This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
I think that there should be a section for this, but only if they can be sourced. I think it is important to not only to Aaliyah's fans but also to other people. It is important for people to know the "facts", be they rumors or not;if they are out there, we should know(whether they end up being true or not.) What do you guys think?(And be nice I'm only SUGGESTING this.) I may start it if I feel it is valid, and I WILL source them. I have read many, many rumors about her, some which have been proven true to date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raaliyahent01 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aaliyah had premonitions a month before her death that something bad was about to befall her. I am not sure if it is appropriate to include this in the article because there is no telling what's right and what's not on this increasingly outsider complicated site, so I leave it here:
Aaliyah: Someone's following me and I don't know why. I'm scared. Then suddenly I lift off. Far away. As if I'm swimming in the air. Nobody can reach me. Nobody can touch me.
In the early years section, it says that she appeared on Star Search at the age of 10 in 1991. However, Aaliyah would have been 12 in 1991, not 10. Is the year wrong, or her age wrong? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.179.124 (talk) 23:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What happened to the music section its gone someone needs to put that back up there with pics.
They need to put up here about Aaliyah's Recital Hall. The new Detroit School of the Arts, a magnificent building built known for it's high academic standards and performing arts has renamed the Recital Hall after Aaliyah in honor of her memory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.14.226.208 (talk) 00:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aaliyah was born in January of 1979 so unless her birthday had yet to pass she was 12 in 1991. Perhaps she did Start Search in 1989? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.34.246.81 (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Years Active
It says years active "1992-present"...erm...she's not alive so how could she still be active or does it refer to her records still being sold?!86.40.220.231 (talk) 17:33, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ok i see it's been changed..thanks (sorry didn't have an account when i asked that question so that's why it wasn't signed)Nisior (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aaliyah
Do we really need to have this:
"Aaliyah Dana Haughton[1] (January 16, 1979 – August 25, 2001), better known as Aaliyah "
In the article? I hardly think it's significant or unique for someone to be better known by their first name... I'm going to delete the "better known as Aaliyah" part unless someone can come up with a reason for it to be there Pyrotics (talk) 06:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it was her "stage name"; on her records it simply said "Aaliyah". I don't see why
"better known as Aaliyah" doesn't make sense to you. Or maybe it should be "known simply as Aaliyah" ?213.118.75.120 (talk) 01:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. FACT: Aaliyah Dana Haughton - was her full name. FACT: She was better known as Aaliyah. This is a perfectly fine article with correct information. Nothing wrong with the article. Mz magnetik (talk) 21:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok.Everybody thinks that Aaliyah and R.Kelly were married but they both said they didn't right?Well they actually were married but divorced because...well I don't know really why.I think it was because of that rumor. Marexl (talk) 19:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They both claimed the rumors to be false but Vibe magazine shows the marriage license on which Aaliayah faked her age to be 18 when in reality she was 15 or 16. So if someone could verify the validity of the documents from Vibe that would determine the validity of the rumor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.34.246.81 (talk) 13:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Audio Samples
We need some audio samples on Aaliyah.You don't have any of them.You should get We Need A Resolution,More Than A Woman,Rock The Boat,Are You That Somebody?,One In A Million,and Back & Forth.Please,take this into mind.Thankyou!!! Marexl (talk) 19:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Other tributes
This section is pretty much completely out of hand and has become nothing but trivia. I'm not entirely sure how to approach this, as I'd rather not just remove the section completely. Does anyone have any ideas how to go about this? DiverseMentality17:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's fact, cold-hard facts...what's the big deal? And under the circumstances of her sudden death, that section illustrates just how much she actually meant to so many people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.222.254.163 (talk) 14:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that there should be a distinction between a tribute and a mere reference in somebody else's lyrics. I'm not sure where to draw the bright line, but I agree that the list is entirely too long and given undue weight. —C.Fred (talk) 16:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, a flying mention in a song doesn't seem too much of a tribute. For example, Twista mentioning her "Hope" in a single line doesn't seem like a tribute, Edyta Górniak dedicating her album Invisible to Aaliyah is a tribute. What are your thoughts? DiverseMentality19:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
HI, I'M FROM BROOKLYN, NEW YORK AND I'M TALKING DIRECTLY TO OWNERS OF WIKIPEDIA AND TOTALLY DEMAND THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.......... I ALWAYS LEAVE REFERENCES WHENEVER I EDIT AND I DONT KNOW WHY CONFUSED AND/OR COUNTERFEIT FANS AND CRAZY PEOPLE THAT KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BABY GIRL, GO AND VANDALIZE AND PUT UNOFFICIAL PHOTOS UP AND THEN IT NEVER GETS UPDATED AFTERWARDS!!!!!!!!!! HER ALIAS IS BABY GIRL, SHE IS THE QUEEN OF "NEO SOUL" & "URBAN POP" BUT THE PUBLIC EYE DIDNT GET A CHANCE TO SEE THAT FROM THE SECOND -COMING OF Janet Jackson (Aaliyah was highly labeled as "THE NEW janet.") THE PUBLIC & PRESS DIDNT GET TO SEE HER "ROYALTY" IN MUSIC BECAUSE SHE PLANNED TO COMPLETELY CHANGE THE INDUSTRY AND BECOME MORE THAN A QUEEN OVERALL, SHE "DOESNT" HAVE A NEW ALBUM OR MIXTAPE BEING RELEASED ANY TIME SOON AND YES SHE DOES HAVE A NEW MOVIE WITH Keshia Chante DOING HER THE FAVOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND SORRY FOR ANY INCONVENIENCE. xoxo—Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.38.132.137 (talk • contribs)
If her alias is Baby Girl, can you please specify which songs she recorded as Baby Girl and not as Aaliyah? The alias field is not for nicknames. —C.Fred (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per the articles, all four of those songs are credited as Aaliyah, not Baby Girl.
