User talk:Pichpich

Rob "The Lo-Rida" Lowe

why did you delete the page of Rob The Lo-Rida Lowe? He is a real person, and nothing in that article was attacking him. He is a mega celebrity in the state of New Jersey. He deserves his own wikipedia page and everything in that article was completely accurate. Bad job by you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JobSquad86 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Blackie

Then why not simply write the article? An entry on a disambiguation page that doesn't lead to an article is useless, and that es link is neither elegant nor, I think, in agreement with the MoS. Drmies (talk) 22:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Touché. I was hoping someone more knowledgeable about the subject would do it for me and the dab link felt possibly helpful in that respect. But it's not like I cared deeply about the issues and I wouldn't have reverted the removal from the dab page had it not been for the "not notable" edit summary which I felt was unfair. In any case, kudos to you for taking the non-lazy route and writing the stub. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 23:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, it occurred to me after your edit that I should have said "redlink" or something like that instead of "not notable". Now, an es article doesn't mean automatic notability, of course, but there was one good article (there's only two sources...) that was enough to base a stub one, IMO. I looked through Google Books and News as well, but all of it was in Spanish (and I am bad at Spanish). There's a DYK in it if you like... Drmies (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes of course. I never intended to mean that an es article confers notability but in that instance, the es article had good pointers. As for the DYK well let's just say I've never been a big fan of DYK. :-) Best, Pichpich (talk) 03:26, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Transit (2012 film)

I'm going to delete the redirect at Transit (2011 film), but there are still a number of links pointing to the old title. Please fix those links before deleting. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

ah yes of course. Because it was a new page, I didn't check the "what links here" but as this example shows, this is not a smart thing to do! In any case, I've updated the incoming links so the redirect can be safely deleted now. Thanks, Pichpich (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

So, what did you want to talk about?

So, what did you want to talk about? --Ne0Freedom 20:02, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

The A

I guess a redirection is ok, I am just concerned about what happens if people are looking for a possible meaning of "A" (without the "The") or "The A's" (the baseball team). I guess in principle this is supposed to be taken care of on the target page, Atlanta, with a template at the top, but in the context of the Atlanta page (high hit rate) it would be so rare for that error to occur as to make such a template seem not worthy of being there.

Is a nickname in itself not a useful topic of discussion? Viz. Big Apple. This is really just a skeleton version of the same concept. Being from Atlanta, I think it is interesting to see in which media and songs the term appears and which community (African American / hiphop) it is used. Can we keep it if I make it look a tiny bit more like Big Apple? Keizers (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Well if you want an equivalent of the Big Apple article, I think the correct title would be something like The A (Atlanta) or The A (nickname of Atlanta) but I'm not sure that a separate article is necessary. I'm not from Atlanta but I see no evidence that the nickname is used much beyond metro Atlanta and it's not so clear there's that much to say about the nickname without running into original research problems. In any case, I think the first step is to add a small section in the article Atlanta and see where that takes you. Does that make sense? Pichpich (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Gotcha, but I am seeing a little inconsistency in how articles about city nicknames are handled. Big Apple does not redirect you to New York City, but rather informs you on the origin and use of the term. This is what I am envisioning for "The A" - short as that might be in comparison to "Big Apple". Judapest, Metromahala, Mokum, and The Great Wen do the same. I have reformatted the article's text to prose and - short as it may be - to reflect the principle of the Big Apple et al. articles. If you still find it unworthy, then please go ahead an institute a redirect and I will incorporate the text within either the main article or a Nicknames of Atlanta article.Keizers (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Inconsistency on Wikipedia? Surely you're mistaken. :-)

