Jump to content

Talk:MV Don Claudio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheNuggeteer (talk | contribs) at 06:44, 3 August 2024 (Nominated for DYK, see Template:Did you know nominations/MV Don Claudio (DYK-wizard)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Removal for tags

If you want to ask about the removal of tags, you can talk about it in the thread here, the article is entirely sourced and has the proper categories. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 06:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

Created by Alberttwasregistered (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 06:44, 3 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hmm, okay. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 08:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @TheNuggeteer:. Why should this article not be redirected, given that of the six references previously in this article, two were duplicated and have been merged, one isn't reliable, one offers only trivial coverage, and one only mentions the ship in relation to the disaster (and I can't read the sixth)?--Launchballer 20:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing here that establishes notability of this ship for a standalone article on Wikipedia. There are only four sources in this article. The newspaper photogragh posted to Flickr is not a full-fledged news article. The UPI archives article has only a passing mention of the MV Don Claudio. The Kansai Shipbuilding Association Journal entry is just a list of technical specifications. The citation to Philippine Ship Spotters Society is a self-published document on Wordpress, which is a deprecated source. I feel like this is a candidate for deletion or merging, and not for DYK. Flibirigit (talk) 01:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I've redirected this.--Launchballer 07:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]