Talk:Eggplant
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eggplant article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Etymology
Whether all the information added in this edit is correct, I don't know. But the information in the present version is clearly incorrect. The American English name "eggplant" is not derived from the French "aubergine". The plant seems to have been introduced to England from France, and was called "eggplant" because white or yellow cultivars produce fruits resembling eggs. When purple-fruited cultivars were introduced, the French "aubergine" seemed to be more appropriate; see the source given in the article, although this is only a website and not the best kind of source. Some of the edit needs to be retained. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- This definition deriving aubergine seems reasonable: "fruit of the eggplant" (Solanum esculentum), diminutive of auberge "a kind of peach," variant of alberge, from Spanish alberchigo "apricot". The "melongena" explanation from earlier today seemed unconvincing. I would trust your edited version, Peter. Suggest going ahead. --Zefr (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- The Online Etymology Dictionary is being misread in the current text. It reads (in a more helpful layout): 'aubergine (n.) : "eggplant," 1794, from French aubergine, "fruit of the eggplant" ...' It's saying that the meaning of "aubergine" is "eggplant", and the word "aubergine" is derived from the French word aubergine, which is the fruit of the eggplant. It's not saying that the English word "eggplant" is derived from the French word aubergine. I'll correct this bit. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:09, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eggplant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080310174529/http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/solanaceaesource/taxonomy/description-detail.jsp?spnumber=3819 to http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/projects/solanaceaesource/taxonomy/description-detail.jsp?spnumber=3819
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eggplant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150906230329/http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567 to http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eggplant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613160517/http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubs/PDF/C934.pdf to http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubs/PDF/C934.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Interspecific Hybrids
Taking this link from a recent edit: http://eggplantprebreeding.upv.es/Interspecific_hybrids.html Seeing if any of this info can or should be incorporated. Bod (talk) 18:27, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Here is the link to [1] Bod (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Evidence of the new hybrids being used? It was an unencylopedic entry, more work-in-progress than substance of actual implementation. Needs a review. --Zefr (talk) 18:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Salting and oil absorption
The BBC ref notwithstanding, there is no evidence for the idea that salting reduces the eggplant's ability to take up oil during cooking. It seems they've merely perpetuated an old wives' tale, which is now adopted into Wikipedia as "fact". Sorry, it's bunk. There are websites stating as much, including at least one I could find that did a side-by-side with salted and unsalted eggplant. 2607:FEA8:BFA0:47F:14AB:612E:A2B2:DE1D (talk) 06:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
- Copyedited in response, but you should try an edit with a better source which is needed for the paragraph. Salting may soften, but inhibiting the absorption of oil seems to be an illogical old kitchen tale. --Zefr (talk) 14:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Etymology and regional names
In the From Arabic into Iberia and beyond subheading under Etymology and regional names, bringella and bringiela are given as Portuguese forms of the word, even stating "the Portuguese form bringella was borrowed into a variety of other languages." I can't find a source for this and don't believe these two words to be Portuguese, especially bringella as ll is not typically used in that language. beringela is also stated to be an earlier form even though beringela is a current form in Portuguese. Unless sources can be found, bringella and bringiela should be replaced by beringela and/or berinjela. 79.76.160.2 (talk) 17:33, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Go ahead and make the change. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- I can't, the article is protected. 79.76.160.2 (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Marked it with Template:Dubious. --Error (talk) 03:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- I can't, the article is protected. 79.76.160.2 (talk) 10:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 November 2019
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
aubvergine 212.139.51.149 (talk) 09:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 11:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2020
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
include Malaysia, Singapore, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh instead of just South Asia.
Brinjal in Malaysia traced its root from Arabic via Portuguese Beringela Editeous (talk) 06:17, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 November 2020
The image with the caption "Protesters in Bangalore promote the diversity of non-genetically modified eggplants in India." should be removed. It is not illustrative of the article or useful in any way, and appears to exist for political purposes favouring an anti-GMO bias. 71.236.204.7 (talk) 13:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Done. I agree. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Culture section
A section on eggplants in culture could mention:
- Cide Hamete Benengeli
- the eggplant emoji
- The eggplants in Francisco Ibáñez's comics.
--Error (talk) 03:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Change to Oxford English or Commonwealth English
Everywhere that the various terms for this plant are used uses Commonwealth English or Oxford English as its standard except for the US. The current language tag refers to "eggplant" being the article's common name, therefore, US English is used. But the name is also used in other countries where Commonwealth English is used. The plant itself is native to South Asia, where Commonwealth English is standard. The first non-stub version of the article also used Oxford or Commonwealth English, so there's really no justification for this article using US English as its standard. Therefore, I propose it be changed (preferably to Oxford to keep it neutral, but Commonwealth is fine as well). Getsnoopy (talk) 18:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Except that this article is written in American English, thus the bias for "eggplant," and the plant and fruit are referred to hundreds of different names in its native South Asia, in addition to "brinjal." I also have my doubts that it's referred to as "aubergine" in India.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think that's the point I'm making: the topic has strong ties to South and East Asia anyway. Regardless, the original article was written in Commonwealth/Oxford English, so that should be restored. I think changing the canonical title of the article is another matter entirely, which I'm not bringing up here, so the proposal isn't to change it to "aubergine", for example. Getsnoopy (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- It would seem highly illogical to use Commonwealth/Oxford English for the text and have "eggplant" as the title. Best left as it is. (See also Zucchini.) Peter coxhead (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- But they use eggplant in Canada, Australia and New Zealand, all of which are Commonwealth English countries, so I don't see any lack of logic here. As for zucchini, I can attest that people do not use the term in NZ, having lived there; they use courgette. Furthermore, that article seems to have evolved post-stub using US English, so the two situations are not quite comparable. Getsnoopy (talk) 22:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- You're beginning to drift. Are you proposing we change the title of the article, or are you proposing we change the language to British English?--Mr Fink (talk) 23:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Both. It's an aubergine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.131.106.2 (talk) 00:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're beginning to drift. Are you proposing we change the title of the article, or are you proposing we change the language to British English?--Mr Fink (talk) 23:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- But they use eggplant in Canada, Australia and New Zealand, all of which are Commonwealth English countries, so I don't see any lack of logic here. As for zucchini, I can attest that people do not use the term in NZ, having lived there; they use courgette. Furthermore, that article seems to have evolved post-stub using US English, so the two situations are not quite comparable. Getsnoopy (talk) 22:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- It would seem highly illogical to use Commonwealth/Oxford English for the text and have "eggplant" as the title. Best left as it is. (See also Zucchini.) Peter coxhead (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- I think that's the point I'm making: the topic has strong ties to South and East Asia anyway. Regardless, the original article was written in Commonwealth/Oxford English, so that should be restored. I think changing the canonical title of the article is another matter entirely, which I'm not bringing up here, so the proposal isn't to change it to "aubergine", for example. Getsnoopy (talk) 22:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
"" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 10# until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Australia
I thought this couldn't possibly be what you meant Zabararmon. That's why I reverted. In that case can you explain why you are removing Australia and references that are not for Australia – and now also removing New Zealand – and leaving the other countries? Invasive Spices (talk) 14 February 2022 (UTC)
1) Intro would be too long by adding Australia and New Zealand next to the US and Canada, where the name originated.
2) Under the appropriately titled “Etymology and Regional names”, said countries are already mentioned or, in the case of New Zealand, can be added with a list of other countries who also use the name eggplant Zabararmon (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)