Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page extended-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zippybonzo (alt) (talk | contribs) at 08:15, 20 November 2023. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, please do so at the main talk page.

Requests

Note - All archived requests older than one month can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests.
Please note that we generally do not notify users when their request has been reviewed, so please watch this page for updates to your request.
Please refrain from closing requests if you are not an administrator.
Sorry, please be aware that unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request)
Shortcut

Please review the Criteria before making a request.

  • Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines outlined there.
  • Administrators and new page reviewers are automatically approved and do not need to be added to the list.
  • All archived requests older than one month can be found at /Old Requests.
  • If your request is approved, consider adding yourself to the list of reviewers by subject.

October

NPR (Oct)

User:MicrobiologyMarcus

I'm a big fan of the AfC process for new users and I have a track record of creating high quality AfCs. I would like to assist in clearing the backlog. Presently, I have one article in the AfC draft submission. MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 16:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural  Not done. MicrobiologyMarcus, you currently hold NPR rights, which allows you to use the AFCH script. Spicy (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive (Oct)

User:Wingwatchers

Would like to reapply for rights due to my right being removed due to inactivity, and also I want to sign up for the backlog.Wingwatchers (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC) Wingwatchers (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lajmmoore

I feel out of the habit of helping at AfC a while ago, but would like to get back involved, starting with November backlog Lajmmoore (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New (Oct)

User:Nowa

Looking forward to helping clear the backlog. I'm autopatrolled with 8000+ edits. Nowa (talk) 01:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Phuzion

Hello, I'd like to get access to the AFCH script. I've been helping out in #wikipedia-en-help connect on and off for over a year, and I've got a pretty solid understanding of the policies of enwiki. Phuzion (talk) 02:33, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yoblyblob

Have been a member of Wikipedia for a few years, and in the last two years have made over 500 edits. I believe I now have a strong understanding of what is required for notability and an article to be accepted. I have primarily worked on sports-related articles and would prefer to primarily review sports/football-related articles. The primary reason I want to do this is to speed up the rate at which football articles are reviewed to improve the coverage of the sport. Yoblyblob (talk) 13:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yoblyblob All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Two pages deleted, three others draftified, with 0% success at AFD, indicates a lack of knowledge of the notability guidelines. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saurabhsaha

I would like to have my name added to the list of active reviewers. I have been actively involved in counter-vandalism, providing assistance in various venues, resolving disputes, and contributing to AFD, all while addressing copyright violations. Saurabh{Talk} 06:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Argenti Aertheri

Hi! I would like to help with the AfC backlog. I usually stick to copy editing and fixing citation errors, but participated in the August GAN drive and rather enjoyed helping people with their articles. ~ Argenti Aertheri(Chat?) 02:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Argenti Aertheri All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum numeric criteria. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyberwolf434344

I have been working on taking promotional drafts out and i think this could benefit me

Also yes i have the require ments~~ •Cyberwolf• 17:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberwolf434344 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now. While you do have a solid CSD record for a (relatively) new user, G11s are easy to spot and are in some ways the lowest rung of the "notability" ladder. Your lack of AFD participation, plus a few deleted pages, has me concerned you do not have a solid understanding (yet) of the notability policies in a broader sense. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:FatCat96

I would like to become a participant so I can help clear out some of the backlog. I have thoroughly read the instructions and over the past six months I have been on Wikipedia, I have read all the notability guidelines. FatCat96 (talk) 04:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Somej

Hello, have previously been an AFC script user, but dropped off for lack of time ... hoping to contribute to new article reviews again. Thanks! Somej (talk) 07:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Somej All other considerations apart, I would like to see a greater track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:19, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (as a probationary reviewer, per the previous request). Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:GraziePrego

Interested in helping out with this process- I have >3500 edits and some AfD experience :) GraziePrego (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC) GraziePrego (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great thank you very much- how do I get added to the participant list? GraziePrego (talk) 01:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
By making sure I'm actually paying attention when I do requests! Should be sorted now, thanks for the ping. Primefac (talk) 07:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:KINGHB190

Hi, I would like to become an article reviewer on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation — Preceding unsigned comment added by KINGHB190 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:28, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, so to qualify for the reviewing of articles I need to get involved in discussions about deletion. This is fair enough as it will show my views on what makes an appropriate article. King HB 12:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KINGHB190 I suggest that you don't go a-hunting for articles to nominate, but a solid record of offering relevant opinions that generally match the eventual outcome will hone your skills. New to AfD, you might start with those where others have offered opinions in order to learn. I am not the final arbiter here, just offering my opinion. I'm very happy that you see the need to involve yourself in AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, I did not intend to go a-hunting for articles but rather to take a look at nominations in wikiprojects I am part of. King HB 12:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cocobb8