Quoting the template instructions for the alias field: "For listing official stage names for the act; also for solo artists who change their birth name. This field is not for nicknames such as 'The Godfather of Soul' (James Brown) or 'Nippy' (Whitney Houston) which are not the artists' actual stage name."
There's plenty of other articles where aliases are in the ALIAS section and Aaliyah's alias is said in "Hot like Fire", "Are You That Somebody?", "Try Again", "We Need a Resolution"............. and it wasnt a alter ego, it was a family name and it was just all HER being herself. YOU'RE WELCOME. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.38.132.137 (talk • contribs)
Brandy and LeToya dont use stage names and their nicknames are kept on display and i'm not trying to get off topic and talk about other people but i want the truth of our favorite star of all time to be displayed as well and THE TRUTH IS, VH1 WILL BE AIRING "BEHIND THE MUSIC: AALIYAH" REPETITIVELY IN 2011 FOLLOWING THE RELEASE OF THE MOTION PICTURE "AALIYAH" SO ITS ALRIGHT THAT YOU HAVE RULES AND POLICIES ON THIS SITE BECAUSE THE TRUTH WILL REIGN SOON.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.38.132.137 (talk • contribs)
Actually, LeToya is marketed as The H-Town Chick, so that is a valid alias for her. But I digress. Truth is good, but make sure it's verifiable as truth and not first-person accounts, related-party accounts, gossip, or wishful thinking. —C.Fred (talk) 02:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
YOU'RE WELCOME, I WILL CONTINUE TO BE SINCERE AND KEEP EXPOSING THE TRUTH (I KNOW MY BIG SISTER IN HEAVEN WAS WATCHING AND KNOWING WHAT I'M DOING FOR HER ARTICLE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.38.132.137 (talk) 02:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ACTUALLY USER "12.38.132.137" THERE IS AN AALIYAH MIXTAPE COMING OUT.ITS CALLED "OFFICIALLY AALIYAH".AALIYAH HAS BEEN FEATURED ON HUNDREDS MAYBE EVEN THOUSANDS OF MIXTAPES,SO PLEASE CHECK YOUR FACTS BEFORE YOU THINK YOU KNOW IT ALL.THANKYOU!!
I think you are missing the purpose of what she is saying. She never came out with a single in which the cover said Babygirl as opposed to Aaliyah. SHe never came out with an album in which the cover read Babygirl as opposed to Aaliyah. Her videos were never aired with Babygirl as opposed to Aaliyah in the place where an artists title belongs. Her Nickname was BAbygirl used affectinately by friends,family, and fans. Hwoever her stage name was always the one word Aaliyah. If we were to cite every name she uses as being a valid stage name then we would also have to cite that Aaliyah Dana HAughton, and Liyah were stage names. My point is that there is a diference between stage and nicknames. If Babygirl is kept in the place of Nickname or also known as section then its valid. But to claim her official name was ever Babygirl is wrong unless you can find an exapmle of one the things I previously mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.34.246.81 (talk) 14:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there WAS an album that was released after her death where the title simply read: Baby Girl.. greatest hits. It features Aaliyah, her head turned to the side, revealing only the right side of her face. The picture looks like it had been taken in or around 1994, which was when her debut album 'Age Ain't Nothing But A Number' was released. The album cover is in black and white and it features I believe some of her biggest hit songs and some remixes. It reads something along the lines of "Baby Girl: Greatest Hits." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.26.185.209 (talk) 08:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Official Movie?
Is there any reason to have a section on the (alleged) movie right now? It seems to be nothing but a string of speculation and uncited rumors. —C.Fred (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IT DOESNT MATTER WHETHER A SECTION WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE LEGEND'S ARTICLE AT THE MOMENT BECAUSE THESE ARE TRUE ALLEGATIONS BUT NOTHING IS FINALIZED EXCEPT FOR THE PERSON WHO WILL BE PORTRAYING OUR STAR SO YES A "MOVIE" SECTION WILL POP UP IN THE NEAR FUTURE BUT WE WILL BE HAPPY TO SEE MORE UPDATES......—Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.130.223.166 (talk) 18:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is one of a number of articles that I've got on my watchlist. It's been a target of vandalism in the past, plus all the rumours flying around, means I keep an eye on it. There's probably a number of other editors who do the same thing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Was She In The Matrix Sequel
It says in the Filmography section that she appeared in The Matrix Reloaded as "Zee" but on that movie's page it says Zee was played by Nona Gaye. Considering Reloaded was released two years after her death I think this may just be vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.238.75.218 (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aaliyah died before she could finish shooting the role of Zee, so it was then given to Nona Gaye. All this is mentioned in the link to Zee in that section. Remember, movies take years between filming and release. — Digital Jedi Master (talk)
correction needed
I noticed in the "musical style" section it said "Stephen Thomas Erlewine of Allmusic described her eponymous album, Aaliyah, as not only "a statement of maturity and a stunning artistic leap forward", but also one of the strongest urban soul records of the 1990s".
Aaliyah's eponymous album Aaliyah was released in the 2000's not 1990's so please change that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.59.108.191 (talk) 05:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I recently made this edit[1] which separated the paragraphs about Aaliyah's death from her career, and it was reverted with the direction to discuss it here. So I am doing just that.
