Jump to content

Talk:Second Sino-Japanese War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Phead128 (talk | contribs) at 04:53, 28 May 2013 (Map updated, done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good article nomineeSecond Sino-Japanese War was a Warfare good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 22, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed

.

Map is confusing

The map gives the impression that somehow Taiwan (Formosa) and Korea were not under Japanese control at the time.

It also seems to suggest that the Japanese invasion of the Asian mainland seemed to stop at the southern border of China.

A map like this one: http://www.historyplace.com/worldhistory/genocide/map-japan.gif gives a fuller picture.

116.55.65.71 (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That map contains even bigger mistakes. It shows southern Qinghai as under Tibet's control when it was ruled by Ma Bufang who even pushed further into Xikang during the earlier Sino–Tibetan War. It also shows Xinjiang as independent while it was ruled by the pro Soviet warlord Sheng Shicai, who never openly seceded from China and Xinjiang came back under central government control after Sheng's defection from the Soviets.Rajmaan (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that THAT WAS NOT :"Sino-Japan War". It should be "Anti-Japanses War" or " The Empire of Japan Invasion China"

Please be justice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.50.145.216 (talk) 14:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia goes by the published reliable sources, and they call it that. Editors here are required to be neutral regarding Japan and China, and not proponents of one or the other. Rjensen (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify or nitpick, editors are not required to be neutral regarding Japan and China during the war. To be neutral about such a situation would be a form of mental illness. It is our editing that must be neutral. Readin (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
yes but neutral editing is well neigh impossible is a person comes here for the sole purpose of denouncing a national enemy in an event 70 years ago. The title is quite exactly right and the proposed "Anti-Japanese War" is a propaganda slogan used by a reader in China who has not been previously active here. Note that anti-Japanese slogans are in fashion in China today (not to mention burning Japanese cars) Rjensen (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "Second Sino-Japanese War" is the correct title Readin (talk) 06:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Martin B-10 raid over Japan

Chinese Martin B-10 bombers dropped leaflets over Japanese cities on May 19, 1938, to prove that the Chinese air force was capable of striking Japan.

http://books.google.com/books?id=s2NKutuUlA8C&pg=PA320#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=mpSkIrOCrQkC&pg=PA126#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=Re8pJnCXvWoC&pg=PA265#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=N6yy9mXwAEUC&pg=PA86#v=onepage&q&f=false

Boomerang Biological weapons attack which killed Japanese soldiers

Japanese biological weapons boomeranged on their own soldiers and resulted in 10,000 Japanese dead in 1942 in Chekiang (Zhejiang)

http://books.google.com/books?id=ZzlNgS70OHAC&pg=PA171#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mission 204

Just read about Mission 204 and also British Army Aid Group should this be acceptable to include the British & Australian flags in infobox? ChrisWet (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]