Jump to content

Talk:Thomas S. Riley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 07:44, 15 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articleThomas S. Riley has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 25, 2020Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
January 8, 2021Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
April 17, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 8, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Thomas S. Riley, the son of Irish immigrants, was West Virginia's 11th attorney general and chairperson of the West Virginia Democratic Party State Executive Committee?
Current status: Good article


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk11:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait of Riley, published in 1919
Portrait of Riley, published in 1919

Improved to Good Article status by West Virginian (talk). Self-nominated at 13:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • I made one minor copyedit ("serve" is often abused for simply "doing the job one is paid for"), but that's it: the article is absolutely fine, and I agree with the GA review (which seems to have been done in a conscientious and comprehensive manner). All aspects of the hook are properly verified. It's good to go. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]