I understand the reasons for keeping the article chronological, but I think the headings are even more important, with the chronology maintained within the sections. Otherwise, someone trying to find out about her death has to look in an unlikely place. The plane crash, and the subsequent lawsuit, are not part of her career and shouldn't be listed as such. I used the following articles as examples: Freddie Mercury - Herb Brooks - Cory Lidle; all are famous personalities who died prematurely, and all have separate circumstances surrounding their death.
I do believe it is appropriate to add a sentence to the top stating that "Aaliyah was killed in an airplane crash on ....", so the career section that follows is better in perspective. I know I haven't edited this article before, and respect others who have contributed a lot to it, so I won't revert and start an edit-war; but I do feel strongly about my article structure. Please state whether you agree or disagree with me, and why. -Sme3 (talk) 00:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I don't feel this format makes much sense, in a chronological sense. For example, it wouldn't make much sense to start the lead about Aaliyah's death, followed by her career. Looking over the article, having her death under "Career" is a bit strange. I think I can compromise, though. We can do something similar to your edit, with some altercations; moving the "2002–2005: Posthumous recognition" section under the "Death" section and rename it "Posthumous success" or something similar, and expand the "2001: Eponymous album" section. What do you think? — Σxplicit03:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think what you're saying makes perfect sense. I suppose a big flaw in my edit, having a career span past the time of death, is just as odd as death being another phase in a career. Would you like to make the edits, since you're clearly more familiar with the subject matter, or should I? -Sme3 (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I'll do it, considering the section about her eponymous album needs a bit of an expansion. Unless you're up for the workload. — Σxplicit19:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think you've done an excellent job with it. I was lead here by clicking links through some other articles and noticed the awkward structure, but you clearly know more about the content. Thanks! -Sme3 (talk) 03:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For most articles about contemp. R&B this is a pretty well-researched and comprehensive article. I'd nominate it for GA but first wonder if there's still any hurdles to be jumped. --Andrewlp1991 (talk)
I'm currently working on taking it to WP:GAN, but I feel the 'Legacy' section is a bit… short. I'm working on expanding that section; should be ready after that. — Σxplicit20:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No image
After being tagged for being a copyright violation, the image of Aaliyah that was uploaded on Commons was deleted, and now we have no image. Any ideas? — Σxplicit06:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Find a free image? It stands to reason that somewhere on the web is a fan who had a camera at an event Aaliyah was at and took a pic him/herself. Then they can license the picture under CC/GFDL/public domain and upload it. The key is, it has to be a picture they took themselves and not a Photoshop of an image they found elsewhere on the web. —C.Fred (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've actually looked for free images on Flickr—even those that weren't marked as such. The closet thing I could find to a free image was this; the problem is, the image isn't all that great, and those unfamiliar with Aaliyah wouldn't be able to identify her with this image. Should we do something similar as what was done in Selena and use a promotional picture since a free image can't be found and can't be created? — Σxplicit04:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did some digging with the image I put up. It should work out just fine especially since she passed away in 2001. This is just one of those things were you have to dig alot to find a usable image.Mcelite (talk) 05:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The categories that should be added are not categories that are specific for people of partial heritage nor are they exclusive to those of full descent. It makes no sense why they are not in the article.Mcelite (talk) 04:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)04:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The are categories related to her heritage. Per WP:Naming conventions (categories)#Heritage, which is a guideline, "Heritage categories should not be used to record people based on deduction, inference, residence, surname, nor any partial derivation from one or more ancestors."[emphasis added] Since Aaliyah is only partially Native American, those categories should not be applied for her. —C.Fred (talk) 04:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That makes no sense then if that's the case then the African American categories also should not be used. This does not hold a strong case as to why those cats can't be used that is her heritage.Mcelite (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I recently noticed you had added one of the categories back (at a sneaky manner at that, considering the original edit didn't remove the category as it wasn't there). Again, people are not categorized by partial derivations, as explained above. For the record, this article does not contain any African American categories—those were removed as well when I removed the Native American categories. — Σxplicit20:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I still largely disagree with that. By blood she rightfully belongs to those categories despite not being full blooded. Those categories were not created to solely included people whom are full blooded. If they were to only include full bloods those categories would surely almost not exist.Mcelite (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We've got sources saying contradictory things. At the discography article, two sources say over 24 million. The TV One Access clip says nearly 32 million. —C.Fred (talk) 03:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to point out that using YouTube as a source, specifically this copyrighted clip, is in violation of WP:YT. As for the contradiction, the source that was used prior to YouTube claims that Aaliyah sold 24 records (records, in this case, meaning a combination of album sales, single sales, etc.; also, emphasis on records, which I misread as meaning albums when I first added this reference). I wouldn't be against using a published reliable source backing up this claim. — Σxplicit04:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On the one hand, I agree that the link should not be preserved in the reference. I mainly left it in as a linking point to show what the link actually was. If we knew the date that program aired, we could just include that as the reference and remove the link. That said, I agree that a printed source would be much easier to verify and is probably the preferable source in this case, provided it's current. —C.Fred (talk) 16:10, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I find it hard to believe Aaliyah sold 32 million albums worldwide when she only sold 8.1 million in the United States (granted, that number may be out of date, but it couldn't have sky-rocketed since then) and 24 million records seems far more plausible. I'd like also like to point out that in the video, they claim Aaliyah was signed at age 14, when in reality, she was signed at 12. This makes me question the reliability of the entire video. — Σxplicit18:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wasn't there some confusion about her age at various points in her life anyway? However, you have a point about the reliability of the source. Based on that, I support a revert to the 24 figure. —C.Fred (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't found any conflicting sources about that aside from the video. Will revert back to 24 million records shortly. — Σxplicit18:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
