Jump to content

Talk:WrestleMania 32

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2.50.150.106 (talk) at 02:33, 4 April 2016 (→‎Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2016: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconProfessional wrestling Unassessed Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconWrestleMania 32 is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal to redirect to WrestleMania#Future

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a proposed redirect. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not redirected due to no renewed discussion and stalled consensus. TheTMOBGaming2 (talk) 13:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am formally proposing that this article redirect to WrestleMania#Future until there is officially some build for the event, which means until the Royal Rumble (2016) is done. There seems to be no sourced information that is not currently duplicated at WrestleMania#Future. The official "background" disclaimer for professional wrestling in all PPV articles doesn't count. Pragmatically, this article is a magnet for disruption from IPs and redlinks. Alternatively, we could request to semi-protect the article until February 2016, but some disruption might still slip through. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 05:04, 11 February 2015 (UTC) ping @LM2000: @TheMeaningOfBlah: @CRRaysHead90: @RadioKAOS: @InedibleHulk:[reply]

  • Support - I've spoken a lot about this issue on WT:PW and look forward to not talking about this any more. I support this proposal for the many reasons I've stated over there. If this does get support then page protection is obligatory.LM2000 (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I think semi-protection would be better worth it, maybe until mid-April of 2016? TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 14:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The article meets WP:GNG and is reliably sourced. Secondary sources exist. Yes, I'll admit that the article is a ground for possible vandalism. But that has never stopped us in the past 9+ years from creating the article one year in advance, as soon as the next host location in announced. I'm firmly opposed to changing precedent at this point. If anything, the semi-protection will be fine. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 21:26, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neither of you have addressed WP:PAGEDECIDE under WP:GNG. There are other times when it is better to cover notable topics, that clearly should be included in Wikipedia, as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context. [...] Sometimes, when information about a future event is scarce, coverage may instead be better suited to a larger encompassing article (see also Wikipedia:CRYSTAL). Other times, a future event may clearly be suitable for a standalone page before it happens (such as the 2020 Summer Olympics). Look at the amount of stuff in the Olympics article, which has details about the bidding, sports, stadiums etc. Our article has almost nothing at all! starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 22:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since this discussion started, I've pointed out that Wikipedia requires articles to demonstrate notability through secondary sources. Despite some making it clear that these sources exist, not a single one has been added to the article. If someone wants to finally make a legit standalone article, I'll change my mind. But this stub serves no purpose not served by the WrestleMania table. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:09, February 13, 2015 (UTC)
Secondary source that was added like a day ago TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, and that exact same claim is already sourced to WWE. So it added nothing at all. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:14, February 15, 2015 (UTC)
WP:PAGEDECIDE doesn't mention anything about secondary sources, so I'm still opposed to this redirect proposal. TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 13:30, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Secondary sources -> notability. Sometimes, when a subject is notable, but it is unlikely that there ever will be a lot to write about it, editors should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of creating a permanent stub. It is unlikely that there will be anything to write about this event until January 2016, so we should redirect until then. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 13:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's the funny thing about this, though. There is stuff to read and write. Quite a bit of it has already been presented in the discussion, the rest is at everyone's fingertips. You don't even need to leave Wikipedia, there are "Find sources" links right in the tag at the top, straight up asking people to add them if they don't want the article merged, redirected or deleted.
It seems like these people exist, because we're having this chat, yet here Wikipedia stands. HowStuffWorks and WWE. The sum of human knowledge on WrestleMania 32. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:55, February 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - I think the thing that bothers me the most about this discussion is that in the time it's taken us to get this far in this discussion, any one of us (including you two, @Starship.paint: and @InedibleHulk:) could have added something based on the links I provided on WT:PW to establish notability. The line about the possible record breaking attendance writes itself. But the two aforementioned editors seem content redirecting an article even though they know the secondary sources exist to keep the article as is. (On the flip side of that, me and Blah aren't innocent, we could have added it too.) WP:PW seems plagued by laziness when stuff like this happens. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 02:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I had half a mind to do it myself, especially after a few days. But then it became like when a kid refuses to clean his room until you have to do it, just so it doesn't become dangerous. So far, not a lot of danger, just a Sting vs Taker threat. But I started this on the Redirect side, and will not be moved by inactivity! InedibleHulk (talk) 02:45, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
Well it may be worded horribly because I'm not a content guy, but rather a minor edit guy, but me and Blah have added what you suggested. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 03:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! It wasn't exactly worded horribly, but I touched it up a bit. I'm more a sculptor than a builder. There wasn't really anything in that one source about it being highly talked about, but it's a start. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:25, February 20, 2015 (UTC)
@CRRaysHead90: - I am sorry, it's very hard for me to care about WWE at this time. I can't bring myself to update their articles much. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 02:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a proposed redirect. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Official logo?