All kidding aside, the examples you just listed are interesting and I see a stark difference between them and the case of "The A". The first obvious difference is the need to explain the nickname. Everybody gets why New York City or Los Angeles are nicknamed NYC or LA but The Great Wen or Mokum definitely require an explanation. The other and perhaps most important difference is coverage of that specific topic in reliable sources (otherwise known as the general notability criterion). The current article on "The A" lists authors using the nickname but Big Apple cites sources whose sole concern is the nickname itself. Ditto for Mokum and Judapest. (It's not the case for Metromahala but that one shouldn't be a standalone article either). While your examples of use of the nickname are interesting, they are still anecdotal and come close to original research. All in all I still feel that the best option is to redirect The A to Atlanta and to add The A in the list of nicknames of Atlanta in List of city nicknames in Georgia (U.S. state). Pichpich (talk) 19:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, fair enough, thank you very much for being thoughtful and civil about this issue. I have been through so much pain on Wikipedia with people who are not. I am doing the redirect right now. Keizers (talk) 19:05, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok. Let me know if you need further help with anything. Pichpich (talk) 19:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Qnet edits

Bro

Im updating facts about Qnet. Why are you deleting / undoing the information being provided. I have let the controversies stay and thats what u must respect..

---

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgvalani (talk • contribs) 08:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Popular culture in Atlanta, Georgia

Hello, Pichpich. You have new messages at Keizers's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hansel and Gretel in 3D

Oh, no! It looks like you're right. That news article used the wrong title in its headline. Sheesh. I'll try to put it back. Selery (talk) 12:53, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Pichpich. You have new messages at Wifione's talk page.
Message added 22:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wifione ^Message 22:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Joey Hood

Much obliged! Way too many of those Mississippi legislators are redlinks, and some of the "bluelinks" are actually false positives. Wisconsin has a bunch of active Wikipedians who make sure that every new legislator has an article, usually by the day after the general election and sometimes the day after the primary (in my district, the Democratic nominee is guaranteed the winner: the Republicans don't even bother to find a token candidate anymore, and the Greens don't want to anger the progressive Democrats). --Orange Mike | Talk 15:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

You're very welcome. I just stumbled upon the article because it showed up in Wikipedia:Database reports/Completely unreferenced biographies of living people (newest). I have no expertise whatsoever on Mississippi legislators (and no expertise whatsoever on politics) but it's not really required to piece together a few references with basic info. Ballotpedia is a nice starting point by the way. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 16:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Ballotpedia is a wiki, and thus not a reliable source of itself. It is most useful as a source for data mining. Actually, the Mississippi House has a page with live links to the official websites of all the incumbents; I just don't have the time to do much work on the legislature of a state I haven't lived in since I was 6. I've got a legislator-turned-dictator to overthrow! --Orange Mike | Talk 20:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

He he... Good luck with that recall. Also I fully agree that Ballotpedia is not a reliable source – and I haven't used it as such – but they cite their sources and that's what I used. Pichpich (talk) 20:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Cmach7

Hi Pichpich! Just wanted to alert you to considerable previous discussion of this issue, including the Christmas Eve conversation with his mother. See also the talk page for his other IP. A couple of his articles, which are generally in my own area of interest, I expanded, but at least one was a hoax. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 21:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointers. That hoax article certainly gives me pause... Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Pichpich, this is Cmach7, my mom said that I can talk here if I have questions, is that correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmach7 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

That's correct. Pichpich (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Joey Hood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Anna and Bernhard Blume

The article covers two people, the redirects of the single persons don't carry personal data nor live data categories. It is the biography of the living person Anna Blume. Please fix her cats. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

I see you added them to the redirect. It doesn't make sense to me. And what about other redirects for the page such as Anna Blume (artist), and his? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

CfD Discussion

A CfD which you have been previously involved in has been proposed again at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_12#Category:National_Public_Radio. You are invited to participate in the current discussion.  Frank  |  talk  01:27, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Moving categories from articles with living people