that makes sense.. anywho, why arent there any cited sources of Aaliyah's Worldwide sales for her albums? does anyobdy know? I read somewhere a while ago that One In a Million sold 8 million worldwide since 1997, but I need more proof. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dboy4100 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did some pretty heavy research on Aaliyah while writing the article, and I can't say I came across anything that mentioned those figures for One in a Million. If you happen to come across a source that mentions this, we could give it a look . — Σxplicit00:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Guardian verifies that One in a Million sold two million copies: The gap between One In A Million and Aaliyah, her latest album, cost her sales. The former sold two million, but despite contributions… Also, I'm mistaken above; the album did sell over eight million worldwide (it's even in the article!), which can be verified here. — Σxplicit05:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Page needs to be further verified
I don't think its necessary to have her musical style, etc information displayed because Her family wants Aaliyah and her legacy to be respected and not copied and emulated. also, it would be very necessary if her cemetery information only be told via Her official site, MySpace, etc. for security purposes, there has been issues where people go to cemeteries and steal and do lots of absurd things and the family would be more than happy to keep Aaliyah at peace. There is an Official Movie on Aaliyah as confirmed in 2008, and updates are always being displayed via the official Aaliyahtwitter page [2]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sincereofficial (talk • contribs) 22:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Musical style sections are critical to understanding an artists music from an academic standpoint. Several articles have this section: Michael Jackson, Janet Jackson, Mariah Carey and so on. We're not here to glamorize Aaliyah or add plagiarized text (none of the text in the article is plagiarized, by the way). There's no justification for blanking out an entire section just because you don't like it. There is also no reason to omit her burial information—if it's available on all over the internet, omitting it here would do absolutely nothing to stop grave robbing, and I highly doubt anyone would be willing do to that after all the time that has passed. As far as the biopic goes, every story published about it is pure speculation, as the words "rumored" and "reportedly" is no where near "confirmed"—Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. To finish off, Twitter is not a reliable source. — Σxplicit22:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
can you please "READ" like everybody else and see why i said the things i said. and who are you anyway and why are you all over Aaliyah's article like if you're a fan?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sincereofficial (talk • contribs) 17:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Like I stated above, these things have to be confirmed. Taking one of the sources from Keshia Chante, it states: Ottawa-born R&B singer Keshia Chante, 20, will reportedly be playing late singer and actress Aaliyah in a biopic if the singer and actress' life. "Reportedly" is not confirmed, and we're not here to circulate rumors. Wikipedia is not a fansite, it's an encyclopedia of cold, hard facts. — Σxplicit19:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, in the section and article of the Aaliyah album, as well as other pages it is always saying that its her 'final' album. Truth is it is just her 'latest' album, Aaliyah didn't know she was going to perish and was not going to retire at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sincereofficial (talk • contribs) 17:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If an edit needs made, discuss it here, and an experienced (non-new, registered) editor can make the change. Anonymous/new users were vandalizing the page excessively, and that's why it was protected. See the template I've just added to the top of the article that explains it. —
C.Fred (talk) 17:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In the end sentence of he intro/lead, it says aaliyah redefined RB/hipHop music. Please cit this. I love Aaliyah's music but we need to stop overstating importance of singers(some stans feel beyonce is iconic..wtf!), even when they're dead. King Michael Jackson (RIP) is the sole artist who deserves all his accolades bc truly he changed not just music & video, but culture(views/aceptance on AfrAm; dress, dancing, hair, etc). & Madonna too when she dies will be desrving of compliments.
Back on topic: pls cite an article or music professional who says Aa redefined music. Thanks. 70.108.115.212 (talk) 17:50, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The end of the first paragraph of the crash section reads:
The crew had a flight scheduled the following day, but Aaliyah and her entourage were eager to return to the United States due to the filming finishing early, so they demanded that their heavy equipment be loaded on the plane rather than left behind. It resulted in the aircraft being well beyond the standard weight and balance tolerance provided by Cessna.
This is confusing and doesn't seem to quite makes sense. Is "the crew" the video production crew or the crew of the airplane? They were eager to return, so they demanded their equipment be put aboard? The use of the word so (instead of and) suggests that loading the equipment was necessary for them to return? Why? Couldn't they have left without it?
I think the passage in question is trying to say something like this:
The production crew was scheduled on a flight leaving the Bahamas the following day. However, with filming finishing early, Aaliyah and her entourage were eager to return to the United States, and made the decision to leave immediately by chartering a private plane. Reportedly, they demanded that their heavy equipment also be loaded onto the chartered plane, rather than be left behind for the next day's flight. This resulted in their aircraft being well beyond the standard weight and balance tolerance provided by Cessna.
However, I'm not familiar enough with the situation to be certain that my interpretation is correct, so I hesitate to change the article myself. Would someone more familiar with the exact circumstances of the passengers' decision please make an appropriate edit? 12.155.58.181 (talk) 01:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there. "The crew" referred to "Aaliyah and various members of the record company". Not the best word choice, though. I've copy-edited the paragraph to clarify it a bit. Let me know if there are any other issues. — Σxplicit02:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Philanthropy section
Aaliyah should have a philanthropy/charity section.
I have never heard of Aaliyah having any Native American ancestry. Even if she did have, its most likely generations ago. Why does every African American/Black female celebrity's article must include some obscure ethnicity background that is otherwise irrelevant?