Where did it come from? InedibleHulk (talk) 23:12, February 13, 2015 (UTC)

Here. TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 00:03, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:12, February 15, 2015 (UTC)

Unsourced statements

Those unsourced statements in the lede in citations. Same goes for WrestleMania 31. They are WP:OR Could someone better explain to User talk:TheMeaningOfBlah#Manual notification? starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 03:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the statements you two are warring over. Yes, they are OR, however they're also true and easily verifiable by clicking on the wikilinks. I say ignore it in this case. 2014 World Series had similar statements before the series happened, and Super Bowl XLIX currently has similar statements. They're not hurting the wiki. CRRaysHead90 | #RaysUp 20:21, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilinks can work as simpler citations, if the claim is sourced in the link. But we should never double up, linking to an article which links to another with the source. That's too distant. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:13, February 15, 2015 (UTC)

Protection

My request for page protection went through, this should filter out most of the people who want to dump their speculation until December. My hope for a redirect still stands though.LM2000 (talk) 04:53, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 July 2015

rumoured matches 86.163.235.212 (talk) 16:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Higher Quality WrestleMania 32 Logo Found

I have found a higher quality PNG of the WrestleMania logo, this one is sized at 1,482 x 529 pixels (The one currently being used on the page is 500 x 200). I found this on the Pro Wrestling Wikia: http://prowrestling.wikia.com/wiki/File:Wrestlemania_32_logo.png The direct link to the full resolution logo is here: http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/prowrestling/images/b/b0/Wrestlemania_32_logo.png/revision/latest?cb=20150123211002

I can't edit the file, but maybe someone else can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby165324 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if this is formatted incorrectly, I don't really edit Wikipedia.

Just wanted to point out that the graphic on the right says that WM32 takes place on March 4th 2016 when the correct date is April 3rd.

Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2016

Category:Professional wrestling in Texas 59.101.98.130 (talk) 04:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done jcgoble3 (talk) 07:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Matches

I just want to point out that the projected match card still says the there will be a one on one match for the WWE World Heavyweight Championship. Since the Royal Rumble has been modified, there's a chance that the Wrestlemania 32 main event might be a bit different, anyone agree? 147.69.38.96 (talk) 05:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC) You said The Undertaker would be barred from competing at wrestlemania again. Did you mean banned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfisch (talk • contribs) 23:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Injured reserve list

Is there some space to talk about this topic?

Theme song

Remove the theme song which is not supported by a reliable source. 198.108.244.195 (talk) 13:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Found a few very new youtube videos, but nothing reliable/offical , so it has been removed --allthefoxes (Talk) 18:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of this?

I hereby move this to talk. Apart from maybe the date when tickets went on sale this whole package seems unencyclopedic trivia: 

Travel packages and individual tickets went on sale on November 6, 2015, with the Gold Circle VIP Packages available for $2,360, and 
individual tickets ranging from $18 to $1,180. The Gold Circle Packages include seating at ringside, a "VIP Stadium entrance" and a 
"take-home" folding chair.< ref name=32Tickets>"WrestleMania 32 tickets on sale now". WWE. Retrieved 25 November 2015.</ ref>

Str1977 (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Str1977: While the folding chair is definitely trivia, the highest and lowest priced tickets would be very informative to anyone looking to attend a WrestleMania event in the future, by using and comparing past Wrestlemanias as a guide. starship.paint ~ KO 04:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't object to a severely trimmed version of this being reinstated into the article. No travel packages, no folging chairs, no advertisement language. Just the date the sale began and the maximal and minimal prices. Str1977 (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! Str1977 (talk) 01:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Divas Title match

