User talk:Svick
|
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Infobox political party
Thanks for adding the country parameter. That was a really good idea, which solves quite a few problems. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "quite a few problems"? The only think I know about (and the reason why I did it) is that you don't have to write the three links in footnotes and and still get them. Svick (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- After the "Brazil" infobox was closed as delete at TFD, I was trying to figure out a simple way to include the three links at the bottom in the generic infobox. The country parameter is a very simple solution. Excellent idea. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, ok. Svick (talk) 23:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- After the "Brazil" infobox was closed as delete at TFD, I was trying to figure out a simple way to include the three links at the bottom in the generic infobox. The country parameter is a very simple solution. Excellent idea. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Timbits
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Timbits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This is article does not meet the standards of inclusion and is redundant to the donut holes section of the doughnut article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 16:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:21, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Maki
Unfortunately the article (along with Meretz) is a long-term victim of vandalism from Sockpuppets of Runtshit. Long-term semi-protection seems to have been the only effective tool to stop it. пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:30, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
WD
I have a suggestion for the desktop watchlist. If it doesn't do it automatically, would you make it automatically update one's watchlist every minute or so? Btilm 22:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- It does update every 10 minutes automatically and I updated the documentation to say so. I think that 10minutes is about the right interval, but I could make that configurable. Thanks for the suggestion anyway. Svick (talk) 23:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks. It seems to be a general opinion that articles like "Requiescat in pace" are desirable. So I accept it. I had things to write in AfD that were not written because the AfD was closed, but it would probably not have affected the outcome. --Fartherred (talk) 01:13, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Stackoverflow
I disagree: Stackoverflow is primarily about gaining reputation (points). Questions and answers are secondary to many, if not most, of its users.
Just my 2ct :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.110.199.118 (talk) 15:40, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's not about what you or I think, but what reliable sources say. Unfortunately, the are are almost no such sources about SO, so we have to use what the site itself says ("Stack Overflow is a programming Q & A site") or Slashdot article about it ("Spolsky's Software Q-and-A Site"). Do you have any source that supports your view? Svick (talk) 15:50, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
sorry!
http://www.religiousintelligence.co.uk/country/?CountryID=103 http://albania.generalanswers.org/ http://www.consolatoalbanesemilano.org/lalbania_oggi.html
I have the references here, but i changed that because someone is sure that in Albania (the only in the world) have a people 100% religious. So, if you see, albania does'n have a totaly religion.
And, this is the reference of albanian institute: http://www.scribd.com/doc/15738681/Feja-ne-Shqiperi1
Please, keep neutral wikipedia. Thanks!--Albopedian (talk) 16:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)