User talk:Jrcla2
I like to keep my conversations together, so if you post a message here I will respond on this page. If I post a comment on your talk page, you can reply either here or there and I will keep an eye on it. Thanks. |
Nick Kellogg help?
I saw you created the DJ Cooper page. I've never created an article before and started with Nick Kellogg. I've only done edits here and there for the past few months, trying to clean up things involving the Ohio University Bobcats. Kind of a learn as I go thing. Didnt know if you could take a look at it and possibly improve it. I do see you do a great job updating everywhere. Any help or tips would be appreciated. Thanks a bunch! The article is currently under review for submission. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nick_Kellogg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Littlekelv (talk • contribs) 18:08, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Down to two CPOYs for 2011
You up for a run at the last two CPOYs for 2011 (all 2012 and 2013 are complete)? Ken Horton of Central Connecticut State and Mike Smith of East Tennessee are the last two and both are still active in Europe so they should be pretty easy. I'll take one if you do. Rikster2 (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I think that guy creating all the NBA stubs will keep everyone in infoboxes for awhile. Glad to have the articles but yowza! Rikster2 (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- I will take Ken Horton. Yeah I'm glad someone is deciding to do a halfway decent attempt at NBA stubs, but good god that is going to require a ton of backlog cleanup. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
DragoLink08 again?
Special:Contributions/DarkStone06. New editor, on a color-changing tear. Looks like it to me but it's been a while. Thoughts? JohnInDC (talk) 03:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- I decided, yes. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DragoLink08. JohnInDC (talk) 04:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ugh. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- In typical fashion he quit editing as soon as I notified him of the SSI. I think I caught and reverted most of his edits. Lucky it was at 75 and not 775! JohnInDC (talk) 03:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- I noticed that actually. "I've been spotted!" Fuck him (excuse the brashness). Jrcla2 (talk) 03:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- In typical fashion he quit editing as soon as I notified him of the SSI. I think I caught and reverted most of his edits. Lucky it was at 75 and not 775! JohnInDC (talk) 03:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Ugh. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
DUI arrests
If you insist on this being included in the Casey Sanders article, then go (re)insert it on Phil Ford's page. Sauce for the goose .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.246.96.152 (talk) 00:30, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not re-inserting anything on Phil Ford's page. (a) I didn't put it there originally. (b) WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. (c) I don't edit based on anyone telling me what to do, let alone anonymous IPs. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't say that you inserted it there; but if that argument holds water over there it should here also. Wikipedia: an Encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.246.96.152 (talk) 05:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunately. Jrcla2 (talk) 05:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't say that you inserted it there; but if that argument holds water over there it should here also. Wikipedia: an Encyclopedia that ANYONE can edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.246.96.152 (talk) 05:04, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Re: Williams Ephs men's basketball players
Hey, thanks for dropping me a line. Unfortunately, I'm back into academic work at the moment and don't have any time for serious editing. If they're still in the unfinished queue by the time summer rolls around, I'd be happy to take a look at them and get a change of pace from baseball work. Thanks very much for thinking of me. Kithira (talk) 16:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds good. One way or another they'll eventually get done! Jrcla2 (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Wisconsin Badgers men's basketball
Hello, I moved the templetes for the Western Conference to the Big Nine on accident. I am unable to switch it back so now on 1911–12 and 1913–14 there is no longer the conference standings. Can you help? Again, I am sorry about this. Redmen44 (talk) 09:01, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
NCAA basketball team navboxes
I'll leave them all as redlinks then. The reason I was linking them was the red link suggested there was no collective info on a particular teams coaching tree, when in fact the template starts the process. There's nothing to suggest an editor can begin a more extensive article (like North Carolina, Kentucky, or UCLA, but I'm guessing it's going to be a long time before that occurs for many of the lesser known teams. Plus I thought it confusing to have the team navbox be redlinked, yet have another navbox with the coaching information below it......Or show no information on a particular college coaching history on the team or year page, but find the coaching template on a coaches page....Pvmoutside (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Brad Robinson (basketball)
Hi Jrcla2, and thanks for reverting my bad edit to Brad Robinson (basketball). I had been attempting to apply WP:DATERANGE (between <date1> and <date2>) but didn't read the article carefully enough. I'm grateful to you for correcting this for me.
