User talk:Jionunez: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 200: Line 200:


:::I felt that the wording of the edit had unnecessarily negative connotations and did not meet a neutral point of view. As for the caption of the edit, I realise it may have been more productive to contact an administrator about the edit warring, but in the moment I felt that the introduction of a third party would be sufficient to deescalate the situation. Was I mistaken in either of these assumptions? [[User:Jionunez|Jionunez]] ([[User talk:Jionunez#top|talk]]) 08:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
:::I felt that the wording of the edit had unnecessarily negative connotations and did not meet a neutral point of view. As for the caption of the edit, I realise it may have been more productive to contact an administrator about the edit warring, but in the moment I felt that the introduction of a third party would be sufficient to deescalate the situation. Was I mistaken in either of these assumptions? [[User:Jionunez|Jionunez]] ([[User talk:Jionunez#top|talk]]) 08:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

== Wish ==
Hello. Help improve article [[Maureen Wroblewitz]]. Thank you. [[Special:Contributions/125.214.51.223|125.214.51.223]] ([[User talk:125.214.51.223|talk]]) 08:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:23, 20 August 2018

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jionunez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Milhist!

Your question at the Help Desk

You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:57, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I'll be more careful"

Aw, see, that's why we try not to bite the new people. There are some unpleasant people and the nature of your mistake—along with the QPQ thing, which made you look like you'd done at least five nominations already—made me think you were one of them. You really are welcome to jump in and make mistakes and, as long as you're well-intentioned and a good sport about it, most of the people around here are more than ready to help you out. Thanks again for taking the time to help out and make this place better. — LlywelynII 08:21, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Whatsup yung bruva,

I noticed your reply in the Facebook page and I thought I'd drop you a message. Keep it up!

Regards from The Netherlands,

Amin (Talk) 11:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Long Military Service Cross (Spain) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 15:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Order of the Lion (Malawi)

On 22 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Order of the Lion (Malawi), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1967, President Hastings Banda established the Order of the Lion, Malawi's second-highest honor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Order of the Lion (Malawi). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Order of the Lion (Malawi)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

 

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

DYK for Long Military Service Cross (Spain)

On 27 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Long Military Service Cross (Spain), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Juan Carlos I of Spain approved the Long Military Service Cross in 2002, even though it was established in 1958? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Long Military Service Cross (Spain). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Long Military Service Cross (Spain)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias talk 01:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians who like Shaman King requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 16:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Expert Action Badge) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Expert Action Badge, Jionunez!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful article!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 18:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Shaman King user templates has been nominated for discussion

Category:Shaman King user templates, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpbT 19:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Border Police of Georgia

On 8 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Border Police of Georgia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Border Police of Georgia have continued to help enforce Georgian sovereignty over Abkhazia and South Ossetia since the end of the Russo-Georgian War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Border Police of Georgia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Border Police of Georgia), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 02:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jionunez. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Swarm 03:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --John (talk) 07:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do rarely interact with other editors and have only received pending changes reviewer rights a few hours ago. Would you be able to tell me where I made my mistakes, so as not to repeat them? Jionunez (talk) 07:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What was the merit of this edit? --John (talk) 08:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I felt that the wording of the edit had unnecessarily negative connotations and did not meet a neutral point of view. As for the caption of the edit, I realise it may have been more productive to contact an administrator about the edit warring, but in the moment I felt that the introduction of a third party would be sufficient to deescalate the situation. Was I mistaken in either of these assumptions? Jionunez (talk) 08:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help improve article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thank you. 125.214.51.223 (talk) 08:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]