User talk:HalfShadow

Talkback tags are unnecessary; when I post on a page, I watch it, so you can respond either there or here.

RfA...

...turns out to be short for "Request for Arrows". :) Thank you for your support and coming to my defense when I talked too much. :) This has been a hard but useful experience (useful experiences often are hard) and whether I ever accept a nomination again or not, I'm willing to address the cautions of the sincere Opposers and try to do better. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 02:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And you'll get your cheese sandwich in my next e-mail. If I can figure out how to get it into that 3 1/2 inch slot in the PC. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 02:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my edit on Watchmen characters

I understand that it was redirected a long time ago. I did not see a discussion regarding the merge. I did however see the AfD which was in favor of keeping. Therefore I am reverting it. I understand your merge was bold however I disagree with it so I am asking that you discuss it before reverting my edit. I gave my reason for keeping the article on the talk page of Characters in Watchmen. Thanks :) Valoem ^talk 16:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was a little hestiant in reverting Ozymandias as he was not as main a character as the others however he has established notability by being featured in the forbes fictional 15. Also I never saw any consensus for the merge I tried searching on the talk page and AfD. Valoem ^talk 16:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little confused I looked at the AfD and it looked like consensus was in favor of keeping those articles. Where was it discussed otherwise? It seems someone redirected and no one contested it (actually it looks like it was contested just not by established users). However, I am now contesting it, mainly because the characters are also featured in a film and a video game not just one comic book. I'm sure you would agree with me now right? :) Valoem ^talk 16:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your post on our edits on Ruby Gloom

How about I put the citation as "see Ruby Gloom skit titled 'Mr. Mummbles'. " Kagome 77 (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. The citation now says Ruby Gloom Skit: "The Mr. Mummbles How-to Show". This should work for that citation, since you should not link a youtube video to that, since the video may be taken down later on, due to copyright violations or other things. Kagome 77 (talk) 11:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Axmann8

Should be renamed "Puppetman" today. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 23:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah...

...Never say you don't learn stuff on Wikipedia! LessHeard vanU (talk) 02:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If the Queen tells me too... We live for the nest, we die for the nest (we all believe in the Nest Life!) LessHeard vanU (talk) 02:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Curious

how did you do the upside-down text? .. a converter of some sort on the web? — Ched : Yes? : © 08:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds interesting. Where are you seeing that? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 08:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Perhaps a temp semi-protect of Versus22's talk page?

Re your message: You must have been watching my screen. =) I just semi-protected his talk page for awhile. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Doesn't bother me any. =) They are still creating new accounts, so we shall see. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Negush uprising

Please, do not revert back to the [soskpuppeteer's] version. We've discussed it on the talkpage with two other editors and agreed the article was a hoax and an obvious POV fork of another article. It's up for deletion anyway or maybe for a redirect to the actual article. It was me that removed that info and justified my removal. It wasn't me reverting you later (I'm not the annon), but there is no grounds on which such an imaginative work of fiction should be an article on Wikipedia. Thanks for the understanding. --Laveol ^T 07:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely

This comment nearly triggered a nasal eruption of cream soda. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shramkivka

Hello, HalfShadow. You have new messages at User talk:Dank55/Apr.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

More info - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 21:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know.

This edit Here made me laugh. Thanks.--Jojhutton (talk) 00:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your inquiry

Hello, HalfShadow. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

re-reply here User talk:tide rolls

I've re-re-replied. Tiderolls 17:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page, as well across the rest of Wikipedia. Keep up the great work, SuperHamster (Talk) (Contributions) 22:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jack page

Ok, well let me explain. Essentially, you're factually correct, what you're adding is true information. However, the sections you're adding it to are very short compact ones to summarily describe the character's history in the order it was revealed (sujet as opposed to fabula) and in minimal, essential detail. There is one line later on that discusses Jack's immortality works "either by resurrection or invulnerability" (with a citation to "Utopia" after the word invulnerability). That paragraph, mind, probably does need work but it's the only place in the article that the information should be discussed at length (although, very little length, at that). It's not essential for a reader who wants to know the character's history to know beyond the word "immortality".~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 22:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Learn something new every day

