User talk:Atlantis77177: Difference between revisions
→Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!: new section |
→Reliable sources: new section |
||
Line 309: | Line 309: | ||
{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse|[[Jack Dawson (fictional character)]] |ts=[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)}} |
{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse|[[Jack Dawson (fictional character)]] |ts=[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)}} |
||
== Reliable sources == |
|||
It's great fun trying to edit the [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources]] list isn't it? I had a good few goes myself recently. From the commentary and the discussion, I reckon that 'generally unreliable' is a more appropriate classification than 'no consensus'. I have amended the entry appropriately, but should you disagree, feel free to undo my change. [[Special:Contributions/86.140.67.152|86.140.67.152]] ([[User talk:86.140.67.152|talk]]) 13:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:59, 13 November 2020
October 2020
Hello, I'm AviationFreak. An edit you recently made to Daniel Cormier seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AviationFreak💬 04:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Assassin7177, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Assassin7177! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 20 October 2020 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:Karikku has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Salimfadhley (talk) Thanks for helping me out friend. I am truly grateful to you. I have made 2 corrections as you told me to do. But won't removing the entire cast list make the article too small. Should I look for a strong source or should I delete it. Assassin7177 (talk)
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Assassin7177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
AfC notification: Draft:Karikku has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
AfC notification: Draft:Karikku has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Assassin7177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Karikku (October 26)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karikku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karikku, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Draft title
There was no need to move Draft:Karikku to Draft:Karikku (Web Series) ; there is no article called "Karikku" so a disambiguation of the title is unnecessary. In addition, what the draft is called is not that important since it is not part of the encyclopedia – but since the draft and the article Karikku have a history with multiple deletions it is preferrable to stick to that title, to avoid misunderstandings. I have moved it back for you. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 17:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Karikku has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Work is important, but it can be important for various reasons
In Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#My article was declined (permalink), you wrote This
[that is, asking for an explaintion of why Draft:Karikku was declined] is really important for me
.
I am curious, why is it important to you?
Actually, don't answer that. It's a rhetorical question. However, YOU need to know why it is important to you. YOU need to know if you are "too closely connected" to the subject to write about it objectively, with a neutral point of view. It is best to avoid writing on topics that you feel strongly about or which you cannot be objective about for whatever reason.
Please also read WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Paid editing disclosure. If you have a conflict of interest with respect to this or any other topic you write about, it is highly recommended that you follow that guideline. It is also highly recommended that you disclose any conflicts of interest you have. Failure to follow these rules is very likely to make editing Wikipedia a very frustrating experience for you.
If the paid editing disclosure applies to you, you must follow the rules outlined on that page. It is not optional. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
You have already been asked about conflict of interest. I will point out that when an editor is as disruptively persistent in asking to have a draft approved, many editors assume that they probably are being paid, and that they are in a hurry to have the article approved so that they can be paid. That is exactly how some of us are viewing your questions. What is especially annoying and suspicious is asking other editors to edit your draft for you so that it will be accepted (and then you will perhaps be paid for the unpaid work of volunteers). You are being disruptive and are likely to be topic-banned or blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
I apologize if I have committed a mistake (talk). It was just personal interest that drove me to this topic and nothing else, and it was just the passion to get it published, for many others, who support Karikku like me that drove me to try to know more
please stop
If a reviewer considers the subject likely to be notable they will approve it. Please do not post about it on my tallk p. again. DGG ( talk ) 15:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Karikku has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
AfC notification: Draft:Karikku has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
AfC notification: Draft:John Toffan has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Your submission at Articles for creation: John Toffan has been accepted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Arthur H. Warner moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Arthur H. Warner, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 06:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Karikku
@Jstalins: Jstalins talk I am a new editor and I created a new article on the malayalam youtube channel- Karikku. An AFC editor who was impressed by my article, but did not know about the relevant sources used in it, asked it as a question in Wikiproject India. He recieved two indirect but positive responses, and is waiting for more. Please give your valuable comments at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#I need a notability check here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#I_need_a_notability_check_here)
AfC notification: Draft:Karikku has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
- Summary: The draft is in the process of being accepted. It is on hold because the target page is "create protected." I have asked the administrator who protected it to remove the protection. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Karikku has been accepted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
List of Bengaluru FC records moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of Bengaluru FC records, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. The sources do not support the claims in the article.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 23:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Georgina Rodriguez moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Georgina Rodriguez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Please also read Wikipedia's guidelines on notability - the WP:DAILYMAIL and The Sun aren't generally considered reliable enough for Wikipedia's purposes. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Seagull123 Φ 17:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Also, there is already a draft article for this person at Draft:Georgina Rodriguez. Seagull123 Φ 17:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgina Rodriguez (model) (November 7)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Georgina Rodriguez (model) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Georgina Rodriguez (model), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
November 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Order of the Phoenix (fictional organisation). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Template:Z187 Captain Calm (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgina Rodriguez (model) (November 8)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
Your thread has been archived
![]() |
Hi Atlantis77177! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Your contributed article, Jack Dawson (Fictional Character)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Jack Dawson (Fictional Character). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jack Dawson (fictional character). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jack Dawson (fictional character). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Praxidicae (talk) 16:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/WP_teahouse_logo_3.png/40px-WP_teahouse_logo_3.png)
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Reliable sources
It's great fun trying to edit the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources list isn't it? I had a good few goes myself recently. From the commentary and the discussion, I reckon that 'generally unreliable' is a more appropriate classification than 'no consensus'. I have amended the entry appropriately, but should you disagree, feel free to undo my change. 86.140.67.152 (talk) 13:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)