Jump to content

User talk:Anesleyp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tm93 (talk | contribs) at 05:52, 11 November 2009 (→In Reference to User_talk:UKER#Transformers_revenge_of_the_fallen: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Aneslyp is currently: OFFLINE
If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page if the comments are constuctive.

{{archive box|image=|


August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Ford Interceptor, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vossanova o< 14:49, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

iCarly

Please stop readding the information to the article's introduction. It is mostly fluff that doesn't belong in the lead, and some of it is unsourced or doesn't support what is being said. Ophois (talk) 04:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The videos weren't taken off the internet, though. They are still available. Besides, half of the stuff you keep adding back is unsourced, so it must be removed by wikipedia policy. And doing a photo shoot for a new season is pretty irrelevant to the article. Ophois (talk) 04:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

I have blanked your userpage as a blatant copyright violation of someone else's userpage. Please do not do this again. — neuro(talk) 19:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not take barnstars like this when they have not been awarded to you. — neuro(talk) 19:51, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Or this, this, this, or many of the others that you have so shamelessly taken without earning. — neuro(talk) 19:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frenzy's head edits

It's already been taken to the talk page as far as I know, and we are talking about it there. Thanks! Mathewignash (talk) 21:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Retirement

I do consider myself retired, but I am making gnomeish edits and keeping an eye on the articles I have made or updated on my watchlist. I haven't though done any updating since going into retirement. I know that isn't the definition of retirement, but I don't have anyone to take over watching the articles I watch yet. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 21:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ford Interceptor

Please stop bringing back the speculation in Ford Interceptor. I suggest reading the guideline "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". The "speculation" section is just that - unfounded rumors. Anything with "possibly" in it should not even be considered for the page, otherwise you are just writing in what you think the truth should be. --Vossanova o< 13:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.atpictures.com/display.php?img=13713&return=%2Fmarlon-wayans%2F. As a copyright violation, File:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Marlon-wayans photoboxart 160w.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Maralia (talk) 20:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kendra-show-1.jpg

I removed the File:Kendra-show-1.jpg image from your userpage as fairuse images should not be used in userspace. I have been called on the carpet for that one before. Please only use images you have created in userspace. If you have any questions, message me. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 22:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You copied my user page

Why did you copy my user page, only changing my name? It just doesn't make sense. Please come up with your own content to describe yourself. --Vossanova o< 14:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I see that various sections of your userpage are still unattributed copies of other users' userpages, even after you were warned about this a month ago at #Userpage. It appears that you selectively copied barnstars and personal, descriptive text from no less than five distinct users to create your userpage. This is a violation of those users' copyrights. I will be removing the improperly copied portions of your userpage. Please see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Re-use of text for information about properly reusing text created by others, and refrain from copying others' content without proper attribution. As Vossanova said above, you should come up with your own content to describe yourself; it is difficult to interpret this as anything other than deliberate misrepresentation. Maralia (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes indeed. Please explain yourself. Take for example this edit. It is easy to check that you have never contributed to any of the articles you listed, so what is the point of publishing such a blatant lie? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 01:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

I have recently reviewed the edit history for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. It appears that you and Anesleyp are "fighting" (or conflict resolving) through the use of edit summaries. Conflicts between two users, even when pertaining to edit conflicts, should not be discussed in the edit summaries. If you do have an editing conflict, do so on the articles talk page. It even states right here to...

Avoid using edit summaries to carry on debates or negotiation over the content or to express opinions of the other users involved. This creates an atmosphere where the only way to carry on discussion is to revert other editors! If you notice this happening, start a section on the talk page and place your comments there. This keeps discussions and debates away from the article page itself.

If you do have an editing conflict, do so on the article's talk page. And, if you so choose, notify the User, whom you are in conflict with, that you are discussing the matter on the article's talk page. But don't use the edit summary box as a way to discuss something between two users. THAT'S WHY THEY MADE USER TALK PAGES. GO FIGURE!!! ⊥m93 talk. 00:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. I have in fact notified the other user.
  2. It is a standard practice for talk messages to be grouped together. What I mean by this is... If a message was left on your user talk page, reply there. If you left a message on my talk page, I will reply there. It keeps things organized. But I started this message here, so let's keep it here; for I am watching it.
  3. I'm glad you actually asked me how to do something from my pages, rather than just take it like you have in the past; something I've asked another admin about. This admin may or may not do anything about it; it's up to him.

How To Use Same Status Box:
1. Create a new page in your userspace. Create it as User:Anesleyp/StatusTemplate

2. Copy this to that page:

'''<div style="border: 1px solid black; background: white; float: right; position: relative; top: -30px; padding: 5px"> User:Aneslyp is [[User:Anesleyp/Status|currently]]: {{ #switch: {{{1}}} | in=<span style="color: green;">ONLINE</span> | busy=<span style="color: orange;">ONLINE BUT WORKING | out=<span style="color: red;">OFFLINE</span> }} </div>'''

3. Create another page. User:Anesleyp/Status. On this page, place: {{User:Tm93/StatusTemplate|out}}. This is where you change your status. You can change it to in, busy, or out.

4. Then place the following wherever you want to place it. {{User:Anesleyp/Status}}

  • To change the status click the link that says currently and edit the page.


