User talk:Rajsingam

Blanking

You have improved a bit, you are no longer blanking a category but you are blanking a whole article called List of prominent Tamils. If you want to write about your own self which ~~i sillegal~~ is illeagal on Wikipedia then go to the section Germany and update information on Rajasingam which is red linked now. ThanksRaveenS 14:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Dominic+jeeva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dominic+jeeva.jpg.Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated.Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image.This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot.If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Rajkumar Kanagasingam

Rajkumar Kanagasingam article is blocked, please help to activate it. rajsingam

My advice, no one is supposed to write their own bio articles. Even Jimbo Wells one of the guys who came up with Wikipedia concept was caught editing his biogrphy and has since apologized. So If I were you I will no longer edit it. Just my advic, you become notable enough that some one else is supposed to write about you. Thanks RaveenS 14:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Jeeva

Your article was nominated for deletion but the nominator is neutral' and I added my comments as strong keep. Please using the WIKI biography model edit it with his birth and death date and link the references properly. I will also do what I can. But its a good article. As a newbie you will ruun into these minor problems. Learn from them and keep moving. We need more content on Sri Lankan Tamils. Thanks RaveenS 14:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RaveenS

Dear RaveenS,

Thanks a lot for your kind advice and concern.

Rajsingam

Arumaipperumal

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Arumaipperumal, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?catid=79&artid=9337. As a copyright violation, Arumaipperumal appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Arumaipperumal has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Arumaipperumal. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Arumaipperumal, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Seraphimblade 07:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vipulananda

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Vipulananda, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tamilnation.org/hundredtamils/vipulananda.htm. As a copyright violation, Vipulananda appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Vipulananda has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Vipulananda. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Vipulananda, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. —Cryptic 11:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pandara Vannian

I edited it quickly so that it will not be deleted, one way to develop an article is to use Sandbox I can create one for you and you use it till you are ready to relaese an article in to the mainstream. I do it all the timeRaveenS 22:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See your Sandbox Sandbox

Image copyright problem with Image:James.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:James.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rajkumar Kanagasingam

Hi.Thanks for leaving a message on my talk page.First let me say I appreciate all the time you've put into editing articles on Wikipedia.And your perspective and your contributions to build an open content encyclopedia are much appreciated.I'm sure it is an unusual experience to work on a Wikipedia article about yourself.The editing and notability discussions can often seem brutal.I hope none of my criticisms of the article come across as criticisms of you, they are not intended to.I do not believe a person's worth as a Wikipedia article subject is related to their worth as a human being.

You brought up a couple of points about the article so I'll try and respond to each.If there was more to your message, please leave me a brief note indicating what I missed.

Just so the main thrust of my response doesn't get lost in all the detail and rationale I want to emphasize, regardless of how much you've written and how many people in Sri Lanka would know your name or recognize your face: We need independent sources who have written about you in order to build an encyclopedia article about you.

1) On the references side:Although I'm sure you're honest and the things your write about yourself are true, such publications do not always satisfy the needs of an encyclopedia.In general, for uncontroversial statements of fact that are not disputed by others, such as when or where you were born, they are normally accepted on Wikipedia, though a secondary, independent source who has found the information by examining records etc. is preferable.For other things the lack of an independent source isn't simply about relying on the rigor of the secondary source to establish the facts, it's also about establishing what is noteworthy about the subject and how to analyze or interpret that in the context of the subject's environment.If no-one else has seen fit to write about it, we have to wonder why Wikipedia readers would want to read about it?What encyclopedia value does it add if the only person to publish on it is the subject of the article?That's why the things you have written yourself are generally not considered appropriate sources for the articles.In general we need references from sources other than yourself (or those who might be expected to speak on your behalf) that confirm the content of the article and to which we can refer as the source of opinions offered in the article.

