User talk:Thenfsa
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Thenfsa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC) |
---|
|
|
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]Hello Thenfsa! Your additions to Panther: Hindustan Meri Jaan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't copy-paste text from other websites into Wikipedia articles. It needs to be summarized and rewritten in your own words. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Thenfsa, I have had to remove content you added to Draft:Raavan 2022 because it was copied and pasted from various copyrighted sources. Most of the text you'll find online is protected by copyright, and Wikipedia's copyright policy actually prevents us from adding such text to articles. Your best bet is to write content for Wikipedia in your own words. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 11:21, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Raavan 2022 (May 25)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raavan 2022 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raavan 2022, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Thenfsa!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 14:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
|
Box Office
[edit]Hi, the source says 2.84 c, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
May 2022
[edit] When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Draft:Raavan 2022, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. You cannot copy and paste plot descriptions from other websites into Wikipedia articles. You must summarize the plot completely in your own words. Ravensfire (talk) 19:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. HenryTemplo (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. HenryTemplo (talk) 18:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Raavan 2022 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ravaan 2022. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.
Also, despite the thread above, the reception section appears to be almost a word-for-word copy of a section of the Times of India review; do not copy from other places on the web as this is likely to be a copyright violation which Wikipedia takes rather seriously. It is noted that the item has had to be revdel'd for similar reasons previously. Continuing to add copyright material can lead to loss of editing privileges.
Further, when an item is declined, it does not mean that the creator can make some minor changes to try to comply with issues raised and then place the item in mainspace; a decline is an invitation to continue to develop the article and re-submit when ready. Eagleash (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
The article Chengiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NFF - unreleased films generally should not have articles, this doesn't have enough information and sourcing. A really basic draft already exists unfortunately.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravensfire (talk) 17:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022: Notice
[edit]Hi there, I'm Sam. I noticed that you recently made changes to Brahmāstra without adequately explaining why, nor attaching any liable source that stands the info of your input. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary, as such changes made can be viewed as unconstructive. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been edited back as to the previous version. Besides, please take some time to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the platform's welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, or would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Sam (talk) 18:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Sam (talk) 18:24, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chengiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Trakinwiki (talk) 19:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Chengiz, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. PHANTOMTECH (talk) 08:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- okay thanks Thenfsa (talk) 08:25, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dev filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 05:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Chengiz
[edit]Hello, Thenfsa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chengiz".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)