User talk:Thingg

Welcome to my talk page!

Hello and thanks for visiting! Feel free to leave a message. I am an administrator here on Wikipedia, which means that I have few extra buttons to push if I need to. It also means that if you need help with something, I can probably provide assistance; so please ask!

Please remember...

I will reply to comments on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
Be polite. It makes the world a better place.
Assume good faith. I am human and I do make mistakes. If I have made one, please tell me.
Sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). This lets me see who you are without having to look at the page history. Also, if you are leaving a message about one of your edits that I have reverted or modified, please provide a diff or at least mention the page's name so I can find the edit you are talking about.

Happy New Year!

Christmas was yesterday: Happy New Year!

Happy new Headcheese!-hexaChord² 02:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Galib is wishing you a Happy New Year. This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing!

Best To Reply At My Talk Page. Thanks.

Just Stopping by. Yours Truly, M.H.^{True Romance iS Dead} 15:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

.[reply]

Deletion of Game Lounge post

I like an explanation of why this post was deleted. Everything in this post was factual. There were no marketing or promotional elements to it. I did not write "This service is great, buy it!". It is important not to hastily judge a post as spam simply because it is for a commercially available product. The service exists, it is noteworthy, and there are no blatant sales pitches in it.

Disappointed in the draconian editing practices here... —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChinaDollz (talk • contribs) 19:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why were u fixing my fix?

u cant argue with that...it is true...that it is portrayed by the simpsons...so y fix it???

email me back...quinnfox@hotmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.16.22.22 (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Maes

Hi there. I was original tagger of that article, which I tagged as A7. After some discussion with the author and with Balloonman, I figured that this article probably meets at least the standards of passing A7, if not notability itself. As you were the original deleter of that article, I figure it is best to go to you for an undeletion request. Sincerely, NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Logos with text

Hi. I was just looking at the new PlayStation Netowork logo which has been placed on the PlayStation Network and PlayStation 3 articles and I was sure that there was something in the MOS about the use of images which include the product/company name in the way that this one does. I thought I remembered reading that if the text is not part of the logo it's self and an alternative without text is available, then that one should be used. But I can't find this now. I noticed that you had reverted to the older version (which has since been reverted again) and wondered if this was the reason or whether I've just made this up in my head!? :) ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 09:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the hug!

		The Special Barnstar
		It was your message that finally convinced me to start using Huggle! As a result, Wikipedia has a far more active vandal fighter in me. To thank you, I award you this special barnstar! John Sloan (view / chat) 16:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know

Why are you changing the date on my Wikipedia bio? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.253.155.193 (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a reliable source for the correct date, there would be no question. WP:AUTO is probably also worth reading; it's generally frowned upon to edit a biographical article about yourself. Frank | talk 23:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus And Horus

Why did you revert to McGeddons last version? The parrallels section is useless to the Horus article in that it teaches nothing about Horus as a god, and is instead interested in teaching the Christ Myth theory. There is a whole Wikipedia article on the Christ Myth theory, which this is better suited to.

The Horus article shoudl be about Horus.

Worse, the information is from unreliable sources and has no credibility whatsoever.

The text of the section isn't even supported by the text above about Horus.

It sonly added to lend credibility to Christ Myth media resources liek Zeitgiest or Religulous, and serves no useful pourpose here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.24.236.20 (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Humphreys

thanks for link updating, I am not always great about that kind of thing (not that I do much page moving) so thanks for saving me the trouble familytree101 (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for that! Will try to keep an eye on those article links! familytree101 (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vitamin D

Hi, you reverted my edit on Vitamin D, but didn't give an edit summary - what exactly was the problem with it? --144.53.226.17 (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I got reverted for an identical edit over on Hypervitaminosis D by a different editor, also by accident, so I was getting a little puzzled. Now I look at the diff, I can see why it happened - seems to be showing my edit as a much larger change than it actually was. --144.53.226.17 (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mauionline.com

Okay I get that you think my link on the Maui page for Mauionline.com is an ad, in a way you are right. All links are ads, Paradise Television Network has been around for over 23 years. We are without question a resource for Maui tourism. If your going to delete this content you need to remove all of the following