Thanks for changing that title, I never realized that wikicode borks the ToC. - 2/0 (cont.) 19:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful what you revert

In this edit, what you reverted was a good-faith request for a G7 speedy deletion. There were no substantial edits by others. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Regarding this incredibly rude, pointed, sarcastic comment: [1] All I can say is... I wish I'd thought of it. :) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 03:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All I know is, Tan handed you a great setup and you knocked it out of the park. The issue now is how to semi-tactfully answer the question, "What does that mean?" although in normal English we would probably say it more like, "What's that supposed to mean?" Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 03:27, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving it for Tan to answer is probably the best thing, and only fair since he's the one who brought up the part about being a social leper, or whatever term it was that he used. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 03:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One thing worth pointing out is your comparison of prickly users to giants, transformers, etc. That may be true for some. Others can turn out to be more like clay pigeons. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 03:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tom fuller band

Yeah, sorry about that. I took too long adding the tags, so by the time I made my edit the article had been recreated. So I tried to get a CSD template on, but nothing fit precisely. D: Z S 19:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mool chand meena

I've declined a speedy deletion tag you placed on the above-captioned article, but I wanted to say that I don't blame you for a moment for placing it; it was such a mess that I very nearly overlooked the assertion that the individual was a member of the Indian parliament myself (the equivalent of a state representative or senator in the US system). I'm going to tidy it up a bit. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't think of why I thought you were an American who needed to know what "Parliament" meant; we're fellow BCers, as I now note. I expect it would be a lot of trouble to come to Vancouver for a BC Wikipedian meet-up; we've only had one, and it didn't seem to be met with much enthusiasm. I know of only two other admins and one bureaucrat, and not very many regular editors like yourself. Anyway, pardon my assumption. If I can be of any assistance in the future, don't hesitate to contact me. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

A user has reported your recent revisions at AN/I. Care to comment? Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 23:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OOPS! sorry its at AN/Edit warring, here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#HalfShadow_reported_by_70.253.80.212_.28Result:_.29_2

Sorry bout that, Reagrds, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 23:40, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Has this gone through "Checkuser?" I'm just trying to keep things from escalating. And I'd hate to see your good faith editing jeopardised by speedy rollback fighting what is likely tomfoolery/shenanigans. Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 23:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:70.253.80.212

Never mind, what I said before. If he's an abusive sock, gaming the process, and wasting our time, NO QUARTER! Regards, Hamster Sandwich (talk) 23:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dealt with. Black Kite 00:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sipsmith

Hey, I removed your G11 speedy from the article because it doesn't seem to have any advertising in it at all. Feel free to retag under a different criteria, or prod it. Regards, Finger z 18:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Funny

That was funny. Sorry about them ears. Toddst1 (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious Sock is Obvious

Roux and myself, along with a couple others have said it, we believe Pzrmd is a sock of someone else. I would like to request a checkuser of the account, but am unsure if that is possible since I don't know who the person is a sock of. Should it be left alone or what should I do? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 22:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I always thought you were. Even with the little line on Popups that says who is what, I still get confused :) I thin Gwen Gale is taking care of it, so we shall see. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 00:25, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

174.3.103.39

I couldn't believe how quickly a swarm of admins descended on that guy. Must be a slow night in AdminLand. Either that, or they're all watching me to see what havoc I might wreak. Not a bad idea. I should post a Warning at the top of my talk page: "Big Brother Admins Are Watching!" 0:) Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 05:34, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thank you for all of your comments on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding my Rollback rights. I really appreciate it. Regards.--David | ^Talk 18:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your little pony

Please keep in mind 3RR is not an entitlement. Ha ha. Just messin' :) But it isn't. And don't you forget it, punk. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:57, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you, HalfShadow, for watching out for my userpage. It's been continually vandalized by the same individual for the past few days. I very much appreciate your vigilance! Basket of Puppies 22:14, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As requested

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Hope you like it~! --Dave1185 (talk) 21:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

"he either doesn't care or he has some sort of mental deficiency"

I missed that yesterday. Please avoid personal attacks going forward. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HalfShadow. You have new messages at Mentifisto's talk page.
Message added 01:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Maybe you should leave off the popups for a bit.

