This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Germania Antiqua article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
@Dbachmann:: Magna Germania already redirects to Germania. Merging into that article seems appropriate, turning this title into a redirect here or to the author of the book by the same title (in which case a hatnote would be needed). P Aculeius (talk) 02:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I totally disagree with the merge. Germania inferior & Germania superior articles on these roman provinces exist....why this (well documented) province that EXISTED and lasted nearly two decades cannot exist ONLY in the en. Wikipedia? In the Italian and in other Wikipedias there are well written articles related to this province!.... BD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.1.171.43 (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I have not been able to find other articles concerning Germania Antigua (google "Germania Antiqua" site:wikipedia.org -site:en.wikipedia.org). A similar search (google "Germania Antiqua" -site:wikipedia.org) seems to document the term 'Germania Antiqua' to have been extremely popular amongst 19th century cartographers. But I do not know of any academic source that also reach this conclusion. This seems to be a stale discussion, so I maybe just should realise the proposal, as a merge with only Germania. The text is not so full, and I suggest(/think about) adding to sections Germania#Geography and Germania#History, but have to admit I know very little about the subject. I trust the information but oppose the chosen article topic. Actually calling this a province seems a little far-fetched, when the information about the time frame of 16 years holds true. I think it is too short as a credible timespan for effectuating a province. Sechinsic (talk) 10:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Perhaps someone can come up with a new way of constructing and sourcing such an article so that it adds something which is not better handled in other articles such as Germania, but I am not seeing it so far. Being devil's advocate, it looks a bit like a quiet corner of WP where a specific academic proposal is being promoted without mention of the fact that not all academics see it the same way? BTW the topic was recently discussed in a few threads on Germanic peoples, e.g. (in archives already): [1],[2].--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
