User talk:Denisarona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 213.196.213.195 (talk) at 19:40, 30 September 2011 (→‎hyphenated variants are not spelling variants: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Denisarona, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk) 07:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:28, 27 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Portland stone

Sorry not familiar with talk pages but I'd like to know why you reverted my change to the page as 'vandalism'? Isn't a link to what freestone actually is helpful and informative within the context of this article? 91.143.78.44 (talk) 14:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Josef Váňa

Thanks! :)) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Istanbul not Constantinople

OOO! Now I see. My bad. Lovely song though, innit? Ratibgreat (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

There was no need for the message - I was trying to revert at same time as User:Xionbox - and have apologised direct to him. Denisarona (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I looked at your edit again and again and just couldn't figure that you would have made that particular edit. I should have just posted a personal message asking you about it, rather than slap the template on you. No worries, I removed the warning. Sorry! Wikipelli Talk 14:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - no problems. Denisarona (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Denisarona,
I got the message as well. Thanks for notifying me and don't worry about it. ;-)
Xionbox₪ 14:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Vandal on fighter aircraft-related pages

The IPs that have been making strange edits to the See also sections of fighter aircraft pages appear to be the same person, despite that they come from different IPs. Geolocate shows that they have the same ISP and location. Should a WP:SPI be filed? -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 12:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that something needs to be done and possibly blocking them may solve the problem. If you have time to file a report I have no objection - vandalism annoys me!! Denisarona (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We'll see if they come back again. Once they've made 4 reverts using any of their IPs on the one page we can file a WP:3RR violation which almost always results in a ban; SPI is too slow to have any significant impact, as it takes a matter of days to progress an investigation. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 16:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

maybe you would like this...

You have been undoing a lot of vandalism lately, which is great. I realized that it might be hard to revert vandalism using the undo button. If you would like to easily revert vandalism in a single click, you might want to request Rollback rights. You can quickly request them by clicking here, but I recommend you read this page first. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 15:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Crazymonkey1123: your anti-vandalism work is great, and you would find rollback rights very useful. I'll grant them to you if you'd like them. Acalamari 16:05, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You would also get access to Igloo, a powerful anti-vandalism script that requires Rollback rights in order for it to be used by a user. You can click on the Igloo link, which will take you to a page that shows you how to install and use it. You need Rollback rights first before you can use it though! Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 16:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rollback granted: just remember that it should be used for reverting blatant vandalism/spam, and that using it to revert anything is considered inappropriate use of rollback. Wikipedia:New admin school/Deleting/delete is a place to practice if you wish to test the tool first. Have fun! Acalamari 16:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nice job in using rollback! I just have one suggestion for you: you could type {{subst:template:Uw-unsourced1}} (without the template word) ~~~~ when you want to let new users know that they added unsourced or improperly cited material, which would have made it easier to warn 2.50.44.134. Keep up the good work! Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T or M/Sign mine 16:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Ospedaletti

I don't understand this. The infobox parameters are formatted correctly, the photo is located on Commons, yet it doesn't display in the article. Do you have any idea why is that? - Darwinek (talk) 08:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, but it's possible that the "name.jpg" is incorrect - you used 'Ospedaletti_panorama.jpg' - is this the correct caption? My technical knowledge of images is almost non-existant!. Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Tall Dwarfs

Have again corrected the Tall Dwarfs page - their first release WAS on Furtive Records (Propeller's sister label) in 1981 -, and was later re released by Flying Nun. For the sake of accuracy and to no further perpetuate the growing number of Flying Nun myths this correction should stand.

http://www.discogs.com/Tall-Dwarfs-Three-Songs/master/149658

is merely on reference and i can supply more -not to mention the actual copy that I have - but can supply more evidence.

Cheers Elscarface (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reference is correct, but if it had been quoted/shown when making the edits, then there would have been no need to revert "unsourced" edits. Denisarona (talk) 05:45, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for the help on my talk page. Bentogoa (talk) 12:55, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Many thanks, Denisarona, for all you do on Wikipedia—especially keeping my user page vandalism free. Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Denisarona. You have new messages at JohnCD's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you

... for cleaning up vandalism on my talk page. Cheers, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Medieval saints

To be honest, I don't know off the top of my head either. I'll have a look, though - my rule in situations like that is to revert if anything smells fishy, legitimate or no. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I left word over at User talk:Polylerus - he knows far more than I. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing - happy to be of help. :-) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 15:55, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

polargeo

I appreciate your enthusiasm but it really is me (check the IP if you really care). Can you leave my post as it was. Thanks Polargeo. 194.66.0.122 (talk) 15:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Demi Lovato

This is not vandalism. The edits to create that was. ℥nding·start 19:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say your edit was vandalism, I'm just telling you the blanking was not vandalism and that the content that the person blanked was. Sorry if I wasn't too clear on that. ℥nding·start 05:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks, guardian angel! Fleet Command (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jannali, New South Wales

Why do you keep deleting the Gym's section?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.247.172 (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks...

...For reverting a fan of mine. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why did you automatically "undo" my edit and mark it as "minor"?

Would you care to read the talk page? Look at the edit history? Do a quick Google search on the article topic?

