Talk:History of Japan
Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of Japan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 28 days |
History of Japan was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Medieval Japan
Seeing that other articles like Samurai link to here using the term "medieval Japan", which I am sure many readers will not know and think that "medieval" refers to the same period in time as in the context of European history, wouldn't it make sense to introduce this term when talking about the "feudal Japan"?--Nico b. (talk) 20:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Classical does seem an unusual choice given this is usually used to describe considerably earlier periods in Greece & Rome? Can we have a citation ? 27.85.205.27 (talk) 00:01, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Heisei period (1989–2019)
The second paragraph in the § Heisei period (1989–2019) section on Japan's relations with China and Korea seems excessively long and inappropriate as a descriptive summary of the Heisei period, especially considering that the paragraph on the 3/11 earthquake is only two sentences long. The paragraph seems to be a manifestation of Wikipedia's systemic bias, in which editors add information of their own interest without considering its proportion to other parts of the article. 2602:FC24:13:1:E4F7:9065:0:1 (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
The military clashes with British armed forces at the end of Edo period
Why is there no mention about the armed conflict with British forces in Japan in the 1860-s? 2A01:799:CA1:9600:79D9:7D77:B583:D845 (talk) 21:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
War between Korean and Japanese
In the war of Korean and Japanese . The Japanese concept in won the battle : after this Japanese people agreed to be friends and colobrate with Korean people 2402:4000:1201:4E12:C578:9943:F42D:B446 (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in History
- B-Class vital articles in History
- B-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class Japan-related articles
- Top-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- B-Class Archaeology articles
- Mid-importance Archaeology articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors