Jump to content

Talk:Roar (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.9.43.75 (talk) at 00:22, 12 November 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page already moved by User:Amatulic; no point this occupying space at WP:RM, despite valid comments from 76.65.128.222, and no precedent set non-admin tidy up - but if anyone wants to re-open go ahead In ictu oculi (talk) 03:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Roar (Katy Perry song)Roar (song) – The other song "Roar" is unnotable. It's probably annoying that I do this to every article, but all I want is for this website to be successful. Billboard Man (talk) 20:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Plagiarism accusation

Should we include the whole plagiarism scenario in the Release section? Just a sentence or a short text. I have two sources for that. Pedro João [talk] 11:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. — Status (talk · contribs) 11:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think its a little bit too soon for it to be included. Let's see how this plagiarism thing plagues out (burp). Is this a case like Lady Gaga's BTW and EY? Don't think so. The rabid critic and fanwars haven't began yet. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably because Sara Bareilles isn't and never has been at Madonna's status level. Roar is a lot more similar to Brave in terms of chords, melody, instrumentation, structure and theme than what Born This Way was to Express Yourself and many critics have mentioned it so I think it's worth noting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.254.236.207 (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with IndianBio on this. If things get more serious, then it should be added. Arre 13:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@IP user. Mentioning the critical analysis and coming to the conclusion that "Roar" shares similarities with "Brave" is fine, since music journalists are pointing that out. However, taking that out to remark that it was a case of plagiarism is arbid and without third party notability (and I mean that word) at this point. Things might change though. Why not wait this out? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 14:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If the whole situation develops soon, I'll add it to the article. Thanks for the help. Pedro João [talk] 16:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If we add these accusations into the article, please provide references- someone keeps adding that without any citations about it. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A user keeps editing the upper text area, claiming that critics called the song a "rip-off". I already edited it again though. I'm going to add a short sentence about it on the Composition section, but nothing like accusations, just a sentence showing that some critics compared it to Sara Bareilles' song. Pedro João [talk] 20:22, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know. However, I should mention that Huffington Post (a source you added) is not reliable. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 21:17, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sources added along side Sara's picture is pretty reliable and so is The Huffington Post. Cut the crap now. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 05:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
XXSNUGGUMSXX, with all respect, you aren't in a position to deem a source unreliable and The Huffington Post certainly is reliable.Arre 06:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, that site has actually often given false information. For example, it reported Katy was feuding with her friend Rihanna when in fact that was never the case at all. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reliability doesn't seem to be the problem right now since a lot of music-related sites are reporting the situation aswell. Pedro João [talk] 15:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 13 August 2013

Roar was written by Katy Perry, Lukasz Gottwald, Max Martin, Bonnie McKee and Henry Walter and produced by Dr. Luke, Max Martin and Cirkut. Artispopculture (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. For Cirkut being a producer, the rest are already listed. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 14 August 2013

Roar was produced by Dr. Luke, Max Martin and Cirkut. Here is the source http://www.billboard.com/articles/review/5645969/katy-perry-roar-track-review Artispopculture (talk) 01:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Status (talk · contribs) 02:13, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 19 August 2013

"before the record belonged to "Heart Attack" by Demi Lovato"

At the moment, "Heart Attack" attempts to link to Heart Attack (song), which ends up redirecting to Heart attack (disambiguation). Please change it to link to Heart Attack (Demi Lovato song) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.222.89 (talk) 10:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roar sales WW

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). http://www.mediatraffic.de/ Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).


Roar' is still the biggest hit worldwide, it holds the top position for a seventh week and shrinks 4% in points to 454.000 points, a total of 4.205.000 points after only eight weeks on the tally.