With regard to the other changes you reverted, I presume you have no objection to the application of WP:NBSP to "215 pounds". I concede that my change of "sophomore" to "second" is more debatable, but I did this on the MOS principle: "Avoid words and phrases that give the impression of straining for formality, that are unnecessarily regional, or that are not widely accepted." The word "sophomore" is undoubtedly a regional term, not widely understood outside North America, and "second year" is universally understood. I cannot understand why we should deliberately make the article more difficult for a worldwide readership to understand. Does "sophomore" carry extra connotations which are not conveyed by "second"? I've never come across the word "sophomore" before, so am unsure as to such nuances. On the other hand, one could argue that the Brad Robinson (basketball) article is so unlikely to be of interest to anyone outside North America that the use of local dialect such as this may be excusable. What do you think? Sincerely — Hebrides (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- I have no objection to adding WP:NBSP to 215 pounds (I didn't see that edit or else I'd have left it in...I'll go in and re-insert it myself). The thing about "sophomore" versus "second year" is that since the article's subject is an American basketball player who is notable for his American collegiate career, the context of sophomore is appropriately used. It doesn't exactly fall under WP:ENGVAR, which is more about "color" versus "colour," but the umbrella concept is the same. If Brad Robinson ended up playing professionally in another country outside of the United States, I'd have less of an objection because he would then be more of a universal person of interest. Like you mentioned, he will only really be of interest/known to people in North America, but probably more specifically the United States, so I think sophomore should be left in. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
What is the purpose?
Why do you think Talk:Michigan Wolverines men's gymnastics should be a redirect to itself? --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- I don't, it was a mistake. I tagged it with {{WikiProject Gymnastics}}. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Oklahoma City Stars men's basketball for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oklahoma City Stars men's basketball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oklahoma City Stars men's basketball until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 01:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Discussion about "Template:Cop"
There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_15#Template:Cop about the second nomination of Template:Cop in which you may be interested. --Jax 0677 (talk) 06:24, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
2000/1000 update
Looking like Augustine Rubit won't hit 2000 points. He'd have to average 25 ppg the rest of the way and the team is so bad they'll have no postseason after their conference tourney. However, Alex Francis of Bryant will probably hit 2000 points this weekend, and he has 922 rebounds as well. He has a very good shot at it. Rikster2 (talk) 14:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Francis has 984 rebounds going into the NEC tourney. Two games should do it, if they can get them. Also, the CPOYs are starting to roll in. I'm trying to anticipate a few to knock the queue down. Rikster2 (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- This is the busy time of year. All anons like to hop in to "break the news" about half-rumors as to who earned what. Lots to do, as always. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Francis has 984 rebounds going into the NEC tourney. Two games should do it, if they can get them. Also, the CPOYs are starting to roll in. I'm trying to anticipate a few to knock the queue down. Rikster2 (talk) 21:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Discussion about "Template:Wprk"
There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_8#Template:wprk about the nomination of Template:wprk in which you may be interested. --Jax 0677 (talk) 09:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Why do you keep notifying me about these things? Jrcla2 (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Notable college achievements
Uh, which awards were you referring to? I was only evening out the awards. (T23tran (talk) 13:27, 25 February 2014 (UTC))
- Being NCAA Division I's leading scorer, for one. Being all-conference for another. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Why is it only in a handful of player's infoboxes? How come there's no NCAA Division I assists laders? (T23tran (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC))
- ....Because only a handful of players did that, why else? And if your rationale for completely inappropriate mass removal of information is if every single statistical leader isn't in every player's infobox, then nobody can have it! you have a lot to learn about this website. Also you're incorrectly formatting honors such as consensus All-Americans, years of NBA All-Star Games, etc. Leave basketball players' infoboxes alone, you clearly do not know the consensus on what is to be included and how it is to be formatted. You're undoing literally hundreds of hours (or more) of man hours' worth of editing by myself and other college basketball/NBA editors who have (a) already gained consensus on what is to be included, and (b) been around the proverbial block on the basketball-related realms of Wikipedia and have much more familiarity with standards than you. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oh and not to belabor the point, but Avery Johnson has his NCAA season assists as an infobox highlight, and he's literally the first player I checked. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- It all looks pretty sloppy if you ask me but you're right. Who came up with these standards and where do I go to learn them? Also, how do I voice my opinion on what these standards should be?(T23tran (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC))
