Jump to content

User talk:Peaceray: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tag: MassMessage delivery
m question asked
Line 688: Line 688:
</div></div> <section end="technews-2017-W15"/> 18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
</div></div> <section end="technews-2017-W15"/> 18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=16563313 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Tech_ambassadors&oldid=16563313 -->

== Question about creating a new page ==

Hi again,

So I wanted to create a page for Graham Brown, American thriller author that has co-written books with [[Clive Cussler]]. He is on the disambiguation page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Brown already. I don't have complete info about him, but wanted to at least start the page so I did a draft so far https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Graham_Brown_(writer). So I've checked the Making Your First Page article but ran into a couple of quesions:
Can I use the official bio photo with permission and how to I mark that?
I have a year of birth, but not day/month. Is that necessary?
I was using another author page as my example. I want to link to the books he's written, and provide a quick summary. My assumption is as a co-author of two NYT best-selling novels he qualifies as a writer of note and deserves his own page.

Thanks

[[User:BookReviewer|BookReviewer]] ([[User talk:BookReviewer|talk]]) 00:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:56, 15 April 2017

Peaceray
home
Barnstars,
Badges, &
User Boxes
Talk to meNowhere, in
particular


Sunday January 15: Wikipedia Day NYC 2017

You are invited to join us at Ace Hotel for Wikipedia Day NYC 2017, a Wikipedia celebration and mini-conference as part of the project's global 16th birthday festivities. In addition to the party, the event will be a participatory unconference, with plenary panels, lightning talks, and of course open space sessions.

With special guests Katherine Maher of the Wikimedia Foundation and Tim Wu of Columbia Law School speaking on our Post-truth panel!

Also featuring an International/Multilingual panel, a Documenting Activism panel, a Multimedia/Tech Panel, a Science panel, an Art panel, and more.

And there will be cake.

We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

10:00am - 7:00 pm at Ace Hotel, 20 West 29th Street in Manhattan

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC) 23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Reversion of Baltimore Ravens edit by 126.19.93.217

Why did you revert my edit on the Baltimore Ravens page? You should read the edit. It's just some guy inserting his personal opinion about how great the move is. It barely sounds appropriate. I'll re-add it since I assume you didn't even read it. 126.19.93.217 (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, why did you threaten me for saying my edit summary was misleading? That seems like really inappropriate behavior. Like I said previously, actually read the edit please. 126.19.93.217 (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You removed two URLs from reference citations & removed part of the image syntax, leaving a red link. While it is true I did not scroll down far enough to see the opinion that you removed, the first three portions of your edit were indistinguishable between incompetence or vandalism, so I reverted them. Since your edit summary deleted random opinion of a user had nothing to do with the URL removals or the mangling of the image syntax, I flagged it as a misuse of the edit summary. I apologize if I misinterpreted your intent behind these mistakes. When I spot something that looks like vandalism or seems amiss, I act quickly. I would ask that you please preview your edits before saving them to avoid future mistakes in the Wikimarkup & the interpretation of your intent. We all make mistakes, particularly when we begin editing. After, seven years & 16,000 edits, I, myself, am certainly not immune to mistakes, although previewing my edits has certainly helped.
Your last edit to Baltimore Ravens looks great!
Finally, when you post to another user's talk page, please either start a new section or add to an existing section. Most editors will react pretty negatively to someone posting to the top of their page.
Peaceray (talk) 20:45, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
20:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC) 18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Learning Quarterly: February 2017

L&E Newsletter / Volume 4 / Issue 11 / February 2017
Learning Quarterly

Stay tuned
blogs, events
& more!

Leave your mark on Meta!
Inspiring ideas and learning patterns you can contribute to.

19:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Wednesday February 15, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan.

Featuring special guest presentations on WikiProject La Guardia and Wagner Archives, WikiProject Metropolitan Museum of Art, Wiki Loves the Dominican Republic, and more.

We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants.

We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, and other outreach activities.

We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.

After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!