Agreed. Ethnicity categories should be limited to first generation only. From what I have heard, one of her grand parents may have had some sort of Indian heritage. -- 69.133.90.247 (talk) 05:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's an opinion and we are uncertain how much Native American heritage she had, it doesn't matter. Both her African American and Native American heritage are on equal grounds and neither are to be favored over the other.Mcelite (talk) 17:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How is her native american heritage irrelevant? Because of the one drop rule, that makes everyone Black? Whether her heritage is first generation or not, we are who we are. And if one drop of Black blood makes you black, then one drop of Native American, makes you Native American too. Educatedlady (talk) 01:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Voice
Aaliyah was a Light Lyric Soprano. Aaliyah had a 4 octave vocal range (listen to the song giving up). Highest note: F#5 (I Care 4 You), A5 Lowest note: C3
Where is it documented that that's her range? We've got a reliable source that says she's a soprano, but trying to narrow it down to light lyric soprano based on what's heard in a song is original research. —C.Fred (talk) 19:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Attempt at featured article?
It's been a while since the article passed its good article nomination and has gone through a peer review after that. It seems the article has become stable after the user(s) who kept removing the musical style section has given up. Would anyone be opposed to take this through WP:FAC? — ξxplicit01:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Someone listed Britney Spears amongst artists who were inspirations for Aaliyah. This is INCORRECT. If anything, Aaliyah was probably an inspiration for her. For one she started the whole teen takeover thing in the 90's. She got her first record deal when she was 12 and "Age ain't nothing but a number" dropped in 1994 when she was 15. After her album dropped, next thing you know we got Brandy, Monica, Leann Rimes, then Britney Spears, and Christina, etc. I know Brit was on the Mickey Mouse club BUT Britney Spears did not drop her first single until 1998 (Baby one more time). So, she wasn't even heard of yet in terms of a recording artist. And Aaliyah with her "street but sweet" style would be widely copied even today with artists like Ciara. So I think that this is inaccurate and needs to be taken out or at least put her in a another section listing artists Aaliyah influenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cookie1127 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
fixed. Aaliyah never stated to be influenced By Britney Spears or Nnsync, she just liked a couple of songs from them. Not once has she said she was "inspired" by them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dboy4100 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aaliyah debuted in the early 1990's & emerged victoriously out of the one of the 1990's decade as being one of the best-selling artists of the decade, as well as being the Top-Selling solo female R&B artist of the decade as well with over a combined 11 million records worldwide with her two albums "Age Ain't Nothing But A Number" selling over 3 million,and "One In A Million" selling 8 million respectively. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinynu15 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
HEY U DID A GOOD JOB...BUT ADD MORE STUFF..... MAKE IT LONGER SOME OF THE SECTIONS ARE TOO SHORT....
IN THE BEGINNING WRITE AALIYAH IS TWO TIME MTV VMA WINNER AND FIVE NOMINATED GRAMMY POP/R&B ARTIST,ACTRESS,MODEL,SPOKESPERSON(TOMMY HILFIGER IN 1998)
FOR THE MAIN PICTURE CHANGED IT TO AALIYAH HOLDING HER VMA!! ALSO ADD MORE PICTURES LIKE AALIYAH AT OSCARS
SEPARTED ROMEO MUST DIE ERA AND AALIAYH ERA MAKE IT TWO SEPARTE SECTIONS.. also separte the posthomous career and invesgation... u need to have alots of stuff for different eras im not going to write all u gonna write u should already have done that.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monsterjt (talk • contribs) 01:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Albums sales... again
I'm have some concerns regarding the reference being used to cite Aaliyah's album sales. To start off, the main story of that article is the alleged Aaliyah biopic, which has been circulating the web since 2008. Two years later, only rehashes of the exact same story has been around. As the supposed film is nothing but bogus, I have reason to believe everything written in it is bogus as well. I have found absolutely no reliable source that backs up this claim of 32 million albums sold worldwide. What I've found was the following: The Insider (an unreliable source, as anyone can submit anything), which took the story from a gossip blog; SOHH, which took the story from the personal blog Music 2 Nite (which may be the origin to the whole damn thing); Digital Spy (just as unreliable) also cites the personal blog Music 2 Nite; Sowetan, which cites Sixshot as the source (which appears to be under construction; I should note that my browser warned me about this site as being malicious); and the unreliable EURweb, which doesn't even display properly. The only possible sources I could find were: Los Angeles Times, but the story is extremely erroneous, as the article states Aaliyah sold 32 million records in the United States alone, while Billboard magazine states 8.1 million albums sold as of 2008; The Arizona Republic, a newspaper in Arizona, simply went with the LA Times story. — ξxplicit06:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a fan of Liyah so much about researching it. In various sources it is mentioned that Aaliyah sold 32 million copies (as you said).
Several reliable sources cite absurd things, like 32 million albums sold in the U.S. and 100 million records worldwide.
Cited on page "Aaliyah discography" that it had sold 24 million records worldwide (which is outdated).
Sales of Aaliyah are outdated! Because if we follow the RIAA it sold 7 million albums in the U.S. (then again you're right, we should follow the Billboard [which is very reliable]).
The BET channel is a very respected. Even the film being suspended the news is correct (targeting 2008), where the supposed "director" of the film spoke about the project. BET said it sold 32 million albums worldwide.
Concluding my answer:
32 million albums is over 32 million records so I think we should follow the BET. Its source in the discography (The NY Times [or post]) also said about the film.