Your edit [1]moving several categories from Christo and Jeanne-Claude to their individual redirects makes sense to me, mostly, but I am doubtful about moving the BLP cat. Even though Jean-Claude is dead, I think the BLP cat may belong on the article for the couple, since that is the one that may draw vandalism and libel. Do you think that this should be discussed at Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects? Meanwhile I set the parameter for WPBiography living=yes at the couple's talk page for BLP coverage of Christo.--Hjal (talk) 08:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't mind discussing it but I'm convinced that the BLP cat should be reserved for individual biographies. The primary purpose of Category:Living people is categorization, not maintenance and we shouldn't change that. Keeping the BLP cat on the Christo and Jeanne-Claude article to prevent BLP vandalism is like adding the BLP cat to The Beatles which is just as likely to draw libel as Paul McCartney or Ringo Starr. Pichpich (talk) 13:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The same question came up with Anna and Bernhard Blume, and in the same way I would argue that whereas the members of the Beatles have individual biographies, Anna and Christo have not. Do you see a different way against vandalism than the "living people" cat? Until there is one, I vote for keeping the cat on the couples. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Again, unless you're ready to tag The Beatles with the BLP category, I just don't see how this argument makes sense. You can try to convince people to create a separate mechanism by which the BLP warning appears on all articles that contain a lot of biographical information about a living person. But we can't start placing articles in categories that are obviously wrong. Pichpich (talk) 14:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

By adding the Living person=yes parameter to the WP:Biography template on the talk page, I put the talk page into Category:Biography articles of living people. Perhaps this is sufficient for BLP vandalism workers. What do you think about adding this step to the guideline for Categorizing redirects? Something like, "When moving the BLP cat from an article to a redirect, check to see if the talk page is in Category:Biography articles of living people; if not, then ..."--Hjal (talk) 16:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm ok with that. I just don't want articles that are placed in contradictory categories (such as Christo and Jeanne-Claude) or categorized in odd if not sinister ways (for instance if we we weren't categorizing the redirects, we'd end up placing Death of Caylee Anthony in Category:Living people.) Pichpich (talk) 05:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Raymond Picard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bligny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Passchendaele

Thank you for your attention to the pages related to this one. I'm a beginner at formatting pages so do you mind pointing me to a page which explains 'transclude template' and which ones to use for what purpose? Thanks very much. Keith-264 (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks you're a great help.Keith-264 (talk) 13:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Joseph Amankwanor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Democratic Congress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Tony Samara - your speedy deletion nomination

I note you were connected with a speedy deletion nomination in regard to the "Tony Samara" article here. Thank you. I'm not a Wikipedia member, but was surprised to see the article is "up and running", as it were. I am concerned about this kind of promotional activity on Wikipedia, and thought I'd point you to the talk page of the "article" in question where I repeat this assertion: I'd also be interested to see what your opinion is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tony_Samara Thanks again. 86.135.187.39 (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Pichpich - thanks for addressing the issue of the inadequate, unsatisfactory promotional article on Tony Samara. As you know, I haven't created a WP account, so have no particular sway or much influence on what happens here. However, I noted at the talk page of the article that the user Sionk (who has been helpful) mentioned he wasn't keen to participate in further discussion. As such, I was hoping that perhaps you could somehow at the very least place the article back in AfC: surely this sort of third-rate content is unsuitable. Actually I'd welcome a debate on it. And if after a debate the article was allowed to be included at WP, I'd be A/ extremely surprised and B/ actually rather crestfallen and concerned for the future of human thought ; )

One can't help noting that some perhaps calculating, dubious methods in regard to this have taken place, such as creating a "Meditation Leader" category (possibly to force the article). Ironic, considering the reputed purity & humility of the subject, but of course that's just my personal opinion.