Yeah... mumble. I need to remember to lay off of it when on WP:ANI which is too active. I think I repaired everything. I was trying to fix a sockpuppet edit, but got all tangled up in other edits. And then that last one was my stupid browser history getting in the way. Mumble. I got it fixed and all, I think. Mumble. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I think I'm going to go take a nap. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Priceless

Ha! Tiderolls 12:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Reversion on NGS-NN

Greetings. I was reading through the Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding Newport News article and I noticed some additional vandalism by 74.231.186.104 that was apparently missed. This includes deletion of a significant portion of the history section. I was wondering, assuming you can, if you could possibly revert the page back to the 10/3/09 edit by TomNativeNewYorker? If not, could you please get in touch with someone who does? Sorry for throwing this on you, I'm just a casual user trying to bring this to the attention of more dedicated editors then I. 67.247.67.149 (talk) 03:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know I could have just done the edits manually, but I figured it'd just be easier for someone with the permission to do so to do a reversion. I haven't even figured out how to list an edit as minor. 67.247.67.149 (talk) 21:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mario

They were automated by Twinkle, but I guess I can leave it to admins now? ninety:one (reply on my talk) 21:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, this was funny, but let's not kick people while they're down, ok? :) Cheers, henrik•talk 21:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you star

"We're sorry, Mario, but your copyvio uploads are in another castle."? LOL --Cameron Scott (talk) 15:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

30 Seconds to Mars

Thank you for the reverts (this IP is also doing this on A Beautiful Lie as well) I left a message about this situation to this admin as well but nobody exactly seems to understand any of this. If you could, could you assist me in dealing with this situation? I feel as if I'm doing something wrong towards stopping all this. -- GunMetal Angel 17:53, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now I believe this IP can be blocked I've left four warnings, an admin to block this IP is needed if you could find one that would be much appreciated. Also, I've already reported this to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents -- GunMetal Angel 18:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HalfShadow. You have new messages at Datheisen's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just let me squeeze this banner in under that important admin stuff just above... ♪ daTheisen (talk) 03:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond The Spiderwick Chronicles

I removed your speedy. It isn't a copyright violation since the material is from Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 21:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP Vandal

RE: Your edit - my edit, you have a valid argument, but you did not attempt contact with user before reporting this time. Last message to user was October 2009. The IP is not currently active and has not been recently warned these are 2 of the 3 requirements for posting to WP:AIV. If you have any questions leave a note on my talk page. Jeepday (talk) 23:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response my talk, Jeepday (talk) 00:59, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Hussain Bisad

Hello HalfShadow, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Hussain Bisad - a page you tagged - because: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graciliano Ramos

I've declined the deletion of the article, as it's salvageable and has a considerable history. I've rewritten it somewhat. It's an interesting phenomenon where it came to resemble the source article at Goodreads more and more closely. Acroterion _(talk) 22:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We crossed in the wiki. A clean version basically required a rewrite from the source, so it's way shorter. No worries, Acroterion _(talk) 22:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Try {{nn-welcome}} vice {{nn-warn}}

When nominating articles by newbies for speedy deletion, you may want to consider changing the {{nn-warn}} template to {{nn-welcome}}. It's a little less bitey, especially for AGF pages. Cheers! --SquidSK ^(1MC^•^log) 17:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For this revert. When I grow up I wanna be able to think of snappy edit summaries like you :-\ Good job Tiderolls 01:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charles McCarroll

Was this edit really necessary? Just because a user is blocked doesn't mean you leave them insults about their cooking. TNXMan 23:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mr. Prez

Hi HalfShadow. Yeah, that's the same conclusion I came to. But I felt that it would only be fair to give the user a chance to save the RfA in case they wanted to keep it for some reason. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Star

Red Star

Congratulations, HalfShadow! It's my pleasure to award you December 22, 2009's Red Star for being hard working, kind to others, and for being an excellent user in general. A record of this award will always be kept at User:Meaghan/Shining Stars. Enjoy! Meaghan - ^Merry _Christmas! - 00:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You could also receive the next higher up award, the Orange Star!

Thanks!