- Oh and not to belabor the point, but Avery Johnson has his NCAA season assists as an infobox highlight, and he's literally the first player I checked. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- ....Because only a handful of players did that, why else? And if your rationale for completely inappropriate mass removal of information is if every single statistical leader isn't in every player's infobox, then nobody can have it! you have a lot to learn about this website. Also you're incorrectly formatting honors such as consensus All-Americans, years of NBA All-Star Games, etc. Leave basketball players' infoboxes alone, you clearly do not know the consensus on what is to be included and how it is to be formatted. You're undoing literally hundreds of hours (or more) of man hours' worth of editing by myself and other college basketball/NBA editors who have (a) already gained consensus on what is to be included, and (b) been around the proverbial block on the basketball-related realms of Wikipedia and have much more familiarity with standards than you. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Why is it only in a handful of player's infoboxes? How come there's no NCAA Division I assists laders? (T23tran (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC))
AC Green
There's a new topic I posted on WT:NBA on AC green I would want your input on. (T23tran (talk) 19:06, 25 February 2014 (UTC))
NBA Rising Star
Hey, I left a new topic on the NBA talk page that I would love your opinion on. Sorry I don't know how to give you the direct link. (T23tran (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC))
Discussion about "Template:Wpcm"
There is a discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_February_25#Template:Wpcm about the nomination of Template:Wpcm in which you may be interested.
Saint vs. St.
I was looking at the division 1 basketball templates, and some of them have the full spelling saint...., others have st......I'm guessing we should be consistent. Should we use Saint or St. and change those already created accordingly????....Pvmoutside (talk) 02:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- No they shouldn't all be consistent. Some schools use Saint, some use St. It has nothing to do with consistency and everything to do with athletics WP:COMMONNAME. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Year-by-year teams
I placed a discussion thread on the College basketball talk page you may be interested in commenting on. It surrounds men's basketball play prior to the 1960's/70's and what the project should title men's teams prior to women's programs beginning....My guess is is will be a pain to change them over and cause some controversy, but I thought we should discuss now rather than later....Pvmoutside (talk) 14:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 16:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—Bagumba (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
TSN AA
It's up on their site. Rikster2 (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'll add them now. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I can't make major updates today. MWC and Southland have named POY too. Rikster2 (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, I'll do them soon as well. Jrcla2 (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Historically, NABC names their AA teams during the day on the Thursday of the Sweet 16. I'll be in meetings but thought I'd flag it for you. Rikster2 (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ok I'll try to remember that; if not and you have a second, remind me and I'll update it. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Actually, they came out today (a day earlier than last year) - http://www.nabc.org/awards/all_america/division_I/2014_NABC_Coaches-_Division_I_All-America_team_release.pdf Rikster2 (talk) 14:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ok I'll try to remember that; if not and you have a second, remind me and I'll update it. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Historically, NABC names their AA teams during the day on the Thursday of the Sweet 16. I'll be in meetings but thought I'd flag it for you. Rikster2 (talk) 12:33, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ok thanks, I'll do them soon as well. Jrcla2 (talk) 18:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I can't make major updates today. MWC and Southland have named POY too. Rikster2 (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
The NBA WikiProject Barnstar | ||
Thank you for all of your edits on basketball articles connected to the NBA. You have greatly improved many of these articles. |
Robert4565 (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you Robert, it is appreciated. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
re:Can you PP an article please?