Also. I was very tired while typing this, so I have made mistakes. Just a little tip for in the future: instead of taking someone's work by copying it without permission or asking them how they did some cool editing thing to add to your page, try using wikipedia's search. It is how you will find almost anything you're looking for... if you look hard enough. ⊥m93 talk. 02:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transformers trilogy

In case you're not aware of it (despite me having notified you in the edit summary), I have started a discussion here to resolve this issue you're having with my statement about Transformers being a trilogy. --uKER (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warring and Warning

Two things: First, your reason of "im right" is not enough to go undoing a user's edits. Unfortunately, you do not work for Michael Bay, and because of this you are not privvy to such information such as the existence, or lack of, a fourth movie in the series. Secondly, your warning of a user for reverting your baseless information is also out of line, and abuses rules of Wikipedia, Keeping a Cool Head, and Discussing the issue in the talk page rather than the edit summaries. Please stop reverting the edit. Gpia7r (talk) 14:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Toddst1 (talk) 15:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Um... dude. look at the edit history (here). He hasn't done but maybe one edit on that current history list. If he/she has and it's was so long ago that it's on the next page of the edit history log... well you should have notified them earlier. But if in fact I am wrong, and you have (BUT IT WAS SO FAR BACK THE HISTORY LOG DOES'NT CONTAIN IT ON THE FIRST PAGE); just remember that you're not supposed to revert an article 3 times within 24 hours. If you disagree with the content, you're supposed to place the appropriate tag and then discuss it on the talk page. ⊥m93 talk. 22:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What? I don't know about you, but I see four edits by Anesleyp in the first page dated October 12, 11, 8 and 3. It's nowhere near violating the 3RR either, but it's not like he hasn't been there. --uKER (talk) 23:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a three EDIT rule. It's a three REVERT rule. ⊥m93 talk. 23:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And my bad. he has made edits. But two things. One its only within a 24 hour time period. Two it's a REVERT rule not EDIT rule. ⊥m93 talk. 23:48, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untruth

Until you purge your user page of inaccuracies and untruth, I shall continue to revert it. Why do you claim to have edited Conrad Hughes Hilton? Why have you put yourself in a bunch of categories and piped them to T-dot? What is your connection with Kansas, Michigan or Ohio? Please reply? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 09:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please point me to the edits which you claim to have made to the following:

— [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 00:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This link (we call it a diff listing) proves that I have edited the school shooting article. Now, in similar style, prove to me that you have edited the six bios listed above. — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 02:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Apoligy"

RE: here
⊥m93 talk. 03:36, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

STILL!...

Ok. I was looking through your stuff on your page. I just don't know where to begin. I guess we'll start here and here. You say that

"I haved learned by better users that I shouldn't copyright others userpages."

But I look through your userpage and there are just several things that don't add up.

  1. You have the userbox {{User wikipedia/rollback}} on your page. Well guess what... you haven't been granted roll back rights. If you did (on the list) your name would appear like these people. But instead your name appears like this. Notice a difference? No? Lemme help you out... it doesn't say (rollbacker) next to your name. A rollbacker is a user that has been granted roll back rights. And from the looks of it you haven't been granted roll back status.
  2. {{User contrib|7000|T-dot}} Hmm... let's see... I believe it says 184 total. So where are the other 6816 contributions? Hmm... and 75 of those (approx. 41%) are "contributions" to your OWN userpage (excluding the 5 that are still in your namespace). But quantity doesn't matter. What matters most is that you are falsely advertising your number of edits. The one userbox that says +131 (think that's what it says) is correct because obviously 184 is more than 131, but 184 ≠ 7000+. Sorry, but if you think 184 = 7000+ then you need to go back to kindergarten math.

Those are only two. Look. If you're going to say that you aren't copyrighting material on your userpage, then I would hope you THOROUGHLY check your page BEFORE you say that kind of stuff. I'm not getting "on your case"; just trying to help you out. ⊥m93 talk. 02:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content in Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, you may be blocked from editing. The article cites a source for Transformers being a trilogy, so unless you have a source that says otherwise, the third movie is the final one in the trilogy.

WPF1 Newsletter (October)

– Cs-wolves(talk) 16:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Reference to User_talk:UKER#Transformers_revenge_of_the_fallen

"Do you know how to leave your signature.If not you are not a proper wikipedian.I suggest you should refer to more wikipedia pages other than Transformers revenge of the fallen."

As you can see from tons of other messages from UKER, he/she in fact does know how to sign messages. But I mean come on!!! You're wasting good edits. No need to be nagging on UKER because her didn't sign a message... BIG WHOOP! There is something that looks exactly like this:

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Anesleyp (talk • contribs) 01:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC) [reply]

You can see this here as by one of your edits. OH and look!!!! You didn't sign here either! You're no better.

"P.S. are you a administrator if not you will not be able to block me from editing."

I believe you are referring to this? Ok. It is true that HE/SHE cannot block you, but he/she sure as heck can bring you to an admin's attention... oh and an admin CAN block you.

"P.S. are you a administrator"

From now on you need to check this list. It is a list of EVERY admin.

Seriously man. From now on, quit nagging UKER. It seems that no matter what you're always in a dispute with them. If you have another issue about Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen don't be clouding up their talk page with junk that needs to be put on the talk page instead. You really need to be focused on expanding WP rather than keeping other users in-line.

And just to make you happy... I'm going to sign my message. Are you ready? Here it goes.

⊥m93 talk. 05:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anesleyp&oldid=325195296"