Jump to content

Use of incendiary weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lklundin (talk | contribs) at 14:54, 14 January 2024 (Armament Research Services). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The most significant using of incendiary weapons were used a number of times during the Russo-Ukrainian War.[citation needed] Russians were accused of using white phosphorus bombs multiple times; in the Battle of Kyiv and against Kramatorsk in March 2022,[1] against dug-in defenders at the Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol in May 2022,[2][3][4][5] and in Marinka over the 2022 Christmas holiday.[6] White phosphorus is a toxic chemical, and exposure to vapors leads to long-term ailments of the body, up to permanent disfigurement and death through organ failure.

The use of incendiary weapons in civilian areas is not violating Article 2 of the 1980 Protocol on Incendiary Weapons, which prohibits only the use of air-delivered incendiary bombs in close vicinity of concentrations of civilians and deliberate attacks against civilians with incendiary weapons (deliberate attacks on civilians are prohibited regardless of the type of weapon used). The 1949 Geneva Conventions do not regulate the use of incendiary weapons. Additional Protocol I.[7] prohibits the indiscriminate use of any weapons, not only incendiary. Both Russia and Ukraine are signatories of the 1980 Protocol on Incendiary Weapons, the former ratified it on June 10, 1982, while the latter did so on June 23, 1982.[8]

Types of munitions

Independent experts interviewed by the media stated at the end of March 2022 that there was a lack of data to unequivocally establish the type of incendiary weapons used,[9][1][10] and some suspected the incendiary effect was produced by the 9M22S thermite incendiary submunitions fired by the Grad MLRS, which were developed by the Soviets "to discover the minimum size fragment of incendiary mix" to annihilate the enemy: "all it takes is about 5 grams – [they] developed [the 9M22S] cluster warhead to distribute these [submunitions]... Each 9N510 submunition consists of a hexagonal shell of magnesium alloy filled with a fire mixture whose main ingredients are gasoline, isopropyl nitrate and rubber... The magnesium burns briefly with a bright white light... and typically sticks to the target while burning. Attempting to scrape the mix off just spreads it, and it is not extinguished by water."[11] A Russian observer of the Battle of Azovstal,[12] who also blamed the 9M22S-9N510 due to its colour, lent credence to this interpretation.[13]

During War in Donbas

The use of incendiary weapons in the Russo-Ukrainian War was first remarked in Sloviansk in June 2014;[14] followed late July 2014 around eastern Ukraine,[15] then in August at Ilovaisk,[14] and between Oleksandrivka and Chumaky in November,[16] all battlegrounds of the war in Donbas (2014–2022).

During the Russian invasion

See also: White phosphorus munitions § Regulation and application
Russian incendiary munitions being used against Ukrainian positions on the Bakhmut front in October 2023. The State Border Guard Service of Ukraine initially reported these munitions as white phosphorus.

On 15 March, 2022, when the incendiaries were used in Battle of Mariupol Serhiy Haidai, the Governor of Luhansk Oblast, called the Russian attackers war criminals, comparing their actions to those of the Nazis. Similar munitions were seen in Popasna two days earlier.[17] On March 25, 2022, in an address to NATO leaders, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky accused the Russian military of using phosphorus shells against civilians: "This morning, by the way, phosphorus bombs were used. Russian phosphorus bombs. Adults were killed again, children were killed again".[1] At the end of the month, the deputy head of the Kyiv police reported about the shelling of Kramatorsk with incendiary shells with phosphorus. And in the media there were photos showing characteristic flashes over Kyiv. Although at that time the fact of the use of phosphorus shells was not confirmed by independent organizations, experts admitted such a possibility. The active Ukrainian resistance and the poor progress of the offensive may have prompted the Russian authorities to use "dangerous weapons".[18][9][1][10] At the same time, Russian Ministry of Defense claimed that the armed forces of Ukraine used phosphorus ammunition in the defense of the Hostomel airfield at the end of February.[19]

Deputy Defense Minister of Ukraine Anna Malyar said in April 2022 that the government has begun checking on incoming information about the possible use of chemical weapons, to which she includes phosphorus bombs in particular, during the blockade of Mariupol. The head of the administration of the Donetsk region and Ukrainian politician Pavlo Kirilenko confirmed that he had seen reports that an unknown explosive device was dropped by a drone in the vicinity of the Mariupol metallurgical plant, three people felt ill and were hospitalized. Russian-backed DPR forces have denied the use of banned weapons in Mariupol.[20]

In mid-May, Ombudsman for Human Rights in Ukraine Lyudmila Denisova[21] accused Russian forces of attacking the Mariupol metallurgical plant Azovstal with incendiary and phosphorus bombs. This was confirmed by a video with characteristic flashes over the territory of the plant, which was posted on social networks by the commander of the pro-Russian self-proclaimed Donetsk Republic Alexander Khodakovsky,[12] clearly depicting the 9M22S thermite-containing incendiary submunitions. At that time, a number of civilians who had previously taken refuge at the plant were evacuated with the support of the International Committee of the Red Cross and the UN.[22]

Western experts disagreed whether the shelling of Azovstal was a fact of using phosphorus ammunition or thermite magnesium ammunition.[23] The Russian command did not comment on which weapon was used for the attack. The Russian media suggested that the Azovstal video showed Grad projectiles, and not phosphorus bombs.[13]

Defence View and Forbes explain that the Russians probably used 9M22S incendiary shells developed by NPO Splav during the Soviet era.[24][11] Instead of a high-explosive fragmentation warhead, the 9M22S rocket carries a warhead containing 180 separate 9N510 incendiary elements.[25] Designed to ignite vegetation, storage facilities, or fuel, these incendiary elements consist of hexagonal prisms made from a magnesium alloy known to the Russian GOST as ML-5,[26][27] filled with a thermite mixture.[14][28] Each element has a nominal length of 40 mm and a width of 25 mm and a burning time of at least 2 minutes. It is also noted that the effect of these incendiary, as well as conventional lighting munitions (especially at night), outwardly resembles the use of phosphorus munitions.[24]

