Jump to content

Talk:Murder of Seth Rich: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Murder of Seth Rich/Archive 13) (bot
No edit summary
Line 64: Line 64:
}}
}}
__TOC__
__TOC__

== Article does not account for the following ==
* Mueller did not interview Assange or Kim Dotcom.
* Flynn was framed by FBI.
* No Russian collusion was found.
* The DNC refused to turn over their servers for investigation.
* The file transfer speed to Romania matched that of a USB key. Impossibly fast otherwise.
* CNN and other sources used here have been caught by Project Veritas, covering up, suppressing, and fabricating news for partisan reasons.


== New Reports ==
== New Reports ==

Revision as of 12:34, 26 May 2020

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 19, 2016Articles for deletionNo consensus
September 15, 2016WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version
October 4, 2016Articles for deletionNo consensus
January 21, 2017Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
February 26, 2017WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version
May 30, 2017WikiProject approved revisionDiff to current version

Article does not account for the following

  • Mueller did not interview Assange or Kim Dotcom.
  • Flynn was framed by FBI.
  • No Russian collusion was found.
  • The DNC refused to turn over their servers for investigation.
  • The file transfer speed to Romania matched that of a USB key. Impossibly fast otherwise.
  • CNN and other sources used here have been caught by Project Veritas, covering up, suppressing, and fabricating news for partisan reasons.

New Reports

Seth was the source of the leaks according to investigators. Its time we remove false conspiracy theories now. Heldjohn (talk) 22:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cite reliable sources, please. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"according to investigators". Investigators? Where are they from? Who do they work for? What are their qualifications? Where has this been reported? What is the source or what are the sources?
And "remove false conspiracy theories"? Well, the following sources - Reuters News Service, CNN, Infowars, and the Washington Times - all state that claims about Seth Rich's supposed involvement in the leaks are false.
So. The article's present information is truthful, factual, and verifiable. Seth Rich was not the source of the leaks. Are there any reliable sources for the claims/assertions about these supposed "New Reports"? No? Didn't think so. Shearonink (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Assange nodding

The small little tidbit of info pertaining to Assange "nodding" needs to be removed. It's very clear that Assange was nodding to the interviewer, but due to a lag (consistent in the rest of the video), it appears that he nodded to the claim presented. The source itself is unbound and clearly open to interpretation (I know, this applies to me too). It should be worded to something else, such as "When asked directly whether Rich was a source, Assange said "we don't comment on who our sources are".Letmejustcorrectthatforyou (talk) 09:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

add Rohrabacher ?

In a phone interview with Yahoo News, Rohrabacher said his goal during the meeting was to find proof for a widely debunked conspiracy theory: that WikiLeaks’ real source for the DNC emails was not Russian intelligence agents, as U.S. officials have since concluded, but former DNC staffer Seth Rich, who was murdered on the streets of Washington in July 2016 in what police believe was a botched robbery.

per Rohrabacher confirms he offered Trump pardon to Assange for proof Russia didn't hack DNC email by Michael Isikoff Yahoo News February 20, 2020 X1\ (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]