The Maui News ~ daily newspaper
Maui Time Weekly ~ Island-Wide Independent Weekly
Maui Free Press Haleakala Times Online (no print edition)
Maui Weekly ~ the South Maui newspaper
Lahaina News ~ the West Maui newspaper
Maui Surf Forecast - Daily forecast and surf discussion
Maui Weather Today - Glenn James's daily Weather Narrative

These are all for profit businesses that I personally now the operators of. Please look this over, thanks Mauionline (talk) 01:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, about my recent edit

This is the cheapo here. Why did you revert my edit on Lego Stunt Rally? It was a perfectly good edit. There was no need to revert it and it constructively built on the article.

--The cheapo (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

odd della robbia

okay, i don't see how it's not notable- the character is one of the main characters of the show, and the show is far more notable and popular than other shows that have pages for their main characters, such as 6teen. Jeremie Belpois (talk) 03:18, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please issue a warning

Thingg, would you warn this user against vandalism? Special:Contributions/66.9.56.114

All three of his edits were fake. I've not issued a warning in the past, and I'm not sure I am authorized to do so. Must look that up... -- RayBirks (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy drive-by. Warning issued and taken care of.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 04:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just wondering why you reverted those edits.

I'm not trying to push anything, I just came across these things in a reuters article and thought they were relevant:

"Ban Ki Moon condemned the attack, saying it was "totally unacceptable".^[1]

 +  
 + The attack has been likened to the 2006 Qana airstrike in which 28 unarmed Lebanese were killed.^[2] "

Just wondering if there's a particular reason.

CheersJandrews23jandrews23 (talk) 17:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the explanation. I won't re-add the thing about Qana but I have put Ban Ki Moon's reaction back in. Jandrews23jandrews23 (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek

Hi Thingg,
I noticed some edits to Star Trek that appeared to be vandalism by IP: 80.195.238.187 recently. I tried to do the undo thing, and tagged as attempt to revert vandalism. Did I do it properly? I noticed when checking back, there seemed to be a bunch of back and forth edits, and it looked like you were taking care of business. I hope my attempt did interfere with your work. Ched (talk) 17:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manitowoc Cranes deletion

My page, Manitowoc Cranes, was deleted. Could you please send me the info that was there. I really would like to try and create a new page after some more research, etc. Kkoeppen (talk) 21:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for restoring that for me. Let's just hope next time goes a bit better. Kkoeppen (talk) 15:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good work...

Quite the double-act we had going there! I'm off for a WikiSmokeBreak or something, but I trust you to hold the fort... Happy reverting! haz (talk) 21:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question

how was my last edit vandalism, how should it have been edited? i was referring to the in-universe manual of style article... surely you can see the redundancies and irrelvancy of the subject matter while considering the need for real world perspective —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deboinhidef (talk • contribs) 23:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The last edit DID appear to be good faith. You might wish to reconsider the last warning you issued. Your call. --NrDg 04:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

complaint

Well the reason I did it was b/c Anome deleted these two wikipedia pages that are redirected from my homepage that someone from the administration of Wikipedia helped me do. I worked really hard on them, and can you please ask him to re post them back up, because I'm extremely frustrated!

Holidayroad8 (talk) 23:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've already threatened to contact one of the administrators on him for doing that. He hasn't responded back. I really need those pages though and I'm extremely upset that I worked for almost a year on those and have them deleted like that, without them being a problem to everyone else, but one little person goes on there and deletes it like a jerk. I don't know what else to do.

Holidayroad92 (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've temporarily restored User:Holidayroad92/RealityTV, per their request. I'll re-delete it in a few days, as per the original WP:AN/I discussion, but this should give the user in question time enough to save its contents elsewhere. To User:Holidayroad92/Holidayroad8: please read WP:NOT. -- The Anome (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Go Man Go

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you so much for all your help in reverting vandalism on Go Man Go while it was on the main page. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eagle Mountain, Utah IP Wars

