User talk:Jiuguang Wang

Unless you specify otherwise, I will reply to messages on this page. Thanks!

Nomination for deletion: Ordinal optimization

Hi Jiuguang Wang! I nominated the article for deletion. Please follow the above link for disussion, if you like.

I think that an article on ordinal optimization would be a great addition to Wikipedia. However, IMHO, your article needs more work before it is ready for Wikipedia. Maybe you could develop/expand it, while maintaining it in your sandbox. You might find related content by using Mathematical Reviews, searching for books and surveys with the categories 90 (Optimization) and 06 (Order & Lattice theory). I would be happy to discuss such an article with you, if you would like any help from me.

Sincerely, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

WITHDRAW NOMINATION: I tried to save the article by adding context, a lead, references to reliable sources, etc. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 22:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs American Automatic Control Council SURF Pattie Maes Thomas Binford Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit Multidimensional systems Game Center Video tracking Patrick Winston IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence Imaging science Computer scientist GLOH Unimate Pharex B-Complex RoboCup 2D Soccer Simulation League Michael Wellman Tilt sensor Bachelor of Computer Science

Cleanup IPhone IPod Touch Phase correlation Merge Dynamical system Spore (2008 video game) Pose (computer vision) Add Sources IOS version history Feature (computer vision) Gothicmed Wikify Globe valve Plug valve Benjamin Wah Expand Mobile Internet device Robotics suite Human-robot interaction

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:34, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Pittsburgh WP10 party

Hey! This is just a friendly reminder about the Wikipedia 10th anniversary celebration in Pittsburgh tomorrow. The meeting time has been moved up to 4:00 so that we can gather before the game starts and stake out places, and it may be a good idea to get there even sooner, if you can. Pittsburgh bars are likely to be a little crazy and very crowded. See you there!--ragesoss (talk) 02:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Richard E. Bellman Control Heritage Award

Template:Richard E. Bellman Control Heritage Award has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Service robots

Hi

I have just restored the article which you decided to remove and replace with a redirect.

You were wrong to do this as service robots have many functions, of which domestic robots are merely a sub-type. I would have thought that someone at Carnegie Mellon would have realised that?

Chaosdruid (talk) 10:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Apparently I did that in 2008 - so first of all, kudos on digging that up. Now, as I am indeed from CMU and apparently know how to Google stuff, I know the "official" IFR definition of service robot is "a robot which operates semi- or fully autonomously to perform services useful to the well-being of humans and equipment, excluding manufacturing operations" [1]. This would exclude the industrial robots you listed and make "scientific robots" an debatable choice (the phrase "scientific robots", by the way, seems made up - most articles are talking about rovers). Ultimately, the vast majority of the service robots in the existing robotics journals and conferences [2] are about domestic service robots, so I stand by my original edit. Feel free to write another technically correct article with more than two sentences and some verifiable sources and I'll be happy to see a stand-alone article on service robots --Jiuguang (talk) 23:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)