Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Schwede66 (talk | contribs) at 09:46, 27 June 2017 (→User:Anoptimistix: not done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please read Wikipedia:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants are unlikely to be granted this right if they have created fewer than 25 new articles, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.

User:Anoptimistix

Can you please give me autopatrolled rights, I'm a genuine contributor,I contribute to the Wikipedia in whatever way I can,I often help newcomers too,as I don't want a valuable contributor quit wikipedia. Can you please assign me the autopatrolled rights, Im requesting these rights as lot of articles are created everyday,other patrollers may not be able to patrol a newly created page, due to which most of the articles including some of mine remains unreviewed, I meet the criteria of having 25 new articles, I admit that initially 2 of my created articles were deleted, it was because I was a new user 1 year ago ,and had no information about guidelines and notablility, and as I do not belong from programming background ,so I had not knowledge about markup language, but after that i worked very hard and by myself learnt markup languages,read guidelines and now i have more than 1000 edits, the autopatrolled rights will really be helpful. Anoptimistix (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has created roughly 24 articles. — MusikBot talk 21:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anoptimistix, I believe 30 is the minimum number of articles created for you to be eligible for autopatrol rights. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The guideline for granting is 25 articles, but the bot is only counting live articles (not deleted), bringing this user's total down to 23 — MusikAnimal talk 20:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Now I have 26 undeleted articles, please check. you can also check my pending changes reviewing and new page patrolling history, I have done my work honestly

Anoptimistix (talk) 04:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done Anoptimistix, your work, especially the last five articles, give the impression of great haste resulting in a sloppy output that is definitely worth others casting an eye over. You should consider taking more time and producing fewer articles, but improving the quality of what you work on. As an aside, the first thing I do when I review an editor's work is look at their talk page. Yours is empty apart from being granted the pending changes reviewer userright. Looking through the talk page history, I come across numerous PROD notices (admittedly, your articles are mainly kept) and copyright violation notices. Deleting those items, and only keeping the userright notice, looks like hat collecting while trying to hide the stuff that's not pleasant. I can guarantee you that this gives the exact opposite impression of what you might try to achieve, and I suggest you start archiving your talk page instead. Schwede66 02:32, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66:. Thanks for spending your valuable time at looking at my autopatrolled rights request. I really felt bad to know that you had an unpleasant experience reviewing my talk page history, but I didn't intentionally deleted other messages, I like to keep things clean so I removed those messages . I didn't knew about talk page archiving, but as you informed me about it I had created archive box in my user page, I will save all future messages there. And I kept pending changes right notice because it had the useful link of pending changes feeds, so it was time consuming as I could have direct access to the feeds, rather than searching on Google . And about the articles that I created fast I want to say that I did it because bot informed me that I had created 23 articles, I got to know that I had to create 25 live (undeleted articles) , my initial 2 articles were deleted if you go through it you may realise that I was newbie at that time so I had no knowledge about guidelines and wiki markup languages at that time. But I self- learnt markup language and I am contributing genuinely to this amazing encyclopedia, and about copyright violations I had less knowledge about image file licensing , but know I am fully informed about Creative Commons licence etc, initially I was not informed that lyrics are not allowed in songs article, but after I got informed I never write lyrics in song article. Mistakes happen with humans, you can go through my Wikipedia contribution history ,I always tried to help new comers and contribute genuinely as much as I can.

I am not hat collecting , initially I didn't bothered about autopatrolled rights but now I have to bother because my created articles gets unreviewed for a very long time I wanted autopatrolled rights ,because new page patrollers hardly patroll new pages due to workload, I am too a new page patroller I can understand this, as most pages remains unreviewed for long time , it gets uindexed in search engines, and all my hard work and effort, and time goes in vain because of this.

If you can assign me the rights ,then I would get more encouraged to work and contribute about India and music ,biographies of notable person etc relate articles to the wikipedia without bothering about getting my contributions ignored.

