User talk:Renamed user 3429187546

Welcome!

Hello, BrickMaster02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:American Idol Live 2015.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:American Idol Live 2015.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:11, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Idol Live 2015 Poster.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm AldezD. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced information or change content based upon your own WP:OR as you did in this edit. AldezD (talk) 17:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheSubstituteLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheSubstituteLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deer Squad

What makes you say the number I gave for the 6th episode isn't the actual rating? Wubzy (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The ratings you provided were for the Nick Jr. airing at 8 PM, while I provided the ratings for the original 9 AM airing on Nickelodeon. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:27, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2019 in American television, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 13:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NickUnfilteredLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NickUnfilteredLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheAstronautsLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheAstronautsLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

American Idol Season 19 Finale Date

Why did you get rid of the source of the American Idol Season 19 Finale date? Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 04:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it because who knows if it could get moved back. Personally, I'd rather wait until the finale actually airs instead of jumping ahead. BrickMaster02 (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings Data for 101 Dalmatian Street

Since the series has aired on Disney XD USA, I was wondering if you could add the data of the ratings for each when they first premiered in the US. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 04:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, More Data....

I want you to insert the ratings dats for the Amphibia episode "True Colors", the 101 Dalmatian Street episode "Fetch"/"Don't Push Your Luck", the The Chicken Squad episodes that have aired so far and the HouseBroken episode "Who Did This?".

That is absolutely impossible. The only site to cover those ratings, Showbuzz Daily, shut down and no one knows what they were. Sorry, but you're gonna have to deal with that. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Bcschneider53. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Common Knowledge (game show) that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from edit summaries such as this one and settle disagreements with civility on the talk page. No need for public personal attacks on anonymous IPs (or anyone else) like that. Thank you. Bcschneider53 (talk) 02:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't blame you. I didn't feel alright after posting that. I'm willing to accept my consequences. BrickMaster02 (talk) 02:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop it. Stuff like this will make for a very short editing career here if you are not careful. Do NOT rise to the bait, please. Thank you DBaK (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I do get it, I really do, and indeed I have seen that IP vandalizing and have tried to help with that myself. But, honestly, the simple fact is that if you react with incivility you put yourself in the wrong with them! I know it is annoying but the rules here are designed to try to stop things escalating. (And no, they don't always work!) So I will just say good luck, count to 10, and Happy Editing! Cheers DBaK (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Test (2005)

Please clean-up the episode list to the series, as it tends to go by production order rather than US broadcast order. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good. Thanks for the request, though. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it!!!

Why do you revert my edits on List of programs broadcast by TeenNick?, I only removed some fake and unsourced information, and updated according to the current status, and I think is very irrelevant to list every movie that has aired on every network, we don't wanna list every film that has aired on TeenNick, that list is unverificable, and olny list the movies thas have aired on the NickRewind block, please, do not undo my edits again!!!--SCD0392 (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...please stop it. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GhostForce

I currently have a sandbox for the show. It doesn't have an actual article yet and there is currently only two episodes on the episode list. Can you please help me construct it? BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 18:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do my own articles, thank you very much. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Viewership counts for episodes 30-35 of 101DS

Find any viewership data on ShowBuzz Daily? If so, I'm happy. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please, for the love of God, stop going to my talk page and requesting things that I'm never going to do? The ratings are not on Showbuzz and are only on SpoilerTV. Good day. BrickMaster02 (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FamJamLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FamJamLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page history

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Severe storm 28 04:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Adventures of Paddington (2019 TV series) into Draft:List of The Adventures of Paddington episodes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 20:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a draft, and a lot of the episode lists I've seen for TV shows copy the first part of the original page. Why am I always attacked on this website? BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't intended as an attack. I'm just letting you know that attribution is always required whenever you copy text from another article that you didn't originally write yourself, which is what happened in this case. That requirement is also true for any episode list that copies from the parent article. DanCherek (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of The Adventures of Paddington episodes has been accepted

List of The Adventures of Paddington episodes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Promised Land (2022 TV series). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Renamed user 3429187546 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel really bad about what I did, and I have learned my lesson. Even though I "tried" to clean up, it didn't work and I don't care anymore. I really want to make a change and not argue with people on this site, and I can't do that if I'm blocked. Please unblock me, and I swear I will never do anything like this ever again. And if I do, you have the right to permanently ban me from this site.

