Jump to content

User talk:Viriditas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rkmlai (talk | contribs) at 16:29, 17 February 2012 (from rkmlai: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


DYK for Robert Kirk (folklorist)

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 1f6dc607c8e67284cae6ed2c7117edc5

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hello my friend

I wrote the below stuff yesterday. I will add a few items:

  • Thanks for the (attempted) help with the images. I guess TUSC is having issues.
  • So, now I know you stalk my talk and my userpage!! Hahahaha. Actually, I just did an accidental rollback too. :)

From yesterdayish:

Long time. Well, a couple of days. But before that, quite a while. In point form:

  1. You may have noticed that I can upload images now. Not sure if it's the new wizard interface, or just the ever-changing firewall rules here. I'm pleased, though not sure how long it will last.
  2. I got a crappy camera, as you probably know.[1]
  3. I want to make Hawaiian beetle articles. I'm looking into it. If you know of any, let me know. (Check your shoulder!)
  4. I like your views on avoiding sections and lists. I also like my views on using sections and lists. I have no idea anymore.
  5. Now that I have a camera, do you have suggestions on the sorts of images that would help counter the systemic bias problem? I've been taking images of objects. But, I want to do other things, like processes such as making tofu. What am I missing that's right under my...nostrils. Like pictures of nostrils, for example.
  6. My English is going down the drain from living here so long. It used to be so good.
  7. I've decided not to go for the big admin thing, at least for a year or way, way more. I just think it would spoil the experience, and thrust me into unpleasant areas. I like the rogue thing. Joining groups bogs things down for me. Helping seems most efficient when done rogue-style.
  8. Per my comments way back when, I asked a friend to help contact the San Fransisco parrot people for article images. No luck so far.
  9. I will rewatch the wonderful Transcendent Man. I haven't forgotten.
  10. Did you ever watch Standing in the Shadows of Motown I recommended? Very good.
  11. I will do the ogg video thing, in particular for Chinese fitness dancing.
  12. See Happy People: A Year in the Taiga. It's sooooo good: 11/10. The doggies! The lovely doggies!
  13. The requested images thing is working out. I am quite pleased with the results, and all terribly proud of myself. :)
  14. Thanks again for the advice on image placement. I am reviewing and revising.

And so, how's by you?

All the best, as usual.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments, Anna. Always good to hear from you. I'll check out those films you recommend. No need to rewatch Transcendent Man, as it is a pretty silly film, but well done. I'm very interested in collaborating on a Hawaiian beetle article with you. Can you find one that has lots of sources? Viriditas (talk) 03:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm thinking that maybe we should just work on a top level article, such as Hawaiian beetles. What do you think? Viriditas (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe Flora of Hawaii and Fauna of Hawaii should come first. Even dorky Canada has Flora of Canada and Fauna of Canada. And this isn't a province or state thing. Hawaii is distinct, and such main articles seem like the next step in terms of expansion. What do you think? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wait. I should check first. I always post then check later. Maybe these exist. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, What am I missing? I see Outline of Hawaii -- huge -- and I see flora and fauna of Hawaii as a one paragraph section in Hawaii. What gives? I must be missing a huge bunch of articles here.
Oh, and again, see Happy People: A Year in the Taiga now now now now! It's sooo nice. I think I want to live there. Except that it's too cold and it would make my skin look old. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And why isn't Outline of Hawaii to be found in Template:Hawaii??? This is on your watch! Don't make me have to come over there, young man. But I do hear it's lovely this time of year. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anna, when you have time, would you be able to help me organize these tasks over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii? Viriditas (talk) 09:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Do you mean the list entitled "To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Hawaii:"? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I mean a new thread where we can invite others to contribute. Sorry for the confusion. :) Viriditas (talk) 13:15, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I'll take a look. But, I just realized that I ought to pay some attention to the Hainan Island vs Province thing. The article is in an unacceptable state, and I'm trying to figure out what to do. 60 watchers and nobody is speaking up. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in no hurry! Anytime this week is good. Viriditas (talk) 13:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhhhhh! Really?? Panic is setting in! You know how easily I panic when there's time pressure. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. I should have said anytime this century. How's that? :) Viriditas (talk) 07:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Gatorade

Hello, Viriditas. You have new messages at Jeff Bedford's talk page.
Message added 15:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Milky Way

Hi,

Did you fully address the citation issues on Milky Way that you said you were working on in February 2011? I left a note on Talk:Milky Way and may try to address this myself if it hasn't already been done. —Alex (ASHill | talk | contribs) 23:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look. Thanks for letting me know. Viriditas (talk) 02:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I looked. The issues were not addressed. Viriditas (talk) 12:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose DRN thread

Hello Viriditas, this is just a message to say that the thread at the dispute resolution noticeboard about the redirect of purpose is stalled, essentially waiting for you to comment. If you have the time, could you can hop over there and tell us what you think about the latest posts there? Thanks — Mr. Stradivarius 01:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been away; taking a look now. Viriditas (talk) 02:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Please see diff.Cirt (talk) 18:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that's not good enough. You've made a mistake, and you need to correct it. More on your user talk page. Viriditas (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Californian Ideology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dotcom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

FYI, please see: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Topic ban proposal for Anupam and Lionelt. Thanks. Jweiss11 (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

mail

Hello, Viriditas. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

from rkmlai

I appreciate the prompt to produce the Lundberg v. County of Humboldt article and appreciate your further contributions http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lundberg_v._County_of_Humboldt&action=history . In response to your question "Thank you so much. You seem very familiar, have you and I interacted in the past?" http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rkmlai&oldid=464927837 . In receiving that question, I knew we had interacted before and indeed found (today, though I had appreciated receiving it then) you had left me this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rkmlai&oldid=276150032#Breathing_space

Thanks rkmlai (talk) 16:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]