SG Ultima (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, the topic isn't unsuitable for Wikipedia, the amount of original research and unsourced content is unsuitable. There are about 6 whole paragraphs of text without any reliable sources to support them- unsourced sections count as original research. If the organisation is actually notable, per WP:GNG and WP:ORG, then sources other than their official, and apparently now defunct, website will support the claims you make in a draft- generally using primary sources for anything other than basic information is discouraged anyway. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:56, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Jimi Hendrix and acid rock

Hi! Would you care to comment at this RfC? It is about the article Jimi Hendrix and whether "acid rock" warrants inclusion in the infobox. Dan56 (talk) 04:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, RfCs aren't really my thing, and I especially don't like getting involved in controversial topics where I have no subject knowledge. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shagadelicbasil23 popping up

Obvious sock

Hi, I've noticed that you have been involved in the blocking of User:Shagadelicbasil23 and finding the other accounts used by them. I think 101.160.12.43 is a sock puppet because of very similar edits, pages they edited, tags etc. I am unsure of the formal process and exactly what to do when reporting it to the sock puppet case page, and I know it is even harder when it is an IP address, so I thought it would be useful to make you aware of it, since you have had quite a bit of success so far. Thanks Flickerd (talk) 11:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Flickerd: Yes, looks like a duck to me- lots of small, consecutive edits, all on cricket/AFL pages (which were the only ones Shagadelicbasil23 edited), every edit tagged as a "Mobile edit, Mobile web edit". As it's an IP address, no-one will run a Checkuser on it (since the results would probably be considered as outing), but I'll file an SPI and see what happens. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:05, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. Flickerd (talk) 12:09, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Time zones

Hello Joseph2302, Thank you for spotting that error for me, I am using a template and I must of forgot to change the time zones. Thanks once again. Skyblueshaun (talk) 16:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for adding the information. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice

I know its an admins job not mine to add block notices, I thought that I would save an admin time by doing it myself, thats all TeaLover1996 (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But thanks for your message in this matter TeaLover1996 (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

00:56:50, 9 June 2015 review of submission by Harmonslide

My mistake, not a copyvio


I'd like to contest the deletion of the submission page below (on ribosomal natural products) as I believe the "copyright infringement" judgment have been made in error. I've re-reviewed the material, which was written independently (not copied from other sources) and which has a unique organization and set of figures (none of which are copied). I believe the appearance of "close paraphrasing" is a misreading of the Duplicate Detector report, as detailed on my "Contested Deletion" help page. Thank you for your time--I'm hoping this can be cleared up! If I missed something huge, I'd like to know. Harmonslide (talk) 00:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at User talk:Harmonslide/sandbox. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help on the Mary Ann Tighe page

Joseph2302, I'm just thanking you for your help on the Mary Ann TIghe Wikipedia page; and I have what I hope is a brief question -- it's on my Talk page under your comment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Botteghe_Oscure#To_Joseph2302.2C_thank_you_so_much_for_your_help_on_the_Mary_Ann_TIghe_Wikipedia_page

Thanks again, Botteghe Oscure (talk) 01:22, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at your talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Today's articles for improvement weekly vote

  • Hello Joseph2302:
This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaborations has begun at Week 27 of 2015. Thanks for participating!
Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 05:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Things to consider while creating brand page on wikipedia

Hello,

I am new to Wikipedia & I have seen that there are lots of company (brand) pages in wikipedia. I don't want to promote any business but would like to create a page for new brand in wikipedia & follow all the guidelines of wikipedia.

Can you give me information of how to create a brand page in wikipedia without violating its guidelines?

Shimpchimp (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:47:22, 9 June 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by ForeitN

Appears to have been deleted


Thanks for taking the time to help review my first Wikipedia entry for the Perry Center. I see that you declined the posting because I had copied some material over from our own annual report, which is public domain, as we are a part of the Department of Defense. I have no problems making changes to the text of my article entry, but I am unable to retrieve any of the content that I created. Is there a way I can get it back so I can make edits to comply with the proper rules?

Best regards,

-Nick

ForeitN (talk) 13:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Noyster, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Check for edit conflicts more carefully so you don't remove talkpage comments. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)@Joseph2302: Did you mean to warn yourself? I mean, I no it's been a slow day, but-! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I do it from time to time. It's a legitimate complaint, it just happens I was the first to notice it. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:05, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We need to have a chat

Use your talkpages to contact me, this conversation is awfully repetitive, and in far too many different places

Joseph,

You continue to mark my article for deletion. The only reason why I can see you doing this is due to poor referencing, to which I am in the process of fixing. If you have a problem with the article subject itself, or do not have positive opinions on Mr. Toner, Wikipedia is not the place to express it.

