User talk:Piotrus

: 632

: 82

: 6

: 22

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Archive

Talk archives:

Extended content

Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014), Archive 53 (created 20 April, 2015), Archive 54 (created 21 September, 2015), Archive 55 (created 4 March, 2016), Archive 56 (created 25 August, 2016), Archive 57 (created 22 December, 2016), Archive 58 (created 1 May, 2017), Archive 59 (created 1 March, 2018), Archive 60 (created 10 July, 2018), Archive 61 (created 6 March, 2019), Archive 62 (created 13 November, 2019), Archive 63 (created 23 March, 2020), Archive 64 (created 1 September, 2020), Archive 65 (created 13 February, 2021) add new archive

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report

No RfXs since 08:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC).—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online}

Thanks for the star

Thanks for sending me a star for my 1,000th edit. Nice to get this. There's still a lot to do so I will now aim for the 10,000 mark. This might take a little time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmccawley (talk • contribs) 21:27, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Hamish59's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stanisław August Poniatowski

Promoted to B class. Sorry I forgot to finalize that. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Cycle of Violence.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?

News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association

Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations

WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia

Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"

Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Thanks for reviewing, but...

Thanks for reviewing the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union article, but as you may have noticed, I'm not entirely finished. Would it be possible for you to wait a day or two, so I could finish my work on the article? Everything is ready, I just haven't found the time to edit the article in a long time. Is it okay or not? Bye. --TIAYN (talk) 14:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old entry from 2004

Greetings. I run into contributions by User:Emax today. Emax was a prolific contributor before he quit Wikipedia in February 2005. He used to correspond with you. While I was looking at the history of his stub on Jan Szczepanik created in 2004 (and its possible source), I discovered that there's a chance of some serious copyright issues in his early submissions. Would you please look into it, just to make sure that we're OK with everything he did by now? Thanks. Poeticbent talk 15:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Geoff Charles

Does the new ALT hook solve the problems you had with this DYK, or has something not been addressed that needs to be? Please stop by the nomination. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kabaret TEY

On 21 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kabaret TEY, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Kabaret TEY was one of the most popular Polish cabarets of the 1970s and 1980s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kabaret TEY. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Siege of Smolensk (1632–1633)

The article Siege of Smolensk (1632–1633) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Siege of Smolensk (1632–1633) for things which need to be addressed. GoP_T^C_{N 16:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)}[reply]

Your GA nomination of Siege of Smolensk (1632–1633)

The article Siege of Smolensk (1632–1633) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Smolensk (1632–1633) for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? GoP_T^C_{N 18:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)}[reply]

re: your GAN 1919 Polish coup d'état attempt in Lithuania

Hi,

I have started reviewing your nomination and made a list of comments at Talk:1919 Polish coup d'état attempt in Lithuania/GA1. I'm interested in your feedback! Regards, MathewTownsend (talk) 20:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs

(You wrote)

I expanded Pod Egidą and Olga Lipińska, so they are both DYKable now, I think. You can nominate them if you'd like :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let's split it between you and I, why don't we. Please nominate Pod Egidą if you want, and I will nominate Lipińska with a few touchups. Would that be OK with you? Poeticbent talk 21:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union

Thanks for giving me the time to finish off the article... I've responded at the GA review page to you're comments. --TIAYN (talk) 12:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Warsaw Uprising poster - Walcząc z Ogniem Bronisz Warszawy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Warsaw Uprising poster - Walcząc z Ogniem Bronisz Warszawy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:29, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from my talk page. A.J. (talk) 16:28, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Utwór nie jest fotografią, a ściśle rzecz biorąc: jako fotografia nie stanowi osobnego utworu, a jedynie kopię (reprodukcję) utworu oryginalnego. PD-Poland dotyczy wyłacznie fotografii; a i to nie wszystkich, tylko nie zastrzeżonych (a jak ktoś udowodni, że była zastrzeżona choć w jednej kopii, to i tak trzeba kasować, pamiętam już 2 takie przypadki, ale był też przypadek, gdzie autor odpuścił). A.J. (talk) 16:51, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]