Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 16: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎DWTD: comment
Nominating [Cross-sibling]]
Line 8: Line 8:
-->
-->
<!-- Add new entries directly below this line. -->
<!-- Add new entries directly below this line. -->
====Cross-sibling====
*<span id="Cross-sibling">{{no redirect|1 = Cross-sibling }}</span> → [[:Sibling#Cross]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Talk:Cross-sibling|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Cross-sibling|links]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cross-sibling&action=history history] <b>·</b> [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-07-17&end=2020-08-15&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Cross-sibling stats])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Cross-sibling|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Cross-sibling]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Cross-sibling|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Cross-sibling]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:Cross-sibling|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Cross-sibling]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;

'''Delete''' Term does not exist, it keeps being removed from the [[sibling]] article as there are no citations that show that it is anything other than an invented term between two interviewed siblings.
:{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/dec/28/shes-my-sister-from-another-mister-cross-siblings|title=She's my sister from another mister!|last=Butterfield|first=Janelle|date=2013-12-28|website=the Guardian|quote=Jess is actually my cross-sister, a technical term it has taken us the 13 years since we met to coin.}}
This clearly indicated that this is an invented term, and not one that at the time of the interview was used by others, and is the only citation that I can find for this term [[Special:Contributions/198.151.8.4|198.151.8.4]] ([[User talk:198.151.8.4|talk]]) 23:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

====IMDB scandal====
====IMDB scandal====
*<span id="IMDB scandal">{{no redirect|1 = IMDB scandal }}</span> → [[:1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Talk:IMDB scandal|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/IMDB scandal|links]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IMDB_scandal&action=history history] <b>·</b> [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-07-17&end=2020-08-15&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=IMDB_scandal stats])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:IMDB scandal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#IMDB scandal]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:IMDB scandal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#IMDB scandal]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:IMDB scandal|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#IMDB scandal]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;
*<span id="IMDB scandal">{{no redirect|1 = IMDB scandal }}</span> → [[:1Malaysia Development Berhad scandal]] <span>&nbsp;<span class="plainlinks lx">([[Talk:IMDB scandal|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/IMDB scandal|links]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IMDB_scandal&action=history history] <b>·</b> [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-07-17&end=2020-08-15&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=IMDB_scandal stats])</span></span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<small class="plainlinks"><nowiki>[</nowiki>&nbsp;Closure:&nbsp;''{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:IMDB scandal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#IMDB scandal]] closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:IMDB scandal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#IMDB scandal]] closed as retarget}}}} retarget]<span class="sysop-show">/[{{fullurl:IMDB scandal|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}#IMDB scandal]] closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]</span>}}''&nbsp;]</small>&nbsp;

Revision as of 23:41, 16 August 2020

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 16, 2020.

Cross-sibling

Delete Term does not exist, it keeps being removed from the sibling article as there are no citations that show that it is anything other than an invented term between two interviewed siblings.

Butterfield, Janelle (2013-12-28). "She's my sister from another mister!". the Guardian. Jess is actually my cross-sister, a technical term it has taken us the 13 years since we met to coin.

This clearly indicated that this is an invented term, and not one that at the time of the interview was used by others, and is the only citation that I can find for this term 198.151.8.4 (talk) 23:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB scandal

Delete Borderline case, but because IMDB redirects to IMDb, I think this could lead to WP:SURPRISE that this does not relate to a scandal at the entertainment database owned by Amazon. 1MDB scandal points correctly, of course. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greek organization

Should this be retargeted to Fraternities and sororities? It seems that the current target talks more about organizations outside of college campuses, and they don't necessarily use Greek letters. —Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 02:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

🍜

Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

I would like to reopen my discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20#🍜. I realized that typing "🍜" in Google search gives many results for its use as Ramen. On social media also, this emoji used for Ramen. I also looked at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 6#🥘, and the 🥘 emoji redirects to Paella#In popular culture. So, analogously, 🍜 should also redirect to Ramen#In popular culture. Neel.arunabh (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon One

Reopening this RfD for clearer consensus. Retarget to Dragon 1 (disambiguation). Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 08:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kiwi sticker

I'm not sure that a price look-up code is known as a "kiwi sticker", or that a kiwi sticker is a price look-up code. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:34, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Volkswagen ID

Volkswagen plans to use the ID brand on other future electric models not just the ID3 but there is also a ID4 that already has a article 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to set index since there are multiple models using this. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Achillea ambrosiaca

The plants wikiproject prefers red-links to non-existent species articles. - Dank (push to talk) 20:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per project preference and WP:RED. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DWTD

"DWTD" redirects to "Deal with the Devil (disambiguation)" on Wikipedia, but when I searched up "DWTD" on Google, it defaults the results as Dumb Ways to Die. Seventyfiveyears at 13:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - seems to be a valid redirect. Google's search algorithms results don't really matter on WP. But even on their results there are several other possible uses for this acronym.Onel5969 TT me 14:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Petitions

Currently links to Wikipedia:List of petitions; would be better pointed to (the relevant clause of) Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:05, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 2nd Silverstone Formula 2 round

Requesting redirect deletion to promote article creation (WP:RfD#D10)
SSSB (talk) 10:26, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neon genis evangellion

Miscapitalized and a double misspelling. The first misspelling is too implausible. Also nominating another miscapitalized + implausible misspelling combo. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Family Jewels (American Horror Story)

As far as I can tell, no element of the television series American Horror Story has ever been titled "The Family Jewels". -- /Alex/21 08:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Bishop-Henchman

Delete: The redirect points to a section on the subject's election as LNC chair, which includes no substantial biographical information about the subject. The redirect should be deleted to allow for the existence of a red link to encourage article creation. — Tartan357  (Talk) 22:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Given that the subject is currently the national chair of a national polititical party, he is likely to be searched on Wikipedia. So it is useful for his name to be included as a search term. Also, there is legitimate potential for article creation (given that he arguably meets the criteria of WP:NPOL already and the past half-dozen or so LNC chairs have articles), and a red link is not a necessity for encouraging article creation. Sal2100 (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect you created points to a short paragraph on the election that contains no biographical information on the subject. The fact that he is notable is exactly why we should have a red link; so that people will see that an article does not yet exist. Having blue links obscures that fact. You have not explained why the paragraph you've linked to is an appropriate redirect; you've simply stated that you want a redirect (possibly any redirect) to exist. This is not the place to argue generally against the usefulness of red links. — Tartan357  (Talk) 03:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hej (interjection)

Kill it. WP:FORRED. (I'm about to put a soft redirect at the target to Wiktionary anyway; this doesn't even warrant that much). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 05:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drug busting

Delete per the RfD discussion for Drug bust, which closed as "delete". Drug busts aren't mentioned at the current target, and it seems that other suitable targets don't exist. Not a very active user (talk) 04:31, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Flux

This redirect has pointed to Template:Current since 2005 but has only 17 transclusions, so is essentially unused. I recently created Template:Fluctuation formatter with shortcuts {{Fluctuation}} and {{Fluc}}. To avoid having to place a hatnote at {{Current}}, I'd like to substitute out the very few uses of this and change the target to {{Fluctuation formatter}}. (I'd be happy to place a hatnote at {{Fluctuation formatter}} if you think anyone might still remember the old target, but that seems unlikely.) {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't have a strong opinion here, but I'm more inclined to let that be deleted and save the name for potential future uses that may have something to do with the concept of flux, rather than use it for something different that has a similar name. – Uanfala (talk) 16:30, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]