User talk:Jimbo Wales: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 08:53, 6 April 2017

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

This is Jimbo Wales's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, Index, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251: 1 days

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

DailyMailTV to launch this fall in over 100 markets across the US with executive producer Dr. Phil McGraw

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4375656/DailyMailTV-launch-fall-100-markets.html

"The show will combine all of the best elements of the website that will both engage and entertain TV audiences," said Dr. Phil McGraw.

"The series will be a fantastic showcase for all DailyMail.com’s brilliant and exclusive news, showbiz and video content," said DailyMail.com publisher Martin Clarke.

--Guy Macon (talk) 11:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if it matters someone will no doubt write an article on it, see National Enquirer TV. No doubt, they appreciate the plug, here, though. Entertainers usually like that. --`Alanscottwalker (talk) 11:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The DM decision is indicative of the relatively unique way in which Wikipedia operates. I would not be surprised to see it reversed at some point, but in the meantime, I think our decision is a good slap in the face to all media which fail to consistently publish reliable stories.....they might be next. So, the end might justify the means in this matter. Nocturnalnow (talk) 16:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

<3 Emosy (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your Mark Dice edit

I'm curious as to what prompted you to make it as there was offwiki recruitment to demand that change and at least one legal threat made on the talk page resulting from that demand. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Hi Jimbo. I notice that verifiability is not required for the "facts" which inform this encyclopedia's decisions. That sounds really well-thought-through. Siuenti (talk) 07:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you verify your claim? (This guy is fresh off a block and is messing with the articles). 51.140.123.26 (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 07:32, 6 April 2017 view source Siuenti (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,893 edits →‎Verifiability: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:53, 6 April 2017 view source 51.140.123.26 (talk) →‎Verifiability Next edit →
Line 49:		Line 49:

	Hi Jimbo. I notice that [[WP:V\|verifiability]] is not required for the "facts" which inform this encyclopedia's decisions. That sounds really well-thought-through. [[User:Siuenti\|Siuenti]] ([[User talk:Siuenti\|talk]]) 07:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)		Hi Jimbo. I notice that [[WP:V\|verifiability]] is not required for the "facts" which inform this encyclopedia's decisions. That sounds really well-thought-through. [[User:Siuenti\|Siuenti]] ([[User talk:Siuenti\|talk]]) 07:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
			:Can you verify your claim? (This guy is fresh off a block and is messing with the articles). [[Special:Contributions/51.140.123.26\|51.140.123.26]] ([[User talk:51.140.123.26\|talk]]) 08:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)