Thank you for your words of support. It means a lot to me. I know I haven't conducted myself immaculately during this little debacle, but I appreciate you still consider me worth speaking up for. - Vianello (Talk) 21:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Click there to open your card! → → →

Thanks

Thanks I missed that pice of vandalism on the pong page. IceBlade710 (talk) 01:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sor Juana a mathematician?

Hi, it appears you found a reference that refers to Sor Juana as a "mathematician", but I don't consider this to be sufficient citation. Do you think you can find a reference that describes her mathematical work, preferably one that highlights her original results? Thanks! Swap (talk) 22:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Service awards proposal

Hello, HalfShadow! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 00:49, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Donnelly

Winning some money off of a television gambling show doesn't give you sufficient notability. He has been in the press on three occasions 1) when he won the lottery 2) the way his life had been ruined by the fact that he had won it and 3) the fact he's dead. If somebody made an article for him, it would be deleted per violating Wikipedia's notability guidelines but still. And yes, I know that a lot of the people on the Recent Deaths page do not have Wikipedia pages, but Donnelly will not get one of his own, similarly to Joe Biden's mother who was listed yesterday, before being removed. If you readd him to the RD section, I won't remove him again but another user will. Do as you wish but please try and take the general opinion into perspective. Thanks--Jkaharper (talk) 00:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kesha; Animal

And my last edit was reverted because...? Percxyz (Call me Percy, it's easier) 18:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So let me get this straight...you reverted perfectly good information that improved the article by providing a much needed source, because of an edit summary that included no vandalism of any kind whatsoever (but rather, the lyrics to one of the songs on the album)? And then, instead of actually letting me know on my page why you reverted the edit, and to point out the problem with my edit summary, you just left it at that? *eyeroll* Percxyz (Call me Percy, it's easier) 18:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. HalfShadow 18:45, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Ta !!! Pedro : Chat 22:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

God, I hope not...

Copyvios aren't in his MO, but believe me, the thought had occurred to me. I think that we've pretty much seen the last of Bambifan101 since we blocked his school IP and even Simple English, in need as they are of editors, initiated the same block range which we did. Definitely worth keeping an eye on this one, though. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You got that right. He remains the single strangest individual I've ever dealt with on this site. The little putz wore out his welcome by basically turning this site's generosity onto itself; his ranges were too big to block and he knew it. He finally pushed too far and three BellSouth ranges and a school are locked out. All of his pet articles are still locked out as well, which is a damn shame. If he were my kid, I wouldn't allow him near a computer until he turned 30. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. He's definitely on the top of the list. User:JarlaxleArtemis in his "Grawp" persona comes to mind, but a lot of the vandalism from that account was coordinated offsite by copycats. User:General Tojo is a pretty persistent individual as is User:Scibaby. The only really intelligent vandal I ever locked horns with was User:Wik under his socks, User:Gzornenplatz and User:NoPuzzleStranger which in turn was an anagram of the other sock. Bambifan was just plain clueless. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Violation of the no-taunting rule could result in a 15-yard penalty and being sent to bed without supper. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 02:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you are a witty fellow. For my part, I don't bother, uh, treatening. -- Hoary (talk) 03:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mmhm.

Yes, we now have our R-rated movies in their own section and/or blank covers. Timeshift (talk) 03:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Family First Party fundies introduced the legislation. Atkinson just preferred to roll over than put up a fight. Moral conservatism just gets larger and larger locally and globally. Timeshift (talk) 04:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the speedy rollback

Seriously. Would you believe that's the first time in four years I've experienced that particular pointlessness? Also, it's pretty impressive to have reverted it ahead of me, when I was already watching. So, yeah, thanks a bunch. — Gavia immer (talk) 03:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:88.202.201.30

88.202.201.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

By all tokens you appear to be a marvelous editor, however, it sounds to me as though you are getting into an edit war with 88.202.201.30 over the content of his usertalk. I left a comment to the same extent on his page. sorry if it sounds patronizing. Tact is not my strong point. Chamberlian (talk) 23:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He needs to study the negotiating skills of his cousin, Neville. I see the IP was blocked as a sock. I also see others (including the above) putting stuff back on his talk page. Actually, the only thing that he's compelled to keep is the denied unblock requests - which the above failed to restore. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:06, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the IP info should also be kept there, so it's clear where it's coming from. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 01:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Weber Brothers

Thanks for fixing my mistake, but... how did you know it was a copy vio?Dusti^SPEAK!! 03:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HalfShadow. You have new messages at Dusti's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Spelling razed

Thank You for the correction, its very kind of You! I thought that the word was accidentally misspelled.