As far as I know, there has been no confirmation of a singles match for the Divas Title, let alone one featuring either Becky Lynch or Sasha Banks, beyond Charlotte saying so in a promo. For all we know, there could be a Triple Threat or Fatal Four-Way match for the title at the event that's still almost six weeks away. Isn't it premature to list otherwise on this page? Skudrafan1 (talk) 17:51, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This match is just WP:CRYSTAL for now. Pedrohoneto (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Since it is WP:CRYSTAL, it should be removed. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I pulled it. I had done so before but my edit was undone. Now we have a conversation on the Talk page to refer to. Skudrafan1 (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And I've already had to take it back down AGAIN, along with claims about Tag Team and IC title matches. I guess there's not much we can do about this. Skudrafan1 (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Added a statement that matches should be referenced before being added. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 22:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Another. Pedrohoneto (talk) 22:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Besides the fact that it's confirmed that she will defend the title against at least one of them at WrestleMania.... --JDC808 ♫ 03:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Give a credible reference and the match can be added to the table. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There was one, the show itself. --JDC808 ♫ 07:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The fact is: Charlotte will have a match at WrestleMania. Against who? We do not know yet. It will be 1 vs. 1, triple threat, handicap, tag team, etc? We do not know. Pedrohoneto (talk) 13:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's for the title, so it wouldn't be tag team match and very less likely a handicap match. --JDC808 ♫ 17:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See, but you're just assuming. Wikipedia isn't a place for assumptions; it's a place for the aggregation of facts. Skudrafan1 (talk) 20:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There were no assumptions, and to put Charlotte vs TBD for the title is not an assumption. If a match type was listed, then it would be an assumption. --JDC808 ♫ 22:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The litmus test should be whether a match is listed on the official WrestleMania preview page on WWE.com. Until it is, it's just speculation and doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Skudrafan1 (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte will have a match at Mania. That is confirmed. The opponent is not, which is why the table would say "Charlotte (c) vs. TBD". This shows that the match is confirmed, but the opponent(s) is not. It's not rocket science. --JDC808 ♫ 17:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not WP:CRYSTAL, therefore the match cannot be posted to the until it is official. Yes, the show is a source, yet you need other sources to confirm the match. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's not CRYSTAL balling to say Charlotte vs TBD. The fact that Charlotte will be defending her title in some sort of match is confirmed. --JDC808 ♫ 22:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What's "not rocket science" is the fact that we shouldn't be listing matches until they are confirmed by WWE. We can reasonably say that AJ Styles will have a match at WrestleMania. Should we put AJ Styles vs. TBD in the chart without having any knowledge of what the match stipulations will be? Of course not. This is no different. Skudrafan1 (talk) 20:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, yes, there is a difference. AJ Styles has not been confirmed to have a match at WrestleMania (though it probably will happen in some form), however, Charlotte has been confirmed. --JDC808 ♫ 22:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2016

The type of match between Dean Ambrose and Brock Lesnar is wrong, its a No Holds Barred Street Fight match, according to the official match cards shown in Youtube and other sites

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFbqaHUx0WM Nathalex1 (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request granted per Wrestlemania. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2016

Add match: Charlotte Vs. Sasha Banks or Becky Lynch - Divas Championship Geekhunter33 (talk) 09:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:37, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

poster

Dose any one know the poster Victor2C (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The poster should also show other wrestlemania participants Abdurrahmanchamp (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Rock

The Rock has confirmed he will appear at Wrestlemania, in the description, why does it not say that The Rock will be appearing at the event, WWE.com and The Rock's twitter account have both confirmed it, could you please add in the description that The Rock has confirmed that he will be at the event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.178.127.41 (talk) 03:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His role needs to be defined before someone to add him anywhere in the article. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We know he will be appearing at Wrestlemania, yes, we don't know if he is in a match, but it would be nice to mention that he will be at Wrestlemania in the description — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.178.127.41 (talk) 04:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royal

Add the new participants for the Andre the Giant Memorial Battle Royal to be officially listed. Bo Dallas, Curtis Axel, Heath Slater and Adam Rose have been officially announced as entrants in the match tonight on an episode of SmackDown.

source: [1] KO Asylum (talk) 07:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wrestling Observer, The Battle Royal is now on the Main Card. Link: http://www.f4wonline.com/wwe-news/full-wrestlemania-card-plus-tv-network-and-ppv-schedule-210166 Quoting article for those who cant get through the paywall:

"WWE has officially updated the plans for Sunday's WrestleMania regarding where the different matches will air on the show.