Hello, I am pleased to put forth my request to become an AfC reviewer. I have some experience in reviewing things, like pending edits, and I have read the guidelines for AfC reviewing. I would love to be able to use my skills to help review drafts created by our amazing newcomer editors. Thank you for the consideration! Cheers, Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cocobb8 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good! I will try to get involved there first, and will get back to you! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cocobb8 I suggest that you don't go a-hunting for articles to nominate, but a solid record of offering relevant opinions that generally match the eventual outcome will hone your skills. New to AfD, you might start with those where others have offered opinions in order to learn. I am not the final arbiter here, just offering my opinion. I'm very happy that you see the need to involve yourself in AfD. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok! I will go step by step and learn that way ! Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; you do not have enough evidence of the "soft" criteria (notability, deletion, etc) to join the project at this point in time. Primefac (talk) 10:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:QuadriSyedSahab

I am an Extended confirmed user who is working since this June 14th. I contributed around 3100 edits and created about 95 pages yet. Looking forward for a small recognition by Wikipedia to feel motivated. I hope that i am that eligible to be a AfC reviewer, rest is upon my ideals and old users. Thanks Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done I have numerous concerns about the age of your account, how fast you are moving and that you don't quite understand the purpose of this right. It's not a "recognition" to help you "feel motivated" (see WP:HATCOLLECT). In addition, it's important for AfC reviewers to be able to communicate clearly with new editors and I find some of your talk page comments difficult to understand. For instance, I have no idea what you're trying to express by rest is upon my ideals and old users. Spicy (talk) 20:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheInevitables

Hi there! I've been editing Wikipedia on and off for 3 years, have around 2500 edits, participate consistently in AFDs, created around 15 pages (including one using the AFC process!) and was a former AFC Reviewer under the username "ArsenalGhanaPartey." I would love to get working on the backlog again. TheInevitables (talk) 20:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheInevitables Forgive me, your user talk page suggest you to be semi-retired from Wikipedia with effect from October 2023?
I find your AfD statistics somewhat confusing, Perhaps your user renaming, assuming that to be what it was, has caused anomalous results? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, apologies for my mistake. That was a tag that was on my user talk page for around a year that I simply neglected to remove.
My AfD statistics seem to have been altered, yes. They don't seem to be accurate, and I have participated significantly more often in AfD discussions than they seem to suggest. TheInevitables (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:SerAntoniDeMiloni

I'd quite like to join this wikiproject. I'm auto-patrolled with dozens of created pages and over 2,000 edits. SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 13:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@SerAntoniDeMiloni All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done, concerns about lack of AfD experience and recent draftifications/maintenance taggings. Spicy (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Robertus Pius

Hi! I’ve been on Wikipedia quite awhile and I’ve been looking for something to help out in, and I think I’ve found it. I’ve read the reviewing instructions thoroughly and believe I am capable of reviewing articles for creation! I look forward to hearing back from someone. Kind regards, --✠ Robertus Pius ✠ (Talk • Contribs) 21:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Robertus Pius All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done for now. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I'm not seeing enough experience with AfD, CSD/PROD or article creation to be confident that you have a strong grasp on the notability criteria. Feel free to re-apply in the future. Spicy (talk) 20:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:NotAGenious

Though I've been involved at CSD, AFD and PROD, reviewing of AFC submissions would probably give me a deeper understanding of more advanced notability criteria, especially on borderline cases. There is a large backlog, but I'll make sure to start with easier reviews. NotAGenious (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@NotAGenious:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kilaseell

Hello! I'd love to help with the AFC submissions. I have read the instructions and criteria and understood them. Cheers! Kilaseell - Message me! - 23:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KilaseellAll other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Heavy Grasshopper

Hi there. I'd like to help at AFC. I have some experience with deletion. Made mistakes here and there, nominated some of my own articles for deletion (after learning ambassadors are not inherently notable), and I think generally it's been positive and the numbers ought to be okayish. I also have some content work including a single GA. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Heavy Grasshopper:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wil540 art

I would like to help review afc drafts. - Wil540 art (talk) 17:47, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:PaulGamerBoy360