Message added 23:56, 13 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
UVA's "Tennessee Turnaround"
Hey, man; saw you kicked that off, and, uhh, I think that's definitely part of their lore now. I see a handful of articles, not just one, that refer to it as the "Tennessee Turnaround", and literally hundreds that mention it in some fashion; their SG Joe Harris going over to Coach Tony Bennett's house, and how they went from the gutter to ACC Regular Season and Tournament champs for the first time since 1976. I'd say that is now as much a part of their lore as the Chaminade Upset. Just because only a handful of news articles actually refer to it by that term doesn't mean it's not notable, and yeah, I'd say it'll mean more to the Cavaliers than putting Valpraiso one more game into the NCAA tournament. Can we slap it back up?
- It's really just recentism; no way is it "as much a part of their lore as their Chaminade upset" – not even close. That Chaminade upset is considered one of the greatest upsets in college basketball history, has had thousands of articles written about it, a documentary made about it, and is the entire reason the Maui Invitational Tournament exists. If you want to write something up on the "Tennessee Turnaround" as a few sources have called it, that would be appropriate as a standalone section in 2013–14 Virginia Cavaliers men's basketball team, not as a separate article. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
- I dunno, man- yeah, I understand that about Maui and such, and while you might have a thing with recentism, I think if you polled Wahoos, they might disagree about where it stands in THEIR lore now; which is the operative thing, IMHO. 'specially if they make a deep run in the tourney, but, then, we'll see. If you argument is recentism, then I can buy it for now. If it's the spot in UVA lore, I'd hafta respectfully disagree. Ks64q2 (talk) 01:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Boise State Broncos men's basketball navbox
The Boise State men's basketball media guide doesn't have any seasons listed in it prior to 1968-69. It seems odd that they sponsored football and not men's basketball prior to that, but I can't find any indication that they did. --SportsMaster (talk) 16:18, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Question about division ii templates
Hello, Jrcla2 I have noticed that you have helped identify some of my division ii standings templates in the past. I have ran into an editor who is claiming that the standings don't have notability, even though I place the templates into the season article. An example is Template:1986 Missouri Intercollegiate Athletic Association football standings and I have linked it to the page for the 1986 NCAA Division II football season. I have noticed on this editors talk page that (him or herself) has had several articles nominated for deletion and is on a vendetta. I would like to avoid an edit war if at all possible. I was wondering if you would have any advice on the proper course of action. ThanksUCO2009bluejay (talk) 01:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have also noticed this user is also posting pseudo time notifications and placing a notification that there has been a previous page which to my knowledge has never been created. Thanks-UCO2009bluejay (talk) 01:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- This nomination was made in error because the rationale deletion is bonkers. Mr. Guye has no clue what qualifies as valid nomination rationale, plus he seems incompetent as en editor in general. Do not sweat this. Jrcla2 (talk) 03:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
TfD Nom
Nomination for deletion of Template:1986 Missouri Intercollegiate Athletic Association football standings
Template:1986 Missouri Intercollegiate Athletic Association football standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Temple Owls men's basketball navbox
Why did you undo my edit to the Template:Temple Owls men's basketball navbox? You didn't give a reason why. Wouldn't a man that coached at the school for 24 years be considered part of the culture, or are coaches not considered part of it as what is standard on other templates?--SportsMaster (talk) 22:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- No individual persons go on college basketball, college football, or college baseball team navboxes. It is the consensus among the three projects. Jrcla2 (talk) 22:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Good to know. Thanks. --SportsMaster (talk) 04:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Jrcla2 (talk) 05:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Cherry Hill High School East
Why are you insisting on having the Cherry Hill High School East seal outside the infobox instead of inside? There's no FFA photo in your version of the article, just the difference of the placement of the seal. —C.Fred (talk) 00:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
FFA was an iPad typo. You're owning the CHE article. So not only do you revert my edit, you don't even include the photograph of the high school back in. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)My iPad is the worst. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Washington Capitols