58.164.118.105 (talk) 04:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 11:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked another user to look at the Amanda Lindhout situation. And the IP has been warned not to engage in edit wars. Lets hope this is the end of that discussion.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunatly this are the kind of tactics some IP/users use to distract from their edits. I have asked for the article to be indefinitly protected for sometime so the situation can calm down. Perhaps you can make a comment to, as to why it should be protected so atleast not IPs can do edits on the article. Well, lets hope that particular situation is over with. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also just to mention it, I find it to be really inappropriate by the IP in question to label you as an "idiot" in his/hers edit summary on the IP talk page. Just because you simply dont agree with the IP in a matter.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you could start a discussion on the Amanda Lindhout talk page about reverting back to an earlier version of the article. Perhaps to your latest edit?. Would be easily fixed. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:25, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Methodist Boys' School (Kuala Lumpur)

Sorry. I am not a registered with Wikipedia. And I do not know how to post properly. But I was a former student of that school and an archivist with the school too. The school does not maintain the page. It's maintained by students who overwhelmingly over exaggerated it and it's misleading other students. And they maintain topics which serve no purpose to people wanting to have a general view only. I am basically removing topics which have take up too much space in that particular page and as well as trimming it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.138.123.168 (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:33, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Mignogna

Hi you added a very poor addition/BLP violation/reported defamation to this article - it was removed correctly and you added it again - please investigate more and take care what you add to articles - thanks - if you want to discuss there is a thread at the BLP noticeboard - Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Vic_Mignogna - Off2riorob (talk)

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Almoravid dynasty

But in 1031 Caliphate of Cordoba finish, How is possible in 1040 Caliphate of Cordoba was a country??87.217.106.39 (talk) 13:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then Caliphate of Cordoba crash 1009-1031 formed a lot of countries (taifas)

  • Banu Ghaniya was a almoravid rulers of Mallorca, but when almohad invasion they flight to them

Maps:

I've responded on your talk page. See message about using the article's talk page. Denisarona (talk) 13:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zoo Tycoon Articles

 Remind


I was just reverting trashy fake animals that don't appear in those games. You did not need to revert them. And I wonder why they put Scillian in the Dwarf elephant's name in Zoo Tycoon 2. That was also true. Don't revert my edits again. And you must type in a summary when editing also. 58.110.247.14 (talk) 08:18, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read your talk page! Denisarona (talk) 08:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? 58.110.247.14 (talk) 09:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Daniel Osvaldo

Stop making your vandalism.--87.17.227.198 (talk) 14:26, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


50.102.250.142

Why did you threaten to block me over cited edits of the incorrect "Purgatoire River" page? The changes used citations from a college and a newspaper in the area of the Purgatory River, reflecting the correct name of the river. That name is also shown in the USGS link on the page as the first of the two official USGS alternate names, and it's also the name reflected on all maps of the area and in every verbal reference in the area. There was absolutely no vandalism of the page involved; I was attempting to correct it, not disrupt it. 50.102.250.142 (talk) 20:17, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on your talk page. I didn't threaten you - just asked 3 times for you to provide reliable sources for your edits. Denisarona (talk) 20:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Were the college and the newspaper I cited unreliable? That's what confused me about the harsh tone of the third note (I saw the first two after you reverted the second edit). 50.102.250.142 (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prasanth Thyagarajan Paternal relative to Vikram, Source Article Vikram (actor)

Check the article again - he is a cousin on his mother's side: a maternal relative.Denisarona (talk) 05:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don Valley Parkway

HI there. I received a message saying that I had edited some pages about the Don Valley Parkway. This is impossible as I have not been at work for three weeks this month, and didn't go on this to look at that page. Just wanted to let you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.92.126.10 (talk) 17:12, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to the History Log of Don Valley Parkway you made an edit at 16:59 UTC today and this is the edit I reverted. Denisarona (talk) 17:38, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OCRBSK

Hi, I received a message from you on my edits to the National University of Singapore page. I am not sure if this is the right channel to reach out to you so do let me know otherwise. But I need to understand why my edits were reverted. They were done to update information on the page as well as to correct some misinformation. All edits were done based on the content on the official website of National University of Singapore. Please let me know how I can edit the page again to avoid further reverts as I am new to Wikipedia editing. Thanks. Ocrbsk (talk) 09:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Ocrbsk[reply]

I have responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Hello Denisarona! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

hey thanks for reverting my edit, it was by mistake actually and i didn't even pay attention to it. I was just adding a picture which i will re-add right now. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A.K.Khalifeh (talk • contribs) 13:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to INFINITE MLM SOFTWARE: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Alex discussion ★ 09:19, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on your talk page - I don't really understand what your point is. Denisarona (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

after your warnings the Vandal account Bilalsafdar1 has been blocked. dBigXray 21:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Kashmir Conflict