Anoptimistix (talk) 06:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your considered reply, Anoptimistix. How about you look closely through the edits that I've made on your last ten articles, take the issues on board, produce five more articles that are up to scratch, and then come back here? I'd be most glad to have another look. Schwede66 06:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: I have created 5 more articles upon your advice, please spend some of your valuable time checking those articles, honestly I try to fix those issues. I won't have requested autopatrolled rights if my created articles would have been reviewed within sometime of it's creation,but unfortunately for months many of them stays unreviewed, but I know I can't complain as I am too a new page patroller I know the workload there is, as a patroller I try to do sincerely my work but unfortunately I can't patrol my own creations that's why Autopatrolled rights would have been very helpful to me.Anoptimistix (talk) 17:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I guess the numerous maintenance tags that have been added to those five articles (by others than me) are an answer to that request. In addition what's pointed out there, I've seen numerous links to dab pages. You also need to be aware of sentence case for headings. And avoid redlinked categories. Schwede66 09:46, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tsange

Been on the project nearly ten years, 3.5k mainspace edits, 85 articles created, none deleted, clean block log. You'll find on their talk page where myself and other have raised issues with their articles that needed fixing, and from what I can tell, from the moment the issues were raised onward, it was never an issue again. Most recent articles are pretty much impeccable stubs as far as I can tell. TimothyJosephWood 16:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC) TimothyJosephWood 16:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, I'm picky, but having looked over the last 10 articles (all from June 2017!), there were a ton of little things that I improved. Have a look through my contributions, starting with this edit and then the next 23 or so edits (ignoring the date setting exercise which is mostly just there to get a dmy tag but it did pick up a few MOS issues, too). I'd be inclined to say that the articles could do with review, but if another admin thinks that autopatrolled can be granted, that'll be fine. Schwede66 04:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well... you might have a better argument if the improvements you've done had happened before the articles were reviewed. But whatever issues there are, reviewing doesn't seem to be fixing them. TimothyJosephWood 11:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hildabast

Requesting for Hildabast, who has now written 29 great articles on science and scientists, with her consent. I'm keen to reduce the review queue in future and her articles are all very solid. Blythwood (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Blythwood (talk) 20:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Becksperson

Sports articles mainly, and those I'ver eviewed are well-formed from the start. Boleyn (talk) 13:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Amys eye

Good articles on notable Chinese people; no concerns about those I've patrolled. Another editor raised an issue about Kristina Hu, but this is an atypical topic for Amys eye. 

Boleyn (talk) 13:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Equineducklings

I don't create a large number of articles, but if any of the load can be taken off the good people at NPP, that's probably a good thing. Of course, I'm open to any questions. Equineducklings (talk) 15:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bennv3771

I've made almost 7,000 edits and created over 40 articles and none have been deleted (a redirect was deleted to make way for a move). I intend to keep creating new articles which would add to the backlog, hence I'm hoping to be granted this user right. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Oberhof

Oberhof has created over 100 articles, mainly on Ukrainian topics. I've no concerns. Boleyn (talk) 06:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shhhnotsoloud

Has created 33 pages and no deletions. Mainly works in disambiguation, and has shown a solid understanding of page requirements by correctly nominating dozens of dabs for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ssven2

Has created around 68 articles, including around 26 this year, none of which were deleted. Seems to have learnt from his initial articles getting deleted. Works on old Indian movies, and adds as much references that can possibly be found. Also has many FA, GA and FL credits, so its probably time we let his articles pass through automatically.Jupitus Smart 12:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rajkrishnan R

I've been active in Wiki since 5 years, and have created a number of Articles, and is now willing for the Autopatrolled Group. Rajkrishnan R (talk) 15:13, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has created roughly 1 article. — MusikBot talk 15:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mccapra

Has created nearly 50 articles, 3 deleted (looks like at creator's request), and those date back to 2013. Recent articles are well-referenced and I have no concerns. Boleyn (talk) 19:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:12, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Roy Bateman

Has created 85 pages, 1 deleted (and I think this was an error in the title and topic created elsewhere). No concerns. Boleyn (talk) 19:28, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks Both.Roy Bateman (talk) 10:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mliu92

Mliu92 has 39 entries with no deletions and clean block log in eight years on the project. On a personal note, I encountered Mliu's strong work when they contributed greatly to an entry I had begun: for comparison, my opening foray versus after their additions! (And all done in just a couple of edits, so even if their edit count may seem somewhat low next to length of tenure, they're clearly doing a great deal of work before posting that others--ahem, yours truly--might more likely do in a series of successive edits.) Innisfree987 (talk) 03:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jonas kam

Lots of good articles, mainly on volleyball. Small number of deletions (6) seem to be broken redirects rather than deleted articles. Boleyn (talk) 09:48, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aliwal2012

Long time user (5yrs) and sysop at af.wiki. I don't create a large number of articles here, mainly new geo-articles of villages and suburbs of South Africa. Thanks! --Aliwal2012 (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled&oldid=787751250"