I'm not aware of a Wikipedia guideline that suggests removal of parent categories, like you did in the Washington Capitols article. Would you please educate me. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 02:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Also on the Sacramento Kings article. Truthanado (talk) 02:21, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Category:Washington Capitols and Category:Sacramento Kings fall under the parent categories I removed and appear as subcategories in them. Therefore, the articles Washington Capitols and Sacramento Kings should not be in Category:Basketball Association of America teams, because those teams' main categories are already in it. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Barack-etology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barack-etology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barack-etology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zzyzx11 (talk) 02:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders article
Hello. The Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders should have the word "State" in its name because you told me when I created the page Missouri Southern State Lions, that it should have "State" in it because the school's name had state. I don't agree with the move page of the Article when you told me about the whole "State" name. And, can you provide proof that they don't use State in their athletics name? Thanks, Corkythehornetfan(talk) 04:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball#Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders/Middle Tennessee State Blue Raiders. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:39, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
- Got it! Thanks! Corkythehornetfan(talk) 04:42, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
HOF inductees
Hello, Jrcla2. Technically, the inductees have not been inducted yet, they have merely been announced for induction, so shouldn't the ledes on various articles be left alone for now?Hoops gza (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you want to go super technical then yes, but there is literally a 0% chance that they won't be in the HOF two months from now. It's not worth it to wait. Jrcla2 (talk) 23:03, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Formatting help
Hi - I was redlinking Lamar Patterson on some articles and came across a formatting issue I couldn't resolve on three Pitt season articles - 2008–09 Pittsburgh Panthers men's basketball team thru 2010–11 Pittsburgh Panthers men's basketball team. Was wondering if you could help. All of the players in these articles were linked - obviously not all the players are even close to notable. Do you know how to delink names when name sort formatting is used? Thanks for any help you can give. Rikster2 (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's a quirky feature but for some reason adding "|nolink=1" in the sortname function de-links the names. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Rikster2 (talk) 20:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Mark Tyndale
Hello. I noticed that you added the category American expatriate basketball people in Israel to Mark Tyndale. Do you have any source that states that Tyndale played/plays in Israel? ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 20:50, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- His Eurobasket profile. Also, when creating players' articles whose primary professional notability is overseas, I find it's very useful to check to see if an interwiki version of the article exists. The Italian, Spanish, and French Wikipedias are by far the best at basketball players' articles. Tyndale's Italian Wikipedia article, for example, has an infobox, which could be used if you want to include one in the English version's bio. Jrcla2 (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! Would you mind adding the infobox to tyndales article - for whatever reason I have difficulty adding infoboxes in my browser. Whatever. Anyway, D'Angelo Harrison is at AfD - you might want to check it out. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 00:48, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- I will add his infobox today. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
2 more pics
I am a bit surprised by your preferences, so I have two more guys for you to consider.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:18, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Austin Peay
I do not know what you did, but I have been unable to revert your moves of the Austin Peay Governors and Lady Govs to Austin Peay State Governors and Lady Governors & the associated Talk pages... The women's teams are NOT the Lady Governors--- they are the Lady Govs... Please correct this... GWFrog (talk) 03:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not correcting anything unless every single Austin Peay article and category is brought to a full move discussion. There was no consensus to change it. Jrcla2 (talk) 12:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
False Accusations
Excuse me sir, I would like to inform you that that is NOT my IP Address. Whenever I edit a page, I make sure I am logged in because I do not and will not ever hide behind an IP.
I also do not appreciate that you were so positive that it was me, as I have no idea who that address is. I would strongly appreciate it if you would respond as soon as possible so I know that you are aware of your false accusation.