2) Suitability of the article for Wikipedia:I added a notability tag to the article rather than a deletion request in order to allow time to verify your importance as a subject.I am skeptical about the claim because the things the article talks about you having done - being a journalist, the author of an unpublished book,the author of articles on ezinearticles.com, an officer for an NGO, and the founder of an apparently non-notable organization - do not normally rise to the standard required.But I am aware that the English-language Wikipedia has some systemic bias against subjects not well covered by English-language media, so I wanted to give us all the opportunity to try and establish that notability.

You say Sri Lankans would consider you important if we asked them.Wikipedia isn't equipped to survey people, and in any case that would not give us what we need to ensure we could write an encyclopedic article on you.Perhaps you could point us to evidence of your importance in Sri Lanka, such as interviews with you published in major Sri Lankan newspapers, or your appearance as a major subject of an article by a well respected writer?These do not have to be in English (though we appreciate any translations into English that are available).It is these sorts of things we require to ensure we can build an encyclopedic article, they are the mainstay of the sources from which we can build the article.

You can read more about the reasoning behind this in our core policies verifiability and neutral point of view, and our reliable sources guideline talks a bit more about the difference between primary, secondary and tertiary sources and how each is best used.

Finally you should read our guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest and external links.I note as well as editing your own article you have been adding links to your ezinearticles to other Wikipedia articles.these guidelines cover how to edit in these circumstances Thanks. --Siobhan Hansa 15:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm not sure why you contacted me regarding this, as I've not been involved in this article whatsoever. I did leave you an earlier message regarding copyright violation problems with Arumaipperumal-this was deleted as a copyright violation, but you've since rewritten the article in your own words, which is greatly appreciated. You've also established notability and sourced the article, so that particular article will certainly not be deleted.

As to autobiographical articles-these do indeed tend to come under intense scrutiny, and for good reason. Siobhan Hansa has given you some excellent advice and guidance on this matter. The reason we discourage autobiographical writing is that it is just very hard to write neutrally about oneself-that's certainly not any failing in you, it's simply human nature! It's also very difficult to avoid blending personal knowledge (which is original research and disallowed) with information that can be sourced and verified.

When writing autobiographically, it is even more critically important then normal to ensure that all information is verifiable and reliably sourced. Offline sources are fine for this, but the subject must receive non-trivial mention in multiple independent sources to be considered notable-please note that notability is measured on a worldwide scale, though if you can source the fact that you are highly notable in Sri Lanka this would weigh heavily towards retaining the article. You may also wish to look at the guidelines for notability regarding biographies, and as Siobhan Hansa previously noted, the guidelines and cautions regarding autobiography and conflict of interest.

For the record, here's the types of things I generally look at when autobiographical writing comes to light. Many other editors look at similar types of things.

- You've added a lot of content outside of your autobiography. This certainly counts in your favor.
- You've been willing to take advice regarding policies and practices here. Again, this very much counts in your favor.
- ~~You created the autobiographical article~~, and have been the main editor of it. This does not count in your favor. (removed part of this statement that was in error.) Seraphimblade 21:52, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The article fails to cite sources-again, a mark against.

You do, however, seem to be acting in good faith, so I agree the article should be given some time to cite sources and establish notability. Be aware, though, that the verifiability and reliable source policies are very clear on one point-if information can't be sourced, it does not belong here. I would strongly advise you to trim down the article to only verifiable and reliably sourced information, and to cite sources showing that information to be correct. I'd also advise, in the future, that you seek consensus on the article's talk page before editing your own biography (except for things like minor spelling/grammar corrections or the reversion of blatant vandalism). I would also make sure to identify yourself on the article's talk page as the subject of the article-this type of disclosure is highly recommended, and helps to assure other editors that honesty and full disclosure are something they can expect. Good luck to you, and if you need any assistance or this is unclear, please leave a note on my talk page. Seraphimblade 18:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding.Unfortunately you have not yet provided what we need for the article.The threshold for including something in Wikipedia is verifiability not truth.All of your claims, however true they may be, are no use to Wikipedia if they are not verifiable by reliable sources.The only reference you've provided is a press release by your own organization.This cannot be considered a reliable source for the claims you want it to support.We need sources that are independent of you.Are there any independent reliable sources that verify what is written in the article, or that show you are prominent in Sri Lanka?Thanks --Siobhan Hansa 20:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply to ur msg

