User talk:Baligema

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Rahulgemawath! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 05:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Speedy deletion nomination of Bangalorean (Website)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bangalorean (Website) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Milton India[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Milton India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eurodyne (talk) 18:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bridal association of america[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bridal association of america, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — LeoFrank  Talk 03:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

inuse articles[edit]

Hi, Rahulgemawath! I noticed you just added some tags to John Killeen Handy (politician) which is flagged as {{inuse}} article for classroom purposes. I'd appreciate it if you didn't tag these in this way as these articles are deliberate stubs which the students will work on (as explained in the inuse tag). Adding extra tags will only confuse them. Thanks Kerry (talk) 07:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will revoke this.

Further to this, please familiarise yourself with WP:POLITICIAN. As a member of a state parliament, Henry Williams is intrinsically notable period, and you just nominated him for speedy deletion when he's not eligible for deletion at all. Two sentences is not "no content" for the purposes of the CSD criteria and never has been. You desperately need to familiarise yourself more with Wikipedia policy if you're going to run around tagging things. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will revoke this.

Are you editing for pay?[edit]

Hi there Baligema. I'm a volunteer on conflict of interest related subjects and came across your contributions in relation to another editor. I have a simple question: are you paid for the things you write about on Wikipedia? If the answer is yes, it's not the end of the world, but there are some things you will have to do to continue editing here. You can just reply here, I'll be watching for an answer. Thanks. Brianhe (talk) 16:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have served Wikipedia as non profit things. I Wont edit Anymore. I am Investigating Journalist. I didnt knew this things on wikipedia exist. Where verdict is passed without hearing.

other username etc never heard of. I have removed many prod tags where ever i felt those are wrong also kept prod on many page which where not eligible. why not you check other pages patrolled. Dont know what to say

Thanks.

(

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smileverse, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 17:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I Was blocked, I saw that it was due to multiple account. I dont have internet at my place. So I uses one particular internet center in my area. It might be that other user have the same hobby. I dont know that. I request to please unblock my account. You can see my account activities. I have made few mistake in starting but since when i have got to know the editing policies. I am very proper with guidelines.

Next - As far as i know i have seen admin on wikipedia are calm to newbies and so i request to please unblock my account. Its not worth deleting after so much in past i have contributed. Please

Nomination of MedjetAssist for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MedjetAssist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MedjetAssist (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brianhe (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your Reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 08:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baligema (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi I Was blocked, I saw that it was due to multiple account. I dont have internet at my place. So I uses one particular internet center in my area. It might be that other user have the same hobby. I dont know that. I request to please unblock my account. You can see my account activities. I have made few mistake in starting but since when i have got to know the editing policies. I am very proper with guidelines. Next - As far as i know i have seen admin on wikipedia are calm to newbies and so i request to please unblock my account. Its not worth deleting after so much in past i have contributed. Please Rgema (talk) 10:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but after reviewing the overlap of the accounts in questions, there's just way too much clear coordination between this group of accounts. It may be helpful to be more transparent; obviously there's more here than just "other user have the same hobby". Kuru (talk) 13:25, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@SpacemanSpiff:- who is the sockmaster here? Also, what evidence do you have? PhilKnight (talk) 21:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff: Please give details here; who do you believe is the puppet master, and why?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I note the confirmation of sockpuppetry; the fact that this is the sockmaster rather than a sockpuppet is, of course, of only marginal relevance in terms of the unblock request. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Mattress retailers in United States[edit]

The article List of Mattress retailers in United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List created by a spammer/sock to drive traffic to a page created for promotion of a paid client. Lacks a lead section and is basically a recreation of the "Mattress retailers of the United States" category.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of NPOs in Nigeria[edit]

The article List of NPOs in Nigeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List created by a spammer/sock to drive traffic to a page created for direct compensation; it is an unnecessary list that lacks a lead section.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:58, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Inks.LWC,

I have create this articles based on the similar article over here on this page. If you wish to delete on that basis then you can go ahead and deleted this one too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NGOs_in_Mumbai Inks.LWC

Draft:Waaw Foundation concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Waaw Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Waaw Foundation[edit]

Hello, Baligema. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Waaw Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 08:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Baligema&oldid=1079559866"