Sasha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SashaRearick (talkcontribs) 18:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I gave my advice as a full explanation yesterday at Draft talk:James V. Toner- without decent sources, there is no evidence that he's notable. But you decided to ignore advice and publish it anyway. Also, sign your posts with ~~~~ Joseph2302 (talk) 18:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sasha- I am happy to inform you that I have accepted your request to write the article on "James V. Toner". I completely understand your lack of experience in article writing and I am glad to help. Having written articles on James in the Cape Cod Times over the past two years, I will be able to incorporate knowledge of my own regarding the subject matter, and include references to my previous editorials on him which cannot be found online. Please send me the original draft you created, so I may make changes where needed and enhance the quality of the piece, <redacted> Many thanks! -R — Preceding unsigned comment added by RandyPelkey (talkcontribs)

I've redacted the contact addresses so that they don't get spammed. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, @RandyPelkey: what do you mean "I have accepted your request to write the article on James V. Toner"- are you being paid to create the articles? If so, I urge you to declare it, in accordance with our our Terms of Use, particularly those dealing with paid contributions without disclosure. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention that his "knowledge of my own regarding the subject matter" will likely run into problems with WP:No original research. —C.Fred (talk) 20:33, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, on Draft talk:James V. Toner, I also said that I'm not sure he's currently notable enough whoever writes it- he appears to have only competed in local sports events. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Health Redemption challenge

User now blocked

Please have a little patience. The Health Redemption challenge is work in progress and could take a day or two for completion. There are considerable references and other notable materials. Healthredemption (talk) 19:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Healthredemption: It has already been deleted by @FreeRangeFrog:. The main problem wasn't that there were no references, it was the tone of the article, it contained lots of marketing speech, which isn't neutral tone or at all encyclopedic. If you want to recreate it, I recommend creating a draft article using Wikipedia:Article Wizard, noting that the tone must be neutral, per WP:NPOV and that you need to add reliable sources to show why it's notable, per WP:GNG and WP:ORG- Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources is good for this.
Also, do you work for the organisation, if so you have a conflict of interest, and WP:COI discourages you from creating the page. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note their account has been soft blocked, per WP:ISU. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My status on the Pleime campaign

Ask on the relevant talkpage, or Wikipedia:WikiProject Military History- not my area of expertise

Joseph, What is the status of my The Pleime campaign's submission. I can no more access the discussion of it.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The submission is at Draft:The Pleime Campaign. As I've noted there, when I asked for advice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history, they agreed that most of the content of this submission already exists at Battle of Ia Drang, because you added it to that page. There's no need for 2 articles about basically the same thing, which is why I declined it. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been advised to carry the discussion further if I strongly feel there should be a separate article. I did. What happens to the arguments that I advanced. Have they been addressed to? I cannot see the discussion site where I posted them anymore.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By the looks of it, you posted a counter-argument at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Draft help please which no-one has replied to- I have no subject knowledge which was why I asked there in the first place.
You also posted here, which has a reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 June 2#22:00:22, 2 June 2015 review of submission by Tnguyen4321- apparently The Pleime Campaign now redirects to Battle of Ia Drang. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that my additional arguments for the creation of a separate article is missing. In the nutshell, I said it is irrational to redirect the whole (Pleime campaign) to one of its parts (battle of Ia Drang, siege of Plei Me); should it be the other way around? It is unfortunate that the matter had been given to unknowledgeable people to solve. It is a loss for Wikipedia. I will try to remedy the situation by editing further the Battle of Ia Drang. Thanks anyway for your attention on this matter.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 22:21, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kristy Dempsey

Article now in draftspace

Thanks-the original page just made it as "is a author" nothing of importance even mentioned! Wgolf (talk) 00:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem- not sure if they pass WP:NAUTHOUR, but winning a notable prize is a claim of notability. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Wgolf: In case you care, I've put it up for AfD, winning 1 prize was the only reliable source I could find. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:22:56, 10 June 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Mokawn