Hi Thingg. I saw you reverted edits made by an IP on this page on 7 Jan. A week ago or so I cleaned it up, templated it and posted soft (eg. 1st) warnings to the 2 IP's who were persistently re-inserting their personal tl;dr versions of some alleged mayoral misbehaviours (even though they'd been at it for quite some time, it had slipped under the radar). I was particularly concerned by the WP:BLP issues. As you noticed, IP 204 is now back at it - another warning would be order but as its a shared educational IP I'm not sure how to proceed on this one (and neither am I an admin). Anyway, just thought I'd give some background re. the history of reverts and all. Ta. Plutonium27 (talk) 15:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your good advice, Thingg, I'll keep an eye out (cleared out Watchlist couple days back cos it got Grawped) and take it from there. Ta 2. Plutonium27 (talk) 17:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you thihng or watev spelling --Bandita Chinchilla (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help!

Thingg, that was just what I needed (how to move an article). Thanks for your help and of course all your contributions. Wow! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urbanbluegrass (talk • contribs) 20:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Bureau

Hi. You've recently made contributions to the Marc Bureau article. Would you like to add your opinion on the article name itself on the talkpage? Thanks. LarRan (talk) 23:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Artemis (software)

You reverted my edit on Artemis (Software) which now makes the article read as if it were written as a press release by the Owners of the company. It's Saturday night. Have you nothing more interesting to do? Or are you a Versata shareholder?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.97.190 (talk) 01:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore the entry on Firstfloor Electronix

Hi there,

could you be so kind to restore the article? I checked the Wikipedia rules and failed to see what opposed its inclusion. Also I provided additional sources for the relevance of it you just seemed to ignore (you did not comment on it). Here are some more references on this, one from the art department of the Austrian Broadcasting Corporation, the other from a radion station:

http://www.kunstradio.at/INFO/collab.html http://www.fro.at/ars04/participants.html

Both confirm many facts stated in the article.

Also I don't understand why you have entries like these from the same area of interest but oppose to include the Firstfloor Electronix group:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Sch%C3%B6ning http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norbert_Walter_Peters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USCO

Thanks for your time. Wburma (talk) 16:27, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cylon Resurrection ship

I found your name at Category:Wikipedia_administrators_who_will_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles. Could you please userfy the old version of Cylon Resurrection ship (before it was recreated as a redirect) for me? I'd like to try to incorporate this information into List_of_miscellaneous_ships_in_Battlestar_Galactica_(2004), provided, of course, that there's significant (and referenced) material for me to salvage. At a minimum, I could work from the established language and find references to back up the claims provided. Thanks in advance! -- smurdah^{[citation needed]} 02:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! :) Your help is greatly appreciated. -- smurdah^{[citation needed]} 02:56, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template/wikicode stumper

Resolved

– Too slow! ;> –xeno (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:Xenocidic#Userbox question. Enjoy! –xeno (talk) 23:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

You reverted this edit and warned the user for vandalism. Can you explain how that edit was vandalism? -- IRP ☎ 00:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

..For intervening in State terrorism and State-sponsored terrorism. There are many Single purpose account trolls with Pakistani nationalist persuation who have vanalized these articles against consensus using Unreliable Sources, primarily as a propaganda-retaliation for the 2008 Mumbai attacks. I'm surprised nobody is monitoring these artiles for trolling.72.179.48.138 (talk) 04:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand completely. Perhaps some established editors should watchlist this article to prevent such things from happening again. Doesn't wikipedia have an oprganized peer-review process?72.179.48.138 (talk) 05:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elicidd (contribs) is back to his edits of State-sponsored terrorism and State Terrorism.72.179.48.138 (talk) 04:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Elicidd is back with a sock puppet, User:GeorgeNotBungle contribs. Same pattern of edit-warring over State terrorism and State-sponsored terrorism.72.179.45.108 (talk) 05:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take it to the talk page

You're not a familiar face or a participant of the discussions on the 2008–2009_Israel–Gaza_conflict. The addition of the photo was a result of lengthy discussions with the compromise that pictures of victims are okay as long as they were not graphic. I ask that you revert your edit, and use the talk page to make your case. Thanks --Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting, there wasn't a consensus yet, but the photo did meet the conditions set forth by the people who originally opposed the photos of victims, and I rather appreciate that people first discuss what they think shouldn't be there before reverting someone's work. --Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foo