On 13 March 2023 footage of a hail of thermite munitions raining down on a residential area during the Battle of Vuhledar was released.[29][30]

Overnight 5-7 May 2023 some videos were shown on the networks where attacks with incendiary weapons by the Russians could be seen in the Battle of Bakhmut.[31][32]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d "Zelenskyy claims new Russian war crimes, asks for help as Biden joins NATO partners for emergency summit on Ukraine war". CBS. 24 March 2022.
  2. ^ "Russian backed forces fire grad rockets in direction of Azovstal steel works". The Sun. YouTube. 3 May 2022.
  3. ^ "Russian 9M22S Incendiary 122mm BM-21 Grad Rocket Strikes the Besieged Azovstal Factory in Mariupol". YouTube. 15 May 2022.
  4. ^ "Власти Мариуполя обвинили Россию в применении фосфорных боеприпасов против «Азовстали»" [Mariupol authorities accused Russia of using phosphorus munitions against Azovstal]. Meduza (in Russian). Retrieved 2022-05-23.
  5. ^ "Azovstal steel plant defenders 'hit with phosphorus bombs'". The Times. 2022-05-16.
  6. ^ BIESECKER, MICHAEL; KINETZ, ERIKA (30 December 2022). "Evidence of Russian crimes mounts as war in Ukraine drags on". ksltv.com. Associated Press.
  7. ^ Sommerlad, Joe (2023-05-06). "All we know about deadly white phosphorus bombs Russia accused of using in Ukraine". The Independent. Retrieved 2023-05-14.
  8. ^ "Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons (Protocol III). Geneva, 10 October 1980.: Parties". International Humanitarian Law Databases.
  9. ^ a b "What is white phosphorus, and what does it mean that Russia may be using it in Ukraine?". CBS. 25 March 2022.
  10. ^ a b "Ukraine claims that Russia is using white phosphorus". The Washington Post. 25 March 2022.
  11. ^ a b Hambling, David (25 March 2022). "'White Phosphorus' Claimed To Be Used In Ukraine May Really Be Russian Napalm Weapon". Forbes.
  12. ^ a b "Burning munitions cascade down on Ukrainian steel plant, video shows". Reuters. 15 May 2022.
  13. ^ a b "Стал известен секрет «фейерверка» над «Азовсталью»" [Secret of "fireworks" over Azovstal was revealed]. Московский Комсомолец. 16 May 2022.
  14. ^ a b c Salem, Harriet (13 November 2014). "'A Rain of Fire'..." VICE MEDIA.
  15. ^ Lyamin, Yuri; Smallwood, Michael (14 October 2014). "9M22S incendiary rocket components documented in eastern Ukraine". Armament Research Services.
  16. ^ Jenzen-Jones, N.R.; Ferguson, Jonathan (2014). Raising Red Flags: An Examination of Arms & Munitions in the Ongoing Conflict in Ukraine. Armament Research Services. p. 72. ISBN 9780992462437.
  17. ^ "'Hell came down to earth' Russia chemical weapon fears over 2,500C 'phosphorus bombs'". Express Newspapers. 15 March 2022.
  18. ^ "Ukraine says Russia using phosphorus bombs as Biden warns of 'real threat' of chemical weapons attack". Independent. 23 March 2022.
  19. ^ "Минобороны РФ обвинило армию Украины в применении фосфорных боеприпасов" [The Russian Ministry of Defence accused the Ukrainian army of using phosphorus munitions]. Meduza (in Russian). 27 February 2022.
  20. ^ "Putin defends 'noble' war amid allegations of chemical weapons use". Arab News. 12 April 2022.
  21. ^ "Российские войска применили фосфорные снаряды против украинских защитников «Азовстали» – Денисова" [Russian forces used phosphorus shells against Ukrainian defenders of Azovstal - Denisova]. Крым.реалии. 16 May 2022.
  22. ^ "As Russia continues to bomb Ukraine, are its weapons of choice getting worse?". Guardian. 14 April 2022.
  23. ^ "Fact Check: Does Video Show Russia Use Phosphorus Against Azovstal Plant?". Newsweek. 18 May 2022.
  24. ^ a b "Russia used 9M22S incendiary munitions on Azovstal steel plant". Defence View. 15 May 2022.
  25. ^ "122mm Grad 9M22S Rocket". CAT-UXO.
  26. ^ ГОСТ 2856-79 Сплавы магниевые литейные [GOST 2856-79 Castable magnesium alloys]. 1981.
  27. ^ "9N510 (ML-5) Submunition". CAT-UXO.
  28. ^ "9K51 BM-21 Grad (Hail) 122-mm Multiple Rocket Launcher". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 14 March 2023.
  29. ^ Barnes, Joe (13 March 2023). "Watch: Russian incendiary weapons rain down on Ukrainian town". London, England: Telegraph Media Group. ISSN 0307-1235. OCLC 49632006. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2023.
  30. ^ Marini, Marina (13 March 2023). "Arma para derreter carne humana: como funcionam bombas de termite da Rússia". UOL.
  31. ^ "Russia sets Bakhmut ablaze after Wagner boss threatens to withdraw". The Telegraph. YouTube. 6 May 2023.
  32. ^ Tangalakis-Lippert, Katherine (5 May 2023). "Massive incendiary attack in Bakhmut shows Russia's 'scorched earth' tactics have turned the eastern Ukrainian city to rubble". Insider Inc.

Further reading

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Use_of_incendiary_weapons_in_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War&oldid=1195604605"