How do you know the sales are outdated? The source for the 24 million record sales is in the article of the body, under the "Legacy" section: Having sold 8.1 million albums in the United States and over 24 million records worldwide..., and cites this reference, a book from 2008. How can anyone believe that Aaliyah sold eight million additional records (let alone albums!) in such a short amount of time? The references listed above are no older than a year and a half old. The reason I question every single source claiming 32 million album sales is because they all seemed to have got their information from the personal blog Music 2 Nite, or from other websites who got their information from Music 2 Nite.
Additionally, where are the sources for the claims that the film was suspended and that the director spoke out about the film? There's no evidence that film that the film is even planned, let alone suspended; it's all been based on speculation, and I fear it all came from this personal blog. This is exactly why I feel none of the above sources can be counted on to verify the claim of 32 million album sales worldwide. — ξxplicit00:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Err, a better source for what? Considering the biopic hasn't officially been announced, all these sources are doing is spreading speculation that appears to have origins from a personal blog post. Along with the film, the same blog post claims that Aaliyah sold 32 million albums worldwide—which all the sources above state, a claim that I'm refuting—which brings into question the validity of this figure given by any source (including the BET source), especially if all the information is coming from a personal blog. If the biopic has no validity as of now, nearly two years after speculation surfaced, how can any other claim in these sources be any more valid? My answer: none of this information is valid. The article has a cited reliable source for the 24 million records sold worldwide claim, but none for the 32 million albums sold worldwide claim. — ξxplicit04:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Again, source your claims. Otherwise you're supposition would constitute original research. You haven't presented any other reason for removing the information other than you have a feeling BET got it from a blog post. No direct sources even suggesting that's true. Sounds like detective work, to me. ——Digital Jedi Master (talk) 00:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I said that sales of it are outdated because, following the current sales One in a. .. and age nothin '.. should be 3x platinum. She has sold over 10 million copies in the U.S.. that's what I say.
their sales are not wrong. you had supplies for 24 million records.
Now I find 32 million albums and a trusted source. why not trust? is the BET. if you want I got more referrals with 32,000,000 of albums and 50 million records.
I know. = You will doubt 9 million copies (in U.S.) but I have references of:
Age - 3,000,000
One - 3,000,000
Aaliyah - 2,600,000
I Care 4 U - 1,700,000
Total = 10,300,000
Singles:
Back & - 500,000
At ur best - 500,000
The one - 500,000
Umm, both the book that claims 24 million records sold worldwide and the BET article that claims 32 million albums sold worldwide were published in 2008. To debunk one because the other source claims higher album sales is horrendous logic, which is why I compromised and set an estimate using both sources. Adding up album sales based on certifications without a source that actually verifies the total sales is a perfect example of synthesis of published material that advances a position, which crosses into original research. On a side note, I should point out that certifications are based on the amount of albums shipped to be sold, not actual album sales—or, at least the RIAA does it that way, as far as I'm aware—so your figures are, aside from unsourced, quite obviously off. As for your revert, you undid several changes that were made for good reasons: I moved the sources out of the lead and into the body of the article per WP:LEAD, I formatted the references using the {{Cite web}} template as they should be, I removed the {{pp-pending}} template as the pending changes option had long expired, among other several minor fixes.
As for my "detective work", as Digital Jedi Master, if the claim of the film about Aaliyah was bogus—as not a single production company, actor or director has confirmed it (if I'm not mistaken, I think the supposed director even denied such a film to exist... though I could be wrong, I'd just have to search it, but I'm not keen on doing it at the moment)—it's hard to seriously consider that claim of 32 million albums sold worldwide if it comes from the same article, but I've compromised, as I mentioned above. — ξxplicit01:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I do not agree with using networks as the means of providing album sales. BET, like many other television networks, are respected and they do not generally tell their viewers straight out lies and myths, like say Enquirer magazine, or the Globe. But there can be individual programming on any network where that particular show may not be the most reliable for info, although the network overall is reliable. TV networks and also magazines like People or US are not what we should be using to relay album sales data. This is because those entities are not committed to gathering album sales data; that is not their function. Television networks like NBC or ABC, and even music networks like BET, VH1, or MTV, did not come into existence for the sole purpose of tracking and following album sales from downloading or record stores. Billboard Magazine or the RIAA does that; it is their primary function and the very reason they were created. So realistically, they should be the only sources we are utilizing for musical acts when referring to an act's sales of a particular album or their entire career sales. People who work at television networks or other magazines besides Billboard are getting their information from various places. Numerous people work for those entities. Various hosts and producers work on a variety of tv shows and various writers work at the magazines, and sometimes the magazines hire independent writers who contribute a story or article. So everyone is getting their information from somewhere else. I could watch a tv program where the host named "Josh" says that the band AAZ has sold three million copies of the album in the US, and then later watch a show on the same network where host "Michael" says they sold five million copies of the same album. For that matter, Fox network may say they sold 4 million copies of the album; and People magazine may state they sold 6 million copies. Different numbers from different entities (be it shows on the same network or different media outlets) all referring to the same album.
And considering whether you are a big fan of band AAZ, you may want to believe the higher total. And if you can't stand AAZ, you are gonna tend to view the lower total as more accurate; at least a lot of people think that way. But notice if you use Billboard magazine or RIAA for the sales data, the amounts do not jump all over the place. And the RIAA certifies albums when record labels request it. So lets say an album was released in 1994 and sold 3.2 million copies. If the RIAA last certified that album at three million copies in 1997, the act's record label may request another sales count a few years later to see where it stands now. The RIAA will then give the updated sales, whether it be by a few thousand more, several thousand more, or now certified at 4 million. But the RIAA doesn't do this on its own without a request from a label. How could it when there are an uncountable number of albums that have been released over the decades by an uncountable amount of record labels. Those labels must request the sales tally. So again, the RIAA and Billboard is what should be used when determining album sales, not network tv. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.251.112.134 (talk) 04:31, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Are You That Somebody???