Why do you think there is any good reason for reverting that edit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.254.92.240 (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spiffing.87.254.92.240 (talk) 06:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case concerning Korlzor

You have been helping fight vandalism inflicted by various IP sockpuppets of the blocked User:Korlzor. You may be interested in a sockpuppetry case I have opened here. Best regards. Tennis expert (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pac-Man Dossier

I think you misunderstood my posting of 'The Pac-Man Dossier' on the Pac-Man page. The Dossier is referenced (#22) for part of the document, but is pointing in the wrong place in References. I simply wanted to include it as a 'Further Reading' option instead. I have no company nor do I have anything to "sell". I only want people to be able to get to information related to Pac-Man.

Sincerely,

Jamey Pittman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.239.201 (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:COMPFUNK2

Thanks for cleaning up my userpage. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 17:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irene Melikoff and User:80.1.141.147

Hi. I noticed that you were the other editor who has reverted the above user's changes to Irene Melikoff. I've reverted them several times and tried several different tactics, discussion, warnings and compromise (going through the source they provided and reincluding the material after reverting), to try and get them to understand that these changes should be discussed, particularly the ones that needlessly remove the stub and completely violate WP:DATE. It's not exactly vandalism, but it is very disruptive editing so I would be uncomfortable with doing a block myself given my involvement... but, by the same token, no amount of compromise or request for discussion seems to be sufficient for this individual to let go of their own version of the page. Any suggestions? Cheers, CP 19:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello, Thingg. You have new messages at User_talk:IRP#Re:_revert.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.

dude

r u okay? haven't heard from u in a while... u okay?MidKnightHunter (talk) 21:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lowkey wikipedia page

Hi, My name is Ian, I am part of Lowkey's management. His mother was born in Baghdad of Iraqi orgin. Please do not edit his page, when i make this correction. Many Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.221.65 (talk) 19:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My Talk Page

Ta for reverting the vandalism. Tresiden (talk) 19:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Scott Cooper

This page is a blatant copyvio. the author has reverted me twice, I don't want it to escalate into an edit war. Can you please delete it? --DFS454 (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

section

Hi, can you please explain why you deleted external link to www.recessionwatch.net from "global financial crisis of 2008" please?

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.50.127.29 (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Anangula Island

On January 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Anangula Island, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 07:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Granville Roland Fortescue.svg

Hello, Thingg. You have new messages at Ejosse1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Ejosse1 (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Kundalini yoga

I presume you've seen {{uw-3rr}} before, so I won't post it here. I will say that if you find yourself in a position where you feel it is necessary to revert an editor more than once or twice, you should try consulting our dispute resolution guidelines and enlisting the help of other editors - and if that fails, contact admins via WP:AIV or WP:ANI. Regardless of your motivation, edit-warring is very disruptive and it does nothing to solve the problem. Regards, SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 17:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User 167.206.55.215

Thingg, since you seem to be aware of the issue alreay, User:167.206.55.215 has just vandlised the Basque people page. Akerbeltz (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Renee Samuels listing

from RENEE SAMUELS to THINGG

you took out my page but you have no idea what importance or significance i may have, do you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.202.31.94 (talk) 19:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of "Scalable Network Technologies" page

Hello Thingg,

I created an article on Scalable Network Technologies yesterday and you deleted it. How frustrating. I tried to use an encyclopedic tone and included details similar to the ones on OPNET's page, which is a similar company to SNT. I could use some help from you in revising the page.

What I can do to get it to stick? Your feedback was that a) I'm not defining what SNT does that is noteworthy and/or b) I'm making false claims.

I put a lot of facts up there. If you could give me some feedback as to how I can meet the standards of wikipedia, I'd appreciate it.

