Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 November 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 147.70.242.41 (talk) at 19:01, 18 November 2008 (Transparent screen → Organic light-emitting diode: update: it's dead, Jim!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 11

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 11, 2008

Orphaned, useless.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

California has solar and hydro resources as well 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Texas has solar and hydro resources as well 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are many types of wind powered vehicles 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The two are not logically connected. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 11:07, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect makes no sense at all. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect makes no sense 70.55.84.27 (talk) 09:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


There are other types of transparent electronics, like some organics, and vacuum tubes 70.55.84.27 (talk) 08:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Off gassing does not refer to ERU, and is factually wrong to redirect it in such a way. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BIPV are only one class of these panels 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • So use the editing tools that you already possess and write a disambiguation or an article documenting all of the other classes. You don't need an administrator to fix this problem. You need to write content. Uncle G (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photovoltatic cells are not a topic covered in this article, and crystalline PV cells do not necessarily use silicon. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've retargeted it to Photovoltaic module... but it's not all that likely a search term. 76.66.192.6 (talk) 04:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

optical concentrators are also other things besides magnifying glasses, which we have articles on, particularly in optical communications technology 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • So write an article on the subject telling readers this. You have the editing tools. You don't need administrative tools to fix this problem. The goal is to make the encyclopaedia better, which you won't achieve by not writing the things that you claim are missing from the encyclopaedia and not improving the parts of the encyclopaedia that are incomplete. Uncle G (talk) 11:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can think of nothing encyclopedic to say about "optical concentration" except the self-evident "things that concentrate light". The redirect was created by an editor who has exhausted my ability to assume good faith. Given the user's pattern of contributions, this is better returned to a redlink. Rossami (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These two concepts are not logically equivalent, and one is not a subset of the other. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

blatant advertising NPOV violation 70.55.84.27 (talk) 07:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the only type of foam plastic, not even close. 70.55.84.27 (talk) 06:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what the TF pseudospace means, but it is an improper CNR to a non-content wikiproject. MBisanz talk 02:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note - TF:SA is shown as a short cut on the target page. Reserving recommendation for the time being, except to recommend input from the members of the WikiProject. B.Wind (talk) 03:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep until orphaned. While this is too recent to trip my personal threshold for historical value, it had some relevant usage in internal discussions. Breaking the links would obscure the context and explanation behind the editors' thoughts and make future interpretation of those discussions significantly more difficult. We ought not to gratuitiously break those internal links.
    Once the page has been orphaned, consider me an "abstain". Rossami (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Navel gazing CNR to a wikipedia page, does not link to content. MBisanz talk 02:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improper CNR to a Wikitalk page, proper usage is WT: not WPT: MBisanz talk 02:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

his daughter 68.37.149.120 (talk) 04:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]