I will look at it. Gimme a few days.Baka man 23:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look at WP:AUTO, the users above may have a point. If you need anything I'll try to help you. I added other links to assert your notability.Baka man 23:50, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

You had left a message on my user page, I am not sure of its purpose but I think other senior editors are dealing with you on this matter. Take careRaveenS 16:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Weeramantry

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Christopher Weeramantry, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wicper.org/Judge's%20CV.htm. As a copyright violation, Christopher Weeramantry appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Christopher Weeramantry has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Christopher Weeramantry. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Christopher Weeramantry, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --W.marsh 23:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Killinochi

Gret article except some questions on the Naga history, You may need to find some WP:RS sources for it. Otherwise the article looks great. How is Swami Vipulanada coming up :-))) ?RaveenS 21:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Anton Balasingham1.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Anton Balasingham1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kerr avon 09:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.Kerr avon 09:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you redefine the states of the picture please. Thanks RaveenS 14:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems withImage:Raj 03.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Raj 03.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Oden 06:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to:

Please pay attention to copyright! --Oden 08:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploads and fair use

You have recently uploaded Image:Anton Balasingham.jpg, Image:Anton Balasingham22.jpg, Image:Anton Balasingham32.jpg and Image:Anton Balasingham42.jpg which are all supposed to illustrate a section of a biographical article, Anton Balasingham. Fair use criteria #3 says: "The amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible". Since the event which the images are meant to illustrate is barely mentioned in the article I have removed all four of the images. If you were to improve the article and write a section about the funeral I would suggest using Image:Anton Balasingham.jpg.

Also remember that any images licensed as fair use need a detailed fair use rationale, otherwise they risk being deleted. --Oden 07:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Balaannanswiss 2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Balaannanswiss 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Oden 07:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC) --Oden 07:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Dominic1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dominic1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anton Balasingham

Regarding your edits to Anton Balasingham, I appreciate the fact that you seem to know alot on the subject of that article. I would like to remind you of the following:

You cannot copy and paste text from another website (unless you are quoting someone). Articles need to be written in the words of a editor, that is our contribution to Wikipedia. See WP:C.
Wikipedia's articles need to be neutral, and allow for what some might view as negative aspects on any subject (like criticism). See WP:NPOV.
If you have a dispute with another editor try to work it out on the talk page. If you revert more than three times within a period of 24 hours you risk a 24 hour block (you risk being blocked even longer for apparent bad faith edits). See WP:3RR.
Articles need to have good sources. Don't remove sources from the article without a good reason. See WP:V, WP:RS and WP:CITE.

I will take a closer look at the article when I get a chance. --Oden 15:02, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rajsingam, you left this message about Anton Balasingham for me on my talk page.I haven't been editing that article so I'm not not clear on what the message is about, was there something in particular you wanted my assistance with?--Siobhan Hansa 10:06, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Dominic2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dominic2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes

I moved things around and rewrote part of it. The death section always comes at the end of a biography though so I moved the section on his death to the end.Baka man 15:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV to Anton Balasingham

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. You may also be interested in reading The five pillars of Wikipedia, our Help pages, the Tutorial, the policy on citing sources, and our Manual of Style.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Kaspazes ^talk 16:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Anton Balasingham

I don't have the time to help out - sorry. It isn't too hard to make a few paragraphs of text neutral POV, however. — Wackymacs 22:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anton Balasingham

