User talk:Kelly: Difference between revisions
→Deeyah: new section |
→Lotta-Colour-LoRez.gif: new section |
||
Line 1,137: | Line 1,137: | ||
Hi Kelly, I got your message regarding File:Deeyah Khan.jpg. This picture is not my creation but I got the permission. But what kind of document I should provide to you and how should I do that, to let this picture stay and possibly shared on other Wikipedia pages in other languages- Regard--[[User:Jogibaba|Jogibaba]] ([[User talk:Jogibaba|talk]]) 17:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Kelly, I got your message regarding File:Deeyah Khan.jpg. This picture is not my creation but I got the permission. But what kind of document I should provide to you and how should I do that, to let this picture stay and possibly shared on other Wikipedia pages in other languages- Regard--[[User:Jogibaba|Jogibaba]] ([[User talk:Jogibaba|talk]]) 17:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Lotta-Colour-LoRez.gif == |
|||
Hello, |
|||
I added this photo to the [[Lotta Hitschmanova]] article in 2007. I obtained the photo from the office of USC Canada which owns the photo. I told them that I was updating the Wikipedia article and that a photo would greatly add to the quality of the article. They provided this photo and gave me permission to use it for this purpose. |
|||
I have long since lost that email conversation. I have sent another email to them about this new permissions request. I would ask that you to wait until I hear back from them before you remove it from Wikipedia. |
|||
Thanks. [[User:Atrian|Atrian]] ([[User talk:Atrian|talk]]) 13:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:55, 3 October 2015
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Requesting a review
You seem to do a lot of image work so I'd like a second opinion: Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2015_September_9#File:Goodall_Cup_Replica_Cup_2014.png
withdrawn because the uploader provided new information, however they seemed a bit upset about the initial referral, so I'd like some feeedback either way.
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:59, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sfan00 IMG - I think you were right to bring it up - it's a derivative work and needs a license for the trophy. I tagged the image page with {{Di-dw no license}}. Kelly hi! 12:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hmm, have you read the PUF thread? It was withdrawn BECAUSE they claimed to be on the media team (and thus able to re-license).Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sfan00 IMG, Whoops, I missed that bit - in that case it needs permission. I changed the tag accordingly. Kelly hi! 12:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- It looks like Nyttend removed it, which is fine - I just hadn't seen that particular legal opinion before, either here or at Commons. You learn something new every day. Kelly hi! 12:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sfan00 IMG, Whoops, I missed that bit - in that case it needs permission. I changed the tag accordingly. Kelly hi! 12:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
How far down the deletion process have you gone?
In a recent purge of improperly licensed images, you have flagged a file I uploaded File:Bill C11 Canada Cartoon RMS.jpg as a false positive. Claiming that the copyright owner has not given permission (or that the proof of this is hard to find) is false for the following reasons:
- A statement permitting use in any medium for any purpose provided that there is attribution appears on the image itself.
- The summary template I included with the image has a link to the page where the image (and therefore the license statement) can be found.
- The author of the image is the world's most vocal proponent of free licenses. All editors with an interest in licensing should know that he has spoken at WMF conferences in the past to support any and all media that can help it.
The template you placed at the top (which I have now removed) said that the file will be deleted if an adequate permission link is not provided. In theory, this means it will never be deleted because a permission link was always there to begin with. But in what sense is this image still "up for deletion"? Is there an AfD page where I must go to defend it before an admin makes the final call? Is the person waiting to delete it you or someone else? Connor Behan (talk) 17:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- If the tag is removed it's no longer up for deletion. It would be nice if we had some other evidence of the copyright status besides a tiny watermark at the bottom of the image, but I'm not too worried about it. Kelly hi! 17:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Permissions for files NB3DT6321.jpg and File:LS40075.jpg
The first of these files was not used and can be deleted. The second of these is a photograph taken by the late Neil Lawson who was killed taking a similar photograph in 2007 [Link to BBC News]. I am attempting to contact his executors but this may be tricky. JMcC (talk) 17:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- I see - thanks for the notification. Kelly hi! 17:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
File permission problems
Hi
This is regarding the file permission problems for File:Maarthaanda-Varma-comics.png, File:MarthandaVarma Reprints.png, and File:Marthandavarma-Translations.png. Kindly see the message at User talk:Harithvh#File permission problems.—(harith (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC))
- Hi,
This is regarding the file permission problems for File:Maarthaanda-Varma-comics.png, File:MarthandaVarma Reprints.png, and File:Marthandavarma-Translations.png. We are processing requests for consents from the individual publishers, Sahitya Pravarthaka Co-operative Society, D. C. Books, Poorna Publications, Kerala Sahitya Akademi, Rachana Books, Chintha Publishers, Sahitya Akademi, Sterling Publishers, IBH Publishers, Balarama Amara Chithra Katha, and Amar Chitra Katha as possible; however the processing will not be able to complete in a short span of time, due to requirements of outlay in a month end, and also with uncertainty that whether every party involved will respond to the first attempt. So, we have compiled {{non-free fair use}} template information for the above three sets, we could replace the present descriptions to that, if there are no issues; and we could change it to present ones once after availing consents from the respective parties. Kindly respond.