HI, I have review my new article and rewrite it again. I don't know how to summit. Can you explain to me. Thank you in advance. momo 09:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


momo 09:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

@Mokawn: I've readded my comments about the draft, there's now a button that says "Resubmit". However, since the last review, you have removed most of the references- Wikipedia required more references about the company, to show it's notable, but the draft now has fewer references (only 1). Joseph2302 (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joseph2302 I draft and I didn't change the information. I recheck and put it again. I will try to gather for the source as much as I can. Thank you so much for your comment and review.223.27.209.161 (talk) 03:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your help. I appreciate it. I will go through the links you sent me and adhere to it. Wikipediaelite (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I hoped they help you in writing articles. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted, with suggestions on article talkpage

Joseph2302, You provided some comments on the DRAFT Ring Learning with Errors Key Exchange. Several contributors and I have added a more basic lead section for the article as you suggest. We have also added more explanatory material throughout the article. We look forward to further feedback or having the article progress for more review. Thanks for reviewing the article. We left comments on the talk page for the DRAFT but we are not sure what is the procedure for having you or someone look at the draft again Carvalho1988 (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it's still submitted for review, which means any reviewer can come review it. If it hasn't been reviewed, I'll take a look when I have some spare time. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Accepted it. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 01:49:32, 11 June 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Garthcat

Copyvio


I see you deleted my Draft:John C. Crowell page. I thought citing the quoted text was OK. I would like to remove or rewrite the text in question. Please give me another chance to edit and resubmit this article. Best Regards, Garth

Garthcat (talk) 01:49, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete it, @MilborneOne: did, the reason being unambiguous copyright infringement of [1]. Note that copying or closely paraphrasing other sources is not permitted, per WP:COPYVIO. I don't have access to it (as I'm not an admin), but you can ask User:MilborneOne about it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph2302 (talkcontribs)

Barbara Sumner Burstyn

Unsourced content

Hi Joseph as I have add The Facebook and Twitter account they are deleted but the account is verified by Facebook that the account is of barbara sumner burstyn . please check again and revert for the same

Barbara Sumner Burstyn on Facebook Barbara Sumner Burstyn on Twitter


Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manojrana192000 (talkcontribs) 03:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My reversion here was primarily to remove the completely unsourced paragraph of text you added. I see User:C.Fred has left a note about the external links on your talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:45, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bio

Hey Joseph, I am working to update Rep. Young's information and intend to source the information provided online. I was not able to do so prior to your deletions. I have only added sections I can provide accurate and verifiable information to support. I work in the Washington State Legislature and the information provided is his biographical information. Please advise.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rep. Jesse L. Young (talkcontribs) This template must be substituted.

Discuss at article talkpage or WP:COIN. Adding unsourced information is not okay, and most of it wasn't even relevant. All further discussions of this should be at either article talkpage or WP:COIN. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Choc-late Soldier

Eh, no worries about not finding anything with the short. I honestly wasn't expecting to find anything either and I think I really lucked out with the academic sources since I was really only able to read those because I have access to academic databases through work and my current school. I have to admit that the story behind Hollywood Party is pretty interesting- I ended up buying one of the book sources that I used in the HCS article because of the Hollywood Party content. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My unwritten rule is that if an AfD results in the article being substantial improved, then that's still a good outcome, even if that's not the primary purpose of AfDs. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I declined your CSD solely because there is an MfD running already and speedy deletion is unlikely to assist this (set of) editor(s). There is a major communication issue that is probably not language based. The editor refuses to listen and insists that they are correct. We might stand a chance of educating them via a deletion discussion. I do appreciate with precision why you placed the request. Ordinarily I would agree with you. I think this is an extraordinary case. Fiddle Faddle 11:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's a terrible submission, but I personally think getting rid of it quickly is preferable to drawing out the process with editor(s) unwilling to change their spammy non-notable article, which is just going to cause more arguments. There are 1500 other AFC submissions we could be working on, where people would appreciate our comments. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, while I doubt it, we might, just, convert this editor to being useful. Fiddle Faddle 11:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Joseph2302, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:36, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