77.44.232.141 (talk) 16:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 13 October 2013

Change from: "As she's feeding the monkey, the tiger secretly watch them." to "As she's feeding the monkey, the tiger secretly watches them." The verb form "watch" is incorrect, and should be fixed for grammatical accuracy. Talophex (talk) 08:01, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. There were several things like that in the section, so I've just copy edited the whole thing. --Stfg (talk) 09:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 21 October 2013

On August 12, 2013, a lyric video for "Roar" was released, which was directed/produced by Joe Humpay, Aya Tanimura, Tim Zimmer, and Tuan Le.[1] It depicts Perry doing daily activities such as eating, using the toilet, working out, and taking a bath, while she texts the lyrics on her Nokia Lumia 1020 to various people; Emoji characters are used in place of certain words.[2][3] Music producer Dillon Francis felt that the "Roar" lyric video copied his "Messages" video, as it also used the concept of instant messaging.[4]

the Phone used in the Video is the [Nokia Lumia 1020] NOT the [iPhone] 137.191.225.242 (talk) 11:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that the lyric video uses an iPhone; it's the main music video that features the Nokia phone. Acalamari 11:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The change requested is WP:OR anyways. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a FYI

The song is also known in Japan as "Roar ~Saikyou Gaaru Sengen!" (ロアー〜最強ガール宣言!), which means "Roar ~Strongest Girl Declaration!". Source: [1]. ごだい (会話) 11:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How on Earth can we get the POV tag (neutrality disputed) off the article?

Judging by this link (diff, or whatever it's called),

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roar_(song)&diff=577970919&oldid=577954732

I gather that AARON added a Point of View tag to the article, which remains to this day; I'm sure he had good reasons for adding it back then, but is the neutrality of the article still being disputed today? If so, please, who has a problem with the neutrality of the article, so that we can address the issue? It would be nice to get rid of that tag (obviously I could remove it right now, but that's not the right thing to do, of course). Thanks in advance. Dontreader (talk) 06:29, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article could do with a clear up to be honest, there's a lot of information and quotes that aren't really necessary, and it's not neutral in the way that it presents the information. Its a recurring problem with articles like Katy Perry and Lady Gaga etc. They get inundated with "fandom" editor who portray it as the best thing since sliced bread, and thus don't present information with the neutral tone and language we would be expected in an encylopedia. I forget how many times I've removed unencylopedic language and slang; or, in this and other similar articles, how many times I've seen incorrect chart placings put in (saying it charted higher than it did or got to number one in countries it never did).
I've never thought the issue deserving of the tag though. But then to be honest, I rarely use the tags on these sorts of articles; they so quickly get removed by the fandom who can't bare any errors or problems being highlighted -so you're better to just go and fix the problem right off.
So I'd say, go for a good impartial clean up and copy edit and you'd be ok to remove it. For the exact reason Calvin999 added it, you'd have to ask him yourself.

--Rushton2010 (talk) 12:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Rushton2010, for your detailed explanation. Some of the reasons you cited are understandable since not every fan of an artist can be expected to edit in a neutral way, but if chart placings and other similar issues are wrong, then that might indicate that people directly or indirectly associated with Katy Perry are involved in the editing for promotional purposes. Also, if I'm not mistaken, the page was moved by someone who systematically moves these types of pages. Furthermore, the page in general is too well-written (the main composition style), different from the composition skills of the people involved in the talk page debates, indicating that perhaps someone linked to Perry was involved. Of course I cannot prove these allegations but anyway, I can't make the article neutral enough all by myself since I would expect to meet heavy resistance, perhaps even from powerful people. I wish several different unbiased editors could fix different problems. Oh, and Calvin999 doesn't seem to be available at the moment, but I hope he does read this eventually. Thanks again for your time and help! Dontreader (talk) 20:03, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can we agree on the names of the producers and songwriters?

In the music industry, producers and songwriters go by their artistic names. In the very first paragraph of this article we see this sentence:

Composed by Perry, Dr. Luke, Max Martin, Bonnie McKee, and Cirkut, "Roar" is a midtempo power pop song; its lyrics address standing up for oneself.

