User talk:Serols

Eleni Gabre-Madhin page

Hello Serols, please understand all recent changes made to the Eleni Gabre-Madhin Page were made by Eleni Gabre-Madin herself. The last paragraph in her career section was added in the previous few days and is defamatory and vandalistic in nature, it is also based on unproven and alleged claims and against an accomplished entrepreneur/celebrity. The content itself does not pertain to her actual career but is a recent outburst and scapegoating from what is a tense and divided political climate in Ethiopia. Specific details within the paragraph are inaccurate, such as "The meeting was intended to topple Abiy's government and masterminding transitional government," which was disproven by meeting organizers in a statement. Other statements are unrelated and vilifying such as the searching of her house, which is common practice in Ethiopia in the current political landscape, being linked to the video meeting.

Keeping this content on the page demonstrates a clear bias towards a particular political view in Ethiopia which is highly divisive and damaging, nor does it fall under Wikipedia's guidelines of presenting neutral and unbiased information. Similar unproven information spread on other platforms has led to death threats, sexism, and harassment towards Eleni Gabre-Madhin and her family. Kindly remove this paragraph and allow Eleni Gabre-Madhin to edit her own page.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D, edits without sources will be deleted, Likewise, unfounded deletions are restored (with sources). If the text sections are not correct, she should use the discussion page. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eddy de Jongh page

Please note that all the recent changes made to the page 'Eddy de Jongh' have been made by Eddy de Jongh himself. These changes are all but unconstructive as they correct a number of mistakes and provide more information. Moreover, I've included a selected bibliography. 'Book chapters should actually read 'articles', as that is what they are first and foremost. Please do not bar me from editing my own page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2001:1C02:2F23:EE00:F8CB:6810:7BD3:586D, please use sources. --Serols (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I left all sources intact in the 'career' section, bar one, which accompanied a sentence that made little sense.

As for the bibliography, every single entry there is a source in and of itself, so how can the use of sources be a problem of the editing I did (which consisted mostly of correcting a number of details)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A45F:869A:1:45CF:5948:4757:4946 (talk) 20:08, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In actual fact, you were so quick to undo changes made, you cannot possibly have come to the substantiated conclusion this page was being violated. You probably even failed to see that the final adjustments were made to parts of the page I myself had uploaded only a few hours earlier.

For your information, this page was created by Crispulop (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crispulop), who even states the following on his page: Since 2015 I started writing pages on first the Spinoza Prize winners and subsequently members Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW). As of early I have created over 100 articles. I am not even really interested in academics, I think I just liked that the notability of KNAW members is very clear per Wikipedia:Notability (academics). So if you feel you can improve on those articles, please do! --2A02:A45F:869A:1:11DA:C3BD:FA6F:AF22 (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, such edits do not make sense at Wikipedia.en. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Venedykt Aleksiychuk

Even though official Church communications will often transliterate the bishop's name from Ukrainian (i.e. "Venedykt"),his eparchy's offical style is to translate his name into English (i.e. "Benedict"), he also self-signs official documents with the "Benedict" nomenclature. I think the Wiki should reflect his personal style and his eparchy's style. julianhayda (talk) 4 August July 2021

Hello julianhayda, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names, thanks. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello i'm </MrDDBOI>

thanks for you help and i hope many should procces more with guide on via any desk. MrDDBOI (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

I don't understand Why do you call it greco buddhist art And gandharan art The article seems to be a victim of eurocentrism Indian art is not derived from Greece Please stop this bias.. IRONCULT117 (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IRONCULT117, this is unsourced and the wrong place and her you deleted Greco-Buddhist art, this is the article name. Please underclass such changes --Serols (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For undoing vandals edits as they pop up. For whatever reason I thought you were an admin but clearly you're not and simply just another vandal fighter. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect reverasal of my contribution.

Dear Serols, your reversal was incorrect. I changed the name Mtwara Rural to Mtwara District as per 2012 Census by the National Bereau of Statistics.

recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mtwara Rural

please restore the change I made , thanks. Khalidsalewa (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Khalidsalewa, please note aticle title and Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Important is also to use sources. I will not take the change back. I hope you did not make these changes anymore. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serols. So The user 97.101.193.162 has Vandalised assault rifle list, attacks your talk page and false accused me.