7:00pm - 9:00 pm at Babycastles gallery, 137 West 14th Street

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 22:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Get ready now for Black WikiHistory Month Weekend:

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

UW Bothell details

Hey Peaceray -- saw the post you made at Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle for several UW Bothell events. Do you know what the parking situation is there? They usually charge for the garages, don't they? - Brianhe (talk) 19:56, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianhe: I believe that you are correct. I will check.
@Shameran81: Do you know any details about parting at UW Bothell?
Peaceray (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianhe: & @Shameran81:
I received the following response by email through the contact at www.uwb.edu/admin/facilities/transportation/parking.

Hi Raymond,

You can park in any numbered stall as long as you pay for the stall. There are pay machines at each lot and you pay for the space when you park. Our prices are 3 dollars for under 3 hours and 6 dollars for all day. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Thank you,

Chelsea Ingham
Program Assistant

Commuter Services

Peaceray (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Brianhe: & @Peaceray: Hey there, thanks for asking this important question and for doing a little research on the parking. I've updated the event page with details on the rooms and building addresses. You are correct that parking for the day is $6 for all day. The garages can fill up, so it's best to leave a ten minute buffer for your travel time. I emailed Kimberly to ask her if she would recommend a garage and give us further instruction. Will update the event page accordingly. Will be so glad to have you both there. Shameran81 (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
18:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing as Activism: Black WikiHistory Month Workshop and Edit-a-thon at UW Bothell

Event poster for the Black History Month Editing as Activism Workshop and Edit-a-thon at University of Washington-Bothell Feb. 22-23, 2017.
Editing as Activism: Black WikiHistory Month Workshop and Edit-a-thon
Social Justice Organizers at University of Washington-Bothell are hosting a two-day editing event for Black WikiHistory Month on Feb. 22 and Feb. 23, 2017.
Learn to Purposefully Edit Wikipedia
  • February 22, 2017 ~3-5:30pm
  • Location: UW Bothell Activities & Recreation Center (ARC) Overlook (Sports and Recreation Complex on the campus map), Second floor, room 202. Address: 18220 Campus Way NE, Bothell, WA 98011; vehicle parking in North parking garage $3 for 3 hours or $6/all day rate cash or card
  • This workshop gives you the critical tools you need to log on with purpose and make edits that make a difference.
  • Led by Monika Sengul-Jones
Black History Month Edit-a-thon
  • February 23, 2017 3-6pm
  • Location: UW Bothell Common Grounds Cafe in the Commons Hall (UW2), main floor. Address: 18115 Campus Way NE Bothell, WA 98011; vehicle parking in South parking garage $3 for 3 hours or $6/all day rate cash or card
  • Put your editing skills to work in a group editing session. Edit and/or create pages that improve Wikipedia's coverage of Black history and culture. All welcome. Novice editors encouraged to attend the Learn to Purposefully Edit session on Feb. 22. Bring your laptops, power cords, and books/articles to edit with.
  • All are welcome; this event is specifically geared towards the University of Washington student and faculty community. Light refreshments will be served.
  • Affiliated Sponsor: Cascadia Wikimedians User Group
To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]
Cascadia Wikimedians
cascadia.wiki
19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC) 19:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Art+Feminism March 2017 at UW Seattle


Art+Feminism

Cascadia Wikimedians
cascadia.wiki
Art+Feminism Learn to Edit Pre-session
  • When: Friday, March 3rd, 2017, from 12-2pm PT
  • Where: Research Commons, Allen Library South, Ground floor. University of Washington. Seattle, WA 98195
Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon
  • When: Saturday, March 4th, 2017, 9am-1pm PT
  • Where: Research Commons, Allen Library South, Ground floor. University of Washington. Seattle, WA 98195

The University of Washington Research Commons, Cascadia Wikimedians, iArts, & iQueeries will jointly host an Art+Feminism event in March at the Research Commons.

Join us for a communal updating of Wikipedia entries on subjects related to art and feminism! Our focus is on improving Wikipedia's representation of North American Indigenous art, Indigenous womxn artists, and Indigenous feminism.

We will provide tutorials for beginner Wikipedians, childcare, refreshments, and live streaming for those unable to attend.

Cost is free! Anyone and everyone who wishes to attend this event is welcome. Bring your own laptops and power cords (guest access to UW WiFi will be available).

