Jump to content

User talk:Mahijaat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mahijaat (talk | contribs) at 08:23, 14 March 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mahijaat (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do not have any active account other than this account Mahi Choudhary Falka was my account I lost access to This is why I created a MahiJaat account Mahijaat (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I do not have any active account other than this account Mahi Choudhary Falka was my account I lost access to This is why I created a MahiJaat account [[User:Mahijaat|Mahijaat]] ([[User talk:Mahijaat#top|talk]]) 08:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I do not have any active account other than this account Mahi Choudhary Falka was my account I lost access to This is why I created a MahiJaat account [[User:Mahijaat|Mahijaat]] ([[User talk:Mahijaat#top|talk]]) 08:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I do not have any active account other than this account Mahi Choudhary Falka was my account I lost access to This is why I created a MahiJaat account [[User:Mahijaat|Mahijaat]] ([[User talk:Mahijaat#top|talk]]) 08:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}


Hello, Mahijaat, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Thank Mahijaat (talk) 12:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaon Dastak (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mahijaat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article Writer

Article Writer Mahijaat (talk) 12:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Pooja Bishnoi.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pooja Bishnoi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Pooja Bishnoi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.facebook.com/poojabishnoi36/photos/a.803990186416032/1524396521042058/?type=1&theater. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Pooja Bishnoi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Same content (under same title) currently in draft space has been declined multiple times, author fails to make any improvements.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bingobro (Chat) 06:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of AFC notices

Hey there, on multiple occasions it has been told to you to not remove said AFC notices. Even in the syntax of the notices it says "do not remove this line" . It is disruptive to not follow a simple and straight forward guideline. If you believe that removing the notices enhances the chances of the draft being accepted you're mistaken, remember an AFC reviewer always checks the page history. Also, simply copy-pasting the draft to the main space is not going to help either. Bingobro (Chat) 06:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaon Dastak (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Gaon Dastak. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Mahijaat it is very disruptive of you to remove maintenance templates and notices from the pages you have created, you not acknowledging these messages on your talk page may show that you're not interested in communicating with others and learning about how WP works, this makes me feel that you're trying to fly under the radar and game the system. I'd advise you to go through WP:RS and WP:GNG for your articles and start asking questions and seek help at WP:TH. Bingobro (Chat) 07:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

धन्यवाद। मैं अपनी गलती को स्वीकार करता हूं, बस मेरे द्वारा लिखे गए लेख की जांच करें और मुझे बताएं कि गॉन दस्तक के लेख में क्या कमी है

Mahijaat (talk) 13:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(replying in hi) आपके द्वरा लिखे गए लेख मे कोइ खास कमी नही है, बात सिर्फ यह है कि फिल्हाल गाँव दस्तक शायद प्रसिद्ध नही है, परंतु इस्का यह अर्थ नही है कि गाँव दस्तक आने वाले समय मे भी प्रसिद्ध नही होगा। ‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍Bingobro (Chat) 14:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I accept my mistake, just check the article written by me and tell me what is lacking in the Gaon Dastak article Mahijaat (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you responded, fyi I have restored the notability tag on the article, as of now Gaon Dastak is a relatively new media outlet aimed primarily at rural news, it could still take some time to meet WP:GNG or WP:NME. If more independent and reliable sources are available you should add them to the article. Never take these messages/notices personally and feel free to ask for suggestions from experienced editors on their talk pages or the tea house. You are free to communicate with me in either English or Hindi over here. Thank you! Bingobro (Chat) 14:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Gaon Dastak. This was told to you multiple times, on Draft:Pooja Biahnoi, twice by me, twice by TheBirdShedsTears. You "accepted" your mistake and now less than 24 hours later you've removed the tag again. Bingobro (Chat) 12:32, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding newspaper notability

Hi Mahijaat, hope you are doing well and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. You removed maintenance tag twice from Gaon Dastak, an article created by yourself. Kindly note that thescoopbeats.com, livehindikhabar.in and thenews-tv.com are unreliable sources, however twocircles.net is a reliable source but unfortunately, its source has been written by Suprakash Majumdar, a freelance journalist who write articles if deliberately requested by the involved party. The rest of the sources are trivial mention which adds no value to notability. Please refer to the guidelines for relevant notability criteria and newspaper notability requirements. Please see also WP:V, WP:COI, WP:IS and WP:SOAPBOX and more importantly please see WP:TOOSOON. Regards TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

गांव दस्तक का इंटरव्यू इरफान मेहराज द्वारा लिया गया । ग्रामीण भारत में गांव दस्तक की लोकप्रियता को देखते हुए। अब आप वापस Notability का ठप्पा लगाओ या फिर पेज को भी हटा दो, उससे मेरी कोई शिकायत नही है आपसे। Mahijaat (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahijaat, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your sermons started to sound strange

I can give very little time to this one of my accounts. What will you make another account for

And I do not like to reply to anyone again and again

Get an inquiry or close an account Mahijaat (talk) 16:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't take this personally. You may address the issue or raise your concern at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahijaat in Comments by other users section. Happy editing TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also Defending yourself against claims

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:10, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gaon Dastak moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gaon Dastak, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Gaon Dastak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bingobro (Chat) 03:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Mahi Choudhary falka per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahi Choudhary falka. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]