I want to help approve articles for wikipedia, I have participated in numerus AFD Discussions, I currently have 1,542 live edits(92.8%), Have Created 20 Pages(6 deleted - from my earlier wikipedia contributions), The wikiprojects i am part of can be found here. I currently have a few articles in the AFC waiting for review although that is not the purpose for my requesting. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done for now. Based on your low AfD match rate and some recent article creations that were deleted or declined at AfC, I think you could use a bit more experience before applying for this right. Spicy (talk) 19:51, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Is there a tool or something that displays the AFD match rate, if so i would be interested to look at my results. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 21:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Indiacup

Wanted to get back into helping out with AfC, after an awfully long break. ~ Indiacup 10:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: user blocked. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:UndercoverClassicist

Would like to be able to help out: in particular, have come across Draft:Alessandro Castellani which needs a bit of love, but shouldn't be too far off replacing the current redirect. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC) UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:SamX

I'd like to help out with the November backlog drive. I have some experience at AfD and I've interacted extensively with new editors through recent changes patrol and, more recently, CopyPatrol. — SamX [talk · contribs] 17:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fred114

I would like to help review afc drafts. Fred114 23:56, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
@Fred114: All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fred114: thanks for your interest in helping out, but unfortunately you don't meet the minimum requirements for this permission at this point.  Not done for now. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Could you identify a couple of things I could focus on to meet the minimum? Fred114 08:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fred114 (talk • contribs)
You meet neither our numeric minimums (only 436 article edits), nor the subjective minimums (1 AFD, no CSD, declined drafts, deleted pages, etc). Primefac (talk) 13:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reywas92

I would be interested in participating in the November backlog drive. I have extensive experience at AFD, CS, and Prod. Reywas92Talk 14:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Reywas92:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Novo Tape

I want to participate in the November 2023 drive so I'm requesting access, at least for a short timeframe. I admit I have limited experience with creating articles and at AfD. However, I feel that my work at the Teahouse, doing recent changes patrol, and on speedy deletion qualifies me for AfC helper. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)My Talk Page 16:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Novo Tape:  Done (probationary) — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Karst

Gladly help with the backlog especially where is concerns music-related articles. Karst (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Karst:  Done — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:35, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:KeepItGoingForward

I believe I meet all the requirements for reviewing articles. I have created numerous articles and learned from my participation in AfD discussions and nominations. I will stick with easier reviews until building more experience. Would it be possible to add me to the list of participants? KeepItGoingForward (talk) 22:59, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:F.Alexsandr

I have been editing Wikipedia on and off for around 3 years, but recently have become much more active, creating several artiles. I have noticed several articles in Afc that heavily rely on Russian sources, and I think I can help with clearing that backlog, especially articles about Russian military history. I also would like to take part in November backlog drive. F.Alexsandr (talk) 23:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am confused, can you tell me which criteria? F.Alexsandr (talk) 11:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You only have 450 article-space edits. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, thank you. Where can I see article space edits? I can only see total number of edits in my "User contibutions" tab F.Alexsandr (talk) 12:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Use the "xtools" link above. Primefac (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:EmeraldRange

I've been involved in some AfD discussions and made a few of my own articles (mostly about Administrative Divisions of Myanmar) and after helping with some Drafts in WP:MYANMAR recently, want to help clear some of the backlog, especially for Myanmar-related AfC which can often rely on Burmese language sources. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 00:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Siagoddess

I have been on Wikipedia for some time now. I would like to experience reviewing articles on AFC Siagoddess (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum criteria. Primefac (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November

User:R. S. Shaw

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights: I think I meet the criteria. I want to investigate a review, and see how the helper works. I'm not sure how many reviews I'll end up doing, but I may do some. R. S. Shaw (talk) 20:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
P.S., "Probation" would be fine. -- R. S. Shaw (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Micheal Kaluba

Reasons for requesting afc helper script rights are:
  • I have been contributing to Wikimedia Projects for almost 5 years including but not limited to Wikipedia, Wiki Commons, Wikidata, WikiSource, WikiVoyage etc and for the time I have been involved in Wikimedia activities both national and international, I have not seen a reviewer especially in regions like East And Central Africa and I am applying to contribute to the dissemination of accurate and reliable information to the global audience.
  • I am applying to ensure the regional content is accurately represented and that Local notable topics, culture, history and personalities receive proper recognition on a global platform. Several our fellow Wikimedians' contents from around these regions because people that review some this contents don't have a perspective of this regions topics and editors perspectives.Micheal Kaluba (talk) 07:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC) Micheal Kaluba (talk) 07:15, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
     Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Noting for anyone curious that this is more due to the accepted drafts than anything. Borderline case for me but I am erring on the side of lessons learned. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:F.Alexsandr