(harith (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)) - Hi, ω Awaiting your feedback, on replacing the image file information to {{non-free fair use}} ones. Thanks.—(harith (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2015 (UTC))
- Yes, those images will need non-free copyright tags unless we have a release for a free license. Kelly hi! 05:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, the image tags are changed to to appropriate {{non-free fair use}} as applicable.—«harith»(discuss) 06:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, those images will need non-free copyright tags unless we have a release for a free license. Kelly hi! 05:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Help Akshardham Environment Violation Section & Protest at launch event for Book
Hello,
If you have time would you please take a look at this article: [1] and this discussion [2] and provide your input. There is a content dispute occurring and I feel fresh eyes would help because of your experience. [3].
Also, if you have time , could you see if you have anything additional to add to this talk page? There was a book launch [4] and a translation author was asked not to come because she is a woman and an organization prohibits their holy men from looking at women. This is not typical in normal Hinduism but this is a practice in this branch. The person was offended and there was public outcry. Is this considered something that is notable and included?
Thank you
Swamiblue (talk) 02:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Statomakolo.jpg
The sculpture depicted in this image was installed in 1901 and its creator, Lazaros Sochos, died in 1911. Under Greek law, the copyright expired seventy years after his death, in 1981, and even before that, "occasional use" depictions in other media. But these are moot points, since the image is no longer in use in the Kolokotronis article nor in any another. I would have no objections to its deletion at this point. --Jpbrenna (talk) 16:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- Jpbrenna - whatever you prefer...if you wanted to keep the image it would just be necessary to add that that information to the page along with a {{PD-old-100}} license tag for the sculpture. Kelly hi! 17:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Sandilyan Novels.jpg
Hi,
This is regarding Image copyright problem with File:Sandilyan Novels.jpg. Shall we change the image file information to appropriate {{non-free fair use}} as done in the previous case.
ω Awaiting your feedback.
(harith·discuss) 02:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Yes I think that needs to be done as well. Kelly hi! 04:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Done Thanks—(harith·discuss) 07:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
All of the images at that article have releases signed and submitted to permissions. They have been in the article for over a year, so I don't know why you're having problems now. Please check again. Atsme📞📧 13:07, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Atsme - I've added an {{OTRS pending}} tag to the image. I would advise contacting an OTRS member to check on the license; if a ticket hasn't been added after this amount of time there is likely a problem with the permission e-mail. Be advised that the image will be deleted if an OTRS ticket hasn't been added by a volunteer within the next couple of months. Kelly hi! 15:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- There is a ticket at OTRS. I have a copy of the email that was sent to permissions last year. I just sent them an email with a copy of that release and explained what happened. I don't understand what could have happened between then and now. Thank you. Atsme📞📧 15:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- I have verified that File:Gabor Racz Surgery.jpg and File:Gabor Racz Lecture.jpg have been released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY_SA 4.0) license via OTRS ticket #2014041110016312 (I am on the OTRS team). The permissions are in order for those two images. The File:Gabor B. Racz.jpg image is not covered under that ticket as of right now. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Regarding File:Gabor B. Racz.jpg, I am working on the ticket for that one. It should hopefully be resolved within the next few days. Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Permission has been received and verified for File:Gabor B. Racz.jpg through ticket #2015100110018281. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- There is a ticket at OTRS. I have a copy of the email that was sent to permissions last year. I just sent them an email with a copy of that release and explained what happened. I don't understand what could have happened between then and now. Thank you. Atsme📞📧 15:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Not sure why you did this, but it's not helpful. The 'OTRS received' tag is to grant the contributor some time to sort things out, we grant 30 days for that per our standard practices. Please do not interfere with other procedures. If the permission is not in order after 30 days, the file will be deleted. Jcb (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Kelly, I got your message regarding File:Deeyah Khan.jpg. This picture is not my creation but I got the permission. But what kind of document I should provide to you and how should I do that, to let this picture stay and possibly shared on other Wikipedia pages in other languages- Regard--Jogibaba (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Lotta-Colour-LoRez.gif
Hello, I added this photo to the Lotta Hitschmanova article in 2007. I obtained the photo from the office of USC Canada which owns the photo. I told them that I was updating the Wikipedia article and that a photo would greatly add to the quality of the article. They provided this photo and gave me permission to use it for this purpose.
I have long since lost that email conversation. I have sent another email to them about this new permissions request. I would ask that you to wait until I hear back from them before you remove it from Wikipedia.
Thanks. Atrian (talk) 13:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)