Anyway - what is the procedure for these scenarios? Surely there must be a way of dealing with articles that are (at best) found wanting, or (in this case) simply unacceptable. If anyone has an issue with its removal, the ideal outcome would be for the article to face a simple, democratic, evenhanded debate. It can't just be left like that - can it? Thank you. 86.135.187.39 (talk) 23:40, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. To answer the last question, it certainly can be left just like that and it's not even that hard to find much worse all over the project. The problem is that there's really nothing that will prevent a sufficiently ruthless self-promoting individual or organization from getting a stable article: once they've received a bit of coverage from third-party sources, they're likely to be viewed as passing the Wikipedia notability test and it will be impossible to have the article deleted. I'm not sure Samara is there yet but if you're ready to wait a few days, I can sit down and investigate this. If he fails that test, the article can be deleted after an Articles for deletion debate. I can guide you through that process if you want. If the article is kept, the fact remains that its current form is unacceptable. In particular, you should feel free to remove anything that is not backed up by a reliable third-party source or subjective or not neutral in tone. Pichpich (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a bundle for getting back on this. Rather disheartening, but I'm cognizant of the fact that a noble venture / body like this encyclopedia is open to possible malign manipulation. Case in point: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/06/gingrich-spokesman-defends-wikipedia-edits/

Somehow seems even more grievous when one considers the fact Wikipedia represents that kind of humane, openhearted, ethical side of the web - that's precisely why I'm with Edmund Burke on this:

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."

And whilst aware there are no doubt other articles here that possibly make the Samara one look like Shakespeare, this particular article just happens to be the one bugging me. Surely if those who want the article to survive all strive to be "a beacon of light and an example to others in all situations" (to quote the article) they'll have no problem with a fair debate. One would imagine an open and egalitarian debate would embody precisely the kind of balance and evenness people like Samara claim to typify... As I've asserted before - if Samara is as truthful, courageous and humble as the hagiography article claims, it's rather baffling why he would even care about being mentioned here.

Therefore I'd be satisfied and favourably impressed if (when you have the time) you'd be so kind as to investigate this with a view to putting the article up for an Articles for deletion debate as mentioned above. I'll meanwhile study the procedure. If this (fair and just) process takes place - if only simply to be part of a democratic process - I'll break my vow and sign up here ; ) 86.135.187.39 (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

There are many many good reasons to create an account but this isn't really one of them. You can participate in a deletion debate without creating an account since (at least in principle) any substantive argument will be taken into account whether it comes from me with a few thousand edits, you as a new account with a dozen edits or you as an anonymous contributor. You'll still be at a disadvantage though since you're only partly familiar with the guidelines, policies and, for lack of a better word, Articles for deletion traditions. I'm willing to help to a certain extent once I get around to it. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 22:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

That's the kind of guru I'm talking about. *There goes my schizo IP again*. Sooner or later gotta dive in here. Seriously - greatly appreciated. 109.153.104.122 (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi Pichpich - just a brief query to ask whether anything is taking place in regard to a deletion debate on this article... Thanks 86.162.24.123 (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Nothing new on that front. I'm a little hesitant to nominate the article for deletion because I believe the television and radio interviews might be enough to save the article from deletion. Personally, I don't find them sufficient but I think my interpretation of WP:BIO is (on average) stricter than most. Note that an article is only deleted when there is a consensus to delete. Pichpich (talk) 12:33, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Right. Well there's consensus between you and me. Seems a woebegone scenario, really. Going to sign up here anyway, so see you around ; ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.37.116 (talk) 00:10, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:User simple-N

Thanks for your message on my talk page. I have replied there. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:18, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Ringette players

For your correction of the Julie Blanchette'page

Pour vos belles corrections pour la page de Julie Blanchette

Julie Blanchette" תודה על העבודה שלך

--Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Tiens le patrouilleur parle un excellant français. Je suis surprise par la réponse .. ce patrouilleur est du Québec ? du Canada ? de Belgique ? de la France ? de la Suisse ? du Maghreb ? un franco -américain ? --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 20

09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Une de ces réponses. :-) Pichpich (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Alors paix aux tiens et couvre toi il fait si froid sur cette terre --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC) Ps tu peux m'écrire en privée misssouris@live.ca