I've not been involved with that article, but I'll have a look at it if I get a chance. Also, you've left a couple of messages on my user page. It is customary to leave messages on the user's talk page, you can find mine here. This will also alert the user to the fact that someone has left a message, and generally result in a quicker response. (Just make sure that the header at the top of the page says "User talk:Username" instead of "User:Username"). Seraphimblade 03:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reply to your comment

dear Rajasingham,

Don't even think I hate you.I hate none,not even the LTTErs,whom I would gladly forgive if they give their terrorism up.The problem with you is, you seemed to be in pre-occupied mind set about certain things.I don't mind you having certain issues ,But I believe you should at least try to listen to what others say of things..I have given a link with photos, and You without even looking at them, removed just because you think Asia-tribune, from which I quote,is Not reliable..Were you disputing the Photos ?? !! Were you disputing the article ??If so ,please make your comments at the talk page regarding it.I don't want to say this again, but LTTE had spent millions of Poor Tamil peoples money for this funeral and this must be said in wikipedia. Do you have any idea, how much they paid for the funeral arrangements ?? And, why do you think this is not important ?? And for your kindness,which you have shown for a Sinhalese family, I really appreciate it.And you are not alone, there are many tamils,who had helped Sinhalese in many occasions..I hear stories,where Tamil villagers have even risk their lives by helping trapped Army soldiers!! Same goes vice versa.That's why,more and more tamil people are moving to south to live among Sinhalese rather than live in the LTTE control area.--Iwazaki 11:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you think , these articles are too controversial for you, I think its better not to involve in editing..especially, you have to remember that wikipedia is not anyone's personal Blog , there may be many things that you don't agree here,but you must look at everything in broader sense. I don't think your personal opinion of Anton balasinghams funeral is relevant to us..The fact that LTTE had organized a lavish funeral and spent millions of rupees for it ,must be state here.people have right to know the truth and your personal ideas should not prevent anyone from knowing the truth..And, finally I'm going to revet to my earlier version and If you have any claims,(so far you have shown none) please make it at the talk page.Then we can discuss. Iwazaki 13:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anton Balasingham

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Anton Balasingham. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 14:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting !

Dear Rajsingam, Why you keep changing the Anton Balasingham article with your WP:POV.Remember this is not your personal home page nor your personal BLOG , this is an encyclopaedia and please respect this !! you might get banned if you continue to do this.--Iwazaki 14:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on December 28 2006 to Anton Balasingham

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 3 hours. William M. Connolley 20:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Europeans

That was not necessarily the case, see Out of India theory. Nobleeagle ^[TALK] [C] 03:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Looks like you've being personally attacked in the talk page of Anton Balasingham couple of times. My advise to you is never to respond back in kind, never contravine any WP rules and take your time to respond properly. On your behalf I have left a request on one of the users page. We can see how far either it escalates or cooles down in the future, but at the end always stick to the rules and the wiki process will take care of the offending parties. Thanks RaveenS 18:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article dispute

I'm unsure why you left a note for me, I've not really been involved with this article? If you're having a content dispute with other editors, you should look to the dispute resolution process, which will put the matter before uninvolved editors, often helping to resolve the dispute. Jimbo Wales doesn't generally get involved in content disputes except in the most extreme cases, which this doesn't seem to be one of, so I doubt you'd get far there. I would also caution that accusing other editors of bad faith is not to be done lightly-unless you have some evidence that another editoris acting or intends to act in bad faith, one should always assume good faith, even during a disagreement. If the other side is genuinely acting in bad faith, that will quickly come to light on its own, and the offender will be dealt with. I echo the sentiments of RaveenS, that if you are being personally attacked, it is best not to respond in kind. Personal attacks will not be long tolerated, and if the offender does not stop, (s)he will find h(im|er)self blocked or otherwise sanctioned. Just don't respond in kind, else you may find the same come down on you. Seraphimblade 14:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Raj 02.jpg

Image cannot be tagged both GFDL and Public Domain. GFDL retains copyright and Public Domain releases copyright. Please correct the tagging or I will nominate the image for deletion for inconsistant tags since we have no way of knowing what you intended. -Thanks Nv8200p talk 13:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD on Rajasingahm page

I voted as I felt, but if I were you I will no longer argue for or against ones own article, that somehow does not sound kosher although I cant quote the policy. But one has to always follow WP:BIO to the letter. Even if the article is deleted please dont stop contributing to Wikipedia as time goes on and you become a truely seasoned editor in the years to come, all this will look trivial at the point. We need energetic contributers like you in the future. Thanks RaveenS 16:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warn

