Talk:Liancourt Rocks

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liancourt Rocks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Template:Liancourt Rocks probation

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.

Discussions:

Talk:Liancourt Rocks/Archive 3#Requested move Dokdo → Liancourt Rocks, result of the debate was move, 2 May 2005
Talk:Liancourt Rocks/Archive 4#Requested move Liancourt Rocks → Dokdo, result of the debate was move, 1 June 2006
Talk:Dokdo/Archive 10#Requested Move May 2007 and Talk:Liancourt Rocks/Archive 11#Requested Move May 2007 Dokdo → Liancourt Rocks, result of the debate was move, 28 May 2007

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Citizendium Porting (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Citizendium Porting, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Citizendium PortingWikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium PortingTemplate:WikiProject Citizendium PortingCitizendium Porting articles

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Japan: Geography & environment / History C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:57, November 12, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Geography and environment task force.

This article is supported by the History task force.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Korea B‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.
	This article has been designated as unstable due to recurrent edit wars. Sustainable improvements to this article requires forging a consensus among all good-faith participants.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23

This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Location Sea of Japan Location Sea of Korea(East Sea) Rlarjsdn122 (talk) 13:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The location of the islands should be modified from Sea of Japan to East Sea or at least to East Sea/Sea of Japan...

In order to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding of the location, it should be described both names at least.(East Sea/Sea of Japan) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mudae4 (talk • contribs) 08:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the FAQ and discussions in the archives. Britmax (talk) 08:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Location of Dokdo/Tokdo is "DONGHAE"

The Location of Dokdo is Donghae not Sea of Japan. Because of this unsolved problem Korea and Japan are still fighting. So if the Wikipedia is the dictionary for everyone in the world, wiki should respect every people including Koreans. At least, the location of Dokdo should be Donghae/Sea of Japan. There are so lot of reasons to say why Dokdo's location is Donghae. You could know it clearly at this site. http://maywespeak.com/ Thank you. 짱구보단 한국 (talk) 09:03, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the FAQ and discussions in the archives. Britmax (talk) 09:17, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 November 2014

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change "Sea of Japan" to "East Sea" with reference to http://www.lonelyplanet.com/maps/asia/south-korea/

Yeah i totally agree...but, unfortunately, Korea's influence over other countries, or diplomatic power, is not that high...so, i guess it will happen in the futue.

1999charles (talk) 03:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not going to happen. Please see the notices at the top of this page. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 03:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Add "Under the de facto control of South Korea" or something similar in the lead

First of all, I am not Japanese nor Korean.

That being said, I believe the fact that South Korea has de facto control over these rocks should be mentioned in the lead, perhaps by changing

"Sovereignty over the islets is disputed between Japan and South Korea."

to

"While South Korea has de facto control over the islets, its sovereignty over them is contested by Japan."

Note that the Senkaku Islands lead mentions "Japanese control", the Kashmir lead mentions it being "administered by three countries: India, Pakistan, and the People's Republic of China", the Kuril Islands lead mentions "All of the islands are under the Russian jurisdiction", and the Falkland Islands lead mentions "British administration". Liancourt is an anomaly here, and Wikipedia probably doesn't want casual readers to think that nobody has de facto control over Liancourt after reading just the lead.--Hinmatóowyalahtqit (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]