Jump to content

User talk:Smileverse: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Smileverse (talk | contribs)
Baligema (talk | contribs)
Added comments regarding Appknox
Line 179: Line 179:


I'm not the one who originally created this article. I've just redirected from the wrong url structure (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_benson(businessman)&redirect=no) to here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Benson_(businessman) (technically I created article but still I'm not the original author of this article). Can you please take this warning to the original author's talk page? Oh, no! It seems he doesn't have talk page created, any ways Here is his contribution log: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dewimani Mohith:) 12:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm not the one who originally created this article. I've just redirected from the wrong url structure (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_benson(businessman)&redirect=no) to here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Benson_(businessman) (technically I created article but still I'm not the original author of this article). Can you please take this warning to the original author's talk page? Oh, no! It seems he doesn't have talk page created, any ways Here is his contribution log: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dewimani Mohith:) 12:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

== Ways to improve Appknox ==

Hi, I'm Rahulgemawath. Smileverse, thanks for creating [[Appknox]]!

I've just tagged the page, using our [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|page curation]] tools, as having some issues to fix. Please name the reference section

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on [[User talk:Rahulgemawath|my talk page]]. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at [[WP:TEAHOUSE|the Teahouse]]. [[User:Rahulgemawath|Rahulgemawath]] ([[User talk:Rahulgemawath|talk]]) 04:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:31, 19 June 2015

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Smileverse (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

i am not intended to violate wikipedia terms but it happens by mistake, but i am really a loyal user of wikipedia that i want to contribute to it. and the username "mohithdotnet" is my general username in many of web accounts, so used it on wikipedia too, but not to promote myself or a company. review my input. thanks

Decline reason:

I've reviewed your input. You've done little but insert links to your own website. This is unwelcome. --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Smileverse (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

as i am a newly registered to the wikipedia and telling with faith, you can give me a at least 1 chance. the things happens will never happen again, actually i tried to add a references to the related subject/concerned subject only. but i am not aware of this "should not add references to own website" now i am aware of it because of you guyz. I wan't contribute wikipedia. think of it once. and the final decision is yours. thanks

Decline reason:

Beyond that, the new username you want is insufficiently dissimilar to the old one. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Smileverse (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

please review my new username. thanks. Yes SpacemanSpiff, i am giving you the assurance. that i won't promote any of my blog/website because now i am aware of it. hey i am done with it. then, what to do next? and tell me that can i remove all the reviews in this page?

Accept reason:

Ok, we'll hand you the rope. What you do with it is up to you. Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:59, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?
Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
What can I do now?
You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. —SpacemanSpiff 12:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z17

Use this account

The purpose of your rename was for you to not use the promotional user name. Please use this account only, I have reblocked the old account as it is a violation. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 20:29, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks SpacemanSpiff —Smileverse

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anantapur Sports Village, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sportstaronnet.com/tss3212/stories/20090321503102600.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)Template:Z117 MadmanBot (talk) 07:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Search engine optimization. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 05:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Air Costa

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Smileverse, thanks for creating Air Costa!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to 1 (2014 film), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Because Bangalorean is not a Reliable source. Raghusri 16:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Travertine Mart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Services (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Digital Locker (India), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Flat Out let's discuss it 05:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Auto Portal

Hello Smileverse,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Auto Portal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Step Conference for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Step Conference is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Step Conference until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American Sleep Association (ASA), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:07, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Custom On It, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. BU Rob13 (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smileverse.
Are you aware that this page has been re-directed to another? See DigiLocker 220 of Borg 08:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi 220 of Borg

I'm aware of it. Government of India actually renamed Digital locker as DigiLocker - you can see it here: https://digitallocker.gov.in/ Mohith:) 10:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
You forgot to sign! (~~~~)
I thought as much, but also thought it was a bit rich that someone started a page on the topic months after you did, and then just re-directed it to their later page. Pages can be moved to new titles you know? 220 of Borg 10:21, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding about sign :) And yes i know we can just move the pages/change the titles. In the past, I did for two pages, I think. Mohith:) 10:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of American Sleep Association (ASA) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Sleep Association (ASA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Sleep Association (ASA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 09:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Travertine Mart for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Travertine Mart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travertine Mart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vamshi Paidithalli, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enrico Thanhoffer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enrico Thanhoffer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrico Thanhoffer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MedjetAssist

The article MedjetAssist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. For the most part, the references on the article are either unreliable sources that are very promotional in nature, or simply passing mentions of the company, separate from the substantive content of the story.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Notionaries (rock band)

The article The Notionaries (rock band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Notionaries (rock band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Notionaries (rock band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Notionaries (rock band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MedjetAssist for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MedjetAssist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MedjetAssist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Benson (businessman)

The article William Benson (businessman) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:BIO / WP:BASIC. All coverage of the individual is unreliable or merely mentions him in passing. Most of the sources available are simply promotional in nature and he has not received significant coverage from any reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 11:37, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one who originally created this article. I've just redirected from the wrong url structure (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=William_benson(businessman)&redirect=no) to here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Benson_(businessman) (technically I created article but still I'm not the original author of this article). Can you please take this warning to the original author's talk page? Oh, no! It seems he doesn't have talk page created, any ways Here is his contribution log: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Dewimani Mohith:) 12:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Appknox

Hi, I'm Rahulgemawath. Smileverse, thanks for creating Appknox!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please name the reference section

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Rahulgemawath (talk) 04:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]