User talk:Gareth Owen

This page unintentionally left non-blank.

WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive

For the 2007 Rugby World Cup WikiProject Rugby union is launching an Improvement Drive for national rugby union teams; specifically those participating in the Rugby World Cup.

We need your help! Here is what you can do:

Adopt a national rugby union team article and collaborate with other members to improve it.
Find, create and upload free images that will help improve these articles.
Copy-edit, reference, and expand articles when and where you can.
Promote the project and encourage others to join.

The World Cup is fast approaching and these articles are going to get a lot more hits during the tournament. It would be great if we could have them at a high standard!

For more information see the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby union talk page here.

Shudde ^talk 05:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Babe Zaharias

Hey, thank you for the kind words and encouragement! I like your photos, too, but you might want to check the link from your userpage. Looks like a bot gotcha (by accident). Speaking of photos, I'm still trying to get a good public domain pic of her for the piece. -- LisaSmall ^T/C 00:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

England national rugby union team FAC

I was wondering if you could comment at the England national rugby union team's FAC here. Thanks. - Shudde ^talk 09:08, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gareth

Some Zionist thug is deleting my improvements to the Menachem Begin page. I detailed Begin's involvement in the Deir Yassin Massacre and the shock it elicited from many Jewish thinkers and leaders including Albert Einstein, Hannah Arendt and others, which is evidenced by a letter they published to the New York Times in December 1948 calling Begin's party a fascist party, accusing Begin of terrorism, and warning the public not to allow Begin to visit the US and not to give money to his party. But the Zionist hooligans on Wikipedia, true to Zionistic smear and intimidation tactics, want to hide the truth. Since I'm new, I need some help: How can I undo their deletions? How can I complain? Thanks, Firstamend 14:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrospective award

I Cas Liber, hereby award Rlevse the Flaming Joel-wiki for raising our collective consciousness for work on a Featured Article highlighted by the Übermuse Billy Joel in his great song We Didn't Start the Fire...cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ethan_Daniel_Davidson.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ethan_Daniel_Davidson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gram parsons.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Gram parsons.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr ^{If you've written a quality article...} 22:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ato Bolden

I noticed you added the drug allegations to Maurice Greene. I added details of a letter from Ato Bolden concerning Greene to Boldens page [1], and wondered if you had heard of it? Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eigenvalue, eigenvector and eigenspace

		The E=mc² Barnstar
		Thank you for your recent corrections in Eigenvalue, eigenvector and eigenspace. Your competent help is much appreciated. --Lantonov (talk) 09:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your unsourced Meta images

Please explain the sources and licenses of the following Meta images:

--Jusjih (talk) 01:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None was created by me, but each was entered in the 2001 logo competition, (see m:Logo_suggestions and m:Logo_suggestions/Humorous_logos) and GFDL licensed as part of that procedure. At the end of that competition, Larry Sanger deleted them because he is a humourless tosser. I saved them from deletion because they amused me. -- GWO (talk)

NowCommons: Image:Siegfried roy statue.jpg

Image:Siegfried roy statue.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Siegfried & Roy.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Siegfried & Roy.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Challenger.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Challenger.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brian Moore's Head Looks Uncannily Like London Planetarium

An article that you have been involved in editing, Brian Moore's Head Looks Uncannily Like London Planetarium, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Moore's Head Looks Uncannily Like London Planetarium. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Tuba Player, Whit Friday 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tuba Player, Whit Friday 2008.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Wikipedia:Image use policy

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:09, 26 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:Denton brass.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Denton brass.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Wikipedia:Image use policy

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Gareth Owen

Gareth Owen.

Remember 12 December 2001? Creating your own article on Wikipedia, lol. Sorry if this is an unwelcome reminder, I just thought 'blow me, Vales new loan signing is a Wikipedian', obviously I now see that that isn't the case, but 7 years eh? Where does the time go?--EchetusXe (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my defence, that was two months before the User: namespace. But yeah, 2001 and seems a long time ago. -- GWO (talk)

Your user page

I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 04:36, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

disaster ?

Hello Gareth, I left a wikipedia theory theses on my page. May be this is a disaster ;) gr. Paul --Paul Conradi (talk) 11:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

disaster II

Hello Gareth, I am a user from Germany. On another user page I found the bonmot "The problem with Wikipedia is that it only works in practice. In theory, it's a total disaster" and a link to your page. Is this really from you? It is very true and describes exactly what I try to explain to people who are not familiar with wikipedia. Greetings -- Zigg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.129.105.17 (talk) 13:39, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does sound like something I might have coined, but to be completely honest, I can't remember anymore. Sorry ;(

Proposed deletion of Rock and roll.

The article Rock and roll. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pointless typo. No reason for period. No articles linked here. No one would add a period in search.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 02:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The definition of america is rock and roll

The article The definition of america is rock and roll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pointless redirect. Not a phrase in use. No articles link here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — The Man in Question (gesprec) · (forðung) 02:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Rock and roll.

RfD nomination of The definition of america is rock and roll

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Gareth Owen! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 179 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Wonder Mike - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Leslie Law - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gary Imlach - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/1919 Black Sox

Since you were an uploader, you may have an opinion, which you are welcome to voice, at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/1919 Black Sox.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:15, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The Point Old Trafford 2010.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Point Old Trafford 2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 06:57, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Theory and Practice

Gareth, you are sometimes attributed as the source of the statement on your user page: "The problem with Wikipedia is that it only works in practice. In theory, it's a total disaster". Is this true, if not, I'd love to know how you came by the statement? --Reagle (talk) 14:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tamim Iqbal profile picture

Gareth, I have no idea why you changed/added Tamim Iqbal's picture to a completely wrong one! The picture you uploaded was Bangladeshi pace bowler Shafiul Islam's, not Tamim Iqbal's. This is a wrong photo of Tamim Iqbal and please upload the right picture. gromell —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gromell (talk • contribs) 19:24, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, genuine case of mistaken identity. -- 87.115.7.165 (talk) 06:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Man-Faye

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination). --Gwern (contribs) 11:14 4 August 2010 (GMT) 11:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

File source problem with File:Be good tanya.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Be good tanya.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's not my picture. I uploaded one of that name -- ooh, about 10 years ago -- but someone has overwritten it with a shot of their own. -- GWO (talk)

MfD nomination of User:Gareth Owen/List of everyone who has ever lived

User:Gareth Owen/List of everyone who has ever lived, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gareth Owen/List of everyone who has ever lived and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Gareth Owen/List of everyone who has ever lived during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:54, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Dear Gareth Owen,

I am inviting you to join the Miles Davis WikiProject. I found you, Gareth Owen, on several revision history statistics of articles related with "Miles Davis", and therefore I am of the opinion, that you should be one of those members of this WikiProject I recently created. I hope you will approve my invitation.

Regards,

-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 23:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roger bresnahan.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Roger bresnahan.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Gareth Owen}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Siegfried roy statue.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Siegfried roy statue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 13:06, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Appeal to the great spirit and facia.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:06, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Burghley House.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Burghley House.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]