If you still do not believe me (although I do not feel comfortable with giving out my IP Address), I would gladly prove to you that that IP address is certainly not mine. Mugurple (talk) 00:33 , 27 April 2014 (UTC)
- It's easy to use multiple IP addresses, that proves nothing. I can open up an SPI case and have you, that IP, and User:Chrishill8414 checked by a clerk. If it turns out you're all the same person, you'll all be blocked for disruptive editing. Jrcla2 (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, can you please do that? When you get the results, please respond ASAP. It will (finally) prove to you that I am not the one who keeps making those edits. Don't forget to respond, I would greatly appreciate that. Mugurple (talk) 19:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- Have you opened the case yet? Mugurple (talk) 17:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, can you please do that? When you get the results, please respond ASAP. It will (finally) prove to you that I am not the one who keeps making those edits. Don't forget to respond, I would greatly appreciate that. Mugurple (talk) 19:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
minor edits
Jrcla2,
Thank you for reviewing my edits and seeing what I do; it is much appreciated. I almost literally mark all my edits as "minor edits" because they are usually small things that don't change the content or information of the article and they don't need to be examined by a reviewer. The vast majority of my edits have been edits that don't need to be reviewed. They include:
- Spelling and grammatical corrections
- Simple formatting
- Formatting that does not change the meaning of the page
- Obvious factual errors
- Fixing layout errors
- Adding or correcting wikilinks, or fixing broken external links and references already present in the article
- Removing obvious vandalism
I'm sorry that I marked non-minor edits as minor edits as I know that it takes up your time when seeing if my rare edits I do perform are really minor edits, It was just a habit. I will remember next time. Robert4565 (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
UT Arlington
I don't understand the warning. You mentioned the consensus is that UT Arlington is Texas Arlington. How so? One guy changed it because that's what ESPN had, I reverted back to the original (many of them I created myself) and then he says to start a talk page after he moved it.
The University wishes for its athletic teams to be known as such (see page three of the basketball media guide, grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/txar/sports/m-baskbl/auto_pdf/2013-14/prospectus/prospectus.pdf) and the main page is branded as such (www.utamavs.com). The Conference it belongs to refers to it as UT Arlington (http://www.sunbeltsports.org/index.aspx?path=uta). Even media outlets like Fox Sports refer to UTA as UT Arlington (http://msn.foxsports.com/collegebasketball/story/UT-Arlington-defeats-ULM-8574-53032160). The major daily newspaper refers to them as UT Arlington (http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/college-sports/other-colleges/20140306-ut-arlington-sneaks-past-troy-in-double-overtime.ece). In fact, the only ones who consistently don't are ESPN and TreyDavis3.
I don't get why him moving it first without discussion, then me reverting back to the original gives me a warning and not the guy who vandalized it to begin with.FoUTASportscaster (talk) 21:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
More on the name
Saw another non-ESPN media outlet call UTA UT-Arlington today, http://collegebaseballcentral.com/ut-arlington-wins-on-eric-tates-walk-off-in-sun-belt-baseball-action/5537/ FoUTASportscaster (talk) 04:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Nothing? FoUTASportscaster (talk) 23:44, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
NJCAA
I've been working some on the Chris Jans article. Bowling Green is his first NCAA D1 head coaching job, his previous HC jobs were in the NJCAA which i can find nothing on. Didn't know if you had any idea where to find info on that. I can find current info but teams could've switched conferences since he was there in the 90's. Also, should this even be in his head coaching career chart?Littlekelv (talk) 21:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Junior college information is next to impossible to find. The exception to that statement is if that junior college eventually becomes Division I (like Boise State or Cal State Fullerton), because then the team media guide normally lists yearly results. For Chris Jans, I'd leave it the way you have it if you can't find anything more about his JuCo days. Jrcla2 (talk) 00:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Take a look
Check this out. I don't even have the energy. What is it about Portland? Rikster2 (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
- Jesus Christ. That guy is unbelievable. I don't have the time to set up a TfD right now but that definitely needs to be deleted. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Articles I've created
Hi Jrcla2,
I notice that you are making "cleanup" changes to the Ivy league basketball articles. The changes remove a small amount of characters, and I am thinking that you were removing the extra bytes from the article that I must have caused by pressing the spacebar after a sentence before pressing enter. In this the case? Robert4565 (talk) 17:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Kind of. It's aesthetically unappealing to have a navbox be bunched together between references and categories, not to mention it makes locating the navbox more difficult when editing the page, so all I've really been doing is tidying up the white space above and below the Ivy League basketball navbox. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)