21:38:46, 12 June 2015 review of submission by Hannaguido


Could you please be more specific. So far there are five third-party sources, (not counting Comicsalliance which could be called a blog, so I will remove this). How many more quality sources will make the article acceptable? Hannaguido (talk) 21:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Put simply, as many as you can find. As @Timtrent: has now commented on there, the issue is that most of the article is focused on 1 event, giving it undue weight. There needs to be more written with sources about the publisher, to show why they're notable- the 1 incident doesn't make them notable. Also, not sure why there are 7 references at the bottom of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

first thank you for reverting what he did, it is silly how some people just revert your edit if you delete something isn't sourced , secondly, I agree about deletion thing.. it is really not a notable thing to mention , ( scoring 50 goals a season ) so how does it work..? should i say I agree with you there ? or no only Admins gonna look at it now ? thank you Adnan (talk) 22:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a deletion discussion, so anyone can contribute. The discussion has to last at least 7 days, after which an admin can close if there's a clear consensus (or anyone can close it if there's a clear consensus to keep). It's done by consensus not votes, but people still vote (usually votes go in bold text). Joseph2302 (talk) 22:34, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. can you tell me where exactly I can express my opinion it should be deleted ? because I didn't see any discussion about this at the page .
thank you again Adnan (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of association football players with 50 or more goals in a season. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:39, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you !! Adnan (talk) 22:44, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mohan Nadkarni article

Thanks for your message, Joseph.

This was my first article and I appreciate your suggestions.

The article is about my father, who is no more, contrary to the notice I received saying it is about a living person.

I have also changed the text to read more neutrally.

In addition, I have added a few references to the news item about his passing, which also contain his biographical details.

I hope this meets Wikipedia's standards.

Kind regards,

D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inrakdan (talkcontribs) 01:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Inrakdan: My mistake, it wasn't even eligible under WP:BLPPROD, sorry for the mistake and any offence caused. However, you need to add some more reliable sources to show why notability, per WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as he was your father, you have a conflict of interest, I would strongly advise reading Wikipedia conflict of interest policies, WP:COI. I've also tagged the article as having a COI, so someone can come check it, and cleanup if necessary. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Speedy deletion nomination of Deposit Guarantee Corporation of Manitoba

2-line stubs aren't good articles

Good luck with that. Looks like speedy delete was declined. It is a crown corporation. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:33, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Provincial Credit Union got deleted that way. Seriously, stop creating 2 line stub articles, it's not helpful or beneficial to the encyclopedia. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I've moved it to draftspace, Draft:Deposit Guarantee Corporation of Manitoba, to be finished. Right now it wouldn't survive an AfD, so it's much better in draftspace. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Very Sorry

Replied at their talkpage about this and related things

Look I'm Sorry OK put I need to find out how are Characters are The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail and Secrets at Sea and Plot.

But I'm Sorry about What happen I put Characters and Plot. Would you ever forgive me like I'm Sorry what I put the Characters and Plot.

But Still need to find Out who are Characters and Plot I just have to wait for days I been?

Could find soon how are Characters are The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail and Secrets at Sea and Plot.––90731fly (talk) 04:50, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing an AFD as keep

Hi.

You missed recording the AFD outcome on the article talk page when closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mouse with the Question Mark Tail. I've added that now,. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 12:24, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:39, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

@Joseph2302: I want to Improve The Hamed Zarei Article wat I most to do?
Add more reliable sources, as was suggested on your talkpage 2 days ago. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2015)

People enjoying the nightlife at a nightclub in Cape Town, South Africa
Hello, Joseph2302.

The following are WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selections:


Previous selections: Sport • Buggy (automobile) • Types of chocolate


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Thanks again for all your help with the sockpuppet investigation. Much appreciated! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:24, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou

Sir, thanks for investigating and understanding that I am not linked to Pakistan's Military. Just because I happen to have interest in military history, and unfortunately, being unaware of Wikipedia's username polices, I had a user name that misled some (although that username was not controversial, still I had it changed) to wrongly and at times deliberately believe that I am a member of Pakistani military and thus a certain user here have resorted to IP edits and have accused me of CoI in the past. Now, that I have changed my username after understanding and reading the polices here, I still was reported that too by an IP with fewer than 10 edits (9 of them were edits that accused me here). I must say that you understood the mischief behind the report and made the correct discussion. Thanks. —TripWire talk 12:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hello Joseph2302,

I have a question about the page I've tried to create. In the comments to help to develop the article you wrote "Needs more reliable sources to show that the corporation is notable enough". Does it mean if the company is not important enough it can't be on wikipedia ? I'm a little bit because I've edited two articles on the french and german wikipedia and there is no problem. It is also the first time that I use wikipedia and

Thank you

~~TitusKreyenberg~~