Please voice your concerns at WP:ANI instead, and please provide evidence in form of diff links when doing so. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

So The user 97.101.193.162 has attacked and made a lot of vandalism, and used false accuse against me, and attacked your talk page. He said Freak Off although swearing can be hashtagged. 97.101.193.162 has swear using bad words, so thanks for saving your talk page. So I removed the edit from 97.101.193.162 because he broke rules like false accuse & vanalism. Serol, You saved the day. You’re a hero in Wikipedia. Actually 97.101.193.162 got blocked from 2 months. Well that’s true. I’m sure about it. You’re destroying vandalism. If You sign my comment, then thank you for signing it. I’m here to trust you. By: User 101.127.139.158

Hello 101.127.139.158, thank you for the information and your friendly words. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:40, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You’re Welcome Serols :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.127.139.158 (talk) 01:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks Like 97.101.193.162 is deleting blocks for no reason so he got blocked for 3 months. His block timing increased for removing a block for no reasons. Sign my comment so I can eventually be helping you. Big update at the date:17 October 2021. By:2406:3003:2002:57:11da:1ced:a437:57a2

Hello, this is user 97.101.193.162. I'm contacting you to report user 101.127.139.158 and his alternate IP 2406:3003:2002:57:11DA:1CED:A437:57A2. This user has spent the last 24 hours harassing me and claims to have the power to "Block" me for disruptive editing. I have already reported him to the Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism page, yet he continues to harass me. Can you do anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.193.162 (talk) 11:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

If anyone fits the description "Defender of the Wiki" and "Tireless Contributor" at the same time, it's you. You seem to be patrolling recent changes 24/7! Thank you very much for your tireless work in defending the encyclopedia against spam, vandalism and other policy violations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~ ToBeFree, many many thanks. Have a nice Sunday. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 12:42, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

Hi so I see that you removed my edit to the skara Wikipedia page and I see you are talking about my spelling can you tell me what I spelled wrong and what was bad about my grammar and give me advice to improve Wikilover126 (talk) 14:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikilover126, please use upper and lower case. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will try to improve that Wikilover126 (talk) 14:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok done is it now good?

P.S. I added citation’s in case if that might be needed Wikilover126 (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikilover126, its ok now. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read pages before editing them

You evidently did not read the page before making this edit. You have failed to reach your intended audience.

Have a day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.228.78.75 (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 207.228.78.75, more edits like [1] this] you risk to block. --Serols (talk) 15:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted criticism of your actions here, so 47 of your edits have been reverted. Keep fighting against anonymous IP addresses, and stay irrelevant! 207.228.78.5 (talk) 13:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shakespeare's influence

Hey Serols,

Regarding your message on my talk page and the edit I made to Shakespeare's influence, I did put my reasoning for removing the infobox in the edit summary (specifically that 1] other similar articles such as Religious views of William Shakespeare and Reputation of William Shakespeare do not contain an person infobox as they are not biography articles and 2] that the main article's infobox and this articles box are different and will continue to drift out of sync with one another).

Do you think that my edit summary was too brief or that I should have brought it up on the talk page first (I couldn't see any discussion there on this and don't think there was a particular consensus around keeping it) Cakelot1 (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cakelot1, please do not delete the infobox, the box contains important information. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is that this information in the infobox is an almost duplicate of the infobox on the main page (compare William Shakespeare with Shakespeare's influence). It dosn't seem usful to have a duplicated slightly incorrect biographical infobox on a non-biographical page. I'll probably bring it up on the talk page to see what others think of removing it. Cakelot1 (talk) 13:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edmund Nagle

Hi, thanks for rollbacking the additions to Edmund Nagle while I sat there staring at the page wondering what I should do. Thought I'd note that while you labelled it as unsourced content it was also a straight rip of this website. Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pickersgill-Cunliffe, with specification of the source, the editing would be ok. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already solved the problem of "Spanish-Catalan"

Hello Serols:

I am writing you this message to tell you that I re-edited the articles of Catalan politicians and I was successful. This time I used the consensus formula: "Spanish politician from Catalonia" and nobody reversed my edits.

Personally, I think that the other users who edited those articles and who insisted that only the term "Catalan" be used is because those users are in favor of the Catalan independence ideology. And I think it is very likely that those users know the consensus but prefer to ignore it.