Best Regards,

LBrown338 LBrown338 (talk) 19:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Kierensfaroes1

This chap has changed the DOB on Jim Davidson (comedian) twice recently with no apparent source (and I'm sure I saw him on the telly before 1989 anyway). Thought you might wish, if not like, to know. Britmax (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative Question

Hi, Thingg. Thanks for blocking Manishwriter. :) Can you point me to documentation (or the right page) for getting Admin attention for a user that's rapidly escalating up the user-warn levels? I.e., once a user has passed four warnings over a short period of time, where do I go to request an Admin intervene? — X S G 17:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Question answered! Thank you very much for your help! — X S G 18:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ecourier

Hello! Please see my comments on the Talk:Ecourier. We worked together to re-write this article a few months ago.Travisb4279 (talk) 23:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts linking to Big Cartoon Database

Just a comment. Some of these are on my watchlist. I don't agree with the reverts, since BCDB is about as reliable as IMDB, and we don't remove external links to that one. Yngvarr (t) (c) 16:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks, I've put an anon block on that user, since it's not only vandalism, and they have been blocked before.jimfbleak (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vitus Barbaro hoaxer

The Vitus Barbaro hoaxer is back, using the 63.xx variable IP. Take a look at the edit history of Vision Industries Edward321 (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the hoaxer's been rangeblocked for another month [1]. Edward321 (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

sources

I placed several ref's on the art. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloud8a (talk • contribs) 16:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

lurish language

hi excuse me but how i can prevent the non ethical and bad manipulation of the page "Luri language" that some users in Persian redirect it to "lori dialects" page that anger luri people.--Kurdevar (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Button

Hi there. Many thanks for implementing my request for semi-protection on the article. But... having discussed this with another editor, we feel that the edits from other IPs have been valuable enough to warrant allowing their being able to contribute to the article, and that the vandalism edits will be manageable if we keep a closer eye on it. With that in mind, I was wondering if you would now be willing to unprotect it? Sorry to mess you around like this. I should have taken a closer look at the history for the ratio of good edits to bad; I'll certainly do so from now on. All the best, Steve ^{T • C} 22:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hi, I'm somewhat new here on Wikipedia. Looking for someone to adopt me to help with some of the more advanced editing features, policies, and markup language. You can take a look at my user page or the articles I've worked on to get an idea of where I am now. Hope to hear from you soon! GLaDOS (talk) 04:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Xbox

Seeing as how we just changed our portal name, would you mind switching the logo name from Xbox 360 Portal to Xbox Portal. Thanks. BW21.--BlackWatch21 20:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Salesian Mascot

Can you please contact me about the mascot for Salesian High School? This is fun going back and forth with the undo button but it is time to talk about it. My phone number and email are below

Janet

Janet Wilks jwilks@salesian.com 510-234-4433 ex 1204 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.3.155.150 (talk) 19:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feminism page

A vandal moved the page into a disparaging title, and I can't move it back because the original page still technically exists. What should I do? Wandering Courier (talk) 03:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DrStrangelove95

C'mon, my edits were hilarious! You couldn't just let that Woll Smoth picture slide? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrStrangelove95 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Board of Editors in the Life Sciences

Thanks for your comments. I see from your note that this article does not meet the guidelines. I tried to delete the article but was unable. Please delete it for me. I will study Wikipedia rules and regs to see if this information might fit in somewhere. Board of Editors (talk) 03:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ILLOGICAL CENSORSHIP OF INFO

Hey wise guy, on this same page source 65, among others, is a YOUTUBE link! Mines had a NASA Signature at the start of the film. Why don't you go bother the other entries with a youtube source.Sfvace (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adopt me? :)

Hello! I'm a new user seeking to be adopted. I need help with editing articles, which articles to correctly edit, and how to improve articles. Thanks! Papercutbiology 13:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Papercutbiology (talk • contribs)

Editing a site

I have read through all the required material, and its saying vandalising the page I am trying to edit. I work for Piedmont Virginia Community College, and I am trying toupdate the page with our current information, and it keeps getting denied and even said I was vandalising. Have no idea why becasue all that has been put on there is current information.

please help me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.106.166.60 (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Wikipedia

Hello, I am new to the ways of editing and reporting things on Wikipedia. We are having an issue with a particular person from IP address 72.213.190.7 on the Cascia Hall Preparatory School article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascia_Hall_Preparatory_School

What this person keeps editing on this article is terrible and accusatory toward this educational and religious institution. I noticed on other pages that there were headings on them which stated others cannot edit the article. Would that be possible for our situation? The way the page looks currently, after I edited it, is what the school marketing department wrote and is what we would like to remain on the Cascia Hall Wikipedia page.