The article doesn't mention Are You That Somebody?, a single from Dr. Dolittle OST (1998), one of her most succesfull and known songs worldwide --91.64.53.161 (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011
Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
Here we are once again, discussing the Native American category and whether or not it should be included in this specific article. This was discussed July 2009 and the conclusion was that it should not be added, because there was no consensus to add it. Aaliyah barely has any Native American in her, as the source clear states: "The beautiful baby had black hair and brown eyes and was predominantly African-American with a little American Indian in her blood from her grandmother" (bold for emphases). This hardly holds any weight in order to merit the inclusion of the Native American category. This isn't the first time Mcelite has attempted to force these types of categories in to articles. The exact same issue took place at Beyoncé Knowles. Discussion ensued, and if I remember correctly (it's past midnight here, can I save the reading for later?), nearly every other editor, if not all of them, firmly opposed the addition of this category. Having a splotch of Native American in you doesn't automatically make you a Native American. I see absolutely no reason why this category should be added when it clearly doesn't belong, and the undue weight given to the small amount of Native American that was in Aaliyah to categorize her as a Native American person is completely unwarranted. — ξxplicit08:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First off shut up Georgia Bird you go by the one drop rule any way...any amount of African American blood and your black that's your outlook and it isn't right. 2nd Its biased as hell and I don't care if we only have her grandmother confirmed as native the matter is she is drightfully of Native American blood and a meets the standard for being applied to the category which I created. I created that category to not exclude those that are not full blood because that is wrong and does nothing but support ignorance. Even if people want to go by the sky is blue garbage she would pass for native easy..she wouldn't be the odd ball on a reservation. Blood is blood and that's my view on it the same if it was vice versa and the only "record" of African American blood was from her grandmother that doesn't mean she has no other African American ancestors. I don't mean to come of mean but it's just comes off biased because I see her native heritage not being respected.Mcelite (talk) 16:22, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you're not going to try to come across as mean, starting your post by telling another to user to shut up really shows you made no attempt to remain civil. What exactly is the "standard" of inclusion for this category? The one you arbitrarily applying to this article? I noticed that, every time this issue comes around, you always bring up the fact that you created the article, which only shows your bias view on the inclusion criteria. The fact that Aaliyah is of Native American descent isn't being ignored or hidden, she's categorized under Category:American people of Native American descent. If anything, it's disrespectful to categorize her as something she has never been classified under. You're free to hold a certain view, but when you start pushing your view onto articles where it doesn't belong—especially when consensus has denied it before—it becomes a problem, and is downright disruptive. I've provided a source which indicates that she's predominantly African American with a little bit of American Indian ancestry, while this source classifies her as an African American. Yes, she is of Native American descent, but she is not a Native American. — ξxplicit19:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I created that category because it did not exist. No she is not full blood native but that is her heritage and that's what I'm saying; that she still meets the requirements of that category. The category includes not only her but other people ex. Cher who is a singer with Native American heritage. I'm not trying to push my views I just can't support the one-drop rule in effect. I would be just as frustrated if it was vice versa. I just don't see it as fair, I can care less of what the media or magazines want to potray her as she is still of Native blood. No different than Henry Armstrong being potrayed as African American when his mother was Iroquios.Mcelite (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And there you go again... not caring what sources or what consensus dictates, it's your way or the highway. Other stuff exists; the categorization of other articles is not the concern of this article. I fail to see how your arguments here are any different from your arguments you provided in the Beyoncé Knowles article, which, after reading through the discussion, not a single editor supported your addition of Native American foo categories. It's really difficult to have a discussion when you throw out all the arguments of views opposite of yours because you don't like them. "She still meets the requirements of that category..."; your requirements, maybe, but not that of the encyclopedia. — ξxplicit07:39, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the U.S. there is a legal standard (Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990) for whether someone can be called a 'Native American artist'. Basically, an artist has to be registered as a member of a federally recognized tribe, or be certified by a federally recognized tribe, to be considered a "Native American artist". I believe that should be the standard we should apply to categorizing Aaliyah. -- Donald Albury11:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Saying someone is Native American suggests that they actually are enrolled in a Native American tribe, while "Native American descent" generally refers to people with Native American heritage who are not necessarily enrolled. Blood quantum is not always the criteria. The article doesn't mention what tribe she is descended from. -Uyvsdi (talk) 17:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]
Agreed, but not sure why you are expending so much energy on this one article's inclusion in that category when apparently no one in that category is an enrolled Native American people. -Uyvsdi (talk) 21:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]
There's at least one actual Native American in the category (Chuck Billy (vocalist)), but I haven't checked all the pages. A large majority are exactly what Aaliyah is, a descendant. I'll begin cleaning up the category shortly. — ξxplicit21:55, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Contradiction
“
[Age Ain't Nothing but a Number] sold three million copies in the United States and was certified double platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA).
