User talk:210.3.38.33: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:43, 23 November 2015

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page I Am David has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Grim²³ ★ 02:30, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page I Am David. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alan (talk) 02:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Hot spare has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Hot spare. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:31, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Cottage pie. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Traxs7 (Talk) 03:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Cottage pie. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Traxs7 (Talk) 03:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Gunpowder has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Blehfu (talk) 07:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jenson Button, you may be blocked from editing. the NHJG 02:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Jenson Button. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Kgasso (talk) 02:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jujutacular ^talk 02:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grasshopper, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Grasshopper was changed by 210.3.38.33 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-11-30T04:07:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Nitin Kapoor worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 06:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nitin Kapoor, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 04:06, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hyperinflation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. NTox · talk 05:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hyperinflation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. NTox · talk 05:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Total Recall (2012 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Webclient101^talk 05:36, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ronan Parke. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Winkelvi (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to David McClelland constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bar (unit) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:59, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bar (unit). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014

Hello, I'm John Cline. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hudson Taylor, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —John Cline (talk) 03:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Power move has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm Asdklf;. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Environmental audit because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Asdklf; (talk) 04:09, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 17:20, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Christian denomination because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Offensive comments on talk pages.

Hello. I am not sure given your account history why you are not IP banned yet, but I will be requesting that. In the interim, I would suggest refraining from leaving abusive remarks on peoples talk pages, especially with zero context as to why you are abusing them, as it is somewhat counter productive even from the point of view of effectively offending someone. You should probably readjust your attitude though - I mean, do you not look at this wall of grievances against you and think "Wow, I really should re-evaluate my life and the harm I am doing to this project." at all? 121.211.33.244 (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:43, 23 November 2015 edit 121.211.33.244 (talk) →‎Offensive comments on talk pages.: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:43, 23 November 2015 edit undo 121.211.33.244 (talk) →‎Offensive comments on talk pages. Next edit →
Line 86:		Line 86:
	== Offensive comments on talk pages. ==		== Offensive comments on talk pages. ==

	Hello. I am not sure given your account history why you are not IP banned yet, but I will be requesting that. In the interim, I would suggest refraining from leaving abusive remarks on peoples talk pages, especially with zero context as to why you are abusing them, as it is somewhat counter productive even from the point of view of effectively offending someone. You should probably readjust your attitude though - I mean, do you not look at this wall of grievances against you and think "Wow, I really should re-evaluate my life and the harm I am doing to this project." at all? [[Special:Contributions/121.211.33.~~244~~\|121.211.33.244]] ([[User talk:121.211.33.244\|talk]]) 05:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)		Hello. I am not sure given your account history why you are not IP banned yet, but I will be requesting that. In the interim, I would suggest refraining from leaving abusive remarks on peoples talk pages, especially with zero context as to why you are abusing them, as it is somewhat counter productive even from the point of view of effectively offending someone. You should probably readjust your attitude though - I mean, do you not look at this wall of grievances against you and think "Wow, I really should re-evaluate my life and the harm I am doing to this project." at all? [[Special:Contributions/121.211.33.69\|121.211.33.244]] ([[User talk:121.211.33.244\|talk]]) 05:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)