I think that Wikipedia content should be neutral and not influenced by the political ideology of the users. I think that the consensus formula is quite neutral.

Here I send you the link to one of my editions so that you can see the explanation that I used in the edition summary:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1047293241

Greetings Aziyade Gil (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aziyade Gil, thanks for the information. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About The Ice Cream Man page

I apologize if I messed up your work on it. I was only trying to add the cover image. I'm new to Wikipedia editing and would like to fix the issues I caused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halyna11 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About The Ice Cream Man page pt2

I would like to help fix it, as long as there's a way to add the cover image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halyna11 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Halyna11, the cover image does not exist, otherwise I would have inserted it. If you work something, please use the button Show changes, before you publish the editing. Please ask me, if you need help. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Serols reported by User:ToBeFree (Result: ). Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~ ToBeFree, thank you for informing me. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RFPP Decline and Query

Hi Serols,

I just declined your RFPP request about Quranism. I obviously first looked at the most recent set of large removals by an IP, and I was wondering why you a) reverted them stating unexplained content removal when they had edit summaries and b) reported it as vandalism.

I also checked back a few days further, and while there are clearly content disagreements, I couldn't spot clearcut vandalism, please feel free to point out if incorrect Nosebagbear (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nosebagbear, thank you for informing me. If it is ok for you, it's that for me too. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2.97.230.9

Hi Serols. I'm confused. This IP made an unconstructive edit at 14:10 UTC and you gave the IP a uw-vandal3 at 14:11 UTC, but then reported them to AIV a minute later despite the IP having made no further edits. It's not the first time I've seen you do this but I'm often on my phone. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell, the last vandalism edit was 14:45 UTC, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But you miss my point. They made that edit as I was typing (and I've now blocked the IP), and after you reported them to AIV. At the time you made the AIV report, they hadn't edited since the warning you gave them. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:33, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell, please see the edit history, the IP has made vandalism edits in three hours, there would have been more, what happened. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:41, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm familiar with their edit history. What I don't understand is why you warned them, and then reported them to AIV before they made another edit. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell, I do not understand your problem. The IP had three warnings after three vandalism edits 1 2 3 in two hours, two of them from me, so I reported that. After that came the fourth 4. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you gave the third warning for the third edit (fine), but then reported them to AIV a minute later before they made any other edits. I don't understand why you would escalate to AIV before the IP edits again.

Hello HJ Mitchell, please sign your comments.

Take a look at it from another side: If the IP had been blocked after the third warning, would not have given the fourth vandalism edit anymore. I think in Wikipedia there is enough vandalism, since you would not have been needed. The discussion is finished for me. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You always revert something like vandalism edits! TylerMagee (talk) 15:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

jesus christ, stop reverting vandalism so fast, I can't keep up! Every time I go to revert something, you've already done it. 9yz (talk) 18:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 9yz, I'm doing it slower now. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		Keep up the good work on RC Patrol! Mako001 (talk) 13:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For reverting vandalism when you encounter it. For whatever reason I thought you were an admin but it appears you are not. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand Can u help me on creating a Bio !!

I agree Princejoel44 (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Princejoel44, see here -> Wikipedia:How to create a page. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar (or maybe 2) for you!

		The Admin's Barnstar
		You should be an admin! Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		So 2 admin stars should be good! Lopbunny69 (talk) 18:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve to be an admin so you get TWO admin barnstars! (how fitting!) Lopbunny69 (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting vandalism on thousands of articles I think so. Have a nice day. And oh... you got so many awards!!!! RainbowLover334148 (talk) 07:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yaqub-Har

[2] - maybe a bit harsh but there is no way they can edit that article sensibly at the moment. I couldn't think of a better word than "gibberish". Doug Weller talk 12:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doug Weller, you have made the best. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 13:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Clark Regarding Pacific White-Sided Dolphins Article

I made a change to the article on Pacific White-Sided Dolphins. The citation with the scientific name is NOAA Fisheries or https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/pacific-white-sided-dolphin

Ryan2021 (talk) 01:41, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ryan2021, this source is perfect. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

...recent edit summary, for my reversion. The link is dangerous as it stands. Better to have no link than an unsafe one. If you want, take the time to find a working link! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C700:558:EDC1:CD9B:658C:A37C (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link. Minkai^(rawr!)_{(see where I screwed up)} 16:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2601:246:C700:558:EDC1:CD9B:658C:A37C, your edit was ok. sorry for my revert. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry

I apologise for apparently vandalising the page. I’ve only just read your messages now and I’ve now realised what i’ve done. I just wanted to let you know that I’m sorry

Mr Fredericks 2A02:C7F:5027:4300:2026:D375:98AA:AC95 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please stop with your vandalism. --Serols (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian Soviet Republic

The user used sources from communist era writers. He also made fantastic claims, which are not supported by the sources. He elevated/highlighted sentences from the original context of his source, where it is enough to read and see the full context/ pages of his source which prove that his sentences are not represent the reality. --Kandallok (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The most stupid and misleading sentences can be found in the lead of the article.

For example, the war with Czechoslovakia and the establishment of Slovak Soviet Republic is a caesura in the chain of events. He stated that Czech Serbo-French and Romanian armies occupied territories because they fought aganst communism. False. Béla kun and his comrades were POWs in Russia, when Serbo-French Romanian and Czech forces started to occupy the territories of the liberal/capitalist First Hungarian Republic led by Count Mihály Károlyi. So the capitalist/Liberal Hungary lost around 75 % of its territory before the communist coup attempt and creation of Svoiet Republic. So the territorial occupation of neighbouring countries did not start as a war against communism, but simply for for territorial gain/occupation against the capitalist First Hungarian Republic.

He also stated that military officers supported the war. However they left the Red army (with their leader Aurel Stromfeld ) after the establishment of Slovak Soviet Republic. He also stated that everybody supported the communists, which is false, because the Communists government had no authority in the countriside, where the communist waged war against the people of the countryside, the so-called Red Terror (Hungary).He also failed to mention of the original name of the Republic, which is lost in the mistranslation.

--Kandallok (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all of your efforts to revert vandalism and make Wikipedia a better place! My Pants Metal (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For beating me to the revert button a ridiculous amount of times! Coolperson177 (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Recent Changes Barnstar
		SoNiC SpeEd!1!!!11! Lopbunny69 (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

	OBS
	Hi there, it's me cyax i just wanted to say that i'm sorry for talking aggressive, i've deleted the subject and the posts, and thank you for confirming my changes Cyax777 (talk) 19:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UK's education section

Howdy. Why deny Scotland a sub-section heading, when England, Wales & Northern Ireland have one? GoodDay (talk) 14:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GoodDay, your edit was a double, see here -> Main|Education in Scotland and Scotland. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The other three are doubles, too. GoodDay (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GoodDay, then try it again - as a heading. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:54, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for reporting 2607:FEA8:520:C3D0:3854:46C9:55CF:BA53, I was literally typing out a report of them to the AIV as I saw yours entered just above my typing. Teamwork makes the dream work! Have a cookie! Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 16:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minoan language editor

I've deleted ":��[Kiritja Juia]" and reverted back to the original dates. I've no idea what the first means, and I can't source 3000 BC. Doug Weller talk 16:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Posted to my talk page with their IP address claiming that's its real name. Doug Weller talk 16:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Serols

Thank you for your trying to make me know how to make changes legally! My informations aren't erronate and I can prove it ,if I must tell you from where I've taked this I'll tell you! 79.117.44.113 (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No idea what you want from me. --Serols (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is User:Minos Zakaria 12, the Minoan language editor. Doug Weller talk 16:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doug Weller, thanks for the information, now I know what the IP thought. Hope he will soon stop with the nonsense. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both IP and account have been blocked. He was insistent that he knew the name of the language of his ancestors. A bit like the guy I blocked who knew for sure he was a direct descendant of Jesus, he had the same DNA! Doug Weller talk 19:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doug Weller, do not understand why so many are resistant to warnings. The user really had many chances. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want anything from you!

I am not looking for money, I am just looking for justice and for the real informations about my ancestors! 79.117.44.113 (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish name

Because I was founding the Spanish name of his birthname Luis Felipe Calderón Blet. He was a Head Coach for Team Cuba in the Women's Volleyball in the year 2000. And he was a Volleyball player for men in 1972 in Munich. I was looking for translations in Spanish. I was checking his full name at: m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q11764142 72.69.243.12 (talk) 20:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 72.69.243.12, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Regards --Serols (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For battling vandalism and helping Wikipedia with your efforts! Severestorm28 (talk) 16:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Random question, but whats going on with your user page?

