Jump to content

Talk:William Withering

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 15:42, 19 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Style for publications

[edit]

Does the list under "Publications" contain the exact names of the works? If so, Wiki-style for short works (papers, essays) is double quotes. Eg.

  • 1773 "Experiments on different kinds of Marle found in Staffordshire" Phil Trans. 63: 161-2

I've also applied Wiki-style to the "Further reading" list - I hope this is OK. Cheers, JackyR | Talk 12:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they virtually all are the titles as published. Thanks v much for letting me know, and for tidying up the further reading list - I have corrected the refs. where appropriate! Kitb 21:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Withering As Investigator

[edit]

Shouldn't somebody write an account of Withering's investigations into folk medicine? That's how he discovered the effects of foxglove, and from whence he derived _digitalis_. It would be no shame to discuss his researches. 128.147.28.1 (talk) 14:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the fact that Withering obtained his knowledge of Foxglove in CHF from a Shropshire herbalist, who had successfully used a polyherbal formula to treat CHF. Withering deduced that Foxglove was the active ingredient, and this is the basis of the drug today, which has a very narrow therapeutic window. It is an interesting historical fact that despite the fact that the medical profession learned of the use of Digitalis from the herbalist community, it was one of the first herbs that was "banned" from use by non-medical users. It would be interesting to know what the original formula contained, as recent research in botanical medicine has suggests that various constituents, even within a single plant, can moderate the overall therapeutic effect. It could be that this original formula may be just as effective if not more so than the isolated alkaloid. Phytogreen (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC) Phytogreen[reply]

I note that there is an existing available link to dropsy which isn't used. Does anyone know which is the best link in this context? JRPG (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Imaginative sentence removed

[edit]

I have deleted from the section Discovery of Digitalis this comment on the woman who allegedly gave Withering the details, as unencyclopaedic. It could be reinstated if it could be proven to be a quotation from a real person.

Her first name must be Topsy as she just grows and grows. Cloptonson (talk) 20:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on William Withering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]