I have fulfilled the minimum criteria, read and understood the rules, got experience in AfD, and I am ready to contribute to wikipedia review of articles for submission. I would also like to participate in November drive. F.Alexsandr (talk) 22:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Lack of AFD experience is somewhat mitigated by the accepted draft count. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:LEvalyn

I'm interested in getting involved with AfC, especially for the current backlog drive. I'm experienced with evaluating notability, both at AfD and in creating my own articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Styx & Stones

I wish to take part in the November 2023 Backlog Drive. Styx (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Styx (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails the minimum criteria (500 mainspace edits).
(Note: this user has since been renamed to Donnchadh4.) LittlePuppers (talk) 23:12, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lizthegrey

I have a pending AfC request, and figured that I could help pay things forward with clearing the backlog of other articles by handling some of the easier NN declines & providing feedback, leaving experienced folks more time to deal with things closer to the line. I've been around on and off since 2005, have ECP, occasionally patrol ECP requests, and have participated at AfD before. I am aware that I fall slightly short of the 500 mainspace edits count, so will gracefully accept not being approved yet if it's a hard requirement. lizthegrey (talk) 01:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{not done}}, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 09:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac I request reconsideration now that I meet numerical requirements. lizthegrey (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:S5A-0043

I believe that I've met the criteria for joining the AFC process. I currently have created 7 articles (4 of which went onto DYK) and I think I'm generally aware of most of the basic guidelines for AFC to help out with reviewing new articles by others. S5A-0043Talk 03:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Launchballer

I've begun starting articles in my userspace as opposed to starting a stub and x5ing it later, and I'd like to publish them and fill out other bits in one. Launchballer 14:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, AFCH is not for publishing one's own drafts; AFC is not a requirement and you are welcome to create user sandboxes and move them to article space when they are ready. Primefac (talk) 12:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:JacobTheRox

I have always wanted to work at AfC but thought it was better to become a NPPR instead. It turns out it is the other way round. I have good knowledge of the article creation process. I am a member of the Guild of Copy Editors and the Lead Improvement Team so I know the MOS and lead stuff like the back of my hand. I like working on Articles that need lots of improvement so I think AfC is the perfect place for me! JacobTheRox (talk) 10:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 12:38, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:ToadetteEdit

Reason for requesting AFC helper script rights: I wanted to help in reviewing articles and creating redirects. I have a good understanding of deletion and reviewing policies (in case of reviewing, instructions) and I understood how a subject would be notable. I tried to use AFCH but it denied access, stating that I have to be in the list of participants, which unfortunately the main page is protected. I am now requesting it to reduce the current backlog in the category. I wish God would bless the administrator(s) who accept/decline my request. Thank you for reading this. From your fellow Wikipedian. Toadette (let's chat together) 07:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ToadetteEdit All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mach61

I've helped two articles get to mainspace from AFC, (one of which becoming a DYK, and regularly participate in AFD. Please note that it'll take me a bit to learn how to interact with newer users. Mach61 (talk) 14:40, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mach61 AFC is not just technical acceptances and declines. A lot of the work is in seeking to ensure that a new user whose work is declined feels happy to continue. Do you feel you would be comfortable with that? 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Both AFC drafts I improved to mainspace were initially started by someone else Mach61 (talk) 12:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mach61 THat's good to hear. Thank you also for your honesty with the comment that created my question. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aviram7

I have been an active editor since January 2023, with 5,000+ edits. I have too of experience placing maintenance tags on articles.Thnx ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 08:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Commemorative1

I wish to become an AfC reviewer. I've had experience with the queue being long (though in some areas more than others), and since I believe I have a sufficient understanding of Wikipedia policies on deletion, notability, meet the criteria for joining and have read the reviewing instructions, I think I'm ready to. I would love to help out with the project! commemorative (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Commemorative1 All other considerations apart, I would like to see a track record at WP:AFD, since AFC and AFD are two sides of the same pancake. This includes offering opinions (mostly) and nominations (necessarily less) 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Commemorative1: the minimum requirements include 500 mainspace edits, which you do meet quite yet. LittlePuppers (talk) 16:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per the previous. Primefac (talk) 15:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zippybonzo (alt)

Alt of Zippybonzo, I don't have my security key all the time and I want to knock a bit off the backlog. My main account has NPR permissions so I should in theory be eligible here :) -- Zippybonzo (alt)| talk to me | he/she/they 08:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants&oldid=1185999326"