I noticed that you edited someone else's comment[2]. As a rule, please refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks, --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 11:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Kandyan Kingdom. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your original contributions are welcome. --snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 16:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Diana Institute of Peace

I would suggest locating some addition citations for this article.There's nothing wrong with providing some references that are based on the organization's press releases or writings by its managements, but to establish notability most people are going to want you to demonstrate that the organization has been covered by independent media--such as newspaper articles that talk about the group as their primary focus.Hope that helps. Tarinth 13:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I, for one, would not see to it that this is deleted, and if it does, I'd likely just vote "keep and clean up".Just get it cleaned up per Tarinth's commentary.In short, it's a good start.Good luck with this one. =) --Dennisthe2 16:59, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ananda Krishnan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ananda Krishnan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Diana Institute of Peace

The article is written in a good tone. I would suggest procuring additional citation though, since this article relies very heavily on the "Sri Lanka Daily News" article. The information can be verified by additional citations and placing of related links (if possible, a book or two or a journal) will be helpful. If you need help with the citations then I'll be free in a couple of days. Feel free to message me. Cheers! _{Freedom skies| talk} 19:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Anton Balasingham.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anton Balasingham.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 23:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, that source is not specific enough. We would like the HTML page that the image is used on, not just the general website. Please provide a more specific source. --MECU≈talk 15:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've already removed the tag. You now have unlimited time. --MECU≈talk 15:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Man I added some info that I got from your scanned letters, but try to find some RSs for those. Happy Editing! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 07:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, You were hell-bent to delete my article's on the AFD discussion, but suddenly you have changed your mind and expanding my article. I know the nature of Kandyan Sinhalese. Even my step-grand mother is a Kandyan Buddhist Sinhalese. But in wikipedia I have to argue a lot things even in the future. So you might feel still I am an uncomfortable person. Thanks for your editing. Rajsingam 07:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes I was hell bent to delete your article because you are not notable in Sri Lanka. I would have certainly known about you if you were notable. Anyway, I will definitely help you maintain the quality of your article. By the way, how did you guess I am a Kandyan Sinhalese.

--♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 08:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anton B

Thanks for notifying me about Anton. I agree that the term "Terrorist" is rather value-laden here and will provide reasoning to that effect. Rumpelstiltskin223 09:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, try not to make flowery speeches on talk pages, that is a violation of WP:POINT. Instead, form reasoned and relevant arguments like the one I just gave in the talk page. Rumpelstiltskin223 09:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep doing what you're doing now, you'll get into trouble. You are outnumbered by the Sinhalas it seems. The best way is to file a Mediation cabal and then a Request for Comments. That will get some neutral editors involved. Rumpelstiltskin223 10:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what rumpel said.i barely knew the guy.--D-Boy 10:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your post

Just to let you know, you may wish to consider filing a request for comment rather than posting to a bunch of talk pages. I'm certainly generally happy to provide outside opinions in a dispute, but am not really in an expert in the areas you normally edit, quite often an RFC gets comments from those who are interested and knowledgeable in that specific area. If you're unfamiliar with the process, I can certainly walk you through it. There are also other methods of dispute resolution which are often helpful. You might also consider not CC'ing Jimbo Wales-he rarely gets involved in content disputes. I did post an opinion at the page in question. Seraphimblade 10:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to file an RfC, you'd want to file it under the Biography RfC section. You'll want to state what the dispute is over, though of course those who come to the article via RfC may wish to comment on other aspects of the article as well. You must state the RfC in a neutral manner-something like "Debate over whether it is appropriate to call article's subject a terrorist" would be acceptable, but something like "Debate over whether we can call someone a terrorist who really isn't" would most certainly not be. Seraphimblade 11:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree "that posting to a bunch of talk pages" was not the best move in this case.Seraphimblade has given you some good advice above.Please try filing under Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies. -- Jeff G. (talk|contribs|links|watch|logs) 17:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too, in the future dont cc to many users as most will come to ignore it. Should use the wiki problem sresolution process. I knwow it can be all confusing but lets us follow the process. RaveenS 18:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sock puppets Issue

