Talk:Mad Max

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Australia: Cinema Low‑importance

	Australia portal Mad Max is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Science Fiction High‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fury Road Link

I couldn't help but notice that link for Mad Max 4: Fury Road that just sends you to this page. It's very irrelevant and annoying.

It's not irrelevant because the film is currently in production.... Colliric (talk) 15:38, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mad Max Universe

I noticed that user Beyo created a page called Mad Max Universe. I am wondering if this content shouldn't be merged into this article. Thoughts? Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 19:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have already been redirected. I am not sure if the content has been merged however. Jabberjawjapan (talk) 02:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Franchise

All of the movies show a similar resemblance a Wild West world, bandits trying to take supplies and gas by robbing other vehicles and duel gunfights, in Australia, it almost looks as if the director possibly took the ideas from Gunsmoke --50.122.8.14 (talk) 15:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Bruce Spence plays the same charcter in MM2 and MMBT

Can anyone prove otherwise? The credits just address him in different ways. This happens sometimes from one film to another in franchises. 128.95.223.222 (talk) 18:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I always thought it was left deliberately ambiguous whether he was supposed to be the same guy or not.--Leigh Burne (talk) 08:09, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure George Miller has said that he's definitely a different character. It's certainly widely accepted in fandom that the are not the same. Note that the narration at the end of MM2 notes that the Gyrocaptain went on to become the leader of the Great Northern Tribe. This doesn't fit well with him showing up as a single parent in MMBT. --.../NemoThorx (talk • Contributions) 23:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't it the kid who went on to be the tribe's leader?--Leigh Burne (talk) 07:51, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correct; the Feral Kid becomes the Chief of The Great Northern Tribe, not the gyro captain. Note also that Max knows that Spence's character has a plane -- but how could he know that, when, at the beginning of MMBT when Max is knocked off his camel rig by the flying assailant, he is never close enough to see who did it? OTOH, Spence's teeth are not as horrible in MMBT as they were in MM2/Road Warrior. So, Miller's released edit is therefore a "goof" either way, whether they're the same or different characters.--Froglich (talk) 09:24, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cast table

I've made an edit that may be be considered controversial, but I thought I'd be bold... The cast table in this article, with so much empty space and only the one cell that spans more than a single column or row, seems relatively pointless - the only returning character is Max, and the returning actors (in different roles) are already mentioned in prose. I've therefore removed the table. I did not convert the entire table into a list of characters for each film, since those are adequately covered in each film's article, and no character other than Max seemed significant enough to warrant mentioning at a franchise level. Frankly, I think the "crew" table should also be removed, but at least that table has much less empty space and more overlap between films. --Fru1tbat (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I support your edit. A table is unnecessary when the films only have one common character. Betty Logan (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 December 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. The consensus is that the film is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 08:53, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mad Max (franchise) → Mad Max
Mad Max → Mad Max (film)

– The franchise is the primary topic for those searching for Mad Max. The film series alone has enough entries to warrant the primary topic, but this is a full-blown media franchise and what readers expect to find at "Mad Max"—not the first film. czar 06:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Ugh, no, I hate when I unintentionally end up at a franchise article. Mad Max is an important and influential film, and it was one of the most successful low budget films for a very long time. Its legacy can not be brushed aside in favor of sticking a franchise article in its spot. The Max Max franchise would not even exist without the first film, which I think is a pretty compelling argument that it's the primary topic. A hatnote is the appropriate solution. This is how we do it for The Godfather, Hellraiser, The Terminator, RoboCop, Back to the Future, and The Matrix. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As above.--Leigh Burne (talk) 11:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and Mad Max (disambiguation). In ictu oculi (talk) 14:52, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As above. Fortdj33 (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the franchise article serves as an overview article, and the main character of Max is as likely than the first film and the franchise. Either move the franchise article, or make the primary spot a disambiguation page -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per NRP. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 13:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Mad Max 2 (vs Road Warrior)

Given that this page links to other main pages about the films (or soundtracks) in the series, the titles of those movies should be used here - i.e. if you feel strongly that a movie's title is "wrong" (e.g. Mad Max 2) then please lobby on that page for the name change (which would then be reflected here). Over the years from when I created this article, I have been consistent in using primary article names here (rather than deliberately creating a redirect link). Thanks. JabberJaw (talk) 23:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 November 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 21:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mad Max (franchise) → Mad Max
Mad Max → Mad Max (film)

– This was proposed by User:Czar back in 2015. However, I think there is now much more of a case for moving the series article to main. First of all, Fury Road has since been recognized as one of the best movies of all time, so there's less of an argument that the original film is singular in its pop culture impact, as Fury Road has entered the pop culture lexicon too. Second, there's also an upcoming 2022 film which will undoubtedly attract a high amount of attention as well. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Fury Road's prominence. El Millo (talk) 03:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nux

Nux (Mad Max) has been nominated for deletion. Discussion participation and/or article improvements welcome ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Australian" in lead

Per a discussion on the topic on the Fury Road topic, the lead describes the film as an Australian series. There is no source in the article discussing the film as an Australian production or what that entails for a "series". Several good articles identify the nationality of the films such as Halloween do, while others do not (The Invisible Man, Twilight). MOS:FILMSERIES does not state how we should handle this. We aren't supposed to apply things from other wikipedia articles to place in these articles, but this comes into complicated issues when most of the films in the series appear to be strictly Australian, while Fury Road is an Australian-US co-production (per SMH, as well as AFI and BFI). How should this be handled for film series where its not consistent nor is it sourced or mentioned in the article? Andrzejbanas (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a problem here. If there were an effort to raise this to Good Article status, I suppose it would be necessary to add something in the main body, explaining with citations the ties to Australia. Honestly, I don't think that would be particularly difficult. The Mad Max franchise is internationally understood to be as Australian as the kangaroo and Midnight Oil. Having some US dollars involved in the production of a film hardly changes that. CAVincent (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]