Decline reason:

This does not address your edit warring and your refusal to collaborate. What would you do differently if unblocked? How would you resolve this problem, if it happens again? Yamla (talk) 09:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|reason=On Promised Land (2022 TV series), I was trying to clean up the episode table, have each label (Director, Writer, Original air date) layered. I just thought YoungForever was undoing my changes out of spite. Turns out I was the one who undid her changes out of spite. If I was unblocked and resolved this problem, I would actually give an explanation in the edit summary or go on the talk page in advance and discuss more in-depth. BrickMaster02 (talk) 15:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

Block has expired. --Yamla (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two things. One, have you read WP:NPA? Two, users are rarely ever permanently banned, even in severe cases like this. They're almost always just indefinitely blocked, which means the block can still be appealed. Also, if things start getting heated between you and another editor, you should stop, and step away. I understand that may be hard to do sometimes (heck, even sometimes I have a hard time staying cool in certain situations) but you should always make an effort to de-escalate the situation. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 04:34, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, I’m not getting unblocked? BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. That's for an admin to decide, not me. IF you aren't unblocked it'd be best for you to wait a bit before appealing your block again and take that time to read through some of the relevant policies. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 04:47, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The last admin that saw my appeal said "you need to take more than a week away from Wikipedia". Some admin, amirite? BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, given what happened, that would probably be in your best interest. Getting blocked and then appealing it only a few hours doesn't really show that you've learned much (if anything). I'm not accusing you of being stupid though, that's just usually what happens. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 04:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know what? That’s not really helping. I just want to be unblocked, and not want this community to hate me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to help you out here. I see you're already starting to get agitated again. Please, calm down and just take a moment to review the policies that are relevant to your block. If I hated you I wouldn't be trying to help you out. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 04:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, you kinda aren’t. I don’t have a resolution to have my appeal approved. BrickMaster02 (talk) 04:59, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #55268

is closed. Thanks @Blaze Wolf: for trying to help. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I saw the user's unblock request as sincere but not quite enough for them to be unblocked so I attempted to help them by telling them some things they need to address. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So much for helping me. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well you pretty much told me that you didn't want my help so I stopped attempting to help. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well now, I need your help. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Unfortunately I can't see the reason for decline in your UTRS appeal since that's limited to only admins (and I'm not one, despite what some people think), so that makes it a bit harder since I don't know why it was declined and can't help you address the concerns in it. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 00:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I checked. He said this:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block. PLEASE see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. Points to PONDER: EDIT WARRING is wrong even if one is right. ANY ARGUMENTS in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal. CALLING ATTENTION to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior. To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what this all means.

I'm currently writing another block appeal request. ::::::I'm currently writing another block appeal request. Update: This is the message I got after trying to send my new appeal:

It has been detected that you or someone else is trying to spam our system with appeals. Please wait until your previous appeal is closed, or if it's already closed, please try again later.

BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well I think first you should read the relevant policies, such as WP:EW and WP:BRD (which is not a policy but a supplement to other policies). When I'm editing, if I make an edit that I think is right and I Get reverted, and I don't think the other editor is right, instead of immediately reverting, I start a discussion on the talk page, asking them why they think their edit is right so we can reach an understanding. Now, that doesn't necessarily work if the editor simply ignores your talk page message and continues doing their edit (which you can see that situation happening at Ong Seong-wu). ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I totally get that. I just want to get unblocked without waiting a week. BrickMaster02 (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what the "spam appeals" thing is about (or how to fix it since I haven't been blocked before). Also, you may just have to wait a week to be unblocked. Remember, there is no deadline.― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Renamed user 3429187546 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "BrickMaster02". The reason given for BrickMaster02's block is: "Edit warring; personal attacks (filed a report against the other editor at WP:AIV; refusal to collaborate (reverted the other editor's attempt to discuss the dispute on the article Talk page)".