I had to open a Suspected sock puppets case against you and User:DoDoBirds. You can make your comment on the Comments section, on the below of the case. Happy Editing! --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 12:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DoDoBirds: My Sockpuppet

I apologise for my behaviour as I am the sockpuppeteer(Rajsingam) for the sockpuppet(DoDoBirds) and redirecting the DoDoBirds to Rajsingam.

I have started the DoDoBirds on 30 December 2006 to get involved in the highly sensitive international political issues and named it as DoDoBirds on the perception how the Dodo birds were wiped out from the world by Man; if he couldn’t stop the atrocities against each other one day he also will be wiped from this world.

My Violations & Reasons behind

1. I have voted on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam which is my own biography article, after I noticed the Delete vote of User Lahiru_k at 07:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC) just three hours after the AFD tag was put by User Nv8200p at 04:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC).Lahiru_k has never done any editing on my article and his rush for voting, made me to suspect the whole deletion process as a Sinister AFD Scam and prompted me through the DoDoBirds as a third party voice to high light my various activities which are documented in the off-line media sources.[reply]

2. I have voted twice on the Template deletion Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_January_6#Template:State_terrorism_in_Sri_Lanka as I have personally affcted by the state terrorism in Sri Lanka since my childhood in the war-torn Jaffna Peninsula.

I apologise once again for my behaviour.Rajsingam 05:15, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Failure to sign a comment is most certainly not vandalism. Just look through the page history to see who made it and tag it with the {{unsigned}} template. Removal of another person's comment, on the other hand, generally is considered to be borderline vandalism and disruptive. Seraphimblade 13:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Talk:Rajkumar Kanagasingam

Rajsingam, I don't understand what needs to be sorted out.Unless I've misunderstood the edit you're talking about, the comment is on the article's talk page not the article itself, and it's basically a note to other editors about the content they may find when researching for the article.When you ask how you can sort out the matter, what do you mean?-- Siobhan Hansa 16:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Netmonger wasn't the one who left the message - he merely restored a message you had improperly deleted from the talk page.I can appreciate that it must be difficult to watch editors work on an article about you on Wikipedia and discuss issues around that in a way that isn't always complimentary.But you don't have control over the article or how others see you and censoring a message on an article talk page because you disagree with it is disruptive.You should respond on the talk page to the concerns raised, giving the facts as you see them. Responding to comments by attacking the editors making them is not appropriate.Netmonger may well disagree with you on many matters, but his restoring of the comment is not an attack on you - your accusation that a proper edit by him is an attack on you because you !voted different ways on an AfD is a failure to assume good faith.You have managed to make a minor comment on the article talk page into a conflict between yourself and other editors.That's really not good for Wikipedia.Try to stay focused on the content instead of making it about personalities.-- Siobhan Hansa 10:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS It would be nice if you could try to refrain from posting the same comment to me in multiple places.I find it difficult to follow the conversations and work out what I've responded to and what I haven't. Thanks. SH

Image tagging for Image:Rajkumar & Spain(SPCIDI).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajkumar & Spain(SPCIDI).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rosys.jpg

If there is an email proving that this image has been released into the public domain, please forward it to permission-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org.Thanks, --Robth^Talk 06:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there is a reason to believe that the image has been released into the public domain or under a free license, we cannot use it. --Robth^Talk 17:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Lanka Barnstar

		The Sri Lanka Reconciliation Barnstar
		For your merits in Sri Lanka reconciliation[3][4][5], I herewith present you this Sri Lanka specific barnstar, which is the blossom of one of the world's most loved drinks. To keep a cool head in one of the world's hottest conflicts deserves our highest respect! — Sebastian 08:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Rajsingam12.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajsingam12.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright tag