Suite de ma note du 13 février.... aucune nouvelle du patrouilleur tant sur ma page de discussion que dans mon courrier personnel. C'est dingue comment Wikipédia est impersonnelle (ce n'est pas une accusation personnelle contre ta personne, car je devine ton dévouement pour Wiki) mais il est très difficile sur wikipédia (tant francophone, anglophone qu'hébreu (les 3 langues que je parles) d'échanger au plan humain.... je ne sais pas pour les wiki des autres langues...si c'est plus facile) de développer des relations , de se faire des amis (es) . Oui je sais que Wiki n'est pas un réseau social mais une encyclopédie. Mais cette humanité n'est t'elle pas ce qui nous relie tous dans l'encyclopédie. Pour toi cette belle chanson juive canadienne anglaise , ton amie du canada --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 00:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Merci de la petite note et de la chanson. Je comprend mieux maintenant la situation, désolée je n'insisterai pas. J'ai moi même eu de très grave ennuis sur le wiki francophone: J'ai été accusée avec d'autres contributeurs (que je féquente dans la vrai vie en dehors du net) de faux-nez massifs et j'ai été bannie indéfiniment du wiki francophone. Chacun a sa part d'ennui et l'important est de trouver sa niche pour poursuivre un bon travail encyclopédique, Ceci explique pourquoi je suis maintenant sur le wiki anglophone. Bonne chance, Genevieve Afriat, --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 12:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Привет ! StarDeg (talk) 14:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

спасибо! Pichpich (talk) 14:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Pour ce patrouilleur magnifique une belle chanson arabe, de sa petite juive --Cordialement féministe ♀ Cordially feminist Geneviève (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Asar Eppel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ostankino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animals (film)

I have opened an afd for this entry as well Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} ^(Whisper...) 16:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for comments

Hello, you are welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Thanks.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. When you recently edited Jan Dawidziuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kolczyn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Azorín

Hi. Thanks for adding the reference on the Azorín article. --Soman (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Knowledge

what part did i vandalize? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.112.82.129 (talk) 01:57, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for spotting my error in List of former Hindus. I'd been creating quite a number of articles with very similar titles and just missed the of for some reason. =] But thanks! Ncboy2010 (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! Pichpich (talk) 13:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RfA. I will do my best to live up to people's confidence in me. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Category_names#Supranational_.2F_historical_country_categories

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Category_names#Supranational_.2F_historical_country_categories. KarlB (talk) 19:10, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Template:Z48

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. When you recently edited Joe White (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sweet Science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for notifying me of my error (sociologist vs. sociologists)! It's fixed now! Meclee (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Pichpich. You have new messages at Meclee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion declined: Category:Asymmetric-key cryptosystems

Hello Pichpich. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:Asymmetric-key cryptosystems, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Incoming links need to be deleted or redirected. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

	A very thanks to you for telling me to avoid such articles and i am very thankful for your support , help and suggestion. I also want your help to delete the article ..Please Reply Regards Shubhamd15 (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Category:2006 Chilean television series debuts

Hello Pichpich. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:2006 Chilean television series debuts, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Category is not empty. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 13:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Page Deletion

hiii. the deletion for Nyce Nadia could be correct, cos i was little bit sure that the language won't be accepted anymore. I've created 3-4 articles totally that(Nyce Nadia) wasn't my first. Anyway i apologize for vandalizing wiki's copyright policy. Also hope you'll always there for helping me :) thank youRpaigu (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Pichpich. You have new messages at Tboii99's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Pichpich. You have new messages at Tboii99's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re National Heritage Sites, do you favour a merge or a split? The nomination was not for "rename". – Fayenatic London (talk) 11:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:1987 WTA Tour

Category:1987 WTA Tour, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 13:26, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks. The Zhongjianichthys article is still very rough... Marcraymond (talk) 17:28, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks. The Zhongjianichthys article is still very rough... Marcraymond (talk) 17:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)