User talk:Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan

Welcome!

Hello, Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vought F4U Corsair did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. BilCat (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Fat Controller

Greetings. I am asking you to please stop linking to British people on the infobox, as it is completely unnecessary per MOS:OVERLINK – "What generally should not be linked [...] nationalities and ethnicities". Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Next Bob The Builder Show

Will Bob the Builder come back for a next Bob the Builder show? I am hoping that the original designs of Bob the Builder can come back and both Mattel Television and WildBrain will both produce it and Jam Filled Toronto will animate it. 2601:CC:4300:660:4452:D641:D48:A4D3 (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daisy the Diesel Railcar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daisy the Diesel Railcar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jenyire2 20:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy the Diesel Railcar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daisy the Diesel Railcar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Fat Controller, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You've been asked many, many times to read WP's guidelines on overlinking, and why "British people" should be not linked in the infobox. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at North American T-28 Trojan. BilCat (talk) 01:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Curtiss SB2C Helldiver, you may be blocked from editing. Template:Z188 Nigel Ish (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chilean Navy, you may be blocked from editing. Template:Z188 Nigel Ish (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vought F4U Corsair, you may be blocked from editing. Stop posting false information to articles. If you continue to make disruptive edits like you have to these artucles then you are liable to have editing privileges withdrawnTemplate:Z188 Nigel Ish (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bob the Builder: A Christmas to Remember moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bob the Builder: A Christmas to Remember, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:13, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy (Bob the Builder) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wendy (Bob the Builder), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:16, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chilean Navy. You continue to insert false information into articles. Chile did not take part in the First World War, as I am sure that you know, and Chile did not operate all these aircraft that you insist in adding Chile as an operator. Stop doing this or I suspect that your next block will be much longer.Template:Z189 Nigel Ish (talk) 17:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agustin, I have over a dozen books specifically devoted to the Corsair, others where the Corsair is included, and periodicals which have articles on it. None state that it served with Chile. Please do not add that assertion again, unless you have a reliable source specifically stating that assertion. Kablammo (talk) 17:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Do we need another block? BilCat (talk) 22:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat: Well, I was working and unable to respond at the time. And it looks like he found something else to work on. So let's hope he stays on that course. But, if he doesn't, yeah, I'd support another block. Daniel Case (talk) 01:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tugs (TV series)‎, you may be blocked from editing. User has been warned multiple times for overlinking. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pilatus PC-7. Template:Z189 BilCat (talk) 02:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Kralizec! (talk) 12:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Clarence (American TV series). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 00:49, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NatGertler. An edit that you recently made to The Lawnmower Man seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!Template:Z191 Nat Gertler (talk) 02:32, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mooshroom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mooshroom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mooshroom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to add unsourced information

You have been warning many times previously, and even blocked previously, for continually adding unsourced material to Wikipedia as you did here.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 20:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Vought F4U Corsair, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Template:Z190 BilCat (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has vandalized after warnings multiple times, including inserting unsupported and false information into the Corsair article, claiming that the Chilean Navy had Corsairs. And those claims are not even consistent with each other. This editor should be permanently blocked. Kablammo (talk) 01:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Editor is definitely WP:NOTHERE. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 17:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Agustin Sepulveda Venegas 2004 Fan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need to edit Wikipedia again, and do not block me again, please

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I need to edit Wikipedia again, and do not block me again, please |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I need to edit Wikipedia again, and do not block me again, please |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I need to edit Wikipedia again, and do not block me again, please |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}