To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Reversion of removed content from the page "List of people of Cuman descent"

I don't know where to post this but i saw your message about that you restored the removed content from the page "List of people of Cuman descent". I removed the content because there is absolutely no source about the ethnic origin of them, and it's all false, (mostly) made by Hungarian nationalists. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrappos (talkcontribs) 19:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrappos: Three things:
Peaceray (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

March 11: Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon @ MoMA (and beyond!)

Saturday March 11: Art+Feminism Edit-a-thon @ MoMA

Join us at the Dorothy and Lewis B. Cullman Education and Research Building at the Museum of Modern Art, 4 West 54th Street, on Saturday, March 11, 2017 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. for an all-day communal updating of Wikipedia entries on subjects related to art and feminism. There will be childcare, snacks, multiple trainings and panel discussions. People of all gender identities and expressions welcomed and encouraged to attend.

This year’s edit-a-thon kicks off at 10:00 a.m. with a conversation about information activism with writer Joanne McNeil and Data & Society Research Institute Fellow Zara Rahman, moderated by Kimberly Drew, the social media manager for the Metropolitan Museum of Art, creator of the Tumblr “Black Contemporary Art,” and the person behind @museummammy on Instagram. Afternoon breakout groups will engage in focused discussions about related issues, including intersectionality and librarianship, power structures in notability guidelines on Wikipedia, and radical archives. --Pharos (talk) 18:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


And a broader calendar of events on the theme this week/weekend, and the next:

  • Mar 08 - Gladys Marcus Library, Fashion Institute of Technology
11am - 5pm
in New York, NY
Wikipedia:NYC/FIT/Womens Day Edit-a-thon
  • Mar 11 -Purchase College Library
11am - 4pm
in Purchase, NY
Facebook event
  • Mar 11 - The Museum of Modern Art
10am - 5pm
in New York, NY
Facebook event
MoMA event
  • Mar 12 - Interference Archive
2pm - 6pm
in Brooklyn, NY
Interference Archive event
  • Mar 12 - Kickstarter HQ
10am - 5pm
in Brooklyn, NY
Eventbrite event
  • Mar 18 -SVA Library
12pm - 5pm
in New York, NY
Eventbrite event

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

15:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Art+Feminism @ Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (March 18, 2017)

You are invited to the upcoming Art+Feminism edit-athon, which will be held at the Portland Institute for Contemporary Art (415 Southwest 10th Avenue #300, Portland 97205) on Saturday, March 18, 2017 from 10:00am – 5:00pm. For more information, visit Eventbrite.

Hope to see you there! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New question about editing

Hi Peaceray,

I've been an editor a long time, but rarely make changes. Usually when I'm doing research and find a change or citation that needs updating. Today I ran across an entry that I believe needs editing, but wanted some guidance before I did so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirkus_Reviews

There is a section in Influence and reception that seems to just be personal opinion, specifically: →Credibility—a Kirkus review is respected throughout the industry and by media and libraries →Marketing tool—a good Kirkus review is a valuable marketing tool, great for a blurb on a press release, or to be placed on your site, or as an editorial review on retailer sites →Personal gratification—every author I know feels great when their Kirkus review has good things to say.

Am i correct that this is personal opinion and should be removed or rewritten?

Thanks

BookReviewer (talk) 04:49, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BookReviewer: Well, it certainly smacks of WP:PROMO, but more importantly, it is a copyright violation (see WP:COPYVIO) as the text exists in selfpublishingadvice.org/publishing-is-a-kirkus-review-worth-the-price/, which has a June 13, 2014 publication date that precedes the addition of that text to the article. I would say remove that text ASAP with an edit summary of [[WP:COPYVIO]]: copied from http://selfpublishingadvice.org/publishing-is-a-kirkus-review-worth-the-price/.
No one can argue with a WP:COPYVIO.
Peaceray (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Removed that and updated a bit of the description. I need to cite the "most expensive fee-for-review" statement, but I know its correct. I'll find an authoritative link or price comparison chart this weekend to back it up.

Take a look and let me know what you think?