Correct copyright tag for your paper cuttings is this. Though your face was on that paper cutting, you don't own the news paper my friend. So replace that tag with {{Newspapercover}} tag. Otherwise they will definitely get deleted soon. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 08:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Rajsingam10.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajsingam10.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arsath versus Netmonger

If I were you I would have waited the 48 hours before posting about the Rfc in everybody else’s talk page. It is not the process in Wikipedia. So far no one has seconded your case and I think the case fails in number points because 2 third parties did not try to resolve the so called dispute with you and Netmonger. But by posting in everybody else’s talk pages now you have made it a public case and made Netmonger’s job easy to find the 2 people! So dont do such things in the future.

Although as far as I am concerned there is no dispute between you and Netmonger because no two third parties have been asked to resolve it. Hence no legit Rfc.

Just relax and take it easy also don’t be overly concerned about the Bio article either. You cannot waste all your time in Wikipedia chasing one article, with time with your contribution to the world the article will assume a legitimacy that will not need your intervention. Who is chasing Anton Balasingham page ? we all are and your bio too will assume such legitimacy with contributions to the world that no one will question in time. Wikipedia articles are written to last 100’s of years not just few years, always remember that. Thanks RaveenS 13:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My reponse [6]RaveenS

Crossposting to talk pages

Raj, if would be so kind as to exclude me from your talk page posts, I'd be grateful.It's not that I don't care, it's more that I tend to focus my energy on other issues here. --Dennisthe2 22:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Rajsingam! Thank you for your involvement and support at the RfC. It was an unfortunate mess up between me and Grutness. Thanks again. Yugayuga 13:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rajsingam12.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajsingam12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rajsingam10.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajsingam10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rajsingam10.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajsingam10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 19:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Rajsingam12.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajsingam12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 19:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 12:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)^{talk to me}[reply]

Blocked for a personal attack

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up ®} 18:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SOS over Rajsingam/DoDoBirds Accounts

Dear Mr. Fayssal,

I am the original user of Rajsingam & DoDoBirds and shared the passwords with three of my friends as I am busy with my book "German Memories in Asia". As I have some problems over a few edits on Sri Lanka Conflict with them, I think one of them is posting various people which might damage my reputation.

Please help me.

Please remove from "history" all those malicious messages.

I am not responsible these acts.

For your confirmation that all what say is true, I herewith attached my Bio in wikipedia Rajkumar Kanagasingam.

If you don't beleive me, you can use your administrator power and kindly delete my Bio also from wikipedia.

Mt personal e-mail for more confirmation: rajsingam@mail.com

Yours truly,

Rajkumar Kanagasingam 07:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyvio

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:PandaraVanniyan.gif. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.sangam.org/articles/view2/?uid=675 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article [[Talk:Image:PandaraVanniyan.gif|Talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:PandaraVanniyan.gif]] with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article [[Talk:Image:PandaraVanniyan.gif|Talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:Image:PandaraVanniyan.gif]] with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at [[Talk:Image:PandaraVanniyan.gif]] saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome. snowolfD4^{( talk / @ )} 19:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. hbdragon88 05:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Deepti Bhatnagar22.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Deepti Bhatnagar22.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:000005.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:000005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Gaff ^ταλκ 01:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC) —Gaff ^ταλκ 01:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wallace_J._Campbell(CARE).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wallace_J._Campbell(CARE).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 09:07, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:James-spain.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:James-spain.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:34, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Care35.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Care35.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Anton Balasingham1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anton Balasingham1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMG 0410.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:IMG 0410.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Asian Legal Resource Centre

The article Asian Legal Resource Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:AGSEP3.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:AGSEP3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:AGSEP23.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:AGSEP23.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sri Wickama Rajasinghe.jpg

The file File:Sri Wickama Rajasinghe.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fellowship at Hilton Hotel Colombo, Sri Lanka October 2006.jpg

The file File:Fellowship at Hilton Hotel Colombo, Sri Lanka October 2006.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yatra (2002 TV series)

The article Yatra (2002 TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]