Just have never seen one like yours before. Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 16:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Th78blue, that was vandalism, so I can only edit the page. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page was vandalized? You can't revert it to whatever you want? Its YOUR user page! *shocked looking smiley face* Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 17:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Th78blue, no, vandalism edits by new users and IPs. I asked an admin, to locked the site for all. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Thanks. I didn't know you could do that. Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) 17:14, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reported an already blocked user

Hey! I noticed that you added a report to WP:AIV for a user that had previously already been reported and blocked. I would assume this was just a mistake using huggle but just figured I'd let you know. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blaze The Wolf, this was not a mistake, see his/her user talk page. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok. I was only telling you because as I said that same user was reported in this edit and was blocked shortly after. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edits

Hello. This is in response to edits reverted on the Cytokinetics article. I am working on this page to remove content in response to the template. The information about ongoing studies and trials does not fit with the Wikipedia content policies and sourcing WP:MEDRS. I will post this on your talk page as well and plan to continue to edit the page unless you have other suggestions. Thanks! FksUkvpG (talk) 16:51, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FksUkvpG, ok, but use please the comment line. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision rollback

I made an edit on the page Starfire and the edit was removed. It was similar to other listings on the Starfire page and I am not sure why it was removed 64.20.68.19 (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 64.20.68.19, the school has nothing to do with the word Starfire. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

African elephant

Hey Serols : thanks for checking this page!! I'm sure you noticed the many reverts by the now indefinitely blocked User:Reusensio. I wouldn't be surprised if this new editor is another sockpuppet of the same guy? – BhagyaMani (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BhagyaMani, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Super – BhagyaMani (talk) 16:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

removal of link because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia.

why is letting people know about the latest web applications seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia on web application article ... I don't understand the removal of my link what was inappropriate? the blog is relevant to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikientry99 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read Wikipedia's policy re WP:BLOGS. – BhagyaMani (talk) 08:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BhagyaMani, thank you for answering for me. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why is your user page deleted and protected

just wanna know Lopbunny69 (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lopbunny69, see here. --Serols (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But did you ever want a user page? – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 08:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AssumeGoodWraith, I do not need an user page. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent vandalism: vandals created the page too many times and so admins had to delete it and create-protect it—see the edit filter log and log for that page. Ethan Gaming 7640 16:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me! As a reward I present you this!

		All-Around Amazing Barnstar
		Thanks for telling me! Lopbunny69 (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal "Panorama.PL"

Sorry, I'm not experimenting here. It would be nice if you followed the real vandal. I inform you that user "Panorama.PL" and his sockpuppets is a particularly harmful and poisonous troll / vandal. All of his contributions are vandalism. Please see here [3] 2A01:C23:90F5:8700:7893:FFD0:BDD:B241 (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2A01:C23:90F5:8700:7893:FFD0:BDD:B241, sorry, but your edit was not ok, see here. Regards --Serols (talk) 11:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08.12.2021

I'm sorry, I mistakenly canceled your edit - I moved it back already.31.40.131.100 (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 31.40.131.100, it can happen. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accidentally reverted edit for BLP issues

Hey! Just figured I let you know but, while attempting to thank you for reverting an edit I accidentally clicked the RW button to revert an edit for BLP issues since it appeared right as I was hitting the thank button. I've since undone that edit with an edit summary explaining it was an accident. ― Blaze The Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blaze The Wolf, no problem, I have already happened to me. Regards --Serols (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion 2

LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Serols reported by User:ToBeFree (Result: ). Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Serols. Are you really not going to respond to the 3RR complaint? EdJohnston (talk) 15:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdJohnston, in my opinion, it was about a second opinion and that was communicated. The fact is that I have read this editing and accepted it. For me, this edit was the only one, that complied with the rules. Should I add that? I still believe that I did the right thing. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Serols, are you willing to explain at Talk:LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates the reasons for your reverts? What changes are you calling unsourced? (You made this revert on grounds of lack of source). I didn't notice either you or the IPv6 adding or removing any source, so possibly you are referring to some source that might be already in the article. EdJohnston (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdJohnston, the missing source message referred to because they were cross-dressing. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You removed 'cross-dressing' but left in place that the Singaporeans' conviction was 'for attempting to resemble women'? Do you see a difference? EdJohnston (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdJohnston, in this case I have to agree with you now, I overlooked that. Now my online time is over. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has been closed amicably and with semi-protection. Sorry for mostly talking about you instead of with you there; I was pretty frustrated. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~ ToBeFree , I've been active at Wikipedia for many years and think that in this time I will have contributed a lot to maintain the quality. During this time I also got to know many other users and IPs, including you, which are as well take care of Wikipedia very actively, each in his own way. I therefore regard these users and the IPs as colleagues, some as friends, and not as anonymous people.