Blocking administrator: ‪Bbb23‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Block no longer exists. Yamla (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Paramount+. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex_21_TALK 23:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just seen the above; you're already edit-warring a week after coming out of a week-long block for the exact same reason? Navigation boxes are for navigation, not linkless text. -- Alex_21_TALK 00:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:YoungForever. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:53, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Says the person that told me to "Go away", but I've decided not to speak up and instead stay quiet, so I'm done. BrickMaster02 (talk) 21:54, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Go away" is not a personal attack. Calling someone "arrogant" is personal attack. Please learn the differences. — YoungForever^(talk) 21:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by Disney XD

Only one other Disney XD list-of article for the United Kingdom exists among all the DXD networks, many of which are now defunct or about to be; I just removed the Latin American version which had ONE source and was duplicative of this list, along with Jetix and Fox Kids, and every other list among these defunct networks has a blazing 'unsourced' tag on the top. There's no point to maintain these lists when one united list-of article can cover it all, thus my reason for reverting the 'U.S.' part (and it doesn't have anything saying 'just American' in the title). Nate • (chatter) 01:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to the concern above; the point of talk pages is to discuss issues, and I feel I do have a valid reason for changing the above page. Nate • (chatter) 03:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't care about this anymore. Go ahead if you want, I'm not in charge of the page. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you argue about the addition so vehemently? You need to learn how to work out conflicts much better than 'whatever, do what you want' when you get exhausted with something like others have tried before above. I was willing to work with you on this issue, but obviously you see edit priorities much differently than most. Nate • (chatter) 00:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because the program lists for Nicktoons and Disney Junior have the same thing. BrickMaster02 (talk) 00:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This personal attack is uncalled for. Please be kind to other editors, even if you disagree with them or they're vandalizing. Nate • (chatter) 03:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Fairly OddParents: Fairly Odder logo

No clue if I did this right... How did you get this image to be a fully transparent background? (for reference, the logo is available on the Nickelodeon website.) Magitroopa (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you're asking me out of everyone else, but I just found it on the Nick website and cropped out the excess empty space. BrickMaster02 (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Burns vandal

If the editor most recently on Special:Contributions/2603:300A:F00:3000:0:0:0:0/64 reappears with Steve Burns vandalism, let me know. We might need to get an edit filter created to stop this user. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Sunmist (talk) 03:48, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please just cut out all of the profanities and telling people to "go away" in edit summaries. In fact, do not attempt to talk to people in edit summaries at all. Use them for the purpose that's there in their very name: to summarize an edit. They're there for the benefits of other people to scan through an edit history to locate who did what and when, not to be used as a chat tool. "go away" doesn't tell us what happened to the article or why.

Look at my edit summary of Special:Diff/1081883901, for example. I said why I did what I did in the edit, and that is it. Special:Diff/1081941063 is an edit summary from someone else, likewise just summarizing the edit. I'm also talking with the writer of the article, but using a talk page for that, not edit summaries. And we're getting along well.

You're clearly finding it difficult to control your feelings in edit summaries, so the best thing to do is just impose a blanket rule on yourself never to use edit summaries to do anything other than summarize an edit. When you find yourself tempted to do so, pause. Try to aim for the plain unadorned descriptivity of Special:Diff/1081682285, everywhere.

Uncle G (talk) 07:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Burns/Donovan Patton vandalism

Came upon this IP range (that is now blocked) earlier tonight with the same Steve Burns/Donovan Patton vandalism I'd previously seen on other articles (ex: [1] [2] [3] [4]). I definitely remember seeing this same sort of vandalism on a previous article(s?), but can't remember when/where at all. Would you possibly have any clue?... Magitroopa (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it in the same range as the informal TUFF Puppy reunion adder on pages like the Mario movie? Kinda curious--CreecregofLife (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you guys are coming to me, a guy who was blocked twice, to answer this. I don't focus on that stuff usually, I just report and move on. I would not be surprised if it is the same person, though. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holey Moley Season 4 Episode one progress table

Hey BrickMaster02, I thought you were gonna add the progress table for the Season 4 premiere episode. But I don't see it. Do you think you can add it soon?74.96.187.96 (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't do that stuff. Sorry. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:21, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then who does add the tables and when do you think they'll be uploaded? 74.96.187.96 (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How would I know? I just add the viewers. BrickMaster02 (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elliott from Earth

I declined your request for page protection on the Elliott from Earth article. The main reason for this is a lack of activity to justify protection, but also because your edits could be seen as edit warring to insert original research. You have not provided any citations for your claim that the show has ended. Keep in my that "original research" includes the insertion of text/ideas/conclusions you have reached by your own synthesis of materials (or in this case LACK of materials). If you take issue with the edits of other users, please discuss with them via the article talk page or their direct user talk page. All the best, --auburnpilot talk 23:39, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]