Is there no other simple and quick way of communication here on Wiki? or is this way the only way, except sending mail? I was just thinking that it is not last time i will misspell english words and the list of thank You can be realtive big here :)

Once again, thank You! Then...if You have lot of time and dont know what to do with it and You are good at making the layout/ spelling of the articles (as im not) I can most probably give You a full time job here! :)

Best regards, Camdan (talk) 23:46, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HalfShadow. You have new messages at ShadowRangerRIT's talk page.
Message added 21:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Thanks for the help fighting vandals on my user page. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 21:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Iggy Arbuckle Wiki.

Greetings, HalfShadow! It's been a long while since we last spoke, and I hope you've been keeping well. I recall that you once contributed for a while in Iggy Arbuckle Wiki. If you can find time to come back and help us progress over there, again, that would be much appreciated! I've already brought the wiki up to better standards than it was at before, and I've gotten some policies written, based on some of the policies of I've seen here in Wikipedia, which you can have a look at when you get there. Thanks!!! Oh no! It's not here!!! (talk) 23:54, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. What red links? Oh no! It's not here!!! (talk) 02:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. I thought you meant my message to you had red links in it, and there you see why I got confused. Yes, now that I think about it, those really do need to be dealt with, but I can't do it right at the moment. As soon as I'm able to, I will, though. Thanks for pointing that out!!! Oh no! It's not here!!! (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hi. How do you use rollback? It would be useful. Evlekis (talk) 03:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL!!

I caught that too. "False facts?" Man, some folks are just in need of other things to do on the internet. :)) Thanks for the out-loud chuckle. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we could pronounce the "x" like an "s" and the whole mess would still be unpronounceable. I'm speaking as someone who loves reading freeway signs backwards. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shakool

*coff* - Alison ^❤ 00:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Muhammad/images

Hi, I noticed the large scale delete you made on the above page. Such action has been proposed in the past and discouraged, it's a sensitive topic and aslong as protests and replies are civil the general agreement is to keep the protests, they just end up getting archived (have a look through, there's a lot). I propose reinstating the content. raseaC^{talk to me} 17:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never. Also, as far as I know, I'm the one that has proposed removal more often than any one else. However, the community would prefer they remain and so that's why I mentioned it. I don't agree with it but know that others do so that's why I've gone ahead and reinstated the content. raseaC^{talk to me} 17:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Muhammad/images#Revert on sight. raseaC^{talk to me} 10:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

copyright

The material I added is licensed under CC-BY-SA just like wikipedia and was attributed in the edit history. Here is the licensing page http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Wikia:Licensing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.241.122.38 (talk) 23:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no rule that you can't post something you haven't written yourself. It is for example perfectly legal to post material written by the US government, which is under public domain. In fact a lot of content on wikipedia is from public domain sources. It is also legal to post content licensed under a licence which is compatible with Wikipedia's when it's attributed. 129.241.122.38 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Nice comeback

ROTFL Nice!
— V = I * R (Talk • Contribs) 00:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

question

Will i get blocked if i add music lyrics to song pages?Halfwite|ρεβῼ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.45.99.75 (talk) 00:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(I watch this page) Song lyrics are protected by copyright so may not be added in full to an article. Use of a lyric or two to illustrate something *may* be appropriate. If you add copyright material repeatedly you are likely to get blocked, after a warning. Not worth doing. -- Flyguy649 ^talk 01:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will we get a warning first because i did that a couple hours ago.Witeinkρεβῼ 02:09, 5 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Witeink (talk • contribs)

Hey

I'm not "riding your edits". I guess we're just pushing the button at the same time. I have no way of knowing who reverted it first until after the fact. XXX antiuser ^eh? 21:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]