BookReviewer (talk) 17:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Sunday March 26: Action=History Wiki-Hackathon @ Ace Hotel

On the last Sunday of every month, the Boardroom at Ace Hotel New York hosts Action Equals History — a unique opportunity for New Yorkers to learn hands-on in a technology training/workshop session about the mechanics, practices and benefits of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia projects. This is an opportunity for all to gather, share and work collectively towards a more robust account of history.

For this month, and following on the recent Art+Feminism campaign, we'll focus on building better edit-a-thon tools for a variety of different thematic campaigns, and user-testing them with the community. Towards a goal of advancing these tools for wider use with diverse local groups.

Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 05:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

14:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Cut & paste of material from Theranos to Elizabeth Holmes

Sorry, it just seemed like her Wikipedia page read as if it were written by her personally. The talk page seemed to reflect that sentiment as well. 173.179.145.202 (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@173.179.145.202: It is fine to edit anything that seems like bias, but wholesale copy & pasting needs to follow the guideline for copying within Wikipedia as well as any other guidelines. While sometimes is best to be bold, in an article that has edits from nearly 300 editors, I think some consensus & discussion on Talk:Elizabeth Holmes is appropriate.
Also, I do think that there is some negative coverage in the Questions about Theranos section, & the Awards and recognition section does state that 'Following the scrutiny over the Theranos lab controversy, Fortune named Holmes one of the "World's Most Disappointing Leaders" for 2016.' If you want to expand on that, please do, but please adhere to the editing guidelines.
Peaceray (talk) 15:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neophyte edits to Greek mythology articles

Sorry for the inconvenience. Just a neophyte her. Please consider my excuse and can you resolve my editing. --Markx121993 (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Markx121993: Please slow down, read WP:GUIDELINES, always leave editing summaries, & preview your edits. With all the ignored warnings that you have gotten from multiple editors, you are risking being blocked. Peaceray (talk) 15:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warning i will refrain from removing sections in the page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markx121993 (talkcontribs) 15:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a new page

Can I ask how can I make a new page?--Markx121993 (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Markx121993: Please see Your first article: "Writing an article; Learn how you can create an article". Peaceray (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A probable mistake

In this edit you posted a Template:Uw-tdel3 warning, but your edit summary referred to Template:Uw-tdel4, so presumably you intended a level 4 warning and posted the wrong one by mistake. This is of no importance, but I thought I would let you know so that you can watch out for similar mistakes in future. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: Thanks for pointing this out. I usually use Twinkle for user warnings, but I think in this case, because there were section headings after the March 2017 section heading, I was trying to post manually under that heading. I think I made a typo in the template syntax, copied & pasted to the summary, saw my mistake in the body but only managed to correct it there.
I know you admins must rely on the edit summaries to determine up front about the warnings that other editors are make to a particular editor. Sorry if I created any confusion about the matter.
Peaceray (talk) 17:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal acquaintances re-registration

Ray, is it possible you could confirm me again at WP:Personal acquaintances? It looks like my username change set me back to square zero. -- Bri (talk) 12:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bri: I tried, but am only seeing you by your previous ID in the "Who do you want to verify?" drop-down list at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Pers%C3%B6nliche_Bekanntschaften/neue_Anfragen?uselang=en (cannot do an interlanguage inline link with that ?uselang=en part). Peaceray (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's odd, I was sure I saw myself at de:Wikipedia:Persönliche_Bekanntschaften/neue_Anfragen when I was at the conference. Trying again. - Bri (talk) 03:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC) 18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Question about creating a new page

Hi again,

So I wanted to create a page for Graham Brown, American thriller author that has co-written books with Clive Cussler. He is on the disambiguation page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_Brown already. I don't have complete info about him, but wanted to at least start the page so I did a draft so far https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Graham_Brown_(writer). So I've checked the Making Your First Page article but ran into a couple of quesions: Can I use the official bio photo with permission and how to I mark that? I have a year of birth, but not day/month. Is that necessary? I was using another author page as my example. I want to link to the books he's written, and provide a quick summary. My assumption is as a co-author of two NYT best-selling novels he qualifies as a writer of note and deserves his own page.

Thanks

BookReviewer (talk) 00:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]