This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 10:57, 6 January 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 7 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 7 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Christianity}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}, {{WikiProject Women writers}}, {{WikiProject Women in Religion}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:57, 6 January 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 7 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 7 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Christianity}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}, {{WikiProject Religion}}, {{WikiProject Women writers}}, {{WikiProject Women in Religion}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
As part of @LogicalGuessing's purge of sections which only cited Gill or primary church sources, the whole section mentioning the Fall in Lynn was removed. While it may not have been that well written, it's such an important part of the bio it needs to be mentioned somehow. Alexschmidt711 (talk) 17:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because the Fall in Lynn (where Eddy claimed she miraculously healed herself from a fall down her stairs) is a pretty huge part of Christian Scientist theology. Loki (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
here is the edit if any editors wanna see what was removed. Reading the section, it may be significant, but the old section was really really badly sourced. Lots of uncited claims, too many primary and non-independent sources, and of the two scholarly cites in the section one was missing it's page number making it difficult to verify. The old section claimed in wikivoice without citations newspaper accounts existed. In my opinion, it had to go and I wouldn't want to restore anything from the old section, but I wouldn't object to someone rewriting a new section with reliable sources. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Completely agreed with this. We should definitely include it in the article, but only using reliable and independent sources. Loki (talk) 22:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]