Did I make mistakes during this time? Of course, after all, I'm not a robot and I think so No one is free from faults.

Let's take your example

The IP rightly removed sections as they did not contain any sources. Unfortunately, I didn't notice that until late, exactly after four reverts. Then I saved the article in my browser immediately under favorites and then apologized to the IP talk page. The aim was to enable the IP to be changed again or to undo my editing. I did everything to correct my mistake. Nevertheless, you reported me on the site, which I honestly found not very collegial.

You mention here a discussion with me on my talk page last year.

In the article mentioned, a user knowingly removed a critical section indicating the source. I don't think I am a wall. We both just had a different opinion on whether the editing was vandalism/disruptive. For me it was vandalism at the time, as the user tried to remove critical reporting. The user was then also blocked because of edit warring, personal attacks, and aspersions.

Since other users were also of my opinion, I do not find it appropriate to list this as another example for edit on my part.

Please do not see this as a criticism of yourself, I just want to state my point of view.

You write above Sorry for talking mostly about you instead of with you there; I was pretty frustrated.

Why were you frustrated? If you really wanted to talk to me, why not on my talk page? You are always welcome here. Wish you a nice week. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdJohnston, thank you very much for your help, your efforts and your time that you have invested for me. Wish you a nice week. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:42, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit To The Surname

Sir Why are you Deleting the Edit which is being Avaneep Singh Chandel (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Avaneep Singh Chandel, please use sources, spelling and please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A quarry

Thanks for sharing your valuable feedback i will try to make no further mistakes. But can you please tell me how can I publish about myself in Wikipedia pages. Moonlight writter (talk) 04:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Moonlight writter, see here: Wikipedia:How to create a page. Regards--Serols (talk) 14:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You have beaten me to reverting vandalism far too many times… good job. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 13:43, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tejas-Rajdhani Express

I removed informaation because I have created a new article containing the information Tejas-Rajdhani Express. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shark2433086 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shark2433086, please use the the comment line. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

New localization of artist's name - Skryptonite

You have undone my spelling fixes by the artist Skryptonite. You can notice that on services (for example, Spotify, YouTube) exactly this spelling is indicated - Skryptonite. In this regard, on Wikipedia, you must also indicate the correct spelling of the artist's name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musica36 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Musica36, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names and please use latin script. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

adding a citation

A paragraph needed a citation, so I added one. Why are you reverting?

This is why Wiki struggles for editors; these inane, random, and power tripping bots / mods. Keepflying1006 (talk) 08:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Keepflying1006, please use large and lower case, this is standard. Regards --Serols (talk) 08:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 15:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Stark "jgs"

Hi Serols. Not sure to understand why you've reverted my addition to Joan Stark page stating this edit as not constructive. As explained in the edit summary, I've contributed to the infobox and added an ASCII art autoportrait of the artist. Please explain further the problem.

Benoit rigaut (talk) 15:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Benoit rigaut, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Serols, I think you referring to my infobox name change, extending the artist name of the page title with "jgs", her artistic signature. I was not aware there was such a strict policy for page name = infobox name section. I'm publishing again without this change. Still, you'll see that the infobox name is Joan G. Stark and thus not exactly Joan Stark as the page name... Benoit rigaut (talk) 15:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Benoit rigaut, your edit is perfect now. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wrong information