I don't know what the citations say, but selling 3 million albums doesn't automatically make your album triple platinum. If they didn't get the certification, they just didn't get the certification. |helpdןǝɥ|01:44, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Queen Of Urban Pop
Aaliyah was very well known by fans as The Queen Of Urban Pop,
Was there any particular reason why this article was featured on Wikipedia's main page in May this year? Wouldn't it have made more sense to feature it in August, on the ten-year anniversary of her death? I'm a little confused... 109.204.113.111 (talk) 14:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The decision of the "Main Page article" is quite random and rarely repeats considering that there are 365 (366) days in a year and 3,500+ candidates. |helpdןǝɥ|01:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aaliyah's Exact date of birth
I know that Aaliyah was born in 1979, but I know that it was not in either January (like it says) or October. Please change the DOB to anytime in 1979, except January or October. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catperson12 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We have reliable sources stating her birth in January. We will not change this just because "you know better". However, if you provide sources for this, your view will be taken into account. |helpdןǝɥ|01:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please change "Aaliyah is estimated to have sold 24 to 32 million albums worldwide." to "Aaliyah is estimated to have sold 32 million albums" because it is stated in this video [3] created by TV One Access that Aaliyah indeed has sold 32 million albums worldwide and not 24 million.
Cnwodo (talk) 19:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The figure is estimated because one source states she sold 24 million records, while another states she sold 32 million albums. Both sources were both published in 2008 six months apart and we can't just pick one over the other just because one reports higher sales. It's best to keep both. — ξxplicit19:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Can somebody change the infobox picture to Aaliyah Haughton.jpg because it is a better picture and get rid of the caption that saids Aaliyah in Berlin, Germany, May 2000. 76.217.34.49 (talk) 20:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
where it saids 1979-90: Early life and Career beginnings that should be change to say 1979–90: Early life and Career beginnings because it will make the dash bigger. 99.137.149.253 (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Aaliyah was a very talented young girl"her mother said. "She had the most beautiful voice around".Aaliyah was the best "Princess of R&B and soul". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.90.240.28 (talk) 21:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
When Aaliyah died in 2001, I visited her crypt in Ferncliff Cemetery shortly after her interment. My knowledge of her place of entombment is firsthand; I don't need any sources, articles, or lectures to tell me how and where the R&B singer made her final journey.
Aaliyah was initially entombed in a crypt on the third floor of the new extension wing of The Cathedral of Memories. Her crypt was adjacent to the crypt of Peter Loddo. When the nearby Rosewood Mausoleum was completed shorty after Aaliyah's death, she was moved to a private room at the end of a corridor at Rosewood. Aaliyah now occupies a beautiful "corner private room" in the new mausoleum.
There also seems to be some confusion concerning the terms "burial," "interment," and "entombment." Deceased people are buried in the ground. The deceased can also be entombed in mausoleums and crypts. Cremains are interred in a niche. It is not correct to say that Aaliyah was buried at Ferncliff, because she is in a tomb.
I edited Aaliyah's article to show that she was entombed, but somebody keeps insisting that she was "buried."
I am not going to play musical chairs by changing it back to "entombed" again. People keep referring to a source; my knowledge of Aaliyah's final disposition is firsthand, which is more accurate than any source, article, or publication.
Here's the problem: When you say "My knowledge of her place of entombment is firsthand," what that means to Wikipedia users is that your edits are based on original research and not on published secondary sources. We aren't saying that your edits are outright wrong; however, we're saying that there's no way to verify them against any published sources, so we're going to go to the best published sources available. In the case of Aaliyah's burial, that's against this People magazine story:
The story says "She was buried at the Ferncliff Cemetery in suburban Hartsdale, N.Y." That's why the text keeps getting changed to buried: the published source says it. —C.Fred (talk) 01:25, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the information that you read in books, magazines, newspapers, and periodicals is hearsay, rumor, and conjecture. I learned a long time ago that you can't believe everything that you read in print. The People Magazine article on Aaliyah had some incorrect information. Do you remember the time honored headline in the Chicago newspaper: DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN.
Aaliyah was NOT buried at Ferncliff Cemetery. She was initially interred in a crypt in the Cathedral of Memories, and then she was moved to a private room in Rosewood Mausoleum. The best way to verify this information is not through a silly story in People Magazine, but by contacting the Director of Ferncliff Cemetery. The interment records at Ferncliff for Aaliyah will verify that what I have said is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. You can bet every nickel you own that Aaliyah was NOT buried in the ground at Ferncliff Cemetery. Also, I am absolutely certain that the author of the People Magazine article did not attend Aaliyah's service in the cemetery. If you know who wrote that article, walk up to him or her and say, "Objection, hearsay."
Also, I forgot to mention that you can see pictures of Aaliyah's private room in her Find A Grave entry. Ferncliff Cemetery does not permit photography without permission, so I didn't want to break the rules by uploading a photo of her interment site into her Wikipedia article.
On June 17, 2013, Chris Brown released a video for the track "Don't Think They Know" from his upcoming X (Chris Brown album) (the album "X" is scheduled to be released on July 16, 2013). Aaliyah sings the hook for the song "Don't Think They Know," but also appears in the music video as a holographic backup dancer. The video ends with a dedication to Aaliyah which reads "Dear Aaliyah. We love and miss you. thank you for inspiring us all."
I believe vocal fach can be identified in part by where a vocalist crosses form their chest voice to their head voice. There is debate about whether she was a mezzo-soprano or a soprano, but I believe mezzo because she sing very low. I don't know.
Done. — Σxplicit 06:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
— Σxplicit 19:03, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Not done. The figure is estimated because one source states she sold 24 million records, while another states she sold 32 million albums. Both sources were both published in 2008 six months apart and we can't just pick one over the other just because one reports higher sales. It's best to keep both. — ξxplicit 19:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