That is correct. However, under the picture on the right-hand side, we find:

Writer(s) Katy Perry Lukasz Gottwald Max Martin Bonnie McKee Henry Walter

Producer Dr. Luke Max Martin Cirkut

This is wrong, and I had corrected it. Dr. Luke and Lukasz Gottwald are the same person. Also, Cirkut and Henry Walter are the same person. In its current state, the article causes confusion because a reader might think that these are different people involved in the making of the song. This is a very clear example of lack of consistency. Max Martin is an artistic name, too. That's how he is known in the music world; no one calls him Karl Sandberg, and the article correctly calls him Max Martin.

Lukasz Gottwald must be replaced by Dr. Luke, and Henry Walter must be replaced by Cirkut.

I understand that the birth names show up in at least one article used for this page, but that is a mistake. For example:

http://www.billboard.com/articles/review/5645969/katy-perry-roar-track-review

Reuters has it right:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/22/entertainment-us-katyperry-prism-idUSBRE99L0P920131022

We cannot use two names for the same person. Please correct this, and also, how can we stop this from happening again? Thanks in advance. Dontreader (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with this. Whether it's "consistent" or not Dr. Luke is always credited by his artistic name under production credits and his real name under writing credits. Check the the Roar psychical single and the Prism CD booklet. This is the same for every Katy single he's produced along with anything else he's produced for other artists. You're saying we should disregard how he is credited in official credits issued by the record company because it's inconsistent? I don't see how that's correct at all. And by this logic the pages of the hundreds of other singles he's produced are all incorrect as well (even ones that have been declared good articles by Wikipedia). I feel like that's the point of linking both Lukasz Gottwald and Dr. Luke in the infobox. If someone cares to know whether it's the same person or not, they can easily find out. MusicLover (talk) 07:41, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How is BMI listing the writers names? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
MusicLover, well, I am shocked. In all my years buying music I have never seen such a bizarre thing, but since that's the way the names show up on the Roar physical CD single and the Prism CD booklet, those are the best possible sources. Indian:BIO, I'm sorry but I don't know what BMI means; however, it doesn't matter since I was totally wrong. I apologize to both of you for the inconvenience, and thanks for taking the time to explain the situation. I'm not a Katy Perry fan but I have spent time trying to improve this article. Obviously on this occasion I failed but now I can get that issue out of my system. Thanks again. Dontreader (talk) 10:23, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
BMI is Broadcast Music Incorporated, the writers block for songwriters and royalty etc. They generally have the legal names in lieu oftheir stage names in their database and that's what I have seen many articles in WP writing it like that. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:50, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well first off to Dontreader it's all good! I'm just glad we got this problem sorted out now and you understand and agree with where I was coming from. Secondly, Indian:BIO if you're still curious about how BMI listed the writers, they credit Dr. Luke and Cirkut by using their real names just like in the album booklet. Here's the link to the entry: http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&page=1&keyid=16156049&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&querytype=WorkID MusicLover (talk) 11:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks MusicLover for the info. Well I guess its all sorted then how Luke and Cirkut should be listed. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 11:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Roar peaked @ 3 in Czech Republic and Slovakia ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DressinUp (talkcontribs) 10:01, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Cover versions

Please add that Glee covered this song at the end of the show A Katy or A Gaga

  1. ^ http://buzzworthy.mtv.com/2013/08/12/katy-perry-roar-lyric-video/
  2. ^ Moraski, Lauren (August 12, 2013). "Watch: Katy Perry's emoticon lyric video for "Roar"". CBS News. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  3. ^ Mallenbaum, Carly (August 12, 2013). "Katy Perry releases 'emoticon' video for 'Roar'". USA Today. Gannett Company. Retrieved August 12, 2013.
  4. ^ Reilly, Dan (August 12, 2013). "Dillon Francis Says Katy Perry's 'Roar' Ripped Him Off, But She'll Play the VMAs Anyway". Spin. Retrieved August 12, 2013.