User talk:Plastikspork

Leave a new message

Archives:

$, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

This page has archives. Sections older than 24 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Plastikspork is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries on this talk page. If you wish to obtain a more prompt response, please send an email.

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

General Notes

Nielsen Ratings

Posted copyright warning for Nielsen Media.

Is IMDB a reliable source?

Prefix search

Special:PrefixIndex

Catscan

US nuclear plants and NRC region # templates

Talkback

Hello, Plastikspork. You have new messages at Template talk:Texas House of Representatives.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You've got mail

Hello, Plastikspork. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Put a smile in thou face

Hello Plastikspork, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ has given you a shinning smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shinning Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Re: Your closure of the PDFlink TfD

Hi Plastikspork. You closed the above TfD as merging the PDFLink template into the cite * family of templates. However, I'm not entirely clear what should happen in cases where the PDFLink template is being used for something other than citations (e.g. external links). The consensus at the TfD isn't entirely clear to me in that regard, I'm not sure if you considered that in your closure? I'm asking because of this bot request for approval, feel free to respond there. Thanks, - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities of Kosovo

I think that consensus for deletion of this template (link to archived deletion discussion that you closed) was not respected and this template has been recreated without following appropriate procedure. Am I right? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it should be moved to a List like article: it is not typical for templates to have references. --Perkohesisht ai i vjetri (talk) 00:34, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment

Please comment here. Debresser (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LDS Infobox

I was just reading the discussion for and against keeping the LDS infobox and I noticed that there was 3 Keeps and 3 Deletes, how does that equate to a delete? Not trying to be a squeaky wheel, just wanting to understand why! Thanks, speednat (talk) 17:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(tps) seems you forgot the nominator (Justin) and COGDEN, and in case anyone else is wondering, the discussion here. Frietjes (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox oil field

Hi, Plastikspork. I left this message originally at Jimp's talk page but maybe you could help. There seems to be a problem with {{Infobox oil field}} (field:est_oil_t). For some reasons this field has conversion error (e.g. see the infobox at Gunashli oilfield). I don't know how to fix it. Another issue is that this field uses for conversion only the standard API value of 33.4. However, some fields have a different API value. Is it possible to add the API field to the template and to use that value (if the API value is not defined, the value 33.4 should be used instead)? Thank you in advance. Beagel (talk) 13:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox dam cleanup

Hi. You're receiving this message because you are a major contributor to {{Infobox dam}}. You opinion on this cleanup proposal is very much appreciated. Best regards, Reh man 14:36, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another dashes.js patch required please

Right now, the dashes script is causing problems such as this to things inside {{DNB cite}}. Could you possibly adjust the script so that it skips those too? Thanks, -- Ohc ^¡digame! 16:25, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bot assistance

Hi Plastik. Would you be able assist on doing a bot run per this discussion? To put it briefly, we need to make this change, and to facilitate that, we need a bot sweep to do the following changes to articles currently using {{Infobox dam}}:

alt into image_alt
caption into image_caption
location_map_width into location_map_size
location_map_text into location_map_caption
official_name into name_official
locale into location
status=U into status=UC
began into construction_began
commissioned and open, into opening
closed and decommissioned, into demolished
type to dam_type
crosses to dam_crosses
length to dam_length
height to dam_height
height_foundation to dam_height_foundation
height_thalweg to dam_height_thalweg
crest_width to dam_width_crest
base_width to dam_width_base
crest_elev to dam_elevation_crest
volume to dam_volume
spillways to spillway_count
reservoir to res_name
reservoir_capacity to res_total_capacity
active_capacity to res_active_capacity
inactive_capacity to res_inactive_capacity
reservoir_catchment to res_catchment
reservoir_surface to res_surface
reservoir_length to res_max_length
reservoir_max_width to res_max_width
reservoir_max_depth to res_max_depth
reservoir_elevation to res_elevation
tidal_range to res_tidal_range
com into plant_commission
decom into plant_decommission
conventional, run_of_river, tide, and pumped_storage into plant_type
turbines to plant_turbines
installed_capacity to plant_capacity
average_annual_gen and annual_generation, into plant_annual_gen
url to website

Waiting for your reply. Best, Reh man 11:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]