Jump to content

User talk:192.249.47.165

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 192.249.47.165 (talk) at 14:26, 5 August 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

NOTICE: This is a shared account.192.249.47.165 (talk) 22:32, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then go create a user account so you don't both/all get blocked. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 23:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can't speak for the others, but I've tried that, and the culture around here makes it hellish. Plus, you know, work IP.192.249.47.165 (talk) 14:26, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NH Warriors 2010 team

could you please add info on the team please, thanks Youndbuckerz (talk) 10:36, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jerk, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:47, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jerk. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 13:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Jerk. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 22:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Human height has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. RandomStringOfCharacters (talk) 20:23, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to List of protest marches on Washington, D.C., you will be blocked from editing. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Tea Party protests, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 09:15, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation, accepted

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and New Haven Rowing Club was created.

  • The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 18:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dana 70u 31/32 offset.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dana 70. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dana 70U was found 89-93 Dodge W-250 trucks with a 31/32. --Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 17:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Orphan (film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -Tommy! [message] 18:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Orphan (film). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -Tommy! [message] 18:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sikorsky X2, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. -fnlayson (talk) 19:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Westland Lynx, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Westland Lynx. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 12:53, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Your appear to be connected with the United Technologies Research Center an associate company of Sikorsky Helicopters and as such you may have a conflict of interest with editing articles about helicopters in particularly to remove information from the Westland Lynx article. Can you please read the Conflict of Interest guidelines and suggest that you avoid articles related to your company or their rivals. MilborneOne (talk) 15:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Sikorsky X2. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The Popular Mechanics reference clearly states the record is unofficial. Calling the valid edit I made vandalism could be considered a personal attack. -fnlayson (talk) 17:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

COI was read and writter does not meet criteria identified. Writer can only wonder about COI of other editors who insisit on using qualitative rather than quantitative statements to obtain obfuscation regarding speed obtained by X2 and questionable record of Lynx? Questionable as this helicopter has come to the boundary of single rotor helicopters and FAI requires a certain percentage increase for records being broken - thus making the Lynx record technically unbreakable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.249.47.165 (talk • contribs)

I've added a reference to the Sikorsky press release t othe article, in which they clearly state "The speed, reached during a 1.1-hour flight, is an unofficial speed record for a helicopter." The itatlics is word for word what we have in the article. - BilCat (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please take note - You still appear to be editing articles related to Sikorsky or its rivals contrary to the guidelines on conflict of interest. You also appear to be edit waring on the same subjects. If you persist you may have your editing rights restricted or removed. MilborneOne (talk) 21:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

You are now edit warring on the Milford, Connecticut page. Please put up a reason/citation for RobertShaw Controls Company, they appear to be a minor firm of no particular notability. Thank you, Markvs88 (talk) 17:53, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice repeated on User talk:Peter Walukiewicz, exact same edit made. Markvs88 (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Milford, Connecticut has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cajun, you may be blocked from editing. . Per this [1]. Heiro 02:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Godzilla (1954 film) has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tabasco with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 19:17, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tabasco. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tabasco, you may be blocked from editing. Pinethicket (talk) 17:06, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Rhaphidophoridae has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 13:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:192.249.47.165&oldid=443187215"