User talk:Piotrus
![]() |
"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you. |
---|
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
---|
![Archive](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c2/Vista-file-manager.png/50px-Vista-file-manager.png)
Talk archives:
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
![]() Some general observations on Wikipedia governance being broken and good editors trampled by the system ![]()
Current RfAdminship
DYK for Black ProcessionRequestCould you please rewrite and attribute the sentences you copied from this source [1] at Janusz Radziwiłł (1579–1620) and at Janusz Radziwiłł (1612–1655). Diffs of insertion: [2], [3]. These are copyright violations. Details at Talk:Radziwiłł family. Sincerely, Novickas (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Re:Nanuli ShevardnadzeHi. I will try to expand it, but the sources are rather scarce, even in Georgian. Cheers, --KoberTalk 15:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Regarding this comment. Could you point out in which way the evidence I provided is "extremely poor"? Every diff is a revert, and thus evidence of edit warring. Or do you claim otherwise? Edit warring is something Digwuren was blocked for earlier. Offliner (talk) 18:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC) An earlier comment from you: [13]. Could you please provide diffs of "continuing harassment of Digwuren by Offliner"? When have I started "baseless threads" about him? Or, when had I indeed started a single thread about him before that one at WP:AN, or the one at Tiptoety's talk page (where asked me to take to matter to WP:AN)? Please provide evidence for your accusations. Offliner (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Do you still think my evidence was "extremely poor"[14]? Please also provide evidence for accusations such as this. Remember, baseless accusations constitute personal attacks per WP:NPA, and admins are expected to behave according to the highest standards. Offliner (talk) 14:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Please answer my question above (how many times must I still ask?) An earlier comment from you: [15]. Could you please provide diffs of "continuing harassment of Digwuren by Offliner"? When have I started "baseless threads" about him? Or, when had I indeed started a single thread about him before that one at WP:AN, or the one at Tiptoety's talk page (where asked me to take to matter to WP:AN)? Please provide evidence for your accusations. Offliner (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Eastern EuropeYou are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#Eastern Europe and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use— Thanks, Jehochman Talk 19:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC) Happy birthday!
AfdPiotrus, there is agreement among me and users Jacurek and Radeksz to do an afd for "spieprzaj dziadu" [16] Not sure if you agree with the deletion, but if you do would you set up the afd? I have no idea how to and neither does Jacurek (he said to ask you), and honestly I don't really care to learn :) Ostap 19:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
DYK for 1923 Kraków riotAdviceIn light of arbitration findings and cautions from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes specific to you, I am asking you not to comment as an administrator in any arbitration enforcement threads related to Eastern European disputes or WP:DIGWUREN. There is an appearance, to me, that your involvement in these threads tends to confound matters or intensify disputes. Jehochman Talk 20:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Sorry for intervening here, but can someone please move this comment about me back? The relevant ArbCom case [17] tells that: For the purpose of imposing sanctions under this provision, an administrator will be considered "uninvolved" if he or she is not engaged in a current, direct, personal conflict on the topic with the user receiving sanctions. I do not have any current conflict with Piotrus.Biophys (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm not entirely certain what happened here, but I think there may be a misunderstanding. Piotrus hasn't been involved in any of the edit wars by this particular group and actually was cautioned in an entirely different area. I've spent the past day reviewing the topic area (I've got quite a bit more to work through) and I've only seen a single case of intersection; this appears to have been because the article briefly included a description of the EE Arb case (fka Piotrus2). Shell babelfish 23:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Piotrus was involved in edit warring in at least one of the articles that were subject of the AE reports [18][19]. Also, he has made a comment in every single noticeboard thread concerning this issue (if I recall correctly), often supporting the actions of Digwuren & Co., while strongly criticising me and others [20][21]. Piotrus has also appeared in some of the AfD discussions that are part of the dispute, for example [22][23][24], always voting in the same way as Digwuren. I don't think he is uninvolved. Offliner (talk) 23:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC) Shell, Piotrus has a clear history of alignment in this area towards one faction, even if he doesn't participate in many edit-wars in this specific topic-area. Everyone who knows this area is aware of this. That's not something that sets him up as an impartial adjudicator, and I'm sure he knows this. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 23:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Piotrus, I have commented on this matter on Jehochman's talk page. Sandstein 16:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Template:CatdescYou never commented at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2009_June_6#Template:Catdesc. Certain others are now implying (it seems to me) that you meant to keep it, that your concerns at Template talk:Catdesc were somehow alleviated. Could you please clarify at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 18#Template:Catdesc. DYK nomination of Jan Władysław Dawid
Soc 0438This is Mary Hecker and my username is meh40 —Preceding unsigned comment added by meh40 (talk • contribs) this is Glen Wood i made an account —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpwood (talk • contribs) Hey Professor, this is Laura Grimm from the Soc of the Family class. My username is Lngrimm. See you on Thursday! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lngrimm (talk • contribs) Hey Professor, I'm Lenny Caric from your Soc. of the Family class, and my user name is in fact, Lenny Caric. This should be pretty uncomplicated for all. --Lenny Caric (Leave me a message) Kaylee Petsch is username KayPet. I have added myself to group 2 and am waiting for my other group members to do so. I am also posting a diff of that edit for the extra credit. If I have done anything wrong please let me know, I am very unfamiliar with this. Link to Diff [26] --KayPet (talk) 01:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Denastroje (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Hey Professor, I am Dena Stroje in your Sociology of the Family class (2nd summer 09). I've created my account, and added my name as well as our missing group members to group three. I've made a two edits so far. My username is denastroje, so I shouldn't be that difficult to find! Here is the link to my diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scrapbooking&diff=prev&oldid=298435069 This is Maggie Ryan, I made an account and my username is MagggieR. Thanks! Koliber =it's meDear Instructor I just want to identify myself so Koliber is Bozena in your soc. class. Sincerely, Koliber (talk) 16:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Hi Professor, this is Shuo Huang from SOC0438 and my user name is Shuooo, just letting you know! Hello Professor, this is Angela Bickford from soc of the family. My user name is Angela9298 Link to Diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Family_economics&diff=298495987&oldid=297273022 --Angela9298 (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Sociology of the family home work 1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warrior_(2010_film)&action=history
Thanks Chad Bruns Silesian UprisingsPlease see the talk page at Silesian Uprisings. You have inserted copyrighted material. If you still lack time to address these problems, I can post it at the copyright problems page. Sincerely, Novickas (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC) Andrzej WalickiDear Piotrus, our wiki-relationship didn't started in a positive note, but let's move on. I've started the bio of Andrzej Walicki. He is a Polish historian. Can you develop the bio? AdjustShift (talk) 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ceremonial marriage![]() A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ceremonial marriage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ShadowRangerRIT (talk) 15:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC) |