Talk:Next plc

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Retailing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Retailing To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : SM Lanang Premier
Copyedit : Retailing in India
Expand : :- Please expand this project's list of articles. The subcategories of Category:Retailers is also an excellent starting point.
- Expand this project's image gallery page

- More articles for expansion: Automated retail, Big-box store, Chain store, Hypermarket, Store manager
NPOV : Retail loss prevention
Photo : Retail design
Stubs : Leakage (retail), Retail geography
Verify : Department store, Discount store, Retail clerk, Retail in the Republic of Ireland, Retail media, Retail software, Suggested retail price
Other : * Please add this project's banner {{WikiProject Retailing}} to retail-related talk pages. Also, bots can be utilized to automate this task.
- Also, add biographies to the articles list.

–When a task is completed, please remove it from the list.

Contradiction?

This article seems to contradict the George Davies (retailer) article regarding the foundation of Next?!?! Can someone explain?

Hi, I replied in Talk:George Davies (retailer). --- Richard CHS^Talk 15:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Leicester?

Does anyone know why Next moved their HQ from Leeds to Leicester in 1986? --Wrh1973 22:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC) next moved for location purposes where situated now moterway links reach any part of the country central location —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.155.236.239 (talk) 23:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Lime Stores

In the article about Next and the new Lime stores which opened last month, it states that the clothing is refurbished previous seasons clothing. This is incorrect. Lime is a "no frills" clothing range sometimes using cloth from previos seasons main line ranges but never old seasons stock rehashed! Lime has it's own buyers and designers charged with tempting the sort of shopper from the likes of Primark and TK Maxx but with the service and quality of a mid-market retailer.

hi read it proeplty it dosent say that

Sales

Is there really a need to have this section - most stores have sales and I guess that most stores prepare in the same way. Also 9 hour shift is a standard day for most people!

Fair use rationale for Image:Next.gif

Image:Next.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replacing the Stores section image

I replaced the picture of a Next sign apparently from the Bristol store with a picture of their largest chain store, in Manchester. Figured it was a better fit. Anyone disagree? --Skip88 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms of Next.

I intend to add a section on this -ensuring of course that this is fair and includes Next's comments.

Advertising etc.

I agree that the contents of several sections appear to have been written for promotional purposes and fail the neutral point of view test. The Logos and Marketing section is up to 3 years out of date and lacks citations. I would like to see the number of employees included both at Enderby and in the stores though I know it is very seasonal. Far too much lacks citations and contains material which will be quickly out of date. I'll help contribute to improving the article JRPG (talk) 15:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of material cribbed directly from Next website or adverts.

I note
Next continues to improve customer service, introducing new initiatives such as next day delivery as standard for Next Directory orders placed before 9pm.
is an exact copy of wording from http://www.nextplc.co.uk/nextplc/aboutnext/businessoverview/
Whilst Online shopping was introduced in 1999 and the entire book is available to shop from on the internet, page by page – another first in home shopping in the UK
is an exact copy of wording from www.catalogue-connection.co.uk/.../next-directory.htm
I will shorly revert these edits which are in contradiction of WP:SOAP. Please only add neutral material suitable for an encyclopedia, not just items of temporary commercial interest. If you are connected with Next, please read conflict of interest
JRPG (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Logos and Marketing.

This section reads more like the credits for a film than an educational item about Next's strategy on advertising. Beauty Confessional is a blog and doesn't seem a reliable source capable of conferring notability. Unfortunately the section is out of date, has a typo and is confusing to read, so I will be amending it shortly. Please discuss before expanding. JRPG (talk) 16:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced profit forcast

An editor continues to insert information which forecasts £630-640 million for the profit for the year, and cites the Telegraph for that information. The Telegraph does not provide that figure. They quote the company's forecast of its own profit: "It now expects to make pre-tax profits of between £575m and £620m". The company itself, in its third quarter interim management statement from Oct 31, says "We now expect Group profit before tax to be in the range £590m to £620m (previously £575m to £620m)", and there have been no updates since. Analysts' forecasts since then suggest a range of £605m to £618m. So any forecast at the £630m level should be immediately reverted if it continues to be unsourced. Dormskirk (talk) 17:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UK's largest clothing retailer?

The article says the following in its first paragraph....

    "Next is the largest clothing retailer by sales in the United Kingdom, having overtaken Marks & Spencer in early 2012.[5]"

If you click on the reference, you will see that this is Bloomberg saying that Next is the biggest UK clothing retailer by MARKET VALUE, not by SALES. I think M&S is still the largest by sales, although I don't have a definitive source of that information.

Helix123 (talk) 09:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Next plc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.next.co.uk/shot.asp?extra=sch&b=X43&p=708&s=8&n=Children&pid=439-696&exclude=00P00

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Living Wage -removal of properly cited 2014 source

An I/P removed a summary of a 2014 Times article which asked why Next were paying less than a living wage, The I/P claimed there was no proof but this is not required in Wikipedia as reliable sources check their data. See WP:VER
On a more constructive note, I live in Leicester and am very familiar with Next and whilst I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of the 2014 statement I would be very happy to add a response from the company saying it had agreed to pay a living wage. Here's a fuller quote from the Times article -note the reference to Dickens. Feel free to discuss on talk.

Companies relish their upper hand, play the austerity card during pay rounds even now times are better. When the retailer Next was asked why, despite record profits, its wages were still below the living wage, it replied that since 30 people applied for every job advertised, how could it be paying too little?
Would that we had a Dickens to record our age.
Feel free to discuss on talk. JRPG (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Next plc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of shoes

@Goodreg3: Please explain how a photograph of one pair of very well-worn Next plc shoes contributes anything to the value of this article, especially in the "Logo and marketing" section. General Ization ^Talk 02:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]