I would also like to bring to your notice the Page Kashmir Conflict the user Mustihussain has already done many vandalistic changes on the article that had been noticed and reverted by other editors in past. User Mustihussain keeps editing the content and presents not a neutral viewpoint to the issue but a viewpoint biased with Pakistan.I tried to revert back to the last neutral version by Wikireadr41 but he has edited it again. I am not reverting his changes any more as i feel that if i do it again he will revert it back . Hence I am bringing it to your notice. Kindly look into the matter and revert back the vandalistic changes by Mustihussain , with possible warning (if applicable). Thanks dBigXray 21:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

is this a canvas-attempt? your allegations are completely nonsensical. my edits have infinitely improved the "pakistan administrated kashmir"-chapter by removing brazen examples of wp:or, especially concerning gilgit-baltistan. i have brutally complied to wp:npov. absolutely no-one has complained except for you. why don't you tell denisarona the truth about your stupidities on the discussion page [1]? it's clear that you're not interested in improving the article as demonstrated by your deletions of sourced content. my advice to denisarona is to read the "pakistan administrated kashmir"-chapter and the sources used [2]. the blatant lies of dbigxray will become obvious... "vandalistic changes"? "pakistan biased"? my foot!-- mustihussain (talk) 22:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mustihussain First please do not forget that these discussions must occur at talk page of article not on Denisarona's page. Moreover What makes You Mustihussain think that you your editings have a wp:npov when in reality you continue removing many lines related to human rights abuses by Pakistan in Pakistan Administered Kashmir, a difference between your version and the unbiased version by Wikireader41 clearly proves this. Its evident that for a Biased wp:pov like yours they are needless. Please do not remove precious unbiased contributions by other users. dBigXray 08:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepeshraj1 (talk • contribs) [reply]
are you blind or something? read the section and you'll see that it mentions human rights abuses in kashmir. the topic covers almost the whole section! in addition, the section now complies with wp:nor and wp:npov. the older, unimproved version was not "unbiased" at all. what a joke..-- mustihussain (talk) 08:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feliks Kryski

How is this an A7? [3] ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 06:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for your attention, let's rejoice in well editing, and sorry for disturbing with bad notification. Alex discussion ★ 18:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Dyens Citizenship

Roland Dyens was only born in Tunisia, and he only has French citizenship: http://www.classicsonline.com/composerbio/Roland_Dyens_22835/ http://www.trueknowledge.com/q/what_is_the_nationality_of_roland_dyens — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.51.92.161 (talk) 08:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded on your talk page. Denisarona (talk) 08:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In his biography in his official website it is written "Born on October 19, 1955, French interpreter, composer, arranger and improviser Roland Dyens began guitar studies at the age of nine." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.51.92.161 (talk) 09:36, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


County Donegal

"Please go to talk page and state reasons for using a non-officail language . IF YOU CAN PROVE THIS IS AN OFFICIAL LANGUAGE PLEASE DO (http://www.gov.ie/)" Do not use languages that are not officail state languages , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IMOS#Place_names "For articles on places on the island of Ireland, show the modern name in English, Irish and, if appropriate, Scots in the infobox if the article has one." If appropriate , considering that its NOT an official language of the State , its NOT appropriate , if you can prove the Ulster Scots is an officail language include it , but only Irish and English are so stop using it .

Charles de Gaulle

Denisarona, you have reverted a recent edit - I planned to move a couple of paragraphs I have previously contributed to a more relevant section in the article on Algeria because I felt I was perhaps repeating what had already been said. As such, it was constructive but I accept I should have given a better explanation. However, you appear to have reverted it back several versions somehow because additions near the beginning of the article I did earlier today have disapeared as well. In my opinion this is very un-constructive as it has removed useful information about his early life--Godwhale (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All ok again, thanks. I will tidy it up from here, thanksGodwhale (talk) 14:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sophus Bie has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I noticed the vandalism patrol that you were doing this evening, and I just wanted to say well done! Sophus Bie (talk) 09:24, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Sophus Bie (talk) 04:02, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Balkans etc.

Thanks for letting me know. They did more damage as 58.173.108.97, and then as 58.173.109.51, and I have now blocked them - this amount of damage while ignoring talk is simply unacceptable. If you notice any similar pattern of edits from other 58.173.* addresses (or anywhere else in the same TELSTRAINTERNET42-AU netblock), please feel free to ping me again. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Habbani Jews

Please see my post regarding the picture of King Abdullah in the discussion page of "Habbani Jews" article. Thank you. (Rider In The Storm (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I've responded at the article's talk page. Denisarona (talk) 04:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy?

You left a message on my talk which is completely out of context there. I'll leave your third attempt, it can't get worse. To mention something (no matter what) on a talk watched by many (Materialscientist in this case) is the opposite of privacy, imho. I am not interested in the case itself. but in privacy, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:59, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested in privacy contact User:Cncplayer who invaded MY privacy. Thanks Denisarona (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hyphenated variants are not spelling variants

Hey, on the off-chance that you're not an idiot, please carefully consider these two alternatives:

Posttraumatic stress disorder (also known as post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD)

vs.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

A hyphenated variant (posttraumatic vs. post-traumatic) does not constitute an alternative spelling. Including it adds absolutely nothing to the introduction and only clutters the first sentence, which should be optimized for readability. --213.196.213.195 (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Denisarona&oldid=453258525"