Hello Serols

Someone is adding original content to the page Boussouar El Maghnaoui ([4]). 197.247.136.47 (talk) 20:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are still doing it. 197.247.128.9 (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 197.247.128.9, please use sources, without your edits are distruptiv. --Serols (talk) 18:12, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted ([5]) the distruption ([6]). Another account removed again the reliable sources ([7]) and another account added an unreliable sources and original content ([8] [9] [10]), I reverted them again [11] and they reverted me again without bringing any reliable sources [12], I reverted them again and explained the problem that they need to adress [13], they reverted again withou explaing anything [14] and started adding the unreliable source (Discogs) and they even removed a reliable source (telquel), I reverted them again with the same explanation [15], they reverted again [16] with no explanation and added a relibale source [17] where the author never talked about Boussouar's origins (page 24), I reverted them again end explained that Swedenburg didn't mention his origins [18] they reverted me again and told me to read the whole paper the thing that I already did [19], I reverted them again and told them that Swedenburg didn't mention his origins. 197.247.128.9 (talk) 21:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 197.247.128.9, please write a comment on the relevant article talk pages, this is the best way to proceed. Also a good point of contact Wikipedia:Help desk. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Serols: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

zhuya

Hello im wondering how u got that information about Zhuya cañar. 2601:447:C080:B050:1408:241E:E051:22FB (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2601:447:C080:B050:1408:241E:E051:22FB, please write what you want from me. --Serols (talk) 12:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

International Federation of Bodybuilding and Fitness

Hello, I am correcting errors that had occurred — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garciaherasjavier (talk • contribs) 13:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Garciaherasjavier, you have deleted the infobox, please use the preview. Regards --Serols (talk) 13:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Please change its name from Chakoora Pulwama to Chakora Pulwama. 2405:205:82:FE1A:2BFD:4A5F:5689:1224 (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 2405:205:82:FE1A:2BFD:4A5F:5689:1224, I do not do that, see Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. A well-intentioned warning from me, like this lead to a block. --Serols (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

To turbocharge you even more when reverting vandalism, enjoy it! Zippy (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For reverting Vandalism non-stop, I have been beaten by you over 10 times, I am going to have to compare your speed to CluebotNG soon. Zippy (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Badge of Shame

Respected Serols. You, are really senior to me, but still I am telling you this. Users can remove content from their talk page at their will, and there is nothing wrong in doing so. You reverted the edit, when the user removed the warning messages. However, that is not right. The warnings are not badges of shame. Plus, they can remove content from their talk page according to the talk page guidelines. So, is it justified in making that edit? Please correct me if I have said something wrong. Thanks and regards. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 10:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Itcouldbepossible, I know that he can do that. But sometimes it is necessary because the Huggle program starts from the beginning every time. This prevents an automatic message on Wikipedia: Administrator intervention against vandalism. Regards --Serols (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Really serols, I was busy with many other things at the Wikipedia.

Ok, I understand you. So, Huggle sends automatic messages to WP:AIV? Is it what you meant by This prevents an automatic message on Wikipedia: Administrator intervention against vandalism? I must know how Huggle works, because I have been granted rollback rights, and I need to use it properly. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 05:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Itcouldbepossible, see here (Manual:Huggle). Regards --Serols (talk) 16:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks serols. I was always trying to find such a manual. You are always great. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 03:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what i do wrong

why do you keep undoing my things? what i do wrong? can you tell me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamthebeseditor300 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, stop with vandalism and harassment. --Serols (talk) 19:39, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Huggle

Hey Serols! Since I often see you using HUggle I'd like some help figuring out how to use it myself. I used it a little bit last night, but I had a hard time understanding what I was looking at. One of the things I"d like help with setting up with Huggle is a filter to filter out soem of the good edits and show more bad edits (of course, even with the filter it isn't always bad). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blaze Wolf, see here (Manual:Huggle). Regards --Serols (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deonte Harris

My edits to Deonte Harris’s page are correct. He changed his last name to Harty around Christmas to honor his stepfather. It is a little ridiculous that my edits are repeatedly changed when this information is extremely simple to verify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylanstout39 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dylanstout39, if it's so easy to verify, then do that. Reliable, secondary sources please. Drmies (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dylanstout39, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. Regards --Serols (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

won’t let me reply with links, but i literally found 3 on the first page when i look this up. Dylanstout39 (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dylanstout39, I don't know what you mean--what page? And if something is not allowed (is that what you mean?), then it's probably some blacklisted site. Read WP:RS, please. Drmies (talk) 18:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Why did you removed my edits from the zoo? It was correct! Thanks! 2001:56A:7B14:CC00:DDF2:13F3:4A27:E79D (talk) 18:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]