I noticed that a couple of Wikipedia administrators, yourself and someone that goes by the username of Edgehead5150, keep changing the school's posting and reverting back to previously edited material, which has inaccurate information also. We would like for it to stay as is, and we would really like to block the person with the IP address: 72.213.190.7, for a period of time, from being able to edit on wikipedia due to vandalism. I have sent them a warning requesting that they do not post such things. They put the comments right back up, but thanks to "Cluebot", the slanderous material was deleted.

Thank you for your help! mnorvell —Preceding unsigned comment added by MNorvell (talk • contribs) 18:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

my edit fam

fam. it wsant vandlizm it was chekin da speelin. dat is al it was fam. (Nayfam (talk) 17:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

ACORN

Why is it that many articles on Wikipedia are slanted towards socialist or so-called "progressive" views yet when I attempt to balance an article with the other side of the story my edits are constantly reverted? Is Wikipedia really that slanted to the left? Or is it just the agenda of certain administrators and "Vandal-stoppers" shining through? As a point of fact I rarely delete others contributions, even if I disagree strongly with the author. The fact is also that ACORN is a partisan organization which commits vote fraud for them and right now the democrats are trying to give them over $2 billion in their economic stimulus to reward their efforts. Please tell me what is false or misleading about my edit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.118.52 (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing Heart edit

I was confused by this edit. As I read your previous edit, it read smoothly. but if, by chance you really do mean to include the words "prepare to stand by", then I think that there still remains a conjugation error. Un school 20:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Veganism entry

Hi there - i see that you have removed some references I included in the Veganism entry on hemp oil. I'm quite new to Wikipedia so would appreciate it if you could let me know why it was taken down- I thought they were quite relevant. Many thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.127.222 (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete Actano Rplan

Hello I am currently trying to get Actano Rplan restored (http://deletionpedia.dbatley.com/w/index.php?title=ACTANO_RPlan_%28deleted_23_Jun_2008_at_06:29%29). I am new to wikipedia, other then using it as a reference. I have been researching why it was deleted and I still wasn't real clear I know it had something to do with notability. I would appreciate if you could restore the page. Additionally, I would appreciate any guidance you can give to have the page better conform to the guidelines. Thanks alot Jasonfilmfan (talk) 20:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Silent Alarm

Thanks very much for the copyedit and advice, I really appreciate it :D GARDEN 20:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hello, Thingg. You have new messages at Spinach Monster's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Counterstriking

Last time I heard/saw Kevin was in And the Wiener is.... My memory might be a bit hazy but that's what I think. I've only been watching reruns on TBS. That's my guess. Dropping you from somewhere, 66.231.12.116 (talk) 16:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Check your bot?

Hey Thingg - just a note: You may want to check your HG bot. You reverted vandalism to Meat Loaf and your bot reverted your edit back to the vandalized version.

Best regards! --Manway (talk) 17:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thingg

As I understand it, you have deleted the entry I made: Dorset Bach Cantata Club on the grounds of blatant copyright infringement.

I really don't understand. All the facts in question (I'm pretty certain) are true, and from first hand experience. I do not believe any person would consider that they had been demeaned in any way.

If it is the case, could you please explain what the infringement is?

RussellXPD (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Russell Telfer RussellXPD (talk) 08:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't finished my edit, I had saved it so as to prevent it being lost because my internet crashes. The edit I was going to make was a common sense one. Much happens in sport and consequently it is inocorrect to refer to the last 26 years as the modern era. On the article in question, a huge transition took place in 1995, making the sport professional. Having two distinct sporting set-ups in the history of the game means it makes no sense to have an encylopedia entry that merges the two together under the same generic banner. The area of the article I was editing is poorly written, lacks citations and accuracy. If you want to make the changes, go ahead. I had no idea a New Yorker could be an expert on Welsh Rugby.

^ http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?" NewsID=29472&Cr=Palestin&Cr1=
^ http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed2/idUSL7214076._CH_.2400

[1] ttp://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?" NewsID=29472&Cr=Palestin&Cr1=

[2] ttp://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed2/idUSL7214076._CH_.2400

[1]

[2]