Jump to content

Talk:Yadav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by C.Fred (talk | contribs) at 17:35, 16 April 2024 (Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 January 2024: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Articles on Abhira or Ahir

One can refer gamit of articles Yadav_(disambiguation) by various communities including historical, mythological reference, pre-sanskritization, sanskritization, modern, post-indepdence. Good to improve this articles using pre-sanskritization reference for example:

  • A book written long before sanskritisation by James Todd "Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan 1829" [1]

References

  1. ^ James Todd. Tod, James (1829). Annals and Antiquities of Rajast'han or the Central and Western Rajpoot States of India, Volume 1. London: Smith, Elder.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 January 2024

chang traditionally non-elite to elite and non-elite Gouravwikie (talk) 22:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please provide a reliable source RegentsPark (comment) 22:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is the logic behind calling a caste as “non-elite” AkkuDreamz (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AkkuDreamz It is described as such in independent sources. Since castes traditionally have a hierarchy, it makes sense to mention its position in the hierarchy. —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong facts on Arya Samaj

the article says

"Although this movement, founded by Swami Dayananda Saraswati, favoured a caste hierarchy and also endogamy, its supporters believed that caste should be determined on merit rather than on heritage".


This is wrong since Arya Samaj categorically rejects both caste and endogamy. Factpineapple (talk) 11:27, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 March 2024

non-elite ==> Elite Sushilyadav27 (talk) 15:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Liu1126 (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The use of the phrase “non-elite” seems to be based on discriminatory bias and is unacceptable. There is no such reference in the India literature both mythological and genealogical.
It should be removed AkkuDreamz (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AkkuDreamz The phrase "non-elite" is included in a quote from one of the sources. —C.Fred (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]