As of right now, and this could change during the week, the Kalisto vs. Ryback U.S. title match will take place at about 4:30 p.m. Central time, 5:30 p.m. Eastern, and will be a WWE Network exclusive.

The USA Network and WWE Network one hour simulcast from 5-6 p.m. local time and 6-7 p.m. Eastern time, which will also air at WWE.com, the WWE app, and YouTube, will have the women's ten person tag team match and the Usos vs. Dudleys match.

The 20 man Andre the Giant Battle Royal will now be on the WrestleMania PPV card." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.42.51 (talk) 05:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Day vs. LON

Someone added the claim that the New Day vs. LON match is a handicap match for the titles. However, the only source used thus far says nothing about handicap matches nor does it explicitely speak of a title match. We need sources for this. Str1977 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Str1977 (talk): source - [2] KO Asylum (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's a step up but a mere interpretation of the WWE graphic. If this really is the match we must be able to do better. Somebody must have said something to that effet. Str1977 (talk) 02:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the tags are there so that a source is provided. If your link was enough, you would have to include the link into the article. Instead you go and simply delete the tags. That's no way to go. Str1977 (talk) 02:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Str1977 (talk): Can you or someone include the link into the article because i'm unable to do it at the moment. Everything points to it being a 4-on-3 handicap match. At Roadblock, they made sure to state it was 2 vs. 2 when citing Sheamus and Barrett of LON vs. Big E and Kofi of New Day. source: [3] KO Asylum (talk) 03:09, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KO Asylum and Starship.paint:: I will not include the link because a) I'm not convinced of the whole matter*, b) why did you remove the tag when you can't edit the article?
It is possible that the picture indicates a handicap match but that's not certain until we have a reliable source that clearly says that. "Everything points" is not enough.
It is strange that this article made several songs and dances arounds Charlotte's match but simply inserts handicap title match (which normally would be contradictory) without any source. Thanks, Starship, for removing this. Str1977 (talk) 14:16, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link that proves the tag team titles will be defended. Here's the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfisch (talk • contribs) 01:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Starship.paint and Str1977:: Official reliable source: [5] Wrestling Observer/Figure 4 Weekly Online states officially there will be a 4-on-3 Handicap match with the Tag Team titles not at stake. KO Asylum (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 March 2016

Chris Jericho Vs. AJ Styles 2601:240:4300:10D4:B422:87FB:BD80:77F0 (talk) 01:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 22:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sort out the order of matches and the neatness of the table

the most important matches should go on top, followed by secondary main events like the cell match, followed by the other title matches (order: intercontinental, tag team, US and women's or the last two can be switched), followed by the remaining matches, with the pre-show matches lised at the bottom as they're the least important. reading this, you see the first match and think that's the main event match. it's not.

think of it like this - back when you used to buy wrestling videos and dvds, the list of matches at the back, the matches shown at the top of the list is most important, with lesser important matches going further down. it makes sense.

also for notes, make them short and concise. use * and footnotes if it's long and complex, so that the resulting table looks neater. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.146.226.199 (talk) 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's no point in such sorting. It is pretty subjective and will be meaningless in a few hours, when we will conform to the order in which the matches were held. Str1977 (talk) 23:07, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Official Poster

There's been some back and forth editing over what the "official" poster of the event is. There are two images in question:

1 is here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WrestleMania_32#/media/File:WrestleMania_32_poster.jpg

2 is here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&diff=712023455&oldid=712002085#/media/File:Wrestlemania_32_poster.jpg

If you check out Stephanie McMahon's Instagram account here: https://www.instagram.com/p/BCiHW2YhEb_/?taken-by=stephaniemcmahon&hl=en, you can see a picture she posted of the real poster hanging on a wall. It is the 1st image I linked. That 1st image has also been shown hanging on the wall in the office during Raw the last few weeks.

There are some people removing that 1st image off the Mania 32 Wiki page and replacing it with the 2nd image. The 2nd image is a photoshopped picture of an image that is used when you sign up for WWE Network, which you can see here: http://www.wwe.com/wwenetwork. The 2nd image is not a poster. It is a fan manipulated image where they added the WrestleMania logo and and the date and other text to make it look like an official poster. Nowhere on WWE.com is the 2nd image I linked shown as an actual poster with text over it. It's a photoshop. A very well done photoshop, but a photoshop nonetheless. Until someone can can prove otherwise, keep the 1st image as the official poster on this Wiki page. OldSkool01 (talk) 17:10, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@OldSkool01: what about this third poster? It's official. Although since it's on a TV screen rather than a wall, it might be called more of a promotional image than a poster necessarily. With the gradual shift from paper to TV for advertisement, I have to wonder though, should we continue to prioritize printed-on-paper posters over digital images if digital images will probably reach a wider amount of people? If you compare it to the present image, our current poster is basically a cropping of this wider shot except HHH is overlapping reigns more. Ranze (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Bryan

Daniel Bryan retired because of brain damage from too many concussions in his career. Not from his neck injury. Joshua ariel 97 (talk) 16:39, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable source to support this? Anyway I don't think we specify the nature of why he's retiring, just that he is. Explaining why would be relevant to his article but not for WrestleMania. Ranze (talk) 23:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2016

82.170.115.123 (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change the match between triple h and roman reigns from for the wwe world heavyweight championship(x) to no disqualification for the wwe world heavyweight championship(y) here is the source with picture http://www.wrestlezone.com/news/691887-wrestlemania-32-main-event-match-possibly-getting-an-added-stipulation 82.170.115.123 (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sources says "possibly". Str1977 (talk) 20:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Event is currently airing, matter is probably already settled or will be shortly. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strangely worded editorializing

I hereby move the following over here: 

In a rare event for WrestleMania main eventers, it was theorized that WWE scripted Reigns not to speak on the last Raw 
before WrestleMania 32 to avoid him being booed, in a repeat of the Raw before WrestleMania 31 (which Reigns headlined).[1][2]

Not only is this extreemly strangely worded - it is also not actually included in the source attached which merely said: 

Roman Reigns-Triple H beat each other up all night
I would love to see how this story would feel if the fans actually wanted to see Roman Reigns succeed because in a vacuum, 
the story that’s being told is not really all that bad.
It might actually be good if it were not for the fact that the fans do not care to see Reigns defeat Triple H to win the WWE 
World Heavyweight championship at WrestleMania.
The fans’ vitriol toward Reigns has hampered this feud from the very beginning. This was clear Monday.
Instead of getting a chance to state what this match means to him, Reigns said nothing at all Monday night in Brooklyn. He 
didn’t have to say much, but something would have sufficed.
Instead, it felt like WWE was sort of afraid to put him in front of a hostile crowd for fear of him being booed during his 
promo. If that was the case, WWE had good reason to feel that way because despite beating up Triple H on multiple occasions 
and closing the show by doing a cool dive over the top rope, the fans still jeered him.

There is nothing in there about anyone "theorizing" or WWE "scripting". There is also nothing about last years pre-Mania Raw, which makes the inclusion of a RAW report from 2015 all the more pointless. So it's best to put the whole thing away. Str1977 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Johnson, Vaughn. "WWE Monday Night results and observations (03/28/16): We've reached the end of the road". philly.com. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
  2. ^ Powell, Jason. "03/23 Powell's WWE Raw Live Review: The final edition of Raw before WrestleMania 31". prowrestling.net. Retrieved 29 March 2016.

Time of pre-show and main show

Can we please list the date? I tuned in at 7pm because usually it's 7-8 preshow 8-11 main show but accoding to results, the 3 pre-show matches all completed? Can someone list a reference to support these? When did this happen? When does the main show happen? Ranze (talk) 23:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

league of nations

It was a six man tag not a handicap match

When the show is over, can the article be locked from editing permanently?

The vandalism is insane.

Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2016

220.244.228.72 (talk) 01:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2016

Roman Reigns defeated Triple H by disqualifaction in 28:37 minutes 2.